This paper explores the methodological implications of non-representational approaches to organizational complexity. Representational theories focus on the syntactic complexity of systems, whereas organizing processes are predominantly characterized by semantic and pragmatic forms of complexity. After underlining the contribution of non-representational approaches to the study of organizations, the paper warns against the risk of confining the critique of representational frameworks to paradoxical dichotomies such as intuition versus reflexive thought, or theorizing versus experimenting. To counter this difficulty, we suggest the use of a triadic theory of interpretation, and more particularly the concepts of semiotic mediation, inquiry and dialogism. Semiotic mediation dynamically links situated experience and generic classes of meanings. Inquiry articulates logical thinking, narrative thinking and experimenting. Dialogism conceptualizes the production of meaning through the situated interactions of actors. A methodological approach based on these concepts, the ‘dialogical mediated inquiry’ (DMI), is proposed and tested with a case study about work safety in the construction industry. This interpretive view requires the researcher to complicate the inquiry process rather than the mirroring models of reality. In DMI, the inquiry process is complicated by establishing pluralist communities of inquiry in which different perspectives challenge each other. The paper ends with a discussion of the specific contribution of this approach compared with other qualitative methods, and its present limitations.
Adler, Paul S. ( 2005). The evolving object of software development. Organization12(3), 401-435.
2.
Adler, Paul S., Seok-Woo Kwon, & Heckscher, Charles (2008). Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science , 19(2), 359-376.
3.
Anderson, Philip ( 1999). Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science . Organization Science, 10 (special issue), 216-232.
4.
Ashby, William R. ( 1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London : Chapman & Hall.
5.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. ( 1978). Esthétique et théorie du roman. Paris: Gallimard.
6.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. ( 1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. M. Holquist (Ed.) . Austin: University of Texas Press, Slavic Series.
7.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. ( 1984). Problems of Dostoievsky’s poetics (theory & history of literature). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. ( 1986). The problem of the text in linguistics, philology, and the human sciences: An experiment in philosophical analysis. In Vern W. McGee, Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (Trans., Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, translated by, Austin: University of Texas Press.
9.
Balat, Michel ( 2000). Fondements sémiotiques de la psychanalyse. Peirce après Freud et Lacan suivi de Logique des mathématiques de C.S. Peirce. Paris: L’Harmattan .
10.
Bechky, Beth A. ( 2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312-330.
11.
Bergson, Henri ( 2001[1907]). L’évolution créatrice. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
12.
Bergson, Henri ( 2003 [1907]). La pensée et le mouvant. Essais et conférences. On-line edition, Chicoutimi (Canada): Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Les Classiques des Sciences Sociales (http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/bergson_henri/pensee_mouvant/pensee_mouvant.html ). Paris: PUF.
13.
Bergson, Henri ( 2005[1919]). L’énergie spirituelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
14.
Boland, Richard J. Jr., & Collopy, Fred (Eds.) (2004). Managing as designing . Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
Bruner, Jerome S., & Postman, Leo (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206-223.
16.
Carlile, Paul R. ( 2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
17.
Cassirer, Ernst ( 2000[1942]). The logic of the cultural sciences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Chia, Robert ( 1996). Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice. Berlin, New York: Gruyter.
19.
Clot, Yves ( 1999). La fonction psychologique du travail. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
20.
Clot, Yves ( 2009). Clinic of activity: The dialogue as instrument. In Annalisa Sannino, Harry Daniels & Kris D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 286-303). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Clot, Yves, Faïta, Daniel, Fernandez, Gabriel, & Scheller, Livia (2001). Entretiens en autoconfrontation croisée: Une méthode en clinique de l’activité . Education Permanente, 146(1), 17-25.
22.
Cohen, Michael ( 2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routines. Organization Studies, 28, 773-786.
23.
Cooper, Robert ( 2007). Organs of process: Rethinking human organization. Organization Studies, 28, 1547-1573.
24.
Cussins, Adrian ( 1992). Content, embodiment and objectivity. The theory of cognitive trails. Mind, 101(404), 651-688.
25.
Czarniawska, Barbara ( 1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi : Sage.
26.
Czarniawska, Barbara ( 1999). Management she wrote: organization studies and detective stories. Culture and Organization, 5(1), 13-41.
27.
