Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Striking While the Iron Is Hot: Exploring the Impact of Issue Ownership and Issue Salience on Donations to Political Organizations in the 2020 US Presidential Election
This study integrates the perspectives of issue niche theory and issue ownership theory to examine how variations in issue salience affect the resources available to political organizations affiliated with different parties. Analyzing a database with millions of donors’ political donation records, our time series analysis reveals a nuanced interplay: When some issues associated with Democrats assume the spotlight, there is a discernible increase in left-leaning donations. Simultaneously, when other Democrats issue raises to prominence, there is a notable suppression of right-leaning contributions. These findings underline the persuasive force of issue ownership for each party, which either bolsters fundraising for affiliated political organizations or obstructs donations to opposing groups. Furthermore, we observe that competence-related issues, such as COVID-19 and the economy and inflation, exert a substantial influence on political contributions among both left- and right-leaning donors. Notably, competence issues demonstrate a more pronounced influence on donor behavior compared to associative issues. Overall, our study suggests a refined issue niche theory tailored to the political context, where issue niches are shaped not only by issue salience but also by the precise issue ownership type.
AalbergT.JenssenA. T.2007. “Do television debates in multiparty systems affect viewers? A quasi-experimental study with first-time voters.” Scandinavian Political Studies30(1):115–35.
AnsolabehereS.IyengarS.1994. “Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership Over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns.”Public Opinion Quarterly58(3):335–57.
4.
ArbourB.2014. “Issue Frame Ownership: The Partisan Roots of Campaign Rhetoric.”Political Communication31(4):604–27.
5.
AndrewsK. T.EdwardsB.2004. “Advocacy Organizations in the US Political Process.” Annual Review of Sociology30:479–506.
6.
BartleyT.2007. “How Foundations Shape Social Movements: The Construction of an Organizational Field and the Rise of Forest Certification.”Social Problems54(3):229–55.
BudgeI.FarlieD. J.1983. Explaining and Predicting Elections. London: Allen & Unwin.
9.
CliffordS.2014. “Linking Issue Stances and Trait Inferences: A Theory of Moral Exemplification.” The Journal of Politics76(3):698–710.
10.
ColeH. J.HawthorneJ.2013. “Issue Ownership Trends and Tensions in 2008: Obama, the Transformative Democrat?” Argumentation and Advocacy50(2):72–88.
11.
DahlbergS.MartinssonJ.2015. “Changing Issue Ownership Through Policy Communication.” West European Politics38(4):817–38.
12.
DawoodY.2015. “Campaign Finance and American Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science18:329–48.
13.
EllisW. C.RipbergerJ. T.SwearingenC.2017. “Public Attention and Head-to-Head Campaign Fundraising: An Examination of Us Senate Elections.”American Review of Politics36(1):30–53.
14.
EganP. J.2013. Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FarzaneganM. R.ZamaniR.2022. “The Effect of Corruption on Internal Conflict in Iran Using Newspaper Coverage.” Defence and Peace Economics35(1):24–43.
16.
FraussenB.HalpinD. R.2018. “Political Parties and Interest Organizations at the Crossroads: Perspectives on the Transformation of Political Organizations.” Political Studies Review16(1):25–37.
17.
GilensM.2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
GilmoreJ.RowlingC. M.2019. “Partisan Patriotism in the American Presidency: American Exceptionalism, Issue Ownership, and the Age of Trump.” Mass Communication and Society22(3):389–416.
HayesD.2008. “Party Reputations, Journalistic Expectations: How Issue Ownership Influences Election News.” Political Communication25(4):377–400.
21.
HansenM. A.DolanK.2020. “Voter Sex, Party, and Gender-Salient Issues: Attitudes About Sexual Harassment and Brett Kavanaugh in the 2018 Elections.” American Politics Research48(5):532–42.
22.
Hatemi-JA.2014. “Asymmetric Generalized Impulse Responses with an Application in Finance.” Economic Modelling36:18–22.
23.
HillS. J.2022. “A Theory of Intensity, Electoral Competition, and Costly Political Action.” The Journal of Politics84(1):291–303.
24.
IyengarS.KinderD.1987. News that Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
KiousisS.StrömbäckJ.McDevittM.2015. “Influence of Issue Decision Salience on Vote Choice: Linking Agenda Setting, Priming, and Issue Ownership.” International Journal of Communication9(1):3347–68.
26.
KleinnijenhuisJ.WalterA. S.2014. “News, Discussion, and Associative Issue Ownership: Instability at the Micro Level Versus Stability at the Macro Level.” International Journal of Press/Politics19(2):226–45.
