Four studies analyzed how sexual orientation (heterosexual vs. gay) and age categories (young vs. elderly) referring to men are cognitively combined. In Study 1, young gay men were judged as more prototypical of gay men than adult or elderly gay men, while young, adult, and elderly heterosexual men were perceived as equally prototypical of heterosexual men. In Study 2, gay men were stereotyped more by young rather than elderly stereotypical traits, while heterosexual men were not stereotyped in terms of age. In Study 3, elderly men were stereotyped more by heterosexual than gay-stereotypical traits, while young men were not stereotyped in terms of sexual orientation. In Study 4, gay men were judged to be young rather than elderly, while elderly men were judged to be heterosexual rather than gay. Overall, elderly gay men were overlooked when processing their constituent categories, “gay” and “elderly” men. Implications for models of intersectionality are discussed.
Avila-SaavedraG. (2009). Nothing queer about queer television: Televized construction of gay masculinities. Media, Culture & Society, 31, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098243
3.
BaileyA. H.LaFranceM.DovidioJ. F. (2019). Is man the measure of all things? A social cognitive account of androcentrism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318782848
4.
BarrantesR. J.EatonA. A. (2018). Sexual orientation and leadership suitability: How being a gay man affects perceptions of fit in gender-stereotyped positions. Sex Roles, 79, 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0894-8
BergerR. M.KellyJ. J. (2001). What are older gay men like? An impossible question?Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 13, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J041v13n04_07
8.
BlashillA. J.PowlishtaK. K. (2009). The impact of sexual orientation and gender role on evaluations of men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014583
9.
BodenhausenG. V.SchwarzN.BlessH.WänkeM. (1995). Effects of atypical exemplars on racial beliefs: Enlightened racism or generalized appraisals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1003
10.
BrambillaM.CarnaghiA.RavennaM. (2011). Subgrouping e omosessualità: rappresentazione cognitiva e contenuto degli stereotipi di uomini gay [Subgrouping and homosexuality: cognitive representation and content of stereotypes of gay men]. Psicologia Sociale, 6, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1482/34474
11.
BrewerM. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In WyerR. S.SrullT. K. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. 1. A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1–36). Erlbaum.
12.
BrewerM. B.DullV.LuiL. (1981). Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 656–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.656
13.
BrooksJ. A.FreemanJ. B. (2018). Conceptual knowledge predicts the representational structure of facial emotion perception. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0376-6
14.
CarnaghiA.AndersonJ.BianchiM. (2018). On the origin of beliefs about the sexual orientation and gender-role development of children raised by gay-male and heterosexual parents: An Italian study. Men and Masculinities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18775462
15.
CarnaghiA.MaassA. (2007). In-group and out-group perspectives in the use of derogatory group labels: Gay versus fag. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07300077
16.
CarnaghiA.MaassA.GrestaS.BianchiM.CadinuM.ArcuriL. (2008). Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 839–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.839
17.
CarnaghiA.StragàM.ColadonatoR.BianchiM.PiccoliV. (2019). Extrapolating stereotypical information on sexual orientation from race categories: The case of Black and Asian men. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000225
18.
CarnaghiA.YzerbytV. Y. (2007). Subtyping and social consensus: The role of the audience in the maintenance of stereotypic beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 902–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.402
19.
CarnaghiA.YzerbytV.CadinuM.MahauxN. (2005). Dimmi chi sei e ti dirò cosa penso: processi di steroetipizzazione in contesti di giustificazione [Tell me who you are and I’ll tell you what I think: stereotyping and accountability]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 32, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1421/19692
20.
ChasteenA. L.SchwarzN.ParkD. C. (2002). The activation of aging stereotypes in younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, P540–P547. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.6.P540
21.
ClausellE.FiskeS. T. (2005). When do subgroup parts add up to the stereotypic whole? Mixed stereotype content for gay male subgroups explains overall ratings. Social Cognition, 23, 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.23.2.161.65626
22.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
23.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
24.
CrenshawK. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
CroninA.KingA. (2010). Power, inequality and identification: Exploring diversity and intersectionality amongst older LGB adults. Sociology, 44, 876–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510375738
27.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T. (2002). Doddering but dear: Process, content, and function in stereotyping of older people. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 3–26). MIT Press.