Deleuze, Gilles ( 1986). Cinema 1: The movement image. Hugh Tomlinson & Barbara Haberjam (Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
Derrida, Jacques ( 1967). De la Grammatologie. Paris: Minuit. English translation by G. Chakravorty Spivak (1976 ). Of Grammatology, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
29.
Dewey, John ( 1991 [1903]). Studies in logical theory. In Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.). The collected works of John Dewey. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
30.
Dewey, John ( 1997[1909]). How we think. New York, NY : Dover Publications.
31.
Dewey, John ( 1983[1916]). Democracy and education. New York, NY: MacMillan.
32.
Dewey, John ( 1980 [1938]). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers [ New York, NY: Holt].
33.
Durkheim, Emile ( 1997 [1893]). De la division du travail social . Paris: PUF. Trans. (1997) The division of labor in society. New York, NY: Free Press.
34.
Eco, Umberto ( 1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
35.
Eco, Umberto ( 1988). Le signe. Brussels, Belgium: Editions Labor.
36.
Eco, Umberto, & Sebeok, Thomas A. (1988). Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. The sign of three. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
37.
Engeström, Yriö ( 1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
38.
Engeström, Yriö ( 2006). From well-bounded ethnographies to intervening in mycorrhizae activities. Organization Studies, 27, 1783-1793.
39.
Follett, Mary Parker ( 1924). The creative experience. New York, NY: Green & Company. On-line text of the introduction: www.follettfoundation.org/ceintro.pdf.
40.
Fox, Stephen ( 2006). Inquiries of every imaginable kind: ethnomethodology, practical action and the new socially situated learning theory. Sociological Review, 54(3), 426-445.
41.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg ( 1989). Truth and method. Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall (Trans.). New York, NY: Crossroad .
42.
Goldman, Alvin I. ( 1986). Philosophical applications of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In David Middleton and Yriö Engeström (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1970). Toward a theory of communicative competence. In Hans Peter Dreitzel (Ed.), Recent sociology. London, UK: Macmillan .
45.
Heron, John, & Reason, Peter ( 2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In Peter Reason & Hilary Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 179-188). London, UK: Sage.
46.
Hollnagel, Erik, Woods, David D., & Leveson, Nancy (Eds.) (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts . Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
47.
James, William ( 1998[1890]). Principles of psychology. Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press.
48.
Joas, Hans ( 1996). The creativity of action. Cambridge , UK: Polity.
49.
Kemmis, Stephen ( 2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jürgen Habermas . In Peter Reason & Hilary Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 91-102). London, UK: Sage.
50.
Kvale, Steinar ( 1996). Inter Views: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Lacan, Jacques ( 1966). Ecrits. Paris, France: Seuil.
52.
Lewin, Kurt ( 1939). Experiments in social space. Harvard Educational Review, 9(1), 21-32.
53.
Lorino, Philippe ( 2001). A pragmatic analysis of the role of management systems in organizational learning. In Knowledge management and organizational competence. Ron Sanchez (ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
Lorino, Philippe ( 2007). Process based management, dialogism and the reflexive inquiry of collective activity. The case of work safety in the building industry . Paris, France: Essec Research Center, DR-07013.
55.
Lorino, Philippe, & Tarondeau, Jean-Claude (2002). From resources to processes in competence-based strategic management. In John Morecroft, Ron Sanchez & Aimé Heene (Eds.), Systems perspectives on resources, capabilities, and management processes. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
56.
Manning, Peter K. ( 1979). Metaphors of the field: Varieties of organizational discourse . Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 660-671.
57.
March, James ( 1988). Decisions and organizations. Oxford , UK: Basil Blackwell.
58.
Marková, Ivana ( 2003a). Dialogicality and social representations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Marková, Ivana ( 2003b). Constitution of the self: Intersubjectivity and dialogicality . Culture Psychology, 9(3), 249-259.
60.
Mead, George Herbert ( 1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviourist. Charles W. Morris (Ed). Chicago, IIL: University of Chicago.
61.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice ( 1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris, France: Gallimard.
62.
Miettinen, Reijo ( 2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54-72.
63.
Morel, Benoît, & Ramanujam, Rangaraj (1999). Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems . Organization Science, 10(3), 278-293.
64.
Morris, Charles ( 1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. In Otto Neurath et al. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of unified science 1/2. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted in Charles Morris (1971). Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
65.
