Real-time commentary, also called ‘live-tweeting’, has become a widely used feature of the social networking site Twitter. Live-tweeting offers new dynamics in political communication by affording a space in which politicians, journalists, and the public alike are present while commenting on televised events in real time. Here, the social, spatial, and temporal arrangements of political communication are intermingled in a new fashion. This article presents a novel framework to theoretically conceptualize the use of live-tweeting. Drawing on the literature of ‘context collapse’ and a phenomenological perspective on media use, the concept of ‘events-as-participation’ is developed to identify a situation in which a public event is commented on online both by the participants present at the actual event and by an audience not physically present. Thus, a pluralization of the event occurs as it is experienced in situ, via broadcast and on various online platforms where new forms of interaction between those present and the audience can occur, blurring the boundaries between places, scenes, and social contexts and creating a new type of interplay between older and newer media formats.
AdamsPC (1992) Television as gathering place. Annals of the Association of American Geographers82(1): 117–135.
2.
AmpofoLAnsteadNO’LoughlinB (2011) Trust, confidence, and credibility: citizen responses on twitter to opinion polls during the 2010 UK general election. Information, Communication & Society14(6): 850–871.
3.
AnsteadNO’LoughlinB (2011) The emerging viewertariat and BBC question time: television debate and real-time commenting online. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(4): 440–462.
4.
boydD (2008) Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics. PhD Dissertation. University of California-Berkeley, School of Information.
5.
boydD (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
6.
BroersmaMGrahamT (2012) Social media as beat. Journalism Practice6(3): 403–419.
7.
BrunsA (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
8.
ChadwickA (2011a) Britain’s first live televised party leaders’ debate: from the news cycle to the political information cycle. Parliamentary Affairs64(1): 24–44.
9.
ChadwickA (2011b) The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British Prime Minister and the ‘Bullygate’ affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(1): 3–29.
10.
ChadwickA (2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
ChenPJSmithPJ (2011) Digital media in the 2008 Canadian election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics8(4): 399–417.
12.
CouldryN (2012) Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media PracticeCambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
13.
DavisJLJurgensonN (2014) Context collapse: theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication & Society17(4): 476–485.
14.
DayanDKatzE (1992) Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
DiakopoulosNAShammaDA (2010) Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1195–1198. New York: ACM.
16.
DoughtyMRowlandDLawsonS (2011) Co-viewing live TV with digital backchannel streams. Proceedings of the 9th international interactive conference on interactive television, Lisbon, 29 June–1 July, pp. 141–144. New York: ACM.
17.
ElmerG (2013) Live research: twittering an election debate. New Media & Society15(1): 18–30.
18.
GigliettoFSelvaD (2014) Second screen and participation: a content analysis of a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication64(2): 260–277.
19.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.
20.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
21.
HawthorneJHoustonJBMcKinneyMS (2013) Live-tweeting a presidential primary debate: exploring new political conversations. Social Science Computer Review31(5): 552–562.
22.
HineC (2000) Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.
23.
InnisHA (1951) The Bias of Communication. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
24.
JungherrA (2014) The logic of political coverage on twitter: temporal dynamics and content. Journal of Communication64(2): 239–259.
25.
KalsnesBKrumsvikAHStorsulT (2014) Social media as a political backchannel: twitter use during televised election debates in Norway. Aslib Journal of Information Management66: (3): 313–328.
26.
KaplanAMHaenleinM (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons53(1): 59–68.
27.
LarssonAO (2013a) ‘Rejected bits of program code’: why notions of ‘politics 2.0’ remain (mostly) unfulfilled. Journal of Information Technology & Politics10(1): 72–85.
28.
LarssonAO (2013b) Tweeting the viewer – use of twitter in a talk show context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57(2): 135–152.
29.
LarssonAOMoeH (2013) Representation or participation? Twitter use during the 2011 Danish election campaign. Javnost–the Public20(1): 71–88.
30.
McKinneyMSHoustonJBHawthorneJ (2013) Social watching a 2012 Republican presidential primary debate. American Behavioral Scientist58(4): 556–573.
31.
McLuhanM (1964) Understanding Media. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
MascaroCGogginsS (2012) Twitter as virtual town square: citizen engagement during a nationally televised Republican primary debate. In: American Political Science Association 2012 Annual Meeting Paper.
33.
MeyrowitzJ (1985) No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
MooresS (2004) The doubling of place: Electronic media, time-space arrangements and social relationships. In: CouldryNMcCarthyA (eds) MediaSpace: Place, Scale and Culture in a Media Age. London: Routledge, pp. 21–36.
35.
MooresS (2012) Media, Place and Mobility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
PapacharissiZ (2012) A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
37.
ParmeleeJH (2013) The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society14(4): 291–305.
38.
PreeceJNonneckeBAndrewsD (2004) The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior20(2): 201–223.
39.
ScannellP (1996) Radio, Television and Modern Life: A Phenomenological Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
40.
SkovsgaardMVan DalenA (2013) Dodging the gatekeepers? Social media in the campaign mix during the 2011 Danish elections. Information, Communication & Society. 16(5): 737–756.
41.
StrömbäckJ (2008) Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(3): 228–246.
42.
TuanY (1977) Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. London: Edward Arnold.
43.
VergeerMHermansLSamsS (2011) Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: the exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics19(3): 477–501.
44.
WaadeAMLinaa JensenJ (2009) Medier og turisme [Media and tourism], 1st edn. Aarhus: Academica.
45.
WeschM (2009) YouTube and you: experiences of self-awareness in the context collapse of the recording webcam. Explorations in Media Ecology8(10): 19–34.
