This article aims to analyze satisfaction with democracy among political representatives as key actors of democracy. We examine the impact of two possible sources of satisfaction—personal benefits and policy performance—using a database from the Latin American Legislative Elites Project with 1207 personal interviews to legislators from 17 countries. The results show that, in addition to the winner effect, personal benefits and policy performance are also significant factors explaining levels of satisfaction with democracy, but the impact is different for winners and losers. For winners, these aspects are irrelevant, and their levels of satisfaction remain high and stable, even under poor political performance. In contrast, losers have lower levels of satisfaction, but satisfaction with democracy increases with seniority, positive salary assessments, and perceptions of good political performance, suggesting that for defeated legislators, these factors help to heal their wounds.
Alcántara SáezM (2004) ¿Instituciones o máquinas ideológicas? Origen, programa y organización de los partidos políticos latinoamericanos. Barcelona: ICPS.
2.
AndersonCJ (1998) Parties, Party Systems, and Satisfaction with Democratic Performance in the New Europe. Political Studies46 (3): 572–588.
3.
AndersonCJGuilloryCA (1997) Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems. The American Political Science Review91 (1): 66–81.
4.
AndersonCJBlaisABowlerS, et al. (eds) (2005) Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
AndréADepauwS (2017) The Quality of Representation and Satisfaction with Democracy: The Consequences of Citizen-Elite Policy and Process Congruence. Political Behavior39 (2): 377–397.
6.
ApplebaumA (2020) Twilight of Democracy: The Failure of Politics and the Parting of Friends. London: Penguin UK.
7.
BartelsLM (2023) Democracy Erodes from the Top: Leaders, Citizens, and the Challenge of Populism in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BermeoNG (2003) Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BermeoNG (2016) On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy27 (1): 5–19.
10.
BesleyT (2004) Paying Politicians: Theory and Evidence. Journal of the European Economic Association2: 193–215.
BohiguesAAlcántaraM (2020) Political Elites and Democratic Fatigue in Latin America. In: AlcántaraMGarcía MonteroMRivas PérezC (eds) Politics and Political Elites in Latin America: Challenges and Trends. Cham: Springer, pp.129–149.
13.
BowlerSDonovanTKarpJA (2002) When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations. Political Research Quarterly55 (4): 731–754.
14.
BowlerSDonovanTKarpJA (2006) Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions: Self-Interest, Values, or Ideology?The Journal of Politics68 (2): 434–446.
15.
BraendleT (2015) Does Remuneration Affect the Discipline and the Selection of Politicians? Evidence from Pay Harmonization in the European Parliament. Public Choice162 (1–2): 1–24.
16.
ChristmannPTorcalM (2018) The Effects of Government System Fractionalization on Satisfaction with Democracy. Political Science Research and Methods6 (3): 593–611.
17.
ClaassenC (2020) Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive?American Journal of Political Science64 (1): 118–134.
18.
ClaytonKDavisNTNyhanB, et al. (2021) Elite Rhetoric Can Undermine Democratic Norms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America118 (23): E2024125118.
19.
CuriniLJouWMemoliV (2012) Satisfaction with Democracy and the Winner-Loser Debate: The Role of Policy Preferences and Past Experience. British Journal of Political Science42 (2): 241–261.
20.
DahlR (1971) Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
DaoustJFPlesciaCBlaisA (2023) Are People More Satisfied with Democracy When They Feel They Won the Election? No. Political Studies Review21 (1): 162–171.
22.
DassonnevilleRMcAllisterI (2020) The Party Choice Set and Satisfaction with Democracy. West European Politics43 (1): 49–73.
23.
EastonD (1975) A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science5 (4): 435–457.
24.
EsaiassonPGilljamMKarlssonD (2013) Sources of Elite Democratic Satisfaction. How Elected Representatives Evaluate Their Political System. In: DahlbergSOscarssonHWängnerudL (eds) Tepping Stones: Research on Political Representatives, Voting Behavior, and Quality of Government. Gothenburg Studies in Politics. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, p.133.
25.
FerlandB (2021) Policy Congruence and Its Impact on Satisfaction with Democracy. Electoral Studies69: 102204.
26.
FerranzCFinanF (2009) Motivating Politicians: The Impacts of Monetary Incentives on Quality and Performance. NBER Working Paper no. 14906, April. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
27.
FestingerL (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
HanSMChangECC (2016) Economic Inequality, Winner-Loser Gap, and Satisfaction with Democracy. Electoral Studies44: 85–97.
29.
HowellPJustwanF (2013) Nail-Biters and No-Contests: The Effect of Electoral Margins on Satisfaction with Democracy in Winners and Losers. Electoral Studies32 (2): 334–343.
30.
Kestilä-KekkonenESöderlundP (2017) Is It All about the Economy? Government Fractionalization, Economic Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy across Europe, 2002−13. Government and Opposition52 (1): 100–130.
31.
KitscheltHHawkinsKALunaJP, et al. (2010) Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
KumlinSEsaiassonP (2012) Scandal Fatigue? Scandal Elections and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe, 1977–2007. British Journal of Political Science42 (2): 263–282.
33.
LeemannLStadelmann-SteffenI (2022) Satisfaction with Democracy: When Government by the People Brings Electoral Losers and Winners Together. Comparative Political Studies55 (1): 93–121.
34.