Nayak, Ajit ( 2008). On the way to theory: A processual approach. Organization Studies, 29, 173-190.
66.
Orlikowski, Wanda J. ( 2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273.
67.
Peirce, Charles Sanders ( 1958 [1931]). Collected papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
Raelin, Joseph A. ( 1999). Preface. Management Learning, 30(2).
69.
Ransdell, Joseph ( 1980). Semiotic and linguistics. In Irmengard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (Eds.), The signifying animal: The grammar of language and experience (pp. 135-185). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
70.
Reason, Peter ( 2003). Pragmatist philosophy and action research: Readings and conversation with Richard Rorty. Action Research, 1(1), 103-123.
71.
Reason, Peter, & Bradbury, Hilary (2008). The Sage handbook of action research. London, UK: Sage.
72.
Ricoeur, Paul ( 1984). Temps et récit, tome I: L’intrigue et le récit philosophique. Paris, France: Le Seuil.
73.
Saussure, Ferdinand de (1983). Course in general linguistics. Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye (Eds.), R. Harris (Trans). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
74.
Schatzki, Theodore R. ( 2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26, 465-484.
75.
Schön, Donald ( 1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate .
76.
Shotter, John ( 2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking . Organization Studies, 27, 585-604.
77.
Shotter, John ( 2008). Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: Action guiding anticipations and the continuous creation of novelty . Organization Studies, 29, 501-524.
78.
Simon, Herbert A. ( 1982). Models of bounded rationality: Behavioural economics and business organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79.
Simon, Herbert A. ( 1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80.
Smith, Dorothy E. (Ed.) (2006). Incorporating texts into ethnographic practice. In Institutional ethnography as practice (pp. 65-88). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
81.
Strauss, Anselm L., & Corbin, Juliet (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Todorov, Tzvetan ( 1981). Mikhail Bakhtine: le principe dialogique. Paris, France: Seuil. English translation (1984) Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogical principle (theory & history of literature). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
84.
Tricard, Benoît ( 2009). La genèse organisationnelle du risque d’accidents sur les chantiers de construction: une approche dialogique de l’activité collective organisée. PhD Dissertation, ESSEC Business School.
85.
Tsoukas, Haridimos ( 1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (special issue), 11-25.
86.
Tsoukas, Haridimos ( 1998). The word and the world: A critique of representationalism in management research. International Journal of Public Administration , 21, 781-817.
87.
Tsoukas, Haridimos ( 2000). False dilemmas in organization theory: Realism or social constructivism? Organization, 7, 531-535.
88.
Tsoukas, Haridimos ( 2005). Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
89.
Tsoukas, Haridimos ( 2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20, 941-957.
90.
Tsoukas, Haridimos, & Chia, Robert ( 2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567-582.
91.
Tsoukas, Haridimos, & Hatch, Mary Jo (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54, 979-1013.
92.
Van Maanen, John ( 1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 539-550.
93.
Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan, & Rosch, Eleanor (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, London: MIT Press .
94.
Vygotsky, Lev S. ( 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
95.
Vygotsky, Lev S. ( 1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
96.
Vygotsky, Lev S. ( 1994). Défectologie et déficience mentale. Petitpierre & Barisnikov (eds). Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.
97.
Vygotsky, Lev S. ( 1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol.4. The history of the development of higher mental functions. New York, NY: Plenum .
98.
Weick, Karl E. ( 1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
99.
Weick, Karl E. ( 1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
100.
Weick, Karl E. ( 2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
101.
Weick, Karl, & Sutcliffe, Kathleen (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (revised edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
102.
Wertsch, James V. ( 1994). Mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1(4), 202-208.
103.
Wertsch, James V. ( 1998). Mind as action. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
104.
Widerberg, Karin ( 2004). Institutional ethnography - towards a productive sociology: An interview with Dorothy E. Smith. Sosiologisk Tidskrift , 12, 179-184.
105.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig ( 1964). Philosophical remarks. Rush Rhees (Ed.), R. Hargreaves & R. White (Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
106.
Yanow, Dvora ( 2006). Talking about practices: On Julian Orr’s talking about machines. Organization Studies, 27, 1743-1756.
107.
Yoo, Youngjin, Boland, Richard J., & Lyytinen, Kalle (2006). From organization design to organization designing. Organization Science, 17(2), 215-229.
