In this paper we examine how the use of space shapes the dynamic between openness and closure in open strategizing. To do this, we draw from research that has defined organizational space as a process that is both a social product and produces social relations. We analysed the use of space in open strategizing in the Danish TV series and political drama Borgen. In our analysis we focused on three building blocks of space: boundaries, distance and movement, that allowed us to elaborate how the dynamic between openness and closure is shaped. Drawing on our analysis, we revealed three spatial features – physical visibility, strategizing artefacts, discursive designation – that play a role in the dynamic between openness and closure in strategizing. We constructed a conceptual framework that shows how these spatial features, and their different combinations, are associated with pivots between openness and closure. Thus, our findings advance prior open strategy research by providing potential explanations of why openness turns to closure, despite the attempts to keep the strategizing process open. We argue that taking space seriously provides a more nuanced understanding to some of the contingencies and possibilities related to the dynamics of openness and closure in strategizing.
ArmbrüsterThomasGebertDiether (2002). Uncharted territories of organizational research: The case of Karl Popper’s Open Society and its enemies. Organization Studies, 23, 169–188.
2.
BaptistaJoãoWilsonAlexander D.GalliersRobert D.BynghallSteve (2017). Social media and the emergence of reflexiveness as a new capability for open strategy. Long Range Planning, 50, 322–336.
3.
BellEmma (2008). Reading management and organization in film. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
BeyesTimonSteyaertChris (2012). Spacing organization. Non-representational theorizing and the spatial turn in organization research. Organization, 19, 45–61.
6.
BuchananDavid A.HällgrenMarkus (2018). Surviving a zombie apocalypse: Leadership configurations in extreme contexts. Management Learning, 50, 152–170.
7.
ChesbroughHenry (2003). Open platform innovation: Creating value from internal and external innovation. Intel Technology Journal, 7, 5–9.
8.
ChiaRobertHoltRobin (2006). Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies, 27, 635–655.
9.
ConcannonMargaretNordbergDonald (2018). Boards strategizing in liminal spaces: Process and practice, formal and informal. European Management Journal, 36, 71–82.
10.
DaleKaren (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12, 649–678.
11.
DaleKarenBurrellGibson (2008). The spaces of organization and the organization of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
de VaujanyFrançois-Xavier (2019). Legitimation process in organizations and organizing: An ontological discussion. In de VaujanyFrançois-XavierAdrotAnouckBoxenbaumEvaLecaBernard (Eds.), Materiality in institutions: Spaces, embodiment and technology in management and organization (pp. 343–377). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
DobuschLauraDobuschLeonhardMüller-SeitzGordon (2019). Closing for the benefit of openness? The case of Wikimedia’s open strategy process. Organization Studies, 40, 343–370.
14.
EcoUmberto (1981). The role of the reader in the semiotics of text. London: Hutchinson.
15.
FarajSamervon KroghGeorgMonteiroEricLakhaniKarim R. (2016). Special section introduction—Online community as space for knowledge flows. Information Systems Research, 27, 668–684.
16.
FayardAnne-LaureWeeksJohn (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28, 605–634.
17.
GegenhuberThomasDobuschLeonhard (2017). Making an impression through openness: How open strategy-making practices change in the evolution of new ventures. Long Range Planning, 50, 337–354.
18.
GylfePhilipFranckHenrikaLeBaronCurtisMantereSaku (2016). Video methods in strategy research: Focusing on embodied cognition. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 133–148.
19.
HautzJuliaSeidlDavidWhittingtonRichard (2017). Open Strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50, 298–309.
20.
HealeyMark P.HodgkinsonGerard P.WhittingtonRichardJohnsonGerry (2015). Off to plan or out to lunch? Relationships between design characteristics and outcomes of strategy workshops. British Journal of Management, 26, 507–528.
21.
HendryJohnSeidlDavid (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 175–196.
22.
HirschPaul M.LevinDaniel Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10, 199–212.
23.
HodgkinsonGerard P.WrightGeorge (2002). Confronting strategic inertia in a top management team: Learning from failure. Organization Studies, 23, 949–977.
24.
HodgkinsonGerard P.WhittingtonRichardJohnsonGerrySchwarzMirela (2006). The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: Formality, communication, coordination and inclusion. Long Range Planning, 39, 479–496.
25.
HoltRobinZundelMike (2014). Understanding management, trade, and society through fiction: Lessons fromThe Wire. Academy of Management Review, 39, 576–585.
26.
HutterKatjaNketiaBright A.FüllerJohann (2017). Falling short with participation. Different effects of ideation, commenting, and evaluating behavior on Open Strategizing. Long Range Planning, 50, 355–370.
27.
HydleKatja M. (2015). Temporal and spatial dimensions of strategizing. Organization Studies, 36, 643–663.
28.
JarzabkowskiPaulaBurkeGarySpeePaul A. (2015). Constructing spaces for strategic work: A multimodal perspective. British Journal of Management, 26, S26–S47.
29.
JarzabkowskiPaulaSeidlDavid (2008). The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29, 1391–1426.
30.
JarzabkowskiPaulaSpeePaul A.SmetsMichael (2013). Material artefacts: Practices for doing strategy with ‘stuff’. European Management Journal, 31, 41–54.
31.
JohnsonGerryPrashanthamShameemFloydSteven W.BourqueNicole (2010). The ritualization of strategy workshops. Organization Studies, 31, 1589–1618.
