This article analyzes for the first time the fulfillment of election pledges at the regional level using data from Quebec. We theorize that pledge fulfillment by regional governments is subject to adverse effects that do not normally operate at the national level. In line with expectations, we find that regional parties in Quebec fulfill smaller percentages of campaign pledges than their federal counterparts. We identify two main causal explanations for this. The sharing of resources (jurisdictions, power, and money) with the federal government prevents provincial parties from fulfilling some pledges, and it creates jurisdictional rivalries with the federal government that lead regional parties, nationalist parties in particular, to over-pledge. In conclusion, we argue that the results from Quebec can be generalized to other regional governments.
AragonésEPostlewaiteAPalfreyF (2007) Political reputations and campaign promises. Journal of the European Economic Association5(4): 846–884.
2.
ArtésJ (2013) Do Spanish politicians keep their promises?Party Politics19(1): 143–158.
3.
ArtésJBustosA (2008) Electoral promises and minority governments. European Journal of Political Research47(3): 307–333.
4.
BantingKG (2008) The three federalisms: social policy and intergovernmental decision-making. In: BakvisHSkogstadG (eds) Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–160.
5.
BeckNKatzJNTuckerR (1998) Taking time seriously: time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science42(4): 1260–1288.
6.
BélandDLecoursA (2005) Nationalism and social policy in Canada and Québec. In: McEwenNMorenoL (eds) The Territorial Politics of Welfare. London: Routledge, pp. 189–206.
7.
BélangerEBastienFGélineauF (eds) (2013) Les Québécois Aux Urnes: Les Partis, Les Médias Et Les Citoyens En Campagne[in French]. Canada: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal
8.
CameronDSimeonR (2002) Intergovernmental relations in Canada: the emergence of collaborative federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism32(2): 49–72.
9.
CostelloRThomsonR (2008) Election pledges and their enactment in coalition governments: a comparative analysis of Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Policy18: 239–256.
10.
CarterDSignorinoC (2010) Back to the future: modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis18(3): 271–292.
11.
DavisMLFerrantinoM (1996) Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: Why do politicians lie?Public Choice88(1): 1–13.
12.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
13.
DuvalDPétryF (2018) Time and the fulfillment of election pledges. Political Studies67(1): 207–223.
14.
EllingRC (1979) State party platforms and state legislative performance: a comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science23(2): 383–405.
15.
FlynnG (2011) Rethinking policy capacity in Canada: the role of parties and election platforms in government policy-making. Canadian Public Administration54(2): 235–253.
16.
GodboutJFHøylandB (2011) Legislative voting in the Canadian Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science44(2): 367–388.
17.
HåkanssonNNaurinE (2016) Promising ever more: an empirical account of Swedish parties’ pledge making during 20 years. Party Politics22(3): 393–404.
18.
ImbeauLMPétryF (eds) (2004) Politics, Institutions, and Fiscal Policy: Deficits and Surpluses in Federated States. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
19.
KlingemannHDHofferbertRIBudgeI, et al. (1994) Parties, Policies and Democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.
20.
KneeboneRDMcKenzieKJ (2001) Electoral and partisan cycles in fiscal policy: an examination of Canadian provinces. International Tax and Public Finance8(5–6): 753–774.
21.
KostadinovaP (2013) Democratic performance in post-communist Bulgaria: election pledges and levels of fulfillment, 1997-2005. East European Politics29(2): 190–207.
22.
ManserghLThomsonR (2007) Election pledges, party competition, and policymaking. Comparative Politics39(3): 311–329.
23.
McGarryJO’LearyBSimeonR (2008) Integration or accommodation? The enduring debate in conflict regulation. In: ChoudhryS (ed) Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41–88.
24.
McRobertsK (2000) Quebec: Province, Nation, or Distinct Society. Canadian Politics in the 21st Century. Toronto: Nelson Thomson Learning.
25.
MontignyÉGélineauFPétryF (2013) La Boussole électorale québécoise. In: BastienFBélangerEGélineauF (eds) Les Québécois aux urnes: les Partis, les Médias et les Citoyens en Campagne. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal, pp. 281–294[in French].
26.
MouryC (2011) Italian coalitions and electoral promises: assessing the democratic performance of the Prodi I and Berlusconi II governments. Modern Italy16(1): 35–50.
27.
MouryCFernandesJM (2016) Minority governments and pledge fulfillment: evidence from Portugal. Government and Opposition53: 1–21.
28.
NaurinE (2011) Election Promises, Party Behaviour and Voter Perceptions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
NaurinE (2014) Is a promise a promise? Election pledge fulfillment in comparative perspective using Sweden as an example. West European Politics37(5): 1046–1064.
PétryF (2004) Deficits and surpluses in federated states: a pooled analysis. In: ImbeauLMPétryF (eds) Politics, Institutions, and Fiscal Policy: Deficits and Surpluses in Federated States. Lanham: Lexington, pp. 203–224.
34.
PétryF (2013) Le positionnement des partis dans l’espace politique québécois. In: BastienFBélangerEGélineauF (eds) Les Québécois aux urnes: Les Partis, les Médias et les Citoyens en Campagne. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal, pp. 59–72[in French].
35.
PétryFColletteF (2009) Measuring how political parties keep their promises: a positive perspective from political science. In: ImbeauLM (ed) Do They Walk Like They Talk? Speech and Action in Policy Processes. New York/Berlin: Springer, pp. 65–82.
36.
PétryFDuvalD (Forthcoming) Electoral promises and single party governments: the role of party ideology and budget balance in pledge fulfillment. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique. Forthcoming
37.
PraprotnikK (2017) Jurisdiction, time, and money: the role of resources in pledge fulfillment. Party Politics23(6): 848–859.
38.
RoyedTJ (1996) Testing the mandate model in Britain and the United States: evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras. British Journal of Political Science26: 45–80.
39.
SmileyDVWattsRL (1985) Intrastate Federalism in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
40.
StrømK (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
TellierG (2006) Public expenditures in Canadian provinces: an empirical study of politico-economic interactions. Public Choice126(3): 367–385.
42.
ThomsonR (2001) The program to policy linkage: the fulfillment of election pledges on socio-economic policy in the Netherlands, 1986-1998. European Journal of Political Research40: 171–197.
43.
ThomsonRRoyedTNaurinE, et al. (2017) The fulfillment of parties’ election pledges: a comparative study of the impact of power sharing. American Journal of Political Science61(3): 527–542.
44.
TorosE (2015) Piecrust promises: an analysis of the Turkish political parties’ electoral pledges. Turkish Studies16(2): 240–252.
45.
ToubeauS (2011) Regional nationalist parties and constitutional change in parliamentary democracies: a framework for analysis. Regional & Federal Studies21(4–5): 427–446.
46.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
