New extraction processes have unleashed an oil and gas renaissance. The boom has expanded employment opportunities and swelled state and local budgets. The renaissance, however, has a darker side. Environmentalists argue that it harms the environment, hastens the deterioration of infrastructure, and inconveniences citizens. While states may enjoy the majority of economic benefits, many of its costs are felt locally. For some residents, these costs are enough to fuel defiance. Two such examples are Denton, TX, and Longmont, CO. Using spatial and political data, this article assesses which factors are helpful in understanding precinct-level voter support for fracking bans.
ArnoldGwenHolahanRobert. 2014. The federalism of fracking: How the locus of policymaking authority affects civic engagement. Publius: The Journal of Federalism44:344–68.
2.
ArnoldGwenLongLe Anh NguyenGottliebMadeline. 2016. Social networks and policy entrepreneurship: How relationships shape municipal decision-making about high-volume hydraulic fracturing. Policy Studies Journal. doi:10.1111/psj.12175.
3.
ArnoldGwenNeupaneKaubin Wosti. 2017. Determinants of pro-fracking measure adoption by New York southern tier municipalities. Review of Policy Research34:208–32.
BoudetHilaryBugdenDylanZanoccoChadMaibachEdward. 2016. The effect of industry activities on public support for fracking. Environmental Politics25:593–12.
6.
BoudetHilaryClarkeChristopherBugdenDylanMaibachEdwardRoser-RenoufConnieLeiserowitzAnthony. 2014. Fracking controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy65:57–67.
7.
ChomaBecky L.HanochYanivCurrieShannon. 2016. Attitudes toward hydraulic fracturing: The opposing forces of political conservatism and basic knowledge about fracking. Global Environmental Change38:108–17.
DavisCharles. 2012. The politics of fracking: Regulating natural gas drilling practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research29:177–91.
13.
DavisCharles. 2014. Substate federalism and fracking policies: Does state regulatory authority trump local land use autonomy?Environmental Science & Technology48:8397–403.
14.
DavisCharles. 2017a. Fracking and environmental protection: An analysis of US state policies. The Extractive Industries and Society4:63–68.
15.
DavisCharles. 2017b. Shaping state fracking policies in the United States: An analysis of who, what, and how. State and Local Government Review. doi:0160323X17712555.
16.
DavisCharlesFiskJonathan M.. 2014. Analyzing public support for fracking in the U.S. Review of Policy Research31:1–16.
17.
DietzThomasFitzgeraldAmyShwomRachael. 2005. Environmental values. Annual Review of Environmental Resources30:335–72.
FiskJonathan M.2016. Fractured relationships: Exploring municipal defiance in Colorado, Texas, and Ohio. State and Local Government Review48:1–12.
23.
FiskJonathan M. 2017. The Fracking Debate: Intergovernmental Politics of the Oil and Gas Renaissance, 2nd ed. ASPA Series in Public Administration and Public Policy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, A Taylor & Francis Group.
24.
GerberBrian J.NeeleyGrant W.. 2005. Perceived risk and citizen preferences for governmental management of routine hazards. Policy Studies Journal33:395–18.
25.
HarclerodeMelissa A.LalPankajVedwanNeerajWoldeBernabasMillerMichael E.. 2016. Evaluation of the role of risk perception in stakeholder engagement to prevent lead exposure in an urban setting. Journal of Environmental Management184:132–42.
26.
JacquetJeffrey B.2012. Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in Northern Pennsylvania. Energy Policy50:677–88.
27.
JacquetJeffrey B.2014. Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. Environmental Science and Technology48:8321–33.
JohnsonRenee J.ScicchitanoMichael J.. 2000. Uncertainty, risk, trust, and information: Public perceptions of environmental issues and willingness to take action. Policy Studies Journal28:633–47.
30.
LewisRoxanne E.TyshenkoMichael G.. 2009. The impact of social amplification and attenuation of risk and the public reaction to mad cow disease in Canada. Risk Analysis29:714–28.
31.
LohCarolyn G.OslandAnna C.. 2016. Local land use planning responses to hydraulic fracturing. Journal of the American Planning Association82:1–14.
32.
LongJames S.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Riverstone-NewellLori. 2012. Bottom-up activism: A local political strategy for higher policy change. Publius: The Journal of Federalism42:401–21.
35.
Riverstone-NewellLori. 2017. The rise of state preemption laws in response to local policy innovation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx037 (accessed June 2, 2017).
36.
RochatScott. 2011. Longmont well site had Benzene levels almost 100 times state limit. Longmont Times-Call, December 19. http://www.timescall.com/ci_19582173 (accessed April 4, 2016).
37.
SjobergLennart. 2000. Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis20:1–11.
38.
SlimakMichaelDietzThomas. 2006. Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Analysis26:1689–705.
39.
SlovicPaulFischhoffBaruchLichtensteinSarah. 1980. Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough? edited by SchwingR.AlbersW.Jr. 181–216. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
WalshPatrick J.BirdStephenHeintzelmanMartin D.. 2015. Understanding local regulation of fracking: A spatial econometric approach. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review44:138–63.
43.
WarnerBarbaraShapiroJennifer. 2013. Fractured, fragmented federalism: A study in fracking regulatory policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism43:474–96.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