LevitaGMárquez RomoC (2023) Assessing Congressional Institutionalization and Political Elites’ Renewal in Latin America Through Legislative Amateurism. Journal of Politics in Latin America15 (3): 287–310.
35.
LevitskySZiblattD (2018) How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.
36.
LindeJEkmanJ (2003) Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research42 (3): 391–408.
37.
LovelessM (2021) When You Win, Nothing Hurts: The Durability of Electoral Salience on Individuals’ Satisfaction with Democracy. Political Studies69 (3): 538–558.
38.
LovelessMBinelliC (2020) Economic Expectations and Satisfaction with Democracy: Evidence from Italy. Government and Opposition55 (3): 413–429.
39.
LühisteK (2014) Social Protection and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Multi-level Analysis. Political Studies62 (4): 784–803.
40.
LundmarkSOscarssonHWeissenbilderM (2020) Confidence in an Election Authority and Satisfaction with Democracy: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment of a Failed Election in Sweden. Electoral Studies67: 102216.
41.
MainwaringS (2018) Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MarenghiPGarcía MonteroM (2024) ‘No Es La Democracia Que Míster Superman Quiere Imponernos Desde Washington’: An Analysis of Populist Attitudes on Democracy from Latin American Legislators. Legislative Studies Quarterly. Epub ahead of print 24 October 2024. DOI: 10.1111/lsq.12484.
43.
Martínez RosónMMateosA (2020) Satisfaction with Democracy in Latin America: Perspectives from Political Elites and Citizens. In: AlcántaraMGarcía MonteroMRivas PérezC (eds) Politics and Political Elites in Latin America: Challenges and Trends. Cham: Springer, pp.77–96.
44.
MerkleyECutlerFQuirkPJ, et al. (2019) Having Their Say: Authority, Voice, and Satisfaction with Democracy. The Journal of Politics81 (3): 848–861.
45.
Monsiváis-CarrilloA (2023) Happy Winners, Sore Partisans? Political Trust, Partisanship, and the Populist Assault on Electoral Integrity in Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America15 (1): 72–95.
46.
Monsiváis-CarrilloACantú RamosG (2020) Education, Democratic Governance, and Satisfaction with Democracy: Multilevel Evidence from Latin America. International Political Science Review43 (5): 662–679.
47.
Morgan-JonesELovelessM (2023) Early Election Calling and Satisfaction with Democracy. Government and Opposition58 (3): 598–622.
48.
NadeauRDaoustJFArel-BundockV (2020) The Market, the State and Satisfaction with Democracy. West European Politics43 (1): 250–259.
49.
NiessenCSchiffinoNJacquetV, et al. (2019) Critical Candidates: Elite Attitudes Towards the Functioning of Representative Democracy. In: VandeleeneADe WinterLBaudewynsP (eds) Candidates, Parties and Voters in the Belgian Partitocracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.341–364.
50.
NortonMIMochonDArielyD (2012) The IKEA Effect: When Labor Leads to Love. Journal of Consumer Psychology22 (3): 453–460.
51.
PedersenRTPedersenLH (2020) Citizen Attitudes on Politicians’ Pay: Trust Issues Are Not Solved by Delegation. Political Studies68 (2): 389–407.
RichTTreeceM (2018) Losers’ and Non-voters’ Consent: Democratic Satisfaction in the 2009 and 2013 Elections in Germany. Government and Opposition53 (3): 416–436.
54.
SarsfieldREchegarayF (2006) Opening the Black Box: How Satisfaction with Democracy and Its Perceived Efficacy Affect Regime Preference in Latin America. International Journal of Public Opinion Research18 (2): 153–173.
55.
ScarrowSE (2001) Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation. Comparative Political Studies34 (6): 651–665.
56.
SchlesingerJA (1966) Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
57.
SchmidtMG (1996) When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy. European Journal of Political Research30 (2): 155–183.
58.
SinclairBSmithSSTuckerPD (2018) ‘It’s Largely a Rigged System’: Voter Confidence and the Winner Effect in 2016. Political Research Quarterly71 (4): 854–868.
59.
SingerMM (2023) Fiddling While Democracy Burns: Partisan Reactions to Weak Democracy in Latin America. Perspectives on Politics21 (1): 9–26.
60.
SinghSPKarakoçEBlaisA (2012) Differentiating Winners: How Elections Affect Satisfaction with Democracy. Electoral Studies31 (1): 201–211.
61.
SirovátkaTGuziMSaxonbergS (2019) Satisfaction with Democracy and Perceived Performance of the Welfare State in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy29 (2): 241–256.
62.
ValgarðssonVODevineD (2022) What Satisfaction with Democracy? A Global Analysis of “satisfaction with Democracy” Measures. Political Research Quarterly75 (3): 576–590.
63.
Waldron-MooreP (1999) Eastern Europe at the Crossroads of Democratic Transition: Evaluating Support for Democratic Institutions, Satisfaction with Democratic Government, and Consolidation of Democratic Regimes. Comparative Political Studies32 (1): 32–62.
64.
WeßelsB (2018) Norms and Orientations of Political Elites. In: BestHHigleyJ (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.523–537.
65.
WilliamsNSSnipesASinghSP (2021) Gender Differences in the Impact of Electoral Victory on Satisfaction with Democracy. Electoral Studies69: 102205.
66.
ZallerJR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
