The present research examines the developmental outcomes of elementary-aged students engaged in student voice efforts. Using a case study of fifth-grade girls, the authors compare their experiences to research examining secondary school. The authors find marked similarities in the growth of agency, belonging, competence—the ABCs of youth development. The authors also notice two additional dimensions—the need to engage in discourse that allows an exchange of diverse ideas while working toward a common goal. The authors also observed the emergence of civic efficacy, or a belief that one can make a difference in their social worlds. The authors also examine the contexts and conditions that support positive youth development in this case—scaffolding youth learning, establishing inquiry as the framework for teaching and learning, and establishing a clear vision of the school as a place that fosters student voice.
AtwehB.BurtonL. (1995). Students as researchers: Rationale and critique. British Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 561–575.
2.
AngellA. V. (1991). Democratic climates in elementary classrooms: A review of theory and research. Theory & Research in Social Education, 19(3), 241–266.
3.
AngellA. V. (2004). Making peace in elementary classrooms: A case for class meetings. Theory & Research in Social Education, 32(1), 98–104.
4.
BanduraA. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78.
5.
BeaumontE. (2010). Political efficacy and empowerment: Pathways for developing a sense of political efficacy in adults. In SherrodL.Torney-PurtaJ.FlanaganC. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth (pp. 525–558). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
6.
BeckT. A. (2005). Tools of deliberation: Exploring the complexity of learning to lead elementary civics discussions. Theory & Research in Social Education, 33(1), 103–119.
7.
BensonR. L. (2003). Developmental assets and asset-building community: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In LernerR. M.BensonP. L. (Eds.), Developmental assets and asset-building communities: Implications for research, policy and practice (pp. 19–46). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
8.
CaminoL. (2000). Putting youth-adult partnerships to work for community change: Lessons from volunteers across the country. Community Youth Development Journal, 1(4), 213–220.
9.
CaminoL. (2005). Pitfalls and promising practices of youth-adult partnerships: An evaluator’s reflections. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 75–85.
10.
CaminoL.ZeldinS. (2002). From periphery to center: Pathways for youth civic engagement in the day-to-day life of communities. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 213–220.
11.
CopelandM. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375–395.
12.
CostelloJ.TolesM.SpielbergerJ.WynnJ. (2000). History, ideology and structure shape the organizations that shape youth. In JaffeN. (Ed.), Youth development: Issues, challenges, and directions (pp. 185–231). Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
13.
DennerJ.MeyerB.BeanS. (2005). Young women’s leadership alliance: Youth-adult partnerships in an all-female after-school program. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 87–100.
14.
EcclesJ.GootmanJ. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academies of Science.
15.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC.WigfieldA.BuchananC. M.ReumanD.FlanaganC.IverD. M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.
16.
EckertP. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teachers College.
17.
EricksonE. (1950). Childhood and Society. New York, NY: W.W. Norton Company.
18.
FieldingM. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 123–141.
19.
FlanaganC.FaisonN. (2001). Youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for Research in Child Development.
20.
FoucaultM. (1969). The archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
GinwrightS. A. (2005). On urban ground: Understanding African-American intergenerational partnerships in urban communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 101–100.
22.
GoodenowC. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationship to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43.
23.
GoodwillieS. (Ed.). (1993). Voices from the future: Our children tell us about violence in America. New York, NY: Crown Publishers, Inc.
HahnC. L. (1998). Becoming political: Comparative perspectives on citizenship education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
26.
HarterS. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–89.
27.
HeathS. B.McLaughlinM. W. (Eds.). (1993). Identity and inner-city youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
HonigM.KahneJ.McLaughlinM. W. (2001). School-community connections: Strengthening opportunity to learn and opportunity to teach. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 998–1028). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
29.
ItoM.HorstH.BittaniM.BoydD.Herr-StephensonB.LangeP.. . . RobinsonL. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project. Chicago, IL: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning.
30.
KahneJ.WestheimerJ. (2006). The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39, 289–296. doi:10.1017/S104909650606047110.1017/S1049096506060471
31.
KirshnerB. (2004). Democracy now: Activism and learning in urban youth organizations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
32.
KirshnerB.O’DonoghueJ.McLaughlinM. (2005). Youth adult research collaborations: Bringing youth voice to the research process. In LarsonR.EcclesJ.MahoneyJ. (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 131–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
KleinJ. D.SabaratnamP.AuerbachM. M.SmithS. M.KodjoC.LewisK.. . . DandinoC. (2006). Development and factor structure of a brief instrument to assess the impact of community programs on positive youth development: The Rochester Evaluation of Asset Development for Youth (READY) Tool. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 252–260.
34.
KuhnD.FranklinS. (2008). The second decade: What develops (and how)? In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (Vol. 4, pp. 517–545). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
35.
LarsonR. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55(1), 170–183.
36.
LarsonR.HansenD. (2005). The development of strategic thinking: Learning to impact human systems in a youth activism program. Human Development, 48(6), 327–349.
37.
LarsonR.WalkerK.PearceN. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 57–74.
38.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
LernerR. M.LernerJ. V.AlmerigiJ.TheokasC.PhelpsE.GestsdottirS.. . . von EyeA. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17–71.
