Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2007-12
What Would Happen If We Treated Students as Those With Opinions That Matter? The Benefits to Principals and Teachers of Supporting Youth Engagement in School
The author discusses a project that a fords high school principals an opportunity to create collaborative relationships between members of their school communities and college-based teacher education programs. In its 13 years, this collaboration has been shown to increase student and teacher engagement: Students gain perspective on what goes into teaching and learning, develop a voice to talk about the experiences they have and would like to have in school, and work toward creating more productive schooling experiences, and teachers are a forded time to engage in conversations with students about what matters to and a fects them and to strengthen their relationships with students. The author o fers concrete recommendations to principals on initiating partnerships with colleges, universities, or departments of teacher education, integrating such partnerships into the culture of their schools, and recruiting and rewarding teachers committed to student voice and engagement.
Alvermann, D., & Eakle, A.J. (2007). Dissolving learning boundaries: The doing, re-doing, and undoing of School. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 143-166). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
2.
Arnot, M., McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Reay, D. (2004). Consultation in the classroom: Developing dialogue about teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Pearson Publishing .
3.
Banks, J. (Ed.). (1996). Multicultural education, transformative knowledge, and action: Historical and contemporary perspectives. New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
Bowman, C., & Edenfield, R. (2000). Becoming better together through collaboration and technology. English Journal, 90(2), 112-119.
5.
Bullough, R.V., Jr. , & Gitlin, A. (2001). Becoming a student of teaching: Methodologies for exploring self and school context. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
6.
Commeyras, M. (1995). What can we learn from students' questions?Theory into Practice, 43(2), 101—106.
7.
Cook-Sather, A. (2002a). Authorizing students' perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher , 31(4), 3-14.
8.
Cook-Sather, A. (2002b). Re(in)forming the conversations: Student position, power, and voice in teacher education. Radical Teacher, 64, 21-28.
9.
Cook-Sather, A. (2006a). Education is translation: A metaphor for change in learning and teaching. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
10.
Cook-Sather, A. (2006b). The “constant changing of myself”: Revising roles in undergraduate teacher preparation. The Teacher Educator, 41(3), 187-206.
11.
Cook-Sather, A. (2006c). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359-390.
12.
Cook-Sather, A. (2007). Direct links: Using email to connect pre-service teachers, classroom-based teachers, and high school students within an undergraduate teacher preparation program. Journal of Technology andTeacher Education, 15(1),11-37.
13.
Cook-Sather, A. (in press). Learning from the student's perspective: A handbook for teachers and teacher educators. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
14.
Cook-Sather, A., & Youens, B. (2007). Repositioning students in initial teacher preparation: A comparative case study of learning to teach for social justice in the United States and in England. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 62-75.
15.
Dahl, K. (1995). Challenges in understanding the learner's perspective . Theory into Practice, 43(2), 124-130.
16.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES). ( 2004). Working together: Giving children and young people a say. London: Department for Education and Skills.
17.
Donohue, D.M., Bower, J., & Rosenberg, D. (2003). Learning with and learning from: Reciprocity in service learning in teacher education. Equity and Excellence in Teacher Education, 36(1), 15-27.
18.
Dyson, A.H. (2007). School literacy and the development of a child culture: Written remnants of the “gusto of life.” In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 115-142). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
19.
Fielding, M. (1999). Radical collegiality: Affirming teaching as an inclusive professional practice. Australian Educational Researcher , 26(2), 1-34.
20.
Fielding, M. (2001a). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(3), 123-141.
21.
Fielding, M. (2001b). Beyond the rhetoric of student voice: New departures or new constraints in the transformation of 21st century schooling?Forum, 43(2), 100-110.
22.
Fielding, M. (2004a). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295-311.
23.
Fielding, M. (2004b). “New wave” student voice and the renewal of civic society. London Review of Education, 2(3), 197-217.
24.
Freire, P. (1990). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
25.
Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
Hadaway, N. (1993). Encountering linguistic diversity through letters: Preparing preservice teachers for second language learners. Equity and Excellence in Education, 26(3), 25-30.
27.
Heshusius, L. (1995). Listening to children: “What could we possibly have in common?” From concerns with self to participatory consciousness . Theory Into Practice, 43(2), 117-123.
28.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge .
29.
Holdsworth R. (2000). Schools that create real roles of value for young people. UNESCO InternationalProspect, 3, 349-362.
30.
Hull, C. (1985). Pupils as teacher educators. Cambridge Journal of Education, 15(1), 1-8.
31.
Johnston, P., & Nicholls, J. (1995). Voices we want to hear and voices we don't. Theory Into Practice, 43(2), 94-100.
32.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Levin, B. (1994). Education reform and the treatment of students in schools. Journal of Educational Thought, 28(1), 88-101.
