Dismantling the Welfare State? is a modern classic in the welfare state literature. Yet although the book is widely known, the ‘Piersonian argument’ as it is typically referred to today bears limited resemblance to the book’s highly nuanced and thought-provoking ideas. This review revisits the book and explores some of the lessons it still holds for the research community.
AllanJ.P.ScruggsL. (2004) ‘Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies’, American Journal of Political Science48(3): 496–512.
2.
ArnoldR.D. (1990) The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
BandauF. (2015) Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Strukturen Und Parteieneffekte: Eine Vergleichende Analyse Sozialpolitischer Konfliktmuster in Großbritannien, Schweden Und Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
4.
BélandD. (2016) ‘Ideas and Institutions in Social Policy Research’, Social Policy & Administration50(6): 734–50.
BlesesP.Seeleib-KaiserM. (2004) The Dual Transformation of the German Welfare State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BolukbasiH.T.ÖktemK.G. (2018) ‘Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Social Rights: Towards Higher Convergent Validity in SCIP and CWED’, Journal of European Social Policy28(1): 86–100.
8.
BrysonA.EbbinghausB.VisserJ. (2011) ‘Introduction: Causes, Consequences and Cures of Union Decline’, European Journal of Industrial Relations17(2): 97–105.
9.
CastlesF.G. (1993) Families of Nations. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
10.
CastlesF.G. (2002) ‘Developing New Measures of Welfare State Change and Reform’, European Journal of Political Research41(5): 613–41.
11.
CastlesF.G. (2004) The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
ClasenJ.SiegelN.A. (eds). (2007) Investigating Welfare State Change: The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
13.
ClaytonR.PontussonJ. (1998) ‘Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies’, World Politics51(1): 67–98.
14.
EbbinghausB.WißT. (2011) ‘Taming Pension Fund Capitalism in Europe: Collective and State Regulation in Times of Crisis’, Transfer17(1): 15–28.
15.
EbbinghausB.VisserJ. (eds). (2000) Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945. London: Palgrave.
16.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
FinseraasH.VernbyK. (2011) ‘What Parties Are and What Parties Do: Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in an Era of Austerity’, Socio-Economic Review9(4): 613–38.
18.
GanghofS. (2006) The Politics of Income Taxation. Colchester: ECPR Press.
19.
GarritzmannJ.L. (2016) The Political Economy of Higher Education Finance: The Politics of Tuition Fees and Subsidies in OECD Countries, 1945-2015. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GenschelP.SchwarzP. (2011) ‘Tax Competition: A Literature Review’, Socio-economic Review9: 339–70.
21.
GigerN.NelsonM. (2011) ‘The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment: Blame Avoidance or Credit Claiming in the Era of Permanent Austerity?’ European Journal of Political Research50(1): 1–23.
22.
GigerN.NelsonM. (2013) ‘The Welfare State or the Economy? Preferences, Constituencies and Strategies for Retrenchment’, European Sociological Review29(5): 1083–94.
23.
Green-PedersenC. (2001) ‘Welfare-State Retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands, 1982–1998: The Role of Party Competition and Party Consensus’, Comparative Political Studies34(9): 963–85.
24.
Green-PedersenC. (2004) ‘The Dependent Variable Problem within the Study of Welfare State Retrenchment: Defining the Problem and Looking for Solutions’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis6(1): 3–14.
25.
HackerJ.S. (2004) ‘Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States’, American Political Science Review98(2): 243–60.
26.
HallP.A.TaylorR.C.R. (1996) ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies44(5): 936–57.
27.
HinterleitnerM.SagerF. (2016) ‘Anticipatory and Reactive Forms of Blame Avoidance: Of Foxes and Lions’, European Political Science Review9(4): 587–606.
28.
HoodC. (2011) The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
HuberE.StephensJ.D. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago, IL; London: Chicago University Press.
30.
JensenC. (2011) ‘Less Bad Than Its Reputation: Social Spending as a Proxy for Welfare Effort in Cross-National Studies’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis13(3): 327–40.
31.
JensenC. (2012) ‘Labour Versus Life Course-Related Social Policies: Understanding Cross-Programme Differences’, Journal of European Public Policy19(2): 275–91.
32.
JensenC.SeebergH.B. (2015) ‘The Power of Talk and the Welfare State: Evidence from 23 Countries on an Asymmetric Opposition–government Response Mechanism’, Socio-Economic Review13(2): 215–33.
33.
JensenC.ArndtC.LeeS.WenzelburgerG. (2018) ‘Policy Instruments and Welfare State Reform’, Journal of European Social Policy28(2): 161–76.
34.
