This article proposes that theories of ‘new’ social movements (NSMs) may illuminate contemporary welfare struggles and inform research into collective action in social policy. NSM theory is relevant because it focuses on social movement cultures, identity politics and symbolic struggles for the recognition of difference. However, it does this to the exclusion of ‘traditional’ issues such as material redistribution and inequality. A critical social policy, on the other hand, has retained a regard for these issues, but is also concerned with struggles for recognition. It is argued that all social movements raise issues about redistribution and recognition, although these will coexist to varying degrees. Using work carried out in the United States into women's self-help movements, this article shows how movements that are largely cultural may change social policy by posing symbolic challenges.
Adam, B. D. (1993) ‘Post-Marxism and the New Social Movements’, The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology30(3): 316–336.
2.
Bagguley, P. (1991) ‘Post-Fordism and Enterprise Culture: Flexibility, Autonomy and Changes in Economic Organisation’, pp. 151–168 in R. Keat and N. Abercrombie (eds) Enterprise Culture. London: Routledge.
3.
Bagguley, P. (1992) ‘Social Change, the Middle Class and the Emergence of “New Social Movements”: A Critical Analysis’, The Sociological Review40(1): 26–48.
4.
Barry, J. (1998) ‘Social Movements and Social Policy: Ecology and Social Policy’, pp. 218–232 in N. Ellison and C. Pierson (eds) Developments in British Social Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
5.
Bartholomew, A. and Mayer, M. (1992) ‘Nomads of the Present: Melucci's Contribution to “New Social Movement” Theory’, Theory, Culture and Society9(4): 141–159.
6.
Bertoia, C. and Drakich, J. (1993) ‘The Father's Rights Movement: Contradictions in Rhetoric and Practice’, Journal of Family Issues14(4): 592–615.
7.
Buechler, S. M. (2000) Social Movements in Advanced Capitalism: The Political Economy and Cultural Construction of Social Activism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Calhoun, C. (1994) ‘Social Theory and the Politics of Identity’, pp. 9–36 in C. Calhoun (ed.) Social Theory and the Politics of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
Calhoun, C. (1995) ‘ “New Social Movements” of the Early Nineteenth Century’, pp. 173–215 in M. Traugott (ed.) Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10.
Carter, J. and Rayner, M. (1996) ‘The Curious Case of Post-Fordism and Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy25(3): 347–367.
11.
Charles, N. (2000) Feminism, the State and Social Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
12.
Croft, S. and Beresford, P. (1989) ‘User-involvement, Citizenship and Social Policy’, Critical Social Policy9(2): 5–18.
13.
Croft, S. and Beresford, P. (1992) ‘The Politics of Participation’, Critical Social Policy12(2): 20–44.
14.
della Porta, D. (1999) ‘Protest, Protesters and Protest Policing: Public Discourses in Italy and Germany from the 1960s to the 1980s’, pp. 66–96 in M. Giugni, D. McAdam and C. Tilly (eds) How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (1999) Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
16.
Ellison, G. and Martin, G. (2000) ‘Policing, Collective Action and Social Movement Theory: The Case of the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Campaign’, British Journal of Sociology51(4): 681–699.
17.
Fagan, T. and Lee, P. (1997) ‘“New” Social Movements and Social Policy: A Case Study of the Disability Movement’, pp. 140–160 in M. Lavelette and A. Pratt (eds) Social Policy: A Conceptual and Theoretical Introduction. London: Sage.
18.
Fitzpatrick, T. (1998) ‘The Implications of Ecological Thought for Social Welfare’, Critical Social Policy18(1): 5–26.
19.
Fraser, N. (1995) ‘From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Post-socialist” Age’, New Left Review212: 68–92.
20.
Giddens, A. (1991) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
Giugni, M. (1999) ‘How Social Movements Matter: Past Research. Present Problems, Future Developments’, pp. xiii–xxxiii in M. Giugni, D. McAdam and C. Tilly (eds) How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
Habermas, J. (1981) ‘New Social Movements’, Telos49: 33–37.
23.
Habermas, J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
Handler, J. F. (1992) ‘Postmodernism, Protest, and the New Social Movements’Law and Society Review, 26(4): 697–731.
25.
Harrison, M. (1993/4) ‘The Black Voluntary Housing Movement: Pioneering Pluralistic Policy in a Difficult Climate’, Critical Social Policy13(3): 21–35.
26.