28.
DeauxK.LewisL. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
EaglyA. H.KiteM. E. (1987). Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.451
33.
EbnerN. C.RiedigerM.LindenbergerU. (2010). FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 351–362. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.351
FasoliF.MaassA.PaladinoM. P.SulpizioS. (2017). Gay- and lesbian-sounding auditory cues elicit stereotyping and discrimination. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0962-0
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
40.
FiskeS. T.NeubergS. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2
41.
FiskeS. T.NeubergS. L.BeattieA. E.MilbergS. J. (1987). Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 399–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(87)90038-2
42.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
43.
GhavamiN.PeplauL. A. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464203
44.
GrantJ. M. (2010). Outing age. Public policy issues affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender elders. The Policy Institute of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Foundation. https://www.lgbtagingcenter.org/resources/resource.cfm?r=30
45.
GrossmanA. H.D’AugelliA. R.O’ConnellT. S. (2001). Being lesbian, gay, bisexual, and 60 or older in North America. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 13, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1300/J041v13n04_05
46.
HajekC. (2015). Gay men in early midlife: Intergenerational accommodation for approval, reclaimed status, and distinctiveness. Language & Communication, 41, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.003
HegartyP.BuechelC. (2006). Androcentric reporting of gender differences in APA journals: 1965–2004. Review of General Psychology, 10, 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.377
49.
HegartyP.PrattoF.LemieuxA. F. (2004). Heterosexist ambivalence and heterocentric norms: Drinking in intergroup discomfort. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204041399
50.
HerekG. M.GluntE. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499309551707
51.
HerekG. M.KimmelD. C.AmaroH.MeltonG. B. (1991). Avoiding heterosexist bias in psychological research. American Psychologist, 46, 957–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.957
52.
HoffarthM. R.HodsonG. (2018). When intergroup contact is uncommon and bias is strong: The case of anti-transgender bias. Psychology & Sexuality, 9, 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1470107
53.
HostetlerA. J. (2004). Old, gay, and alone? The ecology of well-being among middle-aged and older single gay men. In HerdtG. B.Vriesde (Eds.), Gay and lesbian aging: Research and future directions (pp. 143–176). Springer.
54.
Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT). (2012). La popolazione omosessuale nella società Italiana [The homosexual population in Italian society]. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/62168
JankowskiG. S.FawknerH.SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2014). “Appearance potent”? A content analysis of UK gay and straight men’s magazines. Body Image, 11, 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.010
57.
JohnsonK. L.FreemanJ. B.PaukerK. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025335
58.
JohnstonL.CoolenP. (1995). A dual processing approach to stereotype change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 660–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295217001
59.
JonesC. R.FazioR. H. (2010). Person categorization and automatic racial stereotyping effects on weapon identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1073–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210375817
60.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
JuddC. M.ParkB.YzerbytV. Y.GordijnE.MullerD. (2005). Attributions of intergroup bias and outgroup homogeneity to ingroup and outgroup others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 677–704. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.281
63.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747
64.
KangS. K.ChasteenA. L. (2009). The moderating role of age-group identification and perceived threat on stereotype threat among older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 69, 201–220. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.69.3.c
65.
KangS. K.ChasteenA. L.CadieuxJ.CaryL. A.SyedaM. (2014). Comparing young and older adults’ perceptions of conflicting stereotypes and multiply-categorizable individuals. Psychology and Aging, 29, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037551
KiaH.GraceD.StrikeC.RossL. E. (2019). Across serostatus: A study of subjugation and resistance in older gay men’s experiences navigating health care. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0344-y
KnauerN. J. (2009). LGBT elder law: Toward equity in aging. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 32, 300–358.
71.
KornadtA. E.RothermundK. (2012). Internalization of age stereotypes into the self-concept via future self-views: A general model and domain-specific differences. Psychology and Aging, 27, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025110
72.
KundaZ. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. MIT Press.
LaMarL.KiteM. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551932
75.
LauzenM. M.DozierD. M. (2005). Maintaining the double standard: Portrayals of age and gender in popular films. Sex Roles, 52, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3710-1
76.
LeeI. C.CrawfordM. (2007). Lesbians and bisexual women in the eyes of scientific psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 17, 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507073096
77.
