Empirical research has found that, despite citizens’ perceptions to the contrary, political parties tend to deliver on their campaign promises. What are the reasons for this mismatch between perceptions and performance? Research to date has paid insufficient attention to the reasons for such a mismatch, neglecting the effects of political predispositions such as party identification and sympathy for the government. This article argues that it is such political predispositions that cause biased perceptions of pledge fulfilment. Bias towards perceiving pledges as unfulfilled is expected to be higher for voters whose political predispositions are more unfavourable to government. The argument is supported by data on Portuguese voters and party manifestos in the 2011 election, contributing to better understanding of the mechanisms of political accountability.
AchenChristopher H (1992) Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the iron triangle in voting research. Political Behavior14(3): 195–211.
2.
AlthausScott L (2003) Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AndersonChristopher JMendesSilvia MTverdovaYuliya V (2004) Endogenous Economic Voting: Evidence from the 1997 British election. Electoral Studies23(4): 683–708.
4.
BartelsLarry (2002) Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior24(2): 117–150.
5.
BornAndreasPietervan EckJohannessonMagnus (2017) An Experimental Investigation of Election Promises. Political Psychology. Forthcoming.
6.
CampbellAngusConversePhilipMillerWarrenStokesDonald (1960) The American Voter. New York: Wiley and Sons.
7.
CorazziniLucaKubeSebastianMaréchalMichel AndréNicolòAntonio (2014) Elections and Deceptions: An experimental study on the behavioral effects of democracy. American Journal of Political Science58(3): 579–592.
8.
DownsAnthony. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: HarperCollins.
9.
DuchRaymond MPalmerHarvey DAndersonChristopher J (2000) Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions. American Journal of Political Science44(4): 635–652.
10.
EnnsPeter KKellstedtPaul MMcAvoyGregory E (2012) The Consequences of Partisanship in Economic Perceptions. Public Opinion Quarterly76(2): 287–310.
11.
EriksonRobert SMacKuenMichael BStimsonJames A (2001) The Macro-Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
EvansGeoffreyAndersenRobert (2006) The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions. The Journal of Politics68(1): 194–207.
13.
FestingerLeon (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14.
FiskeSusan TTaylorShelley E (2013) Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture (2nd edn). London: Sage.
15.
GerberAlanHuberGregory A (2010) Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments. American Journal of Political Science54(1): 153–173.
16.
HoboltSara BTilleyJamesWittrockJill (2013) Listening to the Government: How information shapes responsibility attributions. Political Behaviour35(1): 153–174.
17.
KuklinskiJames HQuirkPaul J (2000) Reconsidering the Rational Public: Heuristics, cognition and mass opinion. In LupiaArthurMcCubbinsMathew DPopkinSamuel L (eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 153–182.
18.
KundaZiva (1990) The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin108: 480–498.
19.
LauRichard RRedlawskDavid P (2001) Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science45(4): 951–971.
20.
MagalhãesPedro (2014) The Elections of the Great Recession in Portugal: Performance voting under a blurred responsibility for the economy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties24(2): 180–202.
21.
MansbridgeJane (2003) Rethinking Representation. American Political Science Review97(4): 515–528.
22.
ManserghLucyThomsonRobert (2007) Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking. Comparative Politics39(3): 311–329.
23.
MaravallJosé M (2013) Las promesas políticas. Madrid: Galaxia Gutenberg.
24.
MarshMichaelTilleyJames R (2010) The Attribution of Credit and Blame to Governments and its Impact on Vote Choice. British Journal of Political Science40(1): 115–134.
25.
MouryCatherineStandringAdam (2017) Going beyond the Troika: Power and discourse in Portuguese austerity politics. European Journal of Political Research56(3): 660–679.
26.
MouryCatherineFernandesJorge M (2018) Minority Governments and Pledge Fulfilment: Evidence from Portugal. Government an Opposition53(2): 335–355.
NaurinElinOscarssonHenril Ekengren (2017) When and Why are Voters Correct in their Evaluations of Specific Government Performance?Political Studies65(4): 860–876.
29.
RoyedTerry (1996) Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher eras. British Journal of Political Science26(1): 45–80.
30.
RudolphThomas (2003) Who’s Responsible for the Economy? The formation and consequences of responsibility attributions. American Journal of Political Science47(4): 698–713.
31.
SchedlerAndreas (1998) The Normative Force of Electoral Promises. Journal of Theoretical Politics10(2): 191−214.
32.
SchmittHermanThomassenJacques (eds) (1999) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
SpoonJae-JaeKlüverHeike (2015) Voter Polarization and Party Responsiveness: Why parties emphasize divided issues, but remain silent on unified issues. European Journal of Political Research54(2): 343–362.
34.
TaberCharles SLodgeMilton (2006) Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 755–769.
35.
TeixeiraConceição PTsatsanisEmmanouilBelchiorAna M (2013) Diffuse and Specific Regime Support in Times of Crisis: Voters’ assessments of democracy in Portugal before and after the bailout (2008–2012). South European Society and Politics19(4): 501–518.
36.
TilleyJamesGarryJohnBoldTessa (2008) Perceptions and Reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research47(5): 665–686.
37.
TilleyJamesHoboltSara B (2011) Is the Government to Blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility. The Journal of Politics73(2): 1–15.
38.
ThomsonRobert (2011) Citizens’ Evaluations of the Fulfilment of Election Pledges: Evidence from Ireland. The Journal of Politics73(1): 187–201.
39.
ThomsonRobertRoyedTerryNaurinElin (2012) The Program-to-Policy Linkage: A comparative study of election pledges and government policies in ten countries. APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at: SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2106482.
40.
ZallerJohn R (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
