Despite certain structural limitations, Indymedia provided three vital functions for movement-based media coverage: (1) it established a secure website that shielded its users’ identities when navigating it or producing content, (2) its platform united sympathetic reporting on local and global struggles that fueled an imaginary of worldwide struggle, and (3) it established behind-the-scenes momentum in engaging new participants in independent media that continues to this day.
CouldryN (2015) The myth of ‘us’: digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity. Information, Communication & Society18(16): 608–626.
3.
DowningDH (2013) Towards a political economy of social movement media. Democratic Communiqué26(1): 17–28.
MoscoV (2004) The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
PoellTVan DijekJ (2015) Social media and activist communication. In: AttonC (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media. New York: Routledge, pp. 527–537.
10.
RobéC (2016) Criminalizing dissent: Western State repression, video activism, and counter-summit protests. Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media57(2): 161–188.
11.
RobéC (2020) El Grito de Sunset Park: cop watching, community organizing, and video activism. JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies59(2): 62–87.
12.
TempelinRE (2009) Rage against the machine: how Indymedia’s radical project is working to create the new public sphere. PhD Thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
13.
Terrorizing Dissent (2008) Personal interview with Niko Georgiades by Chris Robe, 18February2019.
