Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Digital media present great potential for disseminating campaigns, connecting with constituencies, and creating spaces for connectivity. This article explores a contemporary digital media project, Todo Mejora México, considering how emerging technology affects activism. This research illustrates how activists mobilize digital media, localizing and vernacularizing an international effort. Through user-generated projects, activists harness the power of digital media to create a platform for storytelling, content curation, and distribution of alternative lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender discourses into the media landscape.

Keywords

LGBT activism digital media social activism alternative media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam, S., & Goodman, M. (2016, November 16). LGBTQ representation nearly invisible in U.S. Spanish-language media, GLAAD report shows. GLAAD. Retrieved from https://www.glaad.org/releases/lgbtq-representation-nearly-invisible-us-spanish-language-media-glaad-report-shows.

Allaston

(2007) Key terms on Latino/cultural and literary studies, Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.

Asakura

Craig

(2014) It gets better… but how? Exploring resilience development in the accounts of LGBTQ adults. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 24(3): 253–266.

Bleys

(2000) Images of ambiente: Homotextuality and Latin American art, 1810-today, London, England: A&C Black.

Bontempo

(1993) Translation fidelity of psychological scales: An item response theory analysis of an individualism-collectivism scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 24: 149–166.

Boyd

(2008) Can social network sites enable political action? International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 4: 241–244.

Brabham, D. C. (2010). The potential of vernacular video for queer youth. Flow, 13. Retrieved from http://flowtv.org/2010/10/vernacular-video-for-queer-youth/.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

Brophy

J. E.

(2010) Developing a corporeal cyberfeminism: Beyond cyberutopia. New Media & Society 12: 929–945.

10.

Cantú

(2002) De ambiente: Queer tourism and the shifting boundaries of Mexican male sexualities. GQ 8(1–2): 139–166.

11.

Castells

(2001) The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business and society, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

12.

Ciszek

(2014) Cracks in the glass slipper: Does it really ‘get better’ for LGBTQ youth, or is it just another Cinderella story? Journal of Communication Inquiry 38(4): 325–340.

13.

Ciszek

E. L.

(2015) Bridging the gap: Mapping the relationship between activism and public relations. Public Relations Review 41(4): 447–455.

14.

Cleaver

(1998) The Zapatista effect: The Internet and the rise of an alternative public fabric. Journal of International Affairs 51: 621–632.

15.

De la Dehesa

(2010) Queering the public sphere in Mexico and Brazil: Sexual rights movements in emerging democracies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

16.

Friedman

E. J.

(2007) Lesbians in (cyber) space: The politics of the internet in Latin American on- and off-line communities. Media, Culture & Society 29(5): 790–811.

17.

Fusco

(2001) At your service: Latin women in the global information network. In: Fusco

(ed.) The bodies that were not ours, London, England: Routledge, pp. 187–201.

18.

Garrido

A. R.

(2009) El ambiente according to her: Gender, class, Mexicanidad, and the cosmopolitan in queer Mexico City. National Women’s Studies Association Journal 21(3): 24–45.

19.

GLAAD. (2016). Nearly invisible: LGBTQ representation on Spanish-Language television in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.glaad.org/files/SLMR/SPAReport2016.pdf.

20.

Goltz

D. B.

(2013) It gets better: Queer futures, critical frustrations, and radical potentials. Critical Studies in Media Communication 30(2): 135–151.

21.

Gray

M. L.

(2009) Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America, New York, NY: New York University Press.

22.

Gross

(2007) Gideon, who will be twenty-five in the year 2012. In: Barnhurst

K. G.

(ed.) Media Q: Media/queered: Visibility and its discontents, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, pp. 261–277.

23.

Grzanka

Mann

(2014) Queer youth suicide and the psychopolitics of “It Gets Better”. Sexualities 17(4): 369–393.

24.

Halberstam, J. (2010, November 20). “It gets worse…” social text. Retrieved from http://socialtextjournal.org/periscope_article/it_gets_worse/.

25.

Hardin

(2002) Altering masculinities: The Spanish conquest and the evolution of the Latin American machismo. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 7(1): 1–22.

