Different research traditions have long held that parental beliefs motivate children’s performance. However, regarding meritocratic beliefs, sociologists often argue that meritocratic narratives legitimize and make sense of societal inequalities as justly deserved. Using the case of China, I tested these competing hypotheses of the relationship between parental meritocratic beliefs and children’s educational achievement. Parental beliefs about skills and hard work as predictors of higher grades were used. I analyzed data from the first and second waves of the China Educational Panel Survey. Autoregressive cross-lagged structural models indicated that parental meritocratic beliefs do not affect children’s educational performance but, rather, meritocratic beliefs are affected by academic results, suggesting their justificatory role. This pattern is much sharper in rural China, where traditional Chinese culture is preserved. The implications of meritocratic beliefs for a broader discussion of citizens’ beliefs about social inequalities and stratification are discussed.
BanduraAlbert. 1997. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BanduraAlbertBarbaranelliClaudioCapraraGian VittorioPastorelliConcetta. 2001. “Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children’s Aspirations and Career Trajectories.”Child Development72(1):187–206.
5.
BourdieuPierre. 1979. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BreenRichardKarlsonKristian BerntHolmAnders. 2018. “Interpreting and Understanding Logits, Probits, and Other Nonlinear Probability Models.”Annual Review of Sociology44(1):39–54.
7.
BuccaMauricio. 2016. “Merit and Blame in Unequal Societies: Explaining Latin Americans’ Beliefs about Wealth and Poverty.”Research in Social Stratification and Mobility44:98–112.
8.
CastilloJuan Carlos. 2011. “Legitimacy of Inequality in a Highly Unequal Context: Evidence from the Chilean Case.”Social Justice Research24(4):314–40.
9.
ChenChuanshengStevensonHarold W.1995. “Motivation and Mathematics Achievement: A Comparative Study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian High School Students.”Child Development66(4):1215–34.
10.
ChenJacqueline ChenTamTonyChiangYen Sheng. 2019. “The Rise of Merit-Based Inequality Acceptance after Exposure to Competition: Experimental Evidence among Chinese University Students.”Social Indicators Research144(2):707–28.
11.
ChenXiaChiChiu Yue. 2010. “Rural-Urban Differences in Generation of Chinese and Western Exemplary Persons: The Case of China.”Asian Journal of Social Psychology13(1):9–18.
12.
CreelHerrlee Glessner. 1953. Chinese Thought, from Confucius to Mao Tsê-Tung. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
DeciEdward L.KoestnerRichardRyanRichard M.2001. “Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again.”Review of Educational Research71(1):1–27.
14.
DiMaggioPaul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.”Annual Review of Sociology23(1):263–87.
15.
FryeMargaret. 2012. “Bright Futures in Malawi’s New Dawn: Educational Aspirations as Assertions of Identity.”American Journal of Sociology117(6):1565–1624.
16.
GlasgowKristan L.DornbuschSanford M.TroyerLisaSteinbergLaurenceRitterPhilip L.1997. “Parenting Styles, Adolescents’ Attributions, and Educational Outcomes in Nine Heterogeneous High Schools.”Child Development68(3):507–29.
17.
GreenbergJeffPyszczynskiTomSolomonSheldon. 1982. “The Self-Serving Attributional Bias: Beyond Self-Presentation.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology18(1):56–67.
18.
HannumEmilyIshidaHiroshiParkHyunjoonTamTony. 2019. “Education in East Asian Societies: Postwar Expansion and the Evolution of Inequality.”Annual Review of Sociology45(1):625–47.
19.
HarackiewiczJudith M.ManderlinkGeorgeSansoneCarol. 1984. “Rewarding Pinball Wizardry: Effects of Evaluation and Cue Value on Intrinsic Interest.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology47(2):287–300.
20.
HeisermanNicholasSimpsonBrent. 2017. “Higher Inequality Increases the Gap in the Perceived Merit of the Rich and Poor.”Social Psychology Quarterly80(3):243–53.
21.
HerrnsteinRichard J.MurrayCharles A.1996. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
22.
HsiehF. Y.1989. “Sample Size Tables for Logistic Regression.” Statistics in Medicine 8(7):795–802.
23.
HsinAmyXieYu. 2014. “Explaining Asian Americans’ Academic Advantage over Whites.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America111(23):8416–21.
24.
HuijsmansTwanNivetteAmy E.EisnerManuelRibeaudDenis. 2019. “Social Influences, Peer Delinquency, and Low Self-Control: An Examination of Time-Varying and Reciprocal Effects on Delinquency over Adolescence.”European Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819838720.
25.
HuntMatthew O.2007. “African American, Hispanic, and White Beliefs about Black/White Inequality, 1977-2004.”American Sociological Review72(3):390–415.
26.
KhanShamus Rahman. 2011. Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
KileyKevinVaiseyStephen. 2020. “Measuring Stability and Change in Personal Culture Using Panel Data.”American Sociological Review85(3):477–506.
28.
