State and local governments traditionally exerted leadership in policy areas that directly affected their communities and citizens. The leadership of cities, however, has expanded into a number of policy areas where the states and the national government have reduced their policy footprint. This article summarizes research on local policy leadership, examines it within the context of historical state–local intergovernmental relations, and reviews three expanding policy areas. As creatures of state government, localities are subject to legislative restrictions; however, recent research reveals a significant upsurge of state governments preempting policy actions of local governments. Therefore, it can be concluded that the flame of local government policy leadership burns brightly now, but forces appear to be gathering that may cause it to flicker.
BermanDavid R.2003. Local government and the states: Autonomy, politics, and policy. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
2.
BetsillMichele M.2001. Mitigating climate change in U.S. cities: Opportunities and obstacles. Local Environment6:393–406.
3.
BowmanAnn O.2017. The state-local government(s) conundrum: Power and design. Journal of Politics79:1119–29.
4.
BoyntonRobert P.WrightDeil S.1971. Mayor-manager relationships in large council-manager cities: A reinterpretation. Public Administration Review31: 28–36.
ByrneJohnHughesKristenRickersonWilsonKurdgelashviliLado. 2007. American policy conflict in the greenhouse: Divergent trends in federal, regional, state, and local green energy and climate change policy. Energy Policy35:4555–73.
de GraauwElsGleesonShannon. 2016. An institutional examination of the local implementation of the DACA program. Unpublished manuscript, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
10.
DuPuisNicoleLanganTrevorMcFarlandChristinaPanettieriAngelinaRainwaterBrooks. 2017. City rights in an era of preemption: A state-by-state analysis. Washington, DC: The National League of Cities.
EngelKristen. 2006. State and local climate change initiatives: What is motivating state and local governments to address a global problem and what does this say about federalism and environmental law. The Urban Lawyer38:1015–29.
13.
EyestoneRobert. 1971. The threads of public policy: A study in policy leadership. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
14.
FiskJonathan M.2016. Fractured relationships: Exploring municipal defiance in Colorado, Texas, and Ohio. State and Local Government Review48:75–86.
KingdonJohn. 2003. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. London, UK: Longman Press.
18.
KraneDaleEbdonCarolBartleJohn. 2004. Devolution, fiscal federalism, and changing patterns of municipal revenues: The mismatch between theory and reality. Journal of Public Research and Theory14:513–33.
19.
KrauseRachel M.2010. Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Affairs33:45–60.
McKandersKarla. 2017. The subnational response: Local intervention in immigration policy and enforcement. In Compassionate Migration and Regional Policy in the Americas, edited by BenderSteven W.ArrochaWilliam F., 33–52. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
MorganDavid R.WatsonSheilah S.1992. Policy leadership in council-manager cities: Comparing mayor and manager. Public Administration Review52:438–46.
24.
MouritzenPoul E.SvaraJames H.2002. Leadership at the apex: Politicians and administrators in Western local government. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
ParlowMatthew J.2008. Progressive policy-making on the local level: Rethinking traditional notions of federalism(Report No. 08-06). Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Law School.
27.
PikettyThomasSaezEmmanuel. 2003. Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics118:1–39.
28.
PressmanJeffrey M.1972. Preconditions of mayoral leadership. American Political Science Review66:511–24.
29.
RichardsonJesse J.GoughMeghan ZimmermanPuentesRobert. 2003. Is home rule the answer? Clarifying the influence of Dillon’s rule on growth management. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
30.
RidgleyJennifer. 2013. Cities of refuge: Immigration enforcement, police, and the insurgent genealogies of citizenship in U.S. sanctuary cities. Urban Geography29:53–77.
31.
Riverstone-NewellLori. 2012. Bottom-up activism: A local political strategy for higher policy change. Publius: The Journal of Federalism42:401–21.
32.
Riverstone-NewellLori. 2017. The rise of state preemption laws in response to local policy innovation. The Journal of Federalism47: 403–25.
RosenthalCindy SimonRosenthalJames A.MooreJonathan D.SmithJamie. 2015. Beyond (and within) city limits: Climate policy in an intergovernmental system. Review of Policy Research32:538–55.
35.
RussellJon D.BostromAaron. 2016. Federalism, Dillon rule and home rule. Arlington, VA: American City County Exchange.
36.
SbragiaAlberta M.1996. Debt wish: Entrepreneurial cities, U.S. federalism, and economic development. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
37.
SharpElaine B.2012. Does local government matter? How urban policies shape civic engagement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
SossJoeHackerJacobMettlerSuzanne Eds. 2007. Remaking America: Democracy and public policy in an age of inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
SvaraJames H.1985. Dichotomy and duality: Reconceptualizing the relationship between policy and administration in council-manager cities. Public Administration Review45: 221–32.
40.
SwindellDavidStenbergCarlSvaraJames. 2017, 10. Navigating the waters between local autonomy and state preemption. Paper presented at the Alliance for Innovation: Transforming Local Government Conference, Tempe, AZ.
41.
WikstromNelson. 1979. The mayor as a policy leader in the council-manager form of government: A view from the field. Public Administration Review39:270–76.
42.
ZahranSammyBrodySamuel D.VedlitzArnoldGroverHimanshuMillerCaitlyn. 2008. Vulnerability and capacity: Explaining local commitment to climate-change policy. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space26:544–62.
43.
ZhangYahongFeiockRichard C.2009. City managers’ policy leadership in council-manager cities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory20:461–76.
