Although the technical and psychological accuracy of the polygraph has been contested almost since the device’s inception, it continues to enjoy substantial popularity within law enforcement and federal agencies throughout North America. This paper excavates the sexual politics of the polygraph focused on two key arenas where the polygraph has been a popular and powerful tool: identifying LGBTQ applicants and employees within federal agencies and determining parole for convicted sex offenders. Key questions guiding this analysis include the following: What are the relationships between the polygraph and disciplining sexual deviance? How does the polygraph fit within a larger history of surveilling and controlling sexual alterity? Drawing on theories of affect and spectacle, the paper unravels the polygraph’s role as an accomplice to state-sanctioned projects of heteronormativity. Through analysis of training materials, practitioner memoirs, and policy guidelines, the polygraph is situated as an early precursor to surveillance infrastructure that attempts to identify, manage, and predict deviant sexuality.
BaeslerJohn Philipp. 2018. Clearer Than Truth: The Polygraph and the American Cold War. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
6.
BalmerAndrew S.SandlandRalph. 2012. “Making Monsters: The Polygraph, the Plethysmograph, and Other Practices for the Performance of Abnormal Sexuality.” Journal of Law and Society39 (4): 593–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00601.x.
7.
Ben-ShakharGershon. 2008. “The Case Against the Use of Polygraph Examinations to Monitor Post-Conviction Sex Offenders.” Legal and Criminological Psychology13 (2): 191–207, doi: 10.1348/135532508X298577.
8.
BrowneSimone. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
BunnGeoffrey C. 2007. “Spectacular Science: The Lie Detector’s Ambivalent Powers.” History of Psychology10 (2): 156, doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.156.
10.
CartwrightLisa. 1995. Screening the Body: Tracing Medicine’s Visual Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
ChunWendy H. K. 2021. Discriminating Data: Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New Politics of Recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
CrawfordKate. 2021. The Atlas of AI. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
DebordGuy. 1967 (2022). The Society of the Spectacle. Canberra, Australia: Hobgoblin Press.
16.
FoucaultMichel. 1995 (1975). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
17.
GatesKelly. 2011. Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and The Culture of Surveillance, Vol. 2. New York: NYU Press.
18.
GayWilliam O. 1948. “The Search for the Truth.” The Police Journal21 (4): 276–86, doi: 10.1177/0032258X4802100407.
19.
GouldDeborah. B. 2009. Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s Fight Against AIDS. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
GrubinDonMadsenLars. 2005. “Lie Detection and The Polygraph: A Historical Review.” The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology16 (2): 357–69, doi: 10.1080/14789940412331337353.
21.
HalberstamJack. 2011. The Queer Art of Failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22.
HarlowMichael C.ScottCharles L.. 2007. “Penile Plethysmography Testing for Convicted Sex Offenders.” Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online35 (4): 536–37.
23.
HongSun-ha. 2020. Technologies of Speculation. New York: New York University Press.
24.
International Spy Museum. 2021. Spies & Spymasters Happy Hour: The Valentine Edition. YouTube. March 2, 2021. Video, 1:29:03. Accessed January 8, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA9oA5gkd_w.
25.
JohnsonDavid K. 2009. The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
KinsmanGary. 1995. “‘Character Weaknesses’ and ‘Fruit Machines’: Toward an Analysis of Anti-Homosexual Security Campaign in the Canadian Civil Service.” Labour/Le Travail35: 133–61.
27.
KinsmanGaryGentilePatrizia. 2010. The Canadian War on Queers: National Security as Sexual Regulation. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
28.
LarkinBrian. 2013. “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure.” Annual Review of Anthropology42: 327–43.
29.
LeporeJill. 2015. The Secret History of Wonder Woman. New York: Vintage.
30.
LingelJessa. 2020. “Dazzle Camouflage as Queer Counter Conduct.” European Journal of Cultural Studies24: 1–18.
31.
LittlefieldMelissa. 2009. “Constructing the Organ of Deceit: The Rhetoric of fMRI and Brain Fingerprinting in Post-9/11 America.” Science, Technology, & Human Values34 (3): 365–92.
32.
MeinersErica R. 2009. “Never Innocent: Feminist Trouble with Sex Offender Registries and Protection in a Prison Nation.” Meridians9 (2): 31–62.
33.
National Research Council. 2003. The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10420.
34.
OswaldMarion. 2020. “Technologies in the Twilight Zone: Early Lie Detectors, Machine Learning and Reformist Legal Realism.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology34 (2): 214–31, doi: 10.1080/13600869.2020.1733758.
35.
QuachKatyanna. 2019. “The Infamous AI Gaydar Study Was Repeated—And, No, Code Can’t Tell If You’re Straight or Not Just From Your Face.” The Register, Accessed January 8, 2022. https://www.theregister.com/2019/03/05/ai_gaydar/.
36.
RobinsonDaniel J.KimmelDavid. 1994. “The Queer Career of Homosexual Security Vetting in Cold War Canada.” Canadian Historical Review75 (3): 319–45.
37.
SchreckerEllen. 1999. Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
SegraveKerry. 2004. Lie Detectors: A Social History. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
