Two studies analyzed whether, at the cognitive level, ‘Elderly gay man’ is “invisible” both when processing the labels ‘Gay man’ and ‘Elderly man’. We suggest that ‘Gay man’ is conflated with ‘Young man’, and that ‘Elderly man’ is conflated with ‘Heterosexual man’. Contact with elderly gay men did not alter the perception of ‘Gay man’ as prevalently young but weakened the perception of ‘Elderly man’ as heterosexual by default.
Avila-SaavedraG. (2009). Nothing queer about queer television: Televized construction of gay masculinities. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098243
2.
BarsalouL. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(4), 629–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.629
3.
BennettK. C.ThompsonN. L. (1991). Accelerated aging and Male homosexuality: Australian evidence in a continuing debate. Journal of Homosexuality, 20(3-4), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v20n03_04
4.
CarnaghiA.RusconiP.BianchiM.FasoliF.ColadonatoR.HegartyP. (2022). No country for old gay men: Age and sexuality category intersection renders older gay men invisible. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(4), 964–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220987606
5.
CarnaghiA.YzerbytV. Y. (2007). Subtyping and social consensus: The role of the audience in the maintenance of stereotypic beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 902–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.402
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
7.
ColadonatoR.BianchiM.CaseF.CarnaghiA. (2022). Age stereotyping of gay and heterosexual men: Why does a minority sexual orientation blur the age of old men, in particular?European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2841
8.
CroninA.KingA. (2010). Power, inequality and identification: Exploring diversity and intersectionality amongst older LGB adults. Sociology, 44(5), 876–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510375738
GalinskyA. D.HallE. V.CuddyA. J. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24(4), 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457783
11.
HajekC.GilesH. (2002). The old man out: An intergroup analysis of intergenerational communication among gay men. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02569.x
12.
HarrisL. T.FiskeS. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17(10), 847–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x
13.
HegartyP.PrattoF. (2001). The effects of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.723
14.
HegartyP.PrattoF. (2004). The differences that norms make: Empiricism, social constructionism, and the interpretation of group differences. Sex Roles, 50(7), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023065.56633.cb
LickD. J.JohnsonK. L. (2016). Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 801–817. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000052
18.
LickelB.HamiltonD. L.WieczorkowskaG.LewisA.ShermanS. J.UhlesA. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223
NgC. H. (2007). Motivation among older adults in learning computing technologies: A grounded model. Educational Gerontology, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270701763845
22.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2015). Modern attitudes toward older adults in the aging world: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 993–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039469
PagottoL.VociA.MaculanV. (2010). The effectiveness of intergroup contact at work: Mediators and moderators of hospital workers’ prejudice towards immigrants. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(4), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1038
25.
PennebakerJ. W.StoneL. D. (2003). Words of wisdom: Language use over the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.291
26.
PreddieJ. P.BiernatM. (2021). More than the sum of its parts: Intersections of sexual orientation and race as they influence perceptions of group similarity and stereotype content. Sex Roles, 84(9), 554–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01185-3
27.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
RosenfeldD. (2009). Heteronormativity and homonormativity as practical and moral resources: The case of lesbian and gay elders. Gender & Society, 23(5), 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209341357
31.
SakalliN.UgurluO. (2003). The effects of social contact with a lesbian person on the attitude change toward homosexuality in Turkey. Journal of Homosexuality, 44(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v44n01_06
32.
SchugJ.AltN. P.KlauerK. C. (2015). Gendered race prototypes: Evidence for the non-prototypicality of Asian men and black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.012
WarrenP. N. (2000, Winter). Elephant graveyards [33 paragraphs]. The Networker [On-line serial], 1. Available: http://www.pridesenior.org.
35.
WightR. G.LeBlancA. J.MeyerI. H.HarigF. A. (2015). Internalized gay ageism, mattering, and depressive symptoms among midlife and older gay-identified men. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.066
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