27.
LachatR.2014. “Issue Ownership and the Vote: The Effects of Associative and Competence Ownership on Issue Voting.” Swiss Political Science Review20:727–40.
28.
LiY.ShinJ.SunJ.KimH. M.QuY.YangA.2021. Organizational Sensemaking in Tough Times: The Ecology of NGOs’ COVID-19 Issue Discourse Communities on Social Media.”Computers in Human Behavior122:106838.
29.
LimD. J.KimM. S.2022. “Measuring Dynamic Efficiency with Variable Time Lag Effects.” Omega: International Journal of Management Science108:102578.
30.
LimJ. S.YoungC.2021. “Effects of Issue Ownership, Perceived Fit, and Authenticity in Corporate Social Advocacy on Corporate Reputation.”Public Relations Review47(4):102071.
31.
LiuZ.Van de WalleS.2023. “A Comparative Analysis of Resource Networks of Intermediary Support Organizations for Nonprofit Development: Evidence from Incubators for Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership34(2):371–91.
32.
LuoP.NgaiE. W.LiY.TianX.2022. “Effects of Visit Behavior on Online Store Sales Performance: Personal Computer (PC) Versus Mobile Channels.” Internet Research32(3):728–67.
33.
MarquisL.TreschA.2022. “The Accessibility and Electoral Consequences of Issue Competence Perceptions: Evidence from the Swiss 2019 Election.” Swiss Political Science Review28(2):254–76.
PachecoD. F.YorkJ. G.HargraveT. J.2014. “The Coevolution of Industries, Social Movements, and Institutions: Wind Power in the United States.” Organization Science25(6):1609–32.
36.
PetrocikJ. R. 1989. “The Theory of Issue Ownership: Issues, Agendas, and Electoral Coalitions in the 1988 Elections.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia, August31–September3.
37.
PetrocikJ. R.1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science40:825–50.
38.
PetrocikJ. R.BenoitW. L.HansenG. J.2003. “Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000.” Political Science Quarterly118:599–626.
ScheufeleD. A.TewksburyD.2007. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication57(1):9–20.
41.
SommerfeldtE. J.SafferA. J.Luoma-AhoV.2022. “Civil Society Networks and Malaysian Government Reform: Considering Issue Homophily in Interorganizational Relationships.” Journal of Communication72(2):264–96.
42.
ThesenG.Green-PedersenC.MortensenP. B.2017. “Priming, Issue Ownership, and Party Support: The Electoral Gains of an Issue-Friendly Media Agenda.” Political Communication34(2):282–301.
43.
TreschA.FeddersenA.2019. “The (in) Stability of Voters’ Perceptions of Competence and Associative Issue Ownership: The Role of Media Campaign Coverage.” Political Communication36(3):394–411.
44.
TsaiJ. Y.YuanS.ComanI. A.2023. “Theorizing Issue-Driven Public Attention and Expectations in Audience Responses to Corporate Sociopolitical Activism: A Mixed-Method Analysis.” Public Relations Review49(4):102353.
45.
VliegenthartR.DamstraA.2019. “Parliamentary Questions, Newspaper Coverage, and Consumer Confidence in Times of Crisis: A Cross-National Comparison.” Political Communication36(1):17–35.
46.
VliegenthartR.LefevereJ.2018. “Disentangling the Direction of Causality Between Competence Issue Ownership and Party Preference.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research30(4):663–74.
47.
WalgraveS.LefevereJ.TreschA.2012. “The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership.” Public Opinion Quarterly76(4):771–82.
48.
WalgraveS.TreschA.LefevereJ.2015. “The Conceptualization and Measurement of Issue Ownership.” West European Politics38(4):778–96.
49.
WrightJ. M.CliffordS.SimasE. N.2022. “The Limits of Issue Ownership in a Polarized Era.” American Politics Research50(5):694–706.
50.
XuY.FulkJ.MongeP.2021. “Ecological Influences on Network Tie Dissolution in the Evolution of Affiliation Networks in the International Communication Association, 2009–2015.” Human Communication Research47(1):75–103.
51.
YangA.2020. “An Issue Niche Theory of NGOs’ Interorganizational Network Ecology.” Communication Theory30(1):41–63.
52.
ZhenL.YanB.TangJ. L.NanY.YangA.2023. “Social Network Dynamics, Bots, and Community-Based Online Misinformation Spread: Lessons from Anti-Refugee and COVID-19 Misinformation Cases.” The Information Society39(1):17–34.
