A core, but so far untested, proposition of the new politics perspective, originally introduced by Paul Pierson, is that welfare state cutbacks will be implemented using so-called ‘invisible’ policy instruments, for example, a change in indexation rules. Expansion should, by implication, mainly happen using ‘visible’ policy instruments, for example, a change in nominal benefits. We have coded 1030 legislative reforms of old-age pensions and unemployment protection in Britain, Denmark, Finland and Germany from 1974 to 2014. With this unique data at hand, we find substantial support for this crucial new politics proposition.
AllanJ.P.ScruggsL. (2004) ‘Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies’, American Journal of Political Science48(3): 496–512.
2.
ArndtC. (2013) The Electoral Consequences of Third Way Welfare State Reforms: Social Democracy’s Transformation and Its Political Costs. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
3.
ArnoldR.D. (1990) The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
4.
CastlesF.R.D.ObingerH. (2008) ‘Worlds, Families, Regimes: Country Clusters in European and OECD Area Public Policy’, West European Politics31(1–2): 321–44.
5.
ClasenJ. (2007) Reforming European Welfare States: Germany and the United Kingdom Compared. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
ClasenJ.CleggD. (2011) Regulating the Risk of Unemployment: National Adaptations to Post-Industrial Labour Markets in Europe. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
ClaytonR.PontussonJ. (1998) ‘Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies’, World Politics51(1): 67–98.
8.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
GigerN. (2010) ‘Do Voters Punish the Government for Welfare State Retrenchment? A Comparative of Electoral Costs Associated with Social Policy’, Comparative European Politics8(4): 415–43.
11.
GigerN. (2011) The Risk of Social Policy? The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment and Social Policy Performance in OECD Countries. London; New York: Routledge.
12.
GigerN.NelsonM. (2011) ‘The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment: Blame Avoidance or Credit Claiming in the Era of Permanent Austerity?’, European Journal of Political Research50(1): 1–23.
13.
GigerN.NelsonM. (2013) ‘The Welfare State or the Economy? Preferences, Constituencies, and Strategies for Retrenchment’, European Sociological Review29(5): 1083–94.
14.
Green-PedersenC.ChristiansenF.J.EuchnerE.M.JensenC.TurnpennyJ. (2012) ‘Dismantling by Default? The Indexation of Social Benefits in Four Countries’, in BauerM.W.JordanA.Green-PedersenC.HéritierA. (eds) Dismantling Public Policies: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects, pp. 129–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
HoboltS.TilleyJ.BanducciS. (2013) ‘Clarity of Responsibility: How Government Cohesion Conditions Performance Voting’, European Journal of Political Research52(2): 164–87.
16.
JensenC. (2011) ‘Marketization via Compensation: Health Care and the Politics of the Right in Advanced Industrialized Nations’, British Journal of Political Science41(4): 907–26.
17.
JensenC. (2012) ‘Labour-Market- vs. Life-Course-Related Social Policies: Understanding Cross-Programme Differences’, Journal of European Public Policy19(2): 275–91.
18.
JensenC. (2014) The Right and the Welfare State. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
JensenC.PetersenM.B. (2017) ‘The Deservingness Heuristic and the Politics of Health Care’, American Journal of Political Science61(1): 68–83.
20.
KangasO. (2007) ‘Finland: Labor Markets against Politics’, in ImmergutE.AndersonK.SchulzeI. (eds) The Handbook of West European Pension Politics, pp. 248–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
KangasO.SaariJ. (2007) ‘Finland: Towards More Proactive Policy’, in KvistJ.SaariJ. (eds) The Europeanisation of Social Protection, pp. 153–73. Bristol: Policy Press.
22.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries’, American Sociological Review63(5): 661–87.
23.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (2003) ‘New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95’, American Political Science Review97(3): 425–46.
24.
LijphartA. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
LindbomA. (2001) ‘Dismantling the Social Democratic Welfare Model? Has the Swedish Welfare State Lost Its Defining Characteristics?’, Scandinavian Political Studies24(3): 171–93.
26.
LindbomA. (2007) ‘Obfuscating Retrenchment: Swedish Welfare Policy in the 1990s’, Journal of Public Policy27(2): 129–50.
27.
PiersonP. (1993) ‘When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change’, World Politics45(4): 595–628.
28.
PiersonP. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
PiersonP. (1996) ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’, World Politics48(2): 143–79.
30.
PowellG.B.JrWhittenG.D. (1993) ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context’, American Journal of Political Science37(2): 391–414.
31.
SchumacherG.VisB.van KersbergenK. (2013) ‘Political Parties’ Welfare Image, Electoral Punishment and Welfare State Retrenchment’, Comparative European Politics11(1): 1–21.
32.
ScruggsL. (2014) ‘Social Welfare Generosity Scores in CWED 2: A Methodological Genealogy’, CWED Working Paper Series, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; University of Greifswald, Germany.
33.
ScruggsL.AllanJ. (2006) ‘Welfare-State Decommodification in 18 OECD Countries: A Replication and Revision’, Journal of European Social Policy16(1): 55–72.
34.
ScruggsL.DetlefJ.KuittoK. (2014) ‘Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset 2: version 2014–03’, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; University of Greifswald, Germany.
35.
Van OorschotW. (2006) ‘Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States’, Journal of European Social Policy16(1): 23–42.
36.
WeaverR.K. (1986) ‘The Politics of Blame Avoidance’, Journal of Public Policy6(4): 371–98.
37.
WenzelburgerG. (2011) ‘Political Strategies and Fiscal Retrenchment: Evidence from Four Countries’, West European Politics34(6): 1151–84.
38.
WolfF.ZohlnhöferR.WenzelburgerG. (2014) ‘The Politics of Public and Private Pension Generosity in Advanced Democracies’, Social Policy & Administration48(1): 86–106.
39.
ZohlnhöferR. (2007) ‘The Politics of Budget Consolidation in Britain and Germany: The Impact of Blame Avoidance Opportunities’, West European Politics30(5): 1120–38.
