It is usually recognized that satisfaction with democracy is enhanced by clean governments and fair democratic procedures. However, under certain circumstances, some citizens might appreciate the quality of democratic governance more than others. Building on research that underlines the accuracy and norm-inducing functions of education, we argue that the quality of democratic governance conditions the relationship between education and satisfaction with democracy. Analyzing data from 18 Latin American countries, we find that higher-educated citizens are less satisfied with the regime than the less-educated. Among the highly educated, nonetheless, the least satisfied are those who were asked by public officials to pay bribes. Highly educated individuals are more satisfied with the regime if their country’s quality of democracy is robust rather than weak. At the lowest level of education, the conditional influence of being asked for a bribe or the quality of democracy is absent.
AgerbergMattias (2019) The Curse of Knowledge? Education, corruption, and politics. Political Behavior41(2): 369–399.
2.
AiChunrongNortonEdward C (2003) Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models. Economics Letters80(1): 123–129.
3.
AndersonChristopher JTverdovaYuliya V (2003) Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science47(1): 91–109.
4.
BeaumontElizabeth (2011) Promoting Political Agency, Addressing Political Inequality: A multilevel model of internal political efficacy. The Journal of Politics73(1): 216–231.
5.
BoboLawrenceLicariFrederik C (1989) Education and Political Tolerance: Testing the effects of cognitive sophistication and target group affect. Public Opinion Quarterly53(3): 285–308.
6.
BoothJohn ASeligsonMitchell A (2009) The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Political Support and Democracy in Eight Nations. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CastorenaÓscarGravesSarah L (2019) Support for Electoral Democracy. In ZechmeisterElizabeth JLupuNoam (eds) Pulse of Democracy. Nashville, TN: LAPOP, 8–25.
CoppedgeMichaelLindbergStaffanSkaaningSvend-ErikTeorellJan (2016) Measuring High Level Democratic Principles Using the V-Dem Data. International Political Science Review37(5): 580–593.
11.
CórdovaAbby (2009) Methodological Note: Measuring relative wealth using household asset indicators. In SeligsonMitchell AZechmeisterElizabeth J (series eds) Americas Barometer Insights Series No. I0806. Latin American Public Opinion Project: Vanderbilt University.
12.
CriadoHenarHerrerosFrancisco (2007) Political Support: Taking into account the institutional context. Comparative Political Studies40(12): 1511–1532.
13.
DahlRobert A (1989) Democracy and Its Critics. Yale: Yale University Press.
14.
DahlbergStefanLindeJonas (2016) Losing Happily? The mitigating effect of democracy and quality of government on the winner–loser gap in political support. International Journal of Public Administration39(9): 652–664.
15.
DahlbergStefanLindeJonasHolmbergSören (2015) Democratic Discontent in Old and New Democracies: Assesing the importance of democratic input and governmental ouput. Political Studies63(S1): 18–37.
16.
DahlbergStefanHolmbergSören (2014) Democracy and Bureaucracy: How their quality matters for popular satisfaction. West European Politics37(3): 515–537.
17.
GolebiowskaEwa A (2019) The Mechanisms Behind the Relationship Between Education and Political Tolerance. Politics, Groups, and Identities1–20, Epub ahead of print doi: 10.1080/21565503.2019.1624180.
18.
HainmuellerJensMummoloJonathanXuYiqing (2019) How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis27(2): 163–192.
19.
HakhverdianArmenMayneQuinton (2012) Institutional Trust, Education, and Corruption: A micro-macro interactive approach. The Journal of Politics74(3): 739–750.
20.
HillygusD Sunshine (2005) The Missing Link: Exploring the relationship between higher education and political engagement. Political Behavior27(1): 25–47.
21.
HoogheMarcMarienSofiede VroomeThomas (2012) The Cognitive Basis of Trust: The relation between education, cognitive ability, and generalized and political trust. Intelligence40(6): 604–613.
22.
HuangMin-huaChangYu-tzungChuYun-han (2008) Identifying Sources of Democratic Legitimacy: A multilevel analysis. Electoral Studies27(1): 45–62.
23.
KlingemannHans-Dieter (2014) Dissatisfied Democrats: Democratic maturation in old and new democracies. In DaltonRussell JWelzelChristian (eds) The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 116–157.
LindeJonas (2012) Why Feed the Hand That Bites You? Perceptions of procedural fairness and system support in post-communist democracies. European Journal of Political Research51(3): 410–434.
26.
LindeJonasEkmanJoakim (2003) Satisfaction with Democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European Journal of Political Research42(3): 391–408.
27.
MagalhãesPedro C (2014) Government Effectiveness and Support for Democracy. European Journal of Political Research53(1): 77–97.
28.
MagalhãesPedro C (2016) Economic Evaluations, Procedural Fairness, and Satisfaction with Democracy. Political Research Quarterly69(3): 522–534.
29.
MainwaringScottPérez-LiñánAníbal (2015) Cross-Currents in Latin America. Journal of Democracy26(1): 114–127.
NyeJS (1967) Corruption and Political Development: A cost-benefit analysis. The American Political Science Review61(2): 417–427.
32.
RothsteinBo (2014) What is the Opposite of Corruption?Third World Quarterly35(5): 737–752.
33.
SchoonIngridChengHelenGaleCatharine RBattyG DavidDearyIan J (2010) Social Status, Cognitive Ability, and Educational Attainment as Predictors of Liberal Social Attitudes and Political Trust. Intelligence38(1): 144–150.
34.
TeorellJanCoppedgeMichaelLindbergStaffanSkaaningSvend-Erik (2019) Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe, 1900–2017. Studies in Comparative International Development54(1): 71–95.
35.
van derMeerWGTomHakhverdianArmen (2017) Political Trust as the Evaluation of Process and Performance: A cross-national study of 42 European countries. Political Studies65(1): 81–102.
36.
van ElsasErika (2015) Political Trust as a Rational Attitude: A comparison of the nature of political trust across different levels of education. Political Studies63(5): 1158–1178.
37.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay LehmanBradyHenry E (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
WagnerAlexander FSchneiderFriedrichHallaMartin (2009) The Quality of Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe—A panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy25(1): 30–41.
39.
WarrenMark (2004) What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy?American Journal of Political Science48(2): 328–343.
WelzelChristian (2013) Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for EmancipationCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
ZmerliSonjaNewtonKen (2008) Social Trust and Attitudes Toward Democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly72(4): 706–724.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
