I contribute to the ‘political CSR’ debate on whether companies can or should fill public governance gaps by exploring how related business–government interactions may result in corporate social irresponsibility. I studied interactions between mining companies and the government in South Africa between 2002 and 2012, focusing on processes that contributed to the deterioration of living conditions in the Marikana area, site of an infamous massacre in 2012. The analysis resulted in a process model of dynamic de-responsibilization, in which business–government interactions progressively dissipate the adopted and enacted social responsibilities of both the government and business. This extends extant critiques of political CSR and elaborates CSiR as not only a systemic, but also a processual phenomenon, and it focuses related scholarly and practical attention on problematizing the government’s role as custodian of democratic accountability.
AguinisH.GlavasA. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968.
2.
AlbaredaL.LozanoJ.YsaT. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391-407.
3.
AlexanderP. (2013). Marikana, turning point in South African history. Review of African Political Economy, 40, 605–619.
ArmstrongJ. S. (1977). Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research, 5, 185–213.
6.
BanerjeeS. B. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34, 51–79.
7.
BanerjeeS. B. (2010). Governing the global corporation: A critical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 265–274.
8.
Benchmarks Foundation (2013). Coping with unsustainability: Policy gap 7. Johannesburg, South Africa: Benchmarks Foundation.
9.
BezuidenhoutA.BuhlunguS. (2011). From compounded to fragmented labour: Mineworkers and the demise of compounds in South Africa. Antipode, 43, 237–263.
10.
BinghamL. B.NabatchiT.O’LearyR. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65, 547–558.
11.
BörzelT. A.HamannR. (Eds.) (2013). Business contributions to climate change governance: South Africa in comparative perspective. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
BörzelT. A.RisseT. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work?Regulation & Governance, 4, 113–134.
13.
BundyC. (2016). Poverty in South Africa: Past and present. Johannesburg, South Africa: Jacana.
14.
CappsG.MnwanaS. (2015). Claims from below: Platinum and the politics of land in the Bakgatla-ba-Kgafela traditional authority area. Review of African Political Economy, 42, 606–624.
15.
ChamberlainL. (2015). Lonmin has broken law by dodging housing obligation. Business Day, 1July2015.
16.
ChangR.HeviaC.LoayzaN. (2018). Privatization and nationalization cycles. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 22, 331–361.
17.
ChildJ.TsaiT. (2005). The dynamic between firms’ environmental strategies and institutional constraints in emerging economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 95–125.
18.
ChingunoC. (2013). Marikana and the post-apartheid workplace order. Johannesburg: Sociology, Work and Development Unit.
19.
ChuaA. L. (1995). The privatization-nationalization cycle: The link between markets and ethnicity in developing countries. Columbia Law Review, 95, 223–303.
20.
City Press (2010). Who killed Councillor Phakoe?City Press, 24October2010.
21.
CraneA. (2011). From governance to governance: On blurring boundaries. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 17–19.
22.
den HondF.RehbeinK. A.BakkerF. G.LankveldH. K. V. (2014). Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, 51, 790–813.
23.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.) (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
24.
Department of Mineral Resources, Republic of South Africa (2009). Mining Charter impact report. Pretoria: Department of Mineral Resources.
25.
DjelicM. L.EtchanchuH. (2017). Contextualizing corporate political responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in historical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 142, 641–661.
26.
DjelicM. L.QuackS. (2007). Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems. Theory and Society, 36, 161–186.
27.
EdwardP.WilmottH. (2008). Corporate citizenship: Rise or demise of a myth?Academy of Management Review, 33, 771–774.
28.
FarlamI. G.HemdrajP. D.TokotaB. R. (2015). Marikana Commission of Inquiry: Report on Matters of Public, National, and International Concern Arising out of the Tragic Incidents at the Lonmin Mine in Marikana, in the North-West Province.
29.
FooksG.GilmoreA.CollinJ.HoldenC.LeeK. (2013). The limits of corporate social responsibility: Techniques of neutralization, stakeholder management and political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 283–299.
30.
FrynasJ. G.StephensS. (2015). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 483–509.
31.
GlaserB. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
32.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Publishing Company.
33.
GrayR.OwenD.MaundersK. (1988). Corporate social reporting: Emerging trends in accountability and the social contract. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1, 6–20.
34.
GreenwoodM. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315–327.
