Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Blending Student Engagement and Voice with Staff Training in Restorative Practices: Findings from the Feasibility Test of the SpeakOut with Advocatr Program
We describe outcomes from a small-scale feasibility study of the SpeakOut with Advocatr program intended to empower middle school students to make their voices heard, while simultaneously training school personnel in restorative approaches to promoting classrooms and schools where students feel comfortable speaking up. The study was conducted in a small rural middle school. We collected pre and post survey data from school staff and students, as well as interview data from the school administrator, counselor, and teachers who implemented the student curriculum. Results indicated some statistically non-significant changes in the desired direction on the staff survey, and few changes on the student survey. Student engagement appeared to decline from pre to post. Qualitative data provided strong support for the feasibility and continued use of the SpeakOut with Advocatr program. We provide recommendations for elevating student voice in the context of current literature and our study results.
AlleyK. M. (2019). Fostering middle school students’ autonomy to support motivation and engagement. Middle School Journal, 50(3), 5–14.
2.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
3.
BrykA.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
4.
BundickM. J.QuagliaR. J.CorsoM. J.HaywoodD. E. (2014). Promoting student engagement in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–34.
5.
ChanD. (2010). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends (pp. 329–356). Routledge.
6.
ChoY.WeinsteinC. E.WickerF. (2011). Perceived competence and autonomy as moderators of the effects of achievement goal orientations. Educational Psychologist, 31(4), 393–411.
7.
Cook-SatherA. (2020). Student voice across contexts: Fostering student agency in today’s schools. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 182–191.
8.
DavisK. M.ChitiyoG. (2019). Student voice and engagement as predictors of exclusionary discipline across grade tiers. Research in the Schools, 26(2), 56–63.
9.
EbersoldS.RahmT.HeiseE. (2019). Autonomy support and well-being in teachers: Differential mediations through basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 921–942.
10.
FeingoldA. (2009). Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 43–53.
11.
Fradkin-HayslipA. (2021). Teacher autonomy, motivation, and job satisfaction: Perceptions of elementary school teachers according to self-determination theory. Ilkogretim Online, 20(2), 198–205.
12.
FroilandJ. M.OrosE. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 119–132.
13.
GonzalezT. E.Hernandez-SacaD. I.ArtilesA. J. (2017). In search of voice: Theory and methods in K-12 student voice research in the US, 1990–2010. Educational Review, 69(4), 451–473.
14.
GrahamJ. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.
15.
GregoryA. (2018). RP-Assess: Quality, quantity, and equity in restorative practices implementation, v. 5. Unpublished compilation of measures. Rutgers University.
16.
GregoryA.EvansK. R. (2020). The starts and stumbles of restorative justice in Education: Where do we go from here?National Education Policy Center.
17.
GuayF.RatelleC.LaroseS.VallerandR. J.VitaroF. (2013). The number of autonomy-supportive relationships: Are more relationships better for motivation, perceived competence, and achievement?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 375–382.
18.
HafenC. A.AllenJ. P.MikamiA. Y.GregoryA.HamreB.PiantaR. C. (2012). The pivotal role of adolescent autonomy in secondary school classrooms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 245–255.
19.
HarrisonL.BishopP. (2021). The evolving middle school concept: This we (still) believe. Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 25(2), 2–5.
20.
HolmesK.ClementJ.AlbrightJ. (2013). The complex task of leading educational change in schools. School Leadership and Management, 33(3), 270–283.
21.
HughesJ. N.CaoQ. (2018). Trajectories of teacher-student warmth and conflict at the transition to middle school: Effects on academic engagement and achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 148–162.
22.
IyerR. V.Kochenderfer-LaddB.EisenbergN.ThompsonM. (2010). Peer victimization and effortful control: Relations to school engagement and academic achievement. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 361–387.
23.
JangH.ReeveJ.DeciE. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Education & Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.
24.
JoS. H. (2014). Teacher commitment: Exploring associations with relationships and emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 120–130.
25.
JonesT. M.WillifordA.SpencerM. S.RiggsN. R.TollR.GeorgeM.BeckerK.BruickS. (2021). School mental health providers’ perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 on racial inequities and school disengagement. Children & Schools, 43(2), 97–106
26.
KingR. B. (2015). Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 26–38.
27.
LeiH.CuiY.ZhouW. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 517–528.
28.
LiY.QiuL.SunB. (2021). School engagement as a mediator in students’ social relationships and academic performance: A survey based on CiteSpace. International Journal of Crowd Science, 5(1), 17–30.