KinlawC. RyanKurtz-CostesBethGoldman-FraserJenifer. 2001. “Mothers’ Achievement Beliefs and Behaviors and Their Children’s School Readiness: A Cultural Comparison.”Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology22(5):493–506.
29.
KlineRex B.2012. “Assumptions in Structural Equation Modeling.” Pp. 111–25 in Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, edited by HoyleR.New York: Guilford Press.
30.
KreidlMartin. 2000. “Perceptions of Poverty and Wealth in Western and Post-Communist Countries.”Social Justice Research13(2):151–76.
31.
KunovichSheriSlomczynskiKazimierz M.2007. “Systems of Distribution and a Sense of Equity: A Multilevel Analysis of Meritocratic Attitudes in Post-Industrial Societies.”European Sociological Review23(5):649–63.
32.
LamontMichèle. 2019. “From ‘Having’ to ‘Being’: Self-Worth and the Current Crisis of American Society.”British Journal of Sociology70(3):660–707.
33.
LeeJenniferZhouMin. 2015. The Asian American Achievement Paradox. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
34.
LeeWing.1999. “The Cultural Context for Chinese Learners: Conceptions of Learning in the Confucian Tradition.” Pp. 25–41 in The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological and Contextual Influences, edited by WatkinsD.BiggsJ.Hong Kong and Melbourne: Comparative Education Research Centre and Australian Council for Educational Research.
35.
LeiYa-Wen. 2020. “Revisiting China’s Social Volcano: Attitudes toward Inequality and Political Trust in China.”Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World6:1–21.
36.
LiFanLoyalkaPrashantYiHongmeiShiYaojiangJohnsonNatalieRozelleScott. 2018. “Ability Tracking and Social Trust in China’s Rural Secondary School System.”School Effectiveness and School Improvement29(4):545–72.
37.
LimVivien. 2003. “Money Matters: An Empirical Investigation of Money, Face and Confucian Work Ethic.”Personality and Individual Differences35(4):953–70.
38.
LiuAiranXieYu. 2016. “Why Do Asian Americans Academically Outperform Whites? The Cultural Explanation Revisited.”Social Science Research58:210–26.
39.
LizardoOmar. 2017. “Improving Cultural Analysis: Considering Personal Culture in Its Declarative and Nondeclarative Modes.”American Sociological Review82(1):88–115.
40.
LizardoOmarMowryRobertSepulvadoBrandonStoltzDustin S.TaylorMarshall A.Van NessJustinWoodMichael. 2016. “What Are Dual Process Models? Implications for Cultural Analysis in Sociology.”Sociological Theory34(4):287–310.
41.
LuYaoTreimanDonald J.2008. “The Effect of Sibship Size on Educational Attainment in China: Period Variations.”American Sociological Review73(5):813–34.
42.
MachamerPeterDardenLindleyCraverCarl F.2000. “Thinking about Mechanisms.”Philosophy of Science67(1):1–25.
43.
MägiKatrinLerkkanenMarja-KristiinaPoikkeusAnna-MaijaRasku-PuttonenHelenaNurmiJari-Erik. 2011. “The Cross-Lagged Relations between Children’s Academic Skill Development, Task-Avoidance, and Parental Beliefs about Success.”Learning and Instruction21(5):664–75.
44.
MartinJohn LeviDesmondMatthew. 2010. “Political Position and Social Knowledge.”Sociological Forum25(1):1–26.
45.
McCallLeslie. 2013. The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
MijsJonathan. 2016a. “Stratified Failure: Educational Stratification and Students’ Attributions of Their Mathematics Performance in 24 Countries.”Sociology of Education89(2):137–53.
47.
MijsJonathan. 2016b. “The Unfulfillable Promise of Meritocracy: Three Lessons and Their Implications for Justice in Education.”Social Justice Research29(1):14–34.
48.
MijsJonathan. 2019. “The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy Go Hand in Hand.”Socio-Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051.
49.
MolinaMarioBuccaMauricioMacyMichael. 2019. “It’s Not Just How the Game Is Played, It’s Whether You Win or Lose.”Science Advances5(7).
50.
MoodC.2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do about It.”European Sociological Review26(1):67–82.
51.
OgbuJohn U.2003. Black American Students in an Affluent Suburb: A Study of Academic Disengagement. New York: Routledge.
52.
OrtnerSherry. 2006. Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
53.
PengYinni. 2019. “Getting Rural Migrant Children into School in South China: Migrant Agency and Parenting.”Asian Population Studies15(2):172–89.
54.
PerryRaymond P.StupniskyRobert H.HallNathan C.ChipperfieldJudith G.WeinerBernard. 2010. “Bad Starts and Better Finishes: Attributional Retraining and Initial Performance in Competitive Achievement Settings.”Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology29(6):668–700.
55.
PulfreyCarolineDarnonCélineButeraFabrizio. 2013. “Autonomy and Task Performance: Explaining the Impact of Grades on Intrinsic Motivation.”Journal of Educational Psychology105(1):39–57.