KitscheltH. (2001) ‘Partisan competition and welfare state retrenchment When do politicians choose unpopular policies?’ in PiersonP. (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State, pp. 265–302. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
KönigP.WenzelburgerG. (2014) ‘Towards a Theory of Political Strategy in Policy Analysis’, Politics & Policy42(3): 397–427.
36.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (2003) ‘New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–1995’, American Political Science Review97(3): 425–46.
KühnerS. (2007) ‘Country-Level Comparisons of Welfare State Change Measures: Another Facet of the Dependent Variable Problem within the Comparative Analysis of the Welfare State’, Journal of European Social Policy17(1): 5–18.
39.
LeeS.JensenC.ArndtC.WenzelburgerG. (2017) ‘Risky Business? Welfare State Reforms and Government Support in Britain and Denmark’, British Journal of Political Science. Epub ahead of print 2 October 2017. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123417000382.
40.
LockeR.ThelenK. (1995) ‘Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics’, Politics and Society23(3): 337–67.
41.
LowiT.J. (1972) ‘Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice’, Public Administration Review32(4): 298–310.
42.
McGrawK.M. (1991) ‘Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts’, The American Political Science Review85(4): 1133–57.
43.
MarxP.SchumacherG. (2016) ‘The Effect of Economic Change and Elite Framing on Support for Welfare State Retrenchment: A Survey Exper-iment’, Journal of European Social Policy26(1): 20–31.
44.
PalierB. (ed.) (2010) A Long Goodbye to Bismarck. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
45.
PiersonP. (1993) ‘When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change’, World Politics45(4): 595–628.
46.
PiersonP. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
PiersonP. (1996) ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’, World Politics48(2): 143–79.
48.
PiersonP. (1998) ‘Irresistible Forces, Immovable Objects: Post-industrial Welfare State Confront Permanent Austerity’, Journal of European Public Policy5(4): 539–60.
49.
PiersonP. (2000) ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review94(2): 251–67.
50.
PiersonP. (ed.) (2001) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
SchumacherG.VisB.van KersbergenK. (2013) ‘Political Parties’ Welfare Image, Electoral Punishment, and Welfare State Retrenchment’, Comparative European Politics11(1): 1–21.
ScruggsL.JahnD.KuittoK. (2013) ‘Comparative Welfare Entitlements Data Set 2 Version 2013’, available at: http://cwed2.org/
54.
SlothuusR. (2007) ‘Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State Retrenchment’, Scandi-navian Political Studies30(3): 323–44.
55.
StarkeP. (2008) Radical Welfare State Retrenchment: A Comparative Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
56.
StreeckWThelenK. (eds). (2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
ThelenK.SteinmoS. (1992) ‘Historical Insti-tutionalism in Comparative Politics’, in LongstrethF.ThelenK.SteinmoS. (eds) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, pp. 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Van KersbergenK.VisB. (2014) Comparative Welfare State Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
VisB. (2016) ‘Taking Stock of the Comparative Literature on the Role of Blame Avoidance Strategies in Social Policy Reform’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis18(2): 122–37.
60.
VisB.Van KersbergenK. (2007) ‘Why and How Do Political Actors Pursue Risky Reforms’, Journal of Theoretical Politics19(2): 153–72.
61.
WeaverK.R. (1986) ‘The Politics of Blame Avoidance’, Journal of Public Policy6(4): 371–91.
62.
WenzelburgerG. (2014) ‘Blame Avoidance, Electoral Punishment and the Perceptions of Risk’, Journal of European Social Policy24(1): 80–91.
63.
WenzelburgerG.HörischF. (2016) ‘Framing Effects and Comparative Social Policy Reform: Comparing Blame Avoidance Evidence from Two Experiments’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice18(2): 157–75.
64.
WenzelburgerG.ArndtC.JensenC. (2018) ‘Sozialstaatliche Kürzungspolitik in Deutschland: Nur Eine Mär? Eine Quantitative Gesetzgebungsanalyse 1974–2014’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift59(4): 681–712.
65.
WenzelburgerG.ZohlnhöferR.WolfF. (2013) ‘Implications of Dataset Choice in Comparative Welfare State Research’, Journal of European Public Policy20(9): 1229–50.
66.
WißT. (2011) Der Wandel Der Alterssicherung in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Springer.
67.
ZohlnhöferR.BandauF. (2020) ‘Policy or Office? The Determinants of Programmatic Change in West European Political Parties’, in CarejaR.EmmeneggerP.GigerN. (eds) The European Social Model in Times of Crisis. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 501–518.
68.
ZohlnhöferR.WolfF.WenzelburgerG. (2013) ‘Political Parties and Pension Generosity in Times of Permanent Austerity’, World Political Science Review9(1): 291–318.