32.
KaplanSarah (2011). Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science, 22, 320–346.
33.
KornbergerMartinCleggStewart R. (2004). Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organization Studies, 25, 1095–1114
34.
KornbergerMartinMeyerRenate E.BrandtnerChristofHöllererMarkus A. (2017). When bureaucracy meets the crowd: Studying “open government” in the Vienna City Administration. Organization Studies, 38, 179–200.
35.
KüpersWendelinMantereSakuStatlerMatt (2013). Strategy as storytelling: A phenomenological exploration of embodied narrative practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22, 83–100.
36.
LangleyAnn (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
37.
LangleyAnnLindbergKaisaMørkBjørn E.NicoliniDavideRaviolaElenaWalterLars (2019). Boundary work among groups, occupations and organizations: From cartography to process. Academy of Management Annals, 13, 704–736.
38.
LêJaneSpeePaul (2015). The role of materiality in the practice of strategy. In GolsorkhiDamonRouleauLindaSeidlDavidVaaraEero (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 583–597). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
LefebvreHenri (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
40.
LuedickeMarius K.HusemannKatharina C.FurnariSantiLadstaetterFlorian (2017). Radically open strategizing: How the Premium Cola collective takes Open Strategy to the extreme. Long Range Planning, 50, 371–384.
41.
MackDaniel Z.SzulanskiGabriel (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning, 50, 385–396.
42.
MalhotraArvidMajchrzakAnnNiemiecRebecca M. (2017). Using public crowds for open strategy formulation: Mitigating the risks of knowledge gaps. Long Range Planning, 50, 397–410.
43.
MantereSakuVaaraEero (2008). On the problem of participation in strategy: A critical discursive perspective. Organization Science, 19, 341–358.
44.
MasseyDoreen (2005). For space. London: SAGE Publications.
45.
MountMatthew P.CleggStewart R.PitsisTyrone S. (2020). Conceptualizing the de-materializing characteristics of internal inclusion in crowdsourced open strategy. Long Range Planning, 53, 1–10.
46.
O’MahonySiobhánBechkyBeth A. (2008). Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 422–459.
47.
PanayiotouAlexisKafirisKrini (2011). Viewing the language of space: Organizational spaces, power, and resistance in popular films. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 264–284.
48.
PuranamPhanishAlexyOliverReitzigMarkus (2014). What’s “new” about new forms of organizing?Academy of Management Review, 39, 162–180.
49.
QuattronePaoloRonzaniMatteoJancsaryDennisHöllererMarkus A. (2021). Beyond the visible, the material and the performative: Shifting perspectives on the visual in organization studies. Organization Studies, 42, 1197–1218.
50.
QuickKathryn S.FeldmanMartha S. (2011). Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 272–290.
51.
RodnerVictoriaRouletThomas J.KerriganFinolavom LehnDirk (2020). Making space for art: A spatial perspective of disruptive and defensive institutional work in Venezuela’s art world. Academy of Management Journal, 63, 1054–1081.
SeidlDavidvon KroghGeorgWhittingtonRichard (Eds.) (2019). The Cambridge handbook of open strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
SeidlDavidWerleFelix (2018). Inter-organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta-problems: Requisite variety and dynamics of participation. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 830–858.
55.
SplitterViolettaJarzabkowskiPaulaSeidlDavid (2021). Middle managers’ struggle over their subject position in Open Strategy processes. Journal of Management Studies, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12776
56.
StephensonKathleenKuisminAriPutnamLindaSivunenAnu (2020). Process studies of organizational space. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 797–824.
57.
TaylorScottSpicerAndré (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 325–346.
58.
TkaczNathaniel (2012). From open source to open government: A critique of open politics. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 12, 386–405.
59.
VaaraEeroRantakariAnniinaHolsteinJeannie (2019). Participation research and open strategy. In SeidlDavidvon KroghGeorgWhittingtonRichard (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of open strategy (pp. 127–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
VaaraEeroTienariJanne (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 985–993.
61.
VaaraEeroTienariJanneLaurilaJuha (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27, 789–810.
62.
VesaMikkoVaaraEero (2014). Strategic ethnography 2.0: Four methods for advancing strategy process and practice research. Strategic Organization, 12, 288–298.
63.
von HippelEricvon KroghGeorg (2003). Open source software and the ‘private-collective’ innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14, 209–233.
64.
von KroghGeorgGeilingerNina (2019). Open innovation and open strategy: Epistemic and design dimensions. In SeidlDavidvon KroghGeorgWhittingtonRichard (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of open strategy (pp. 41–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
WeinfurtnerTaniaSeidlDavid (2019). Towards a spatial perspective: An integrative review of research on organizational space. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35, 1–30.
66.
WhittingtonRichardCailluetLodovicYakis-DouglasBasak (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22, 531–544.
67.
WhittingtonRichardYakis-DouglasBasak (2020). The Grand Challenges of corporate control: Opening strategy to the normative pressures of networked professionals. Organization Theory, 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720969697
68.
ZammutoRaymond F.GriffithTerri L.MajchrzakAnnDoughertyDeborah J.FarajSamer (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18, 749–762.
69.
ZundelMikeHoltRobinCornelissenJoep (2013). Institutional work in The Wire: An ethological investigation of flexibility in organizational adaptation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22, 102–120.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