56.
Rodriguez-LaraIsmaelMoreno-GarridoLuis. 2012. “Self-Interest and Fairness: Self-Serving Choices of Justice Principles.”Experimental Economics15(1):158–75.
57.
SaundersPeter. 1995. “Might Britain Be a Meritocracy?”Sociology29(1):23–41.
58.
SchumanHowardWalshEdwardOlsonCamilleEtheridgeBarbara. 1985. “Effort and Reward: The Assumption That College Grades Are Affected by Quantity of Study.”Social Forces63(4):945–66.
59.
SigelIrving E.LisiAnn McGillicuddy-De. 2002. “Parent Beliefs Are Cognitions: The Dynamic Belief Systems Model.” Pp. 485–508 in Handbook of Parenting: Being and Becoming a Parent, edited by BornsteinM.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
StevensonHarold W.LeeShin YingStiglerJames W.1986. “Mathematics Achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American Children.”Science231(4739):693–99.
61.
SwidlerAnn. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.”American Sociological Review51(2):273.
62.
SwidlerAnn. 2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
TreimanDonald J.1970. “Industrialization and Social Stratification.” Pp. 207–34 in Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970s, edited by LaumannE.Indianapolis: BobbsMerrill.
64.
UbedaPaloma. 2014. “The Consistency of Fairness Rules: An Experimental Study.”Journal of Economic Psychology41:88–100.
65.
VaiseyStephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.”American Journal of Sociology114(6):1675–1715.
66.
VaiseyStephen. 2010. “What People Want: Rethinking Poverty, Culture, and Educational Attainment.”ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science629(1):75–101.
67.
VaiseyStephenLizardoOmar. 2010. “Can Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition?”Social Forces88(4):1595–1618.
68.
VaiseyStephenLizardoOmar. 2016. “Cultural Fragmentation or Acquired Dispositions? A New Approach to Accounting for Patterns of Cultural Change.”Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World2.
69.
VaiseyStephenValentinoLauren. 2018. “Culture and Choice: Toward Integrating Cultural Sociology with the Judgment and Decision-Making Sciences.”Poetics68:131–43.
70.
Van OverwalleFrankMetsenaereMachteld De. 1990. “The Effects of Attribution-Based Intervention and Study Strategy Training on Academic Achievement in College Freshmen.”British Journal of Educational Psychology60(3):299–311.
71.
VerniersCatherineMartinotDelphineDompnierBenoît. 2016. “The Feminization of School Hypothesis Called into Question among Junior and High School Students.”British Journal of Educational Psychology86(3):369–81.
72.
WeberMarx. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73.
WeinerBernard. 1989. Human Motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
WeiningerElliot B.LareauAnnetteConleyDalton. 2015. “What Money Doesn’t Buy: Class Resources and Children’s Participation in Organized Extracurricular Activities.”Social Forces94(2):479–503.
75.
WigfieldAllanEcclesJacquelynneSchiefeleUlrichRoeserRobertDavis-KeanPamela. 2006. “Development of Achievement Motivation.” Pp. 933–1002 in Handbook of Child Psychology: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, edited by DamonW.LernerR. M.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
76.
WilliamsRichard. 2009. “Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients across Groups.”Sociological Methods & Research37(4):531–59.
77.
WinshipChristopherMareRobert D.1984. “Regression Models with Ordinal Variables.”American Sociological Review49(4):512.
78.
WuJinting. 2017. Fabricating an Educational Miracle: Compulsory Schooling Meets Ethnic Rural Development in Southwest China. New York: State University of New York Press.
79.
WuXiaogang. 2019. “Inequality and Social Stratification in Postsocialist China.”Annual Review of Sociology45(1):363–82.
80.
XianHeReynoldsJeremy. 2017. “Bootstraps, Buddies, and Bribes: Perceived Meritocracy in the United States and China.”Sociological Quarterly58(4):622–47.
81.
XiaoHongLiChenyang. 2013. “China’s Meritocratic Examinations and the Ideal of Virtuous Talents.” Pp. 340–62 in The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by BellD.LiC.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82.
XieYu. 2016. “Understanding Inequality in China.”Chinese Journal of Sociology2(3):327–47.
83.
XieYuZhouXiang. 2014. “Income Inequality in Today’s China.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America111(19):6928–33.
84.
YangChung FangChiuChi YueChanKin ManKingAmbroseCheungTak SingChanHoi Man. 2006. “How Confucian Are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and Its Application to Three Chinese Communities.”European Journal of East Asian Studies5(2):157–80.
85.
YeHua. 2015. “Key-Point Schools and Entry into Tertiary Education in China.”Chinese Sociological Review47(2):128–53.
86.
YoungMichael Dunlop. 1958. The Rise of the Meritocracy. New York: Transaction.
ZhouXiangXieYu. 2019. “Market Transition, Industrialization, and Social Mobility Trends in Postrevolution China.”American Journal of Sociology124(6):1810–47.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
