In German, symmetrical treatment of women and men through gender-fair language is well established and the use of feminine forms is evaluated positively. In the present study (N = 331), we examined the mechanisms behind this positive evaluation. Female job applicants were evaluated as more linguistically competent and as more competent in general, which translated into more favorable hiring decisions when using a feminine (vs. a masculine) job title. These results illuminate positive effects of successful language reform for women.
AbeleA. E.HaukeN.PetersK.LouvetE.SzymkowA.DuanY. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness—communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810
2.
BettencourtB.DillK. E.GreathouseS. A.CharltonK.MulhollandA. (1997). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(3), 244–275. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.1323
3.
BojarskaK. (2011). Wpływ androcentrycznych i inkluzywnych płciowo konstrukcji językowych na skojarzenia z płcią [Influence of androcentric and gender-inclusive lexical constructions on gender-associational responses]. Studia Psychologiczne, 49(2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10167-011-0010-y
Dudenredaktion (2020). Der Duden in zwölf Bänden. Das Standardwerk zur deutschen Sprache. [The Duden in twelve volumes. The standard work on the German language]. Dudenverlag.
9.
FormanowiczM.BedynskaS.CisłakA.BraunF.SczesnyS. (2013). Side effects of gender-fair language: How feminine job titles influence the evaluation of female applicants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1924
10.
FormanowiczM.SczesnyS. (2016). Gender-fair language and professional self-reference. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814550877
11.
FormanowiczM.SuitnerC. (2020). Sounding strange(r): Origins, consequences, and boundary conditions of sociophonetic discrimination. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19884354
12.
FormanowiczM. M.CisłakA.HorvathL. K.SczesnyS. (2015). Capturing socially motivated linguistic change: How the use of gender-fair language affects support for social initiatives in Austria and Poland. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01617
13.
GilesH.CouplandN. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Brooks/Cole.
14.
GilesH.WatsonB. M. (Eds.). (2013). The social meanings of language, dialect and accent: International perspectives on speech styles. Peter Lang.
15.
GórskaP.StefaniakA.LipowskaK.MalinowskaK.SkrodzkaM.MarchlewskaM. (2022). Authoritarians go with the flow: Social norms moderate the link between right-wing authoritarianism and outgroup-directed attitudes. Political Psychology, 43(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12744
16.
GygaxP.GabrielU.SarrasinO.OakhillJ.GarnhamA. (2008). Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 464–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701702035
17.
HamiltonM. C. (1988). Using masculine generics: Does generic he increase male bias in the user’s imagery?Sex Roles, 19, 785–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288993
18.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/
HodelL.FormanowiczM.SczesnyS.ValdrovaJ.von StockhausenL. (2017). Gender-fair language in job advertisements – A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(3), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116688085
21.
HorvathL. K.SczesnyS. (2015). Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership? Effects of the wording of job advertisements. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1067611
22.
HoytC. L. (2012). Gender bias in employment contexts: A closer examination of the role incongruity principle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.004
23.
KuhnE. A.GabrielU. (2014). Actual and potential gender-fair language use: The role of language competence and the motivation to use accurate language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13504297
24.
MayrS.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.FaulF. (2007). A short tutorial of GPower. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p051
25.
MerkelE.MaassA.FrommeltL. (2012). Shielding women against status loss: The masculine form and its alternatives in Italian language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X124465
26.
MoultonJ.RobinsonG. M.EliasC. (1978). Sex bias in language use: “neutral” pronouns that aren't. American Psychologist, 33(11), 1032–1036. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.11.1032
27.
SchröterJ.LinkeA.BubenhoferN. (2012). “Ich als Linguist” – Eine empirische Studie zur Einschätzung und Verwendung des generischen Maskulinums. In GünthnerS.HüpperD.SpießC. (Eds.), Genderlinguistik: Sprachliche Konstruktionen von Geschlechtsidentität (pp. 359–380). De Gruyter.
28.
SczesnyS.FormanowiczM.MoserF. (2016). Can gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination?Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00025
29.
StahlbergD.SczesnyS.BraunF. (2001). Name your favorite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(4), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X01020004004
30.
StoutJ. G.DasguptaN. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211406434
VerveckenD.HannoverB. (2012). Ambassadors of gender equality? How use of pair forms versus masculines as generics impacts perception of the speaker. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(6), 754–762. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1893
33.
WilsonE.NgS. H. (1988). Sex bias in visual images evoked by generics: A New Zealand study. Sex Roles, 18, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287786
34.
WitkowskaM.FilippiS.FormanowiczM.SuitnerC. (2023). Sociophonetics and language prejudice. In StrellufC. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of sociophonetics (pp. 342–364). Routledge.