LickD. J.JohnsonK. L. (2016). Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 801–817. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000052
78.
LocksleyA.BordigaE.BrekkeN.HepburnC. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.821
79.
LocksleyA.HepburnC.OrtizV. (1982). Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90079-8
80.
LyonD.SlovicP. (1976). Dominance of accuracy information and neglect of base rates in probability estimation. Acta Psychologica, 40, 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(76)90032-9
81.
MacraeC. N.HewstoneM.GriffithsR. J. (1993). Processing load and memory for stereotype-based information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420230107
82.
MartinA. E.NorthM. S.PhillipsK. W. (2019). Intersectional escape: Older women elude agentic prescriptions more than older men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218784895
NicolasG.de la FuenteM.FiskeS. T. (2017). Mind the overlap in multiple categorization: A review of crossed categorization, intersectionality, and multiracial perception. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217708862
85.
NisbettR. E.BorgidaE. (1975). Attribution and the psychology of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 932–943. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.32.5.932
86.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2015). Modern attitudes toward older adults in the aging world: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 993–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039469
87.
Papadatou-PastouM.NtolkaE.SchmitzJ.MartinM.MunafòM. R.OcklenburgS.ParacchiniS. (2020). Human handedness: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000229
88.
PetskoC. D.BodenhausenG. V. (2020). Multifarious person perception: How social perceivers manage the complexity of intersectional targets. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14, Article e12518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12518
89.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
90.
RemediosJ. D.ChasteenA. L.RuleN. O.PlaksJ. E. (2011). Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay + Black = likable?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1312–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.015
91.
RosenfeldD. (2009). Heteronormativity and homonormativity as practical and moral resources: The case of lesbian and gay elders. Gender & Society, 23, 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209341357
92.
RothbartM.LewisS. (1988). Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes: Geometric shapes and social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.861
93.
SaucierJ. A.CaronS. L. (2008). An investigation of content and media images in gay men’s magazines. Journal of Homosexuality, 55, 504–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802345297
94.
SchugJ.AltN. P.KlauerK. C. (2015). Gendered race prototypes: Evidence for the non-prototypicality of Asian men and Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.012
95.
SeskoA. K.BiernatM. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.016
96.
ShankleM. D.MaxwellC. A.KatzmanE. S.LandersS. (2003). An invisible population: Older lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs, 20, 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1081/CRP-120021079
97.
ShermanJ. W. (1996). Development and mental representation of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1126–1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1126
98.
SimonB.Glässner-BayerlB.StratenwerthI. (1991). Stereotyping and self-stereotyping in a natural intergroup context: The case of heterosexual and homosexual men. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 252–266. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2786654
99.
SkorskaM. N.CoomeL. A.SaokhieoP.KaewthipO.ChariyalertsakS.VanderLaanD. P. (2020). Handedness and birth order among heterosexual men, gay men, and sao praphet song in Northern Thailand. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 2431–2448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01774-z
100.
SlusherM. P.MayerC. J.DunkleR. E. (1996). Gays and Lesbians Older and Wiser (GLOW): A support group for older gay people. The Gerontologist, 36, 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/36.1.118
SteffensM. C.NiedlichC.BeschornerR.KöhlerM. C. (2019). Do positive and negative stereotypes of gay and heterosexual men affect job-related impressions?Sex Roles, 80, 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0963-z
103.
StroessnerS. J. (1996). Social categorization by race or sex: Effects of perceived non-normalcy on response times. Social Cognition, 14, 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1996.14.3.247
104.
ThomasE. L.DovidioJ. F.WestT. V. (2014). Lost in the categorical shuffle: Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035096
105.
TskhayK. O.KrendlA. C.RuleN. O. (2016). Age-related physical changes interfere with judgments of male sexual orientation from faces. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1217–1226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653585
WahlerJ.GabbayS. G. (1997). Gay male aging: A review of the literature. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 6, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1300/J041v06n03_01
108.
WebsterM.Jr.DriskellJ. E.Jr. (1983). Beauty as status. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1086/227836
109.
WightR. G.LeBlancA. J.MeyerI. H.HarigF. A. (2015). Internalized gay ageism, mattering, and depressive symptoms among midlife and older gay-identified men. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.066
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