Hewitt, M. (1996) ‘Social Movements and Social Need: Problems with Postmodern Political Theory’, pp. 199–219 in D. Taylor (ed.) Critical Social Policy: A Reader. London: Sage.
27.
Hillyard, P. and Watson, S. (1996) ‘Postmodernism and Social Policy: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Social Policy25:3-3, 321–346.
28.
Hirsch, J. (1988) ‘The Crisis of Fordism, Transformations of the “Keynesian” Security State, and New Social Movements’, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change10: 43–55.
29.
Honneth, A. (1996) The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Hughes, G. (1998) ‘A Suitable Case for Treatment? Constructions of Disability’, pp. 43–90 in E. Saraga (ed.) Embodying the Social: Constructions of Difference. London: Routledge.
31.
Inglehart, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegenomy and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. New York, NY: Verso.
33.
Langan, M. (1998) ‘The Contested Concept of Need’, pp. 3–33 in M. Langan (ed.) Welfare: Needs, Rights and Risks. London: Routledge.
34.
Mann, K. (1998) ‘Lamppost Modernism: Traditional and Critical Social Policy?’, Critical Social Policy18(1): 77–102.
35.
Mayer, M. (1991) ‘Politics in the Post-Fordist City’, Socialist Review21(1): 105–124.
36.
Mayer, M. and Roth, R. (1995) ‘New Social Movements and the Transformation to Post-Fordist Society’, pp. 299–319 in M. Darnovsky, B. Epstein and R. Flacks (eds) Cultural Politics and Social Movements. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
37.
Melucci, A. (1984) ‘An End to Social Movements?’, Social Science Information23(4/5): 819–835.
38.
Melucci, A. (1985) ‘The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements’, Social Research52(4): 789–816.
39.
Melucci, A. (1989) Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. London: Hutchinson Radius.
40.
Melucci, A. (1995) ‘The Process of Collective Identity’, pp. 41–63 in H. Johnston and B. Klandermans (eds) Social Movements and Culture. London: UCL Press.
41.
Melucci, A. (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Oliver, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
43.
Penna, S. and O'Brien, M. (1996) ‘Postmodernism and Social Policy: A Small Step Forwards?’, Journal of Social Policy25(1): 39–61.
44.
Priestley, M. (1999) Disability Politics and Community Care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
45.
Scott, A. (1990) Ideology and the New Social Movements. London: Unwin Hyman.
46.
Shakespeare, T. (1993) ‘Disabled People's Self-organisation: A New Social Movement?’, Disability, Handicap and Society8(3): 249–264.
47.
Steinmetz, G. (1994) ‘Regulation Theory, Post-Marxism, and the New Social Movements’, Comparative Studies in Society and History36(1): 176–212.
48.
Taylor, D. (1998) ‘Social Identity and Social Policy: Engagements with Postmodern Theory’, Journal of Social Policy27(3): 329–350.
49.
Taylor, V. (1999) ‘Gender and Social Movements: Gender Processes in Women's Self-help Movements’, Gender and Society13(1): 8–33.
50.
Taylor, V. and Van Willigen, M. (1996) ‘Women's Self-help and the Reconstruction of Gender: The Postpartum Support and Breast Cancer Movements’, Mobilization1(2): 123–142.
51.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1994) ‘Postmodernism and Social Policy: A Great Leap Backwards?’, Journal of Social Policy23(3): 385–404.
52.
Touraine, A. (1981) The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Turner, B. S. (1986) Citizenship and Capitalism: The Debate over Reformism. London: Allen and Unwin.
54.
Ward, D. and Mullender, A. (1991) ‘Empowerment and Oppression: An Indissoluble Pairing for Contemporary Social Work’, Critical Social Policy11(2): 21–30.
55.
Williams, F. (1989) Social Policy: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
56.
Williams, F. (1992) ‘Somewhere Over the Rainbow: Universality and Diversity in Social Policy’, in N. Manning and R. Page (eds) Social Policy Review4: 200–219. Canterbury: Social Policy Association.
57.
Williams, F. (1994) ‘Social Relations, Welfare and the Post-Fordism Debate’, pp. 49–73 in R. Burrows and B. Loader (eds) Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?. London: Routledge.
58.
Williams, F. (1999) ‘Good-enough Principles for Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy28(4): 667–687.
59.
Young, I. M. (1987) ‘Difference and Policy: Some Reflections in the Context of New Social Movements’, Cincinnati Law Review56(2): 535–550.