34.
Levin, B. (1998). The educational requirement for democracy. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(1), 57-79.
35.
Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre of education reform . Journal of Educational Change,1(2), 155-172.
36.
Levin, B. (2005). Governing education. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
37.
Lincoln, Y. (1995). In search of students' voices. Theory Into Practice,43(2), 88-93.
38.
MacBeath, J., Demetriou, H., Rudduck, J., & Myers, K. (2003). Consulting pupils: A toolkit for teachers. Cambridge, UK: Pearson Publishing.
39.
MacBeath, J., Myers, K., & Demetriou, H. (2001). Supporting teachers in consulting pupils about aspects of teaching and learning and evaluating impact. Forum , 43(2), 78-82.
40.
McKelvey, J., & Kyriacou, C. (1985). Research on pupils as teacher evaluators. Educational Studies, 11(1), 27-31.
41.
McLaren, P. (1989). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York: Longman.
42.
Meighan, R. (1977). Pupils' perceptions of the classroom techniques of postgraduate student teachers. British Journal of Teacher Education, 3, 139-148.
43.
Mitra, D. (2001). Opening the floodgates: Giving students a voice in school reform. Forum, 43(2), 91-94.
44.
Mitra, D. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development?Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651-688.
45.
Mitra, D. (2007). Student voice in school reform: From listening to leadership. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 727-744). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
46.
Nieto, S. (2000). A firming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Longman.
47.
Office for Standards in Education (OfSTED). ( 2000). Evaluating educational inclusion: Guidance for inspectors and schools. London: Stationery Office.
48.
Oldfather, P. (Ed.). (1995). Learning from student voices. Theory into Practice, 43, 84-87.
49.
Oldfather, P., Thomas, S., Eckert, L., Garcia, F., Grannis, N., Kilgore, J., et al. (1999). The nature and outcomes of students' longitudinal research on literacy motivations and schooling. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 281-320.
50.
Pekrul, S., & Levin, B. (2007). Building student voice for school improvement . In D. Thiessen & A Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 711-726). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
51.
Randolph, R. (1994). Writing across institutional boundaries: A K-12 and university collaboration. English Journal, 83(3), 68-74.
52.
Rodgers, C. (2006). Attending to student voice: The role of descriptive feedback in learning and teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 209-237.
53.
Rubin, B., & Silva, E. (Eds.). (2003). Critical voices in school reform: Students living through change. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
54.
Rudduck, J. (2002). The 2002 SERA lecture: The transformative potential of consulting young people about teaching, learning and schooling. Scottish Educational Review, 34(2), 133-137.
55.
Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement, and school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587-610). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
56.
Rudduck, J., Chaplain, R., & Wallace, G. (1996). School improvement: What can pupils tell us?London: David Fulton.
57.
Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school: Giving pupils a voice . London: Continuum Press.
58.
Sanon, F., Baxter, M., Fortune, L., & Opotow, S. (2001). Cutting class: Perspectives of urban high school students. In J. Shultz & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), In our own words: Students' perspectives on school (pp. 73-91). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
59.
Schultz, K. (2003). Listening: A framework for teaching across di ferences. New York: Teachers College Press.
60.
Shor, I. (1987). Freire for the classroom: A sourcebook for liberatory teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann .
61.
Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
Shultz, J., & Cook-Sather, A. (Eds). (2001). In our own words: Students' perspectives on school. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
63.
Silva, E. (2001). Squeaky wheels and flat tires: A case study of students as reform participants. Forum, 43(2), 95-99.
64.
Sipe, R.B. (2000). Virtually being there: Creating authentic experiences through interactive exchanges. English Journal, 90(2), 104-111.
65.
Smyth, J. (2007). Toward the pedagogically engaged school: Listening to student voice as a positive response to disengagement and “dropping out”? In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 635-658). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
66.
Sullivan, J. (1998). The electronic journal: Combining literacy and technology. ReadingTeacher, 52(1), 90-93.
67.
Thomson, P. (2007). Making it real: Community activism, active citizenship and students' learning. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 775-804). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
68.
Wilson, B.L., & Corbett, H.D. (2001). Listening to urban kids: School reform and the teachers they want. New York: State University of New York Press.
69.
Wilson, B.L., & Corbett, H.D. (2007). Students' perspectives on good teaching: Implications for adult reform behavior. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 283-314). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
70.
Yonezawa, S., & Jones, M. (2007). Using student voices to inform and evaluate secondary school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 681-710). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Publishers.
71.
Youens, B., & Hall, C. (2006). Incorporating pupil perspectives in initial teacher education—Lessons from the pupil mentoring project. Teacher Development, 10(2), 197-206.