26.

Heinz

Inuzuka

Zender

(2002) Under the rainbow flag: Webbing global gay identities. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 7(2/3): 107–124.

27.

Hennink

M. M.

(2008) Language and communication in cross-cultural qualitative research. In: Liamputtong

(ed.) Cross-cultural research: Ethical and methodological perspectives, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 21–34.

28.

Hernandez, B. (2011, August 25). LGBT en Español: Depictions of LGBT people & issues in Spanish-language media. GLAAD. Retrieved from http://www.glaad.org/2011/08/25/lgbt-en-espanol-depictions-of-lgbt-people-issues-in-spanish-language-media.

29.

International Telecommunications Union. (2016). ITU releases 2016 ICT figures. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/2016-PR30.aspx.

30.

Jones

(2015) Generic intertextuality in online social activism: The case of the It Gets Better Project. Language in Society 44(3): 317–339.

31.

Keane

(2015, August 12) Mexico: State intervention & the end of the digital divide. IDG Connect. Retrieved from http://www.idgconnect.com/abstract/10270/mexico-state-intervention-digital-divide.

32.

Kenix

L. J.

(2009) Blogs as alternative. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4): 790–822.

33.

Kennedy

A. K.

Sommerfeldt

E. J.

(2015) A postmodern turn for social media research: Theory and research directions for public relations scholarship. Atlantic Journal of Communication 23(1): 31–45.

34.

Krutzsch

(2014) It gets better as a teleological prophecy: A universal promise of progress through assimilation. Journal of Popular Culture 47(6): 1245–1255.

35.

Lopez

G. I.

Figueroa

Connor

S. E.

Maliski

S. L.

(2008) Translation barriers in conducting qualitative research with Spanish speakers. Qualitative Health Research 18(12): 1729–1737.

36.

Lumsden

(1991) Homosexuality, society and the state in Mexico (No. 13), Toronto, ON: Canadian Gay Archives.

37.

Manning

Kunkel

(2014) Researching interpersonal relationships: Qualitative methods, studies, and analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

38.

Meyer

(2012) An intersectional analysis of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people’s evaluations of anti-queer violence. Gender & Society 26(6): 849–873.

39.

Padilla

Y. C.

(2004) Gay and lesbian rights organizing: Community-based strategies (No. 3–4), Philadelphia, PA: Haworth Press.

40.

Perez, R. (2014, August 7). Can telenovelas put an end to homophobia? The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/roberto-perez/can-telenovelas-put-an-en_b_5660158.html.

41.

Postmes

Brunsting

(2002) Collective action in the age of the Internet: Mass communication and online mobilization. Social Science Computer Review 20(3): 290–301.

42.

Puar, J. (2010, November 16). In the wake of it gets better. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/nov/16/wake-it-gets-better-campaign.

43.

Pullen

(2010) Introduction. In: Pullen

Cooper

(eds) LGBT identity and online new media, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–13.

44.

Raghavan, R. (2009, October 2). Digital activism on YouTube. The official Google blog. Retrieved from http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/digital-activism-on-youtube.html.

45.

Sarangi

(2007) The anatomy of interpretation: Coming to terms with the analyst’s paradox in professional discourse studies. Text & Talk 27(5): 567–584.

46.

Stokes, Z., Trasandes, M., & Quezada, J. (2016). Nearly invisible: LGBTQ representations on Spanish-language television in the United States. GLAAD. Retrieved from http://www.glaad.org/nearly-invisible-casi-invisibles.

47.

Tate

(2013) Redefining Mexican masculinity in twenty-first century telenovelas. Hispanic Research Journal 14(6): 538–552.

48.

Temple

Edwards

(2002) Interpreters/translators and cross-language research: Reflexivity and border crossings. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1(2): 1–12.

49.

Twinn

(1997) An exploratory study examining the influence of translation on the validity and reliability of qualitative data in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 418–423.

50.

West

Frischherz

Panther

Brophy

(2013) Queer worldmaking in the “It Gets Better” campaign. QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking 1(1): 49–85.

Todo Mejora en el Ambiente

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References