35.
HeathJ.NormanW. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era?Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 247–265.
36.
HussainW.MoriartyJ. (2018). Accountable to whom? Rethinking the role of corporations in Political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 519–534.
37.
IlungaY. (2011). Why and how do companies contribute to socioeconomic development and the provision of public goods and services in areas of limited statehood: The case of mining companies in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Unpublished Master’s research report, University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business.
38.
KourulaA.DelalieuxG. (2016). The micro-level foundations and dynamics of political corporate social responsibility: Hegemony and passive revolution through civil society. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 769–785.
39.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London: SAGE Publications.
40.
LangeD.WashburnN. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37, 300–326.
41.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
42.
LangleyA.SmallmanC.TsoukasH.VandeVenA. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1–13.
43.
LeibbrandtM.FinnA.WoolardI. (2012). Describing and decomposing post-apartheid income inequality in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 29, 19–34.
44.
LevyD.ReineckeJ.ManningS. (2016). The political dynamics of sustainable coffee: Contested value regimes and the transformation of sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 364–401.
45.
Lin-HiN.MüllerK. (2013). The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1928–1936.
46.
LockeK. (2011). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
47.
Lonmin (2013a). Lonmin Sustainable Development Summary Report2013.
48.
Lonmin (2013b). Response to the Bench Marks Foundation Policy Gap 7 Report – Lonmin Media Release, 31October2013.
49.
MäkinenJ.KasanenE. (2016). Boundaries between business and politics: A study on the division of moral labor. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 103–116.
50.
MäkinenJ.KourulaA. (2012). Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 649–678.
51.
MattenD.CraneA. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.
52.
MayntzR.ScharpfF.W. (Eds.) (1995). Gesellschaftliche Selbstregulierung und politische Steuerung. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
53.
McMahonT. F. (1999). From social irresponsibility to social responsiveness: The Chrysler/Kenosha plant closing. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 101–111.
54.
MenaS.RintamäkiJ.FlemingP.SpicerA. (2016). On the forgetting of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41, 720–738.
55.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
56.
MoonJ. (2002). The social responsibility of business and new governance. Government and Opposition, 37, 385–408.
57.
Office of the Auditor-General (2012). Report of the Auditor-General to the North-West Provincial Legislature and the Council of the Rustenburg Local Municipality, 2012. Pretoria, South Africa: Office of the Auditor-General.
58.
PalazzoG.SchererA. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 773–776.
59.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
PowellE. E.HamannR.BitzerV.BakerT. (2017). Bringing the elephant into the room? Enacting conflict in collective prosocial organizing. Journal of Business Venturing [online first].
61.
RisiD.WickertC. (2017). Reconsidering the ‘symmetry’ between institutionalization and professionalization: The case of corporate social responsibility managers. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 613–646.
62.
RisseT. (2011). Governance in areas of limited statehood: Introduction and overview. In RisseT. (Ed.), Governance without a state? Policies and politics in areas of limited statehood. New York: Columbia University Press.
63.
RowlinsonM.HassardJ.DeckerS. (2014). Research strategies for organizational history: A dialogue between historical theory and organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 39, 250–274.
64.
RuggieJ. G. (2014). Global governance and ‘new governance theory’: Lessons from business and human rights. Global Governance, 20, 5–17.
65.
Rustenburg Local Municipality (2015). Integrated Development Plan Review 2014–15. Rustenburg Local Municipality, South Africa.
66.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.
67.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899–931.
68.
SchererA. G.RascheA.PalazzoG.SpicerA. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 273–298.
69.
Schrempf-StirlingJ. (2018). State power: Rethinking the role of the state in political corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 1–14.
70.
StrikeV. M.GaoJ.BansalP. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 850–862.
71.
The Sowetan (2002). Editorial, 16August2002, p. 11.
72.
TinkerT.NeimarkM.LehmannC. (1991). Falling down the hole in the middle of the road: Political quietism in corporate social reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4, 28–54.
73.
VogelD. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business & Society, 49, 68–87.
74.
WhelanG. (2012). The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 709–737.
75.
WhelanG. (2018). Political CSR: The corporation as a political actor. In RascheA.MorsingM.MoonJ. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Strategy, communication, governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
WhitemanG.CooperW. H. (2016). Decoupling rape. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2, 115–154.
77.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