40.
LiebermanA.WoodD. (2001). When teachers write: Of networks and learning. In LiebermanA.MillerL. (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 174–187). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
41.
McLaughlinM. (1999). Community counts: How community organizations matter for youth development. Washington, DC: Public Education Network.
42.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
43.
MitraD. L. (2003). Student voice in school reform: Reframing student-teacher relationships. McGill Journal of Education, 38, 289–304.
44.
MitraD. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development. Teachers College Record, 106, 651–688.
45.
MitraD. L. (2005). Adults advising youth: Leading while getting out of the way. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 520–553.
46.
MitraD. L. (2008). Student voice in school reform: Building youth-adult partnerships that strengthen schools and empower youth. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
47.
MitraD. L. (2009). The role of intermediary organizations in sustaining student voice initiatives. Teachers College Record, 111, 1834–1868.
48.
MitraD.SerriereS.StoicovyD. (2012). The role of leaders in enabling student voice. Management in Education.
49.
NightingaleE. O.WolvertonL. (1993). Adolescent rolelessness in modern society. Teachers College Record, 94, 472–486.
50.
NystrandM. (1982). What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse. New York, NY: Academic
51.
Ochoa-BeckerA. S.MortonM. L.AutryM. M. (2001). A search for decision making in three elementary classrooms: A pilot study. Theory & Research in Social Education, 29(2), 261–289.
52.
O’ConnorC.CaminoL. (2005). Youth participation in research and evaluation: Outcomes for youth. Madison, WI: Community Youth Connection, University of Wisconsin Extension.
53.
OldfatherP. (1995). Songs “come back most to them”: Students’ experiences as researchers. Theory Into Practice, 34(2), 131–137.
54.
PajaresF. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In MaehrM.PintrichP. R. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
55.
PaleyV. (1992). You can’t say you can’t play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
ParkerW. C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
57.
PerkinsD. F.BordenL. M. (2003). Risk factors, risk behaviors, and resiliency in adolescence. In LernerR. M.EasterbrooksM. A.MistryJ. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 6 Developmental Psychology (pp. 273–419). New York, NY: Wiley.
58.
Perkins BordenL. M.KeithJ. G.Hoppe-RooneyT.VillarruelF. A., D. F. (n.d.). Community youth development: Practice, policy, and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from internal-pdf:/perkins Definition Community Youth Development.doc
59.
PiagetJ. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press. (Original work published 1936)
60.
PISA: Program for Internal Student Assessment. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation (survey). Washington, DC: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
61.
PittmanK.IrbyM.FerberT. (2000). Youth as effective citizens: Background report and recommendations. Washington, DC: International Youth Foundation.
62.
PittmanK.WrightM. (1991). Bridging the gap: A rationale for enhancing the role of community organizations in promoting youth development. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.
63.
PopeD. C. (2001). “Doing school”: How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of the American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
65.
RoeserR. W.MidgleyC.UrdanT. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 408–422.
66.
RyanR. M.PowelsonC. L. (1991). Autonomy and relatedness as fundamental to motivation and education. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(1), 49–66.
67.
SandersF.MovitM.MitraD.PerkinsD. F. (2007). Examining ways in which youth conferences can spell out gains in positive youth development. LEARNing Landscapes, 1, 49–78.
68.
SerriereS. C.MitraD. L.CodyJ. (2010). Youth citizens take action for better school lunches. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 23(2), 4–8.
69.
SerriereS. C.MitraD. L.ReedK. (2011). Student voice in the elementary years: Fostering youth-adult partnerships in elementary service-learning. Theory and Research in Social Education, 39, 541–575.
70.
SternD.RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2002). National Tests of a New High School Civics Program Designed to Increase Citizenship in Youth: The Student Voices Program. Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
71.
StinsonS. W. (1993). Meaning and value: Reflections on what students say about school. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(3), 216–238.
72.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
73.
SyvertsenA. K.FlanaganC. A.StoutM. D. (2007). Best practices in civic education: Changes in students’ civic outcomes. Washington, DC: CIRCLE.
74.
VillarruelF. A.LernerR. (Eds.). (1994). Promoting community-based programs for socialization and learning (Vol. 63). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
75.
WeberJ. E.WeberP. S.SchneiderK.SleeperB. J. (2007). Preparing students for citizenship: An exploration of the antecedents and outcomes of self-efficacy toward service. Journal of Business Inquiry, 49(4), 359–369.
76.
WestheimerJ.KahneJ. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 237–269.
YeagerE. A.SilvaD. Y. (2002). Activities for strengthening the meaning of democracy for elementary school children. The Social Studies, 93(1), 18–22.
79.
YinR. K. (1994). Case study research: Designs and methods (2nd ed., Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
80.
ZeldinS.CaminoL.CalvertM.IveyD. (2002). Youth-adult partnerships and positive youth development: Some lessons learned from research and practice in Wisconsin. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension.
81.
ZeldinS.CaminoL.MookC. (2005). The adoption of innovation in youth organizations: Creating the conditions for youth-adult partnerships. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 121–135.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