29.
MarshikT.AshtonP. T.AlginaJ. (2017). Teachers’ and students’ needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness as predictors of students’ achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 20, 39–67.
30.
McClureH.VincentC. G. V.SvanksR.ReileyD.MarquezB. (2023). What the COVID-19 pandemic taught us about teaching and learning: High school personnel’s perspectives on providing social support and academic instruction during comprehensive distance learning in the United States. In EscudeiroP.EscudeiroN.BernardesO. (Eds.), Advancing equity and inclusion through educational technology (pp. 176–201). IGI Global Publishing.
31.
McLennanB.McIlveenP.PereraH. (2021). A pedagogical model of autonomy, competence and relatedness for pre-service teacher educators. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 186–200.
32.
MurrayC.ZvochK. (2011). The inventory of teacher-student relationships: Factor structure, reliability, and validity among African American youth in low-income urban schools. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(4), 493–525.
33.
OlivierE.MorinA. J. S.LangloisJ.Tardif-GrenierK.ArchambaultI. (2020). Internalizing and externalizing behavior problems and student engagement in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 2327–2346.
PatrickB. C.StockbridgeS.RoosaH. V.EdelsonJ. S. (2019). Self-silencing in school: Failures in student autonomy and teacher-student relatedness. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 943–967.
36.
PearsonL. C.MoomawW. (2006). Continuing validation of the teaching autonomy scale. Journal of Education and Research, 100(1), 44–51.
37.
PedlerM.YeighT.HudsonS. (2020). The teachers’ role in student engagement: A review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 48–62.
38.
PowersK.ShinS. H.HagansK. S.CordovaM. (2015). The impact of a teacher professional development program on student engagement. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 3(4), 231–240.
39.
RadeyM.Langenderfer-MagruderL.Brown SpeightsJ. (2021). “I don't have much of a choice”: Low-income single mothers’ COVID-19 school and care decisions. Family Relations, 70(5), 1312–1326.
RosenmanR.TennekoonV.HillL. G. (2011). Measuring bias in self-reported data. International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research, 2(4), 320–332.
42.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
43.
SalisburyJ. D.ShethM. J.SpikesD.GraeberA. (2023). “We have to empower ourselves to make changes!”: Developing collective capacity for transformative change through an urban student voice experience. Urban Education, 58(2), 221–249.
44.
SchultzK. (2019). Distrust and educational change: Overcoming barriers to just and lasting reform. Harvard Education Press.
45.
SvanksR.SmithJ.McClureH.VincentC. G.RomeroL.InglishJ.GirvanE.ReileyD. (in review). Considerations for adapting an intervention for middle schools: Context, support, and connections.
46.
TianL.HanM.HuebnerE. S. (2014). Preliminary development of the adolescent students’ basic psychological needs at school scale. Journal of Adolescence, 37(3), 257–267.
47.
ToomeyR. B.CardN. A.CasperD. M. (2014). Peers’ perceptions of gender nonconformity: Associations with overt and relational peer victimization and aggression in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(4), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613495446
48.
TraceyT. J. (2016). A note on socially desirable responding. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000135
Van RyzinM. J.GravelyA. A.RosethC. J. (2009). Autonomy, belongingness, and engagement in school as contributors to adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(1), 1–12.
51.
VelezG.HahnM.RecchiaH.WainrybC. (2020). Rethinking responses to youth rebellion: Recent growth and development of restorative practices in schools. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 36–40.
52.
VincentC.InglishJ.GirvanE.SpragueJ.McCabeT. (2016). Integrating school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports (SWPBIS) and restorative discipline (RD). In SkibaR.MedirattaK.RauschM. K. (Eds.), Inequality in school discipline: Research and practice to reduce disparities (pp. 115–134). Palgrave MacMillan.
53.
VincentC. G.WalkerH.EspelageD. L.ValidoA.MurrayC.SvanksR.MarquezB.PennefatherJ. (2022). Student outcomes from the pilot test of a comprehensive school safety framework for high schools: Student ownership, accountability, and responsibility for school safety (SOARS). NASSP Bulletin, 106(4), 339–363.
54.
WangM. T.EcclesJ. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895.
55.
WangM. T.FredricksJ.YeF.HofkensT.LinnJ. S. (2019). Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000431
56.
WeltonA. D.MansfieldK. C.SalisburyJ. D. (2022). The politics of student voice: The power and potential of students as policy actors. Educational Policy, 36(1), 3–18.
