This field note examines the interorganizational collaboration of state agencies by analyzing the goals and activities outlined in their formal agreements. Leveraging extensive web-based archival data from Iowa, the study reviewed 8,050 agreements involving at least one state agency from 1993 to 2020 across 33 service areas. Insights from exploratory data analysis, focusing on actor, relational, and temporal dimensions, provide a detailed view of specific instances of these agreements. The study finds that state agencies use formal agreements to work with other governments and nongovernmental organizations to fulfill regulation, provision, and coordination roles in service delivery.
AndrewS. A.2009. “Recent Developments in the Study of Interjurisdictional Agreements: An Overview and Assessment.” State & Local Government Review41:133–42.
2.
AndrewS. A.ShortJ. E.JungK.ArlikattiS.2015. “Intergovernmental Cooperation in the Provision of Public Safety: Monitoring Mechanisms Embedded in Interlocal Agreements.” Public Administration Review75:401–410.
3.
BermanD. R.2019. Local Government and the States: Autonomy, Politics, and Policy. 2nd ed., Vol. 1). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BoyerE. J.SchellerD. S.2018. “An Examination of State-Level Public–Private Partnership Adoption: Analyzing Economic, Political, and Demand-Related Determinants of PPPs.” Public Works Management & Policy23:5–33.
5.
BrudneyJ. L.ChoC.WrightD. S.2009. “Understanding the Collaborative Public Manager: Exploring Contracting Patterns and Performance for Service Delivery by State Administrative Agencies in 1998 and 2004.” In The Collaborative Public Manager, edited by O’LearyR.BinghamL. B., 117–36. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
6.
CarrJ. B.ChangH.2024. “Functional Integration of Local Public Services without Political Consolidation: Lessons from Iowa.” Illinois Municipal Policy Journal9:111–34.
7.
CarrJ. B.HawkinsC. V.2013. “The Costs of Cooperation: What the Research Tells Us about Managing the Risks of Service Collaborations in the US.” State and Local Government Review45:224–39.
8.
ChenY.-C.ThurmaierK.2009. “Interlocal Agreements as Collaborations: An Empirical Investigation of Impetuses, Norms, and Success.” The American Review of Public Administration39:536–52.
9.
FarmerJ. L.2022. “State Interventions and Interlocal Collaborations across the Three Pillars of Sustainability.” State and Local Government Review54:120–45.
10.
FeiockR. C.ScholzJ. T.2010. “Self-Organizing Governance of Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas: An Overview.” In Self-Organizing Federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas, edited by FeiockR. C.ScholzJ. T., 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
FlavinP.ShufeldtG.2023. “What Does the Public Think about State Government Preemption of Local Policymaking?” State and Local Government Review55:333–47.
12.
Gutiérrez-MeaveR.ZhangS.CarrJ. B.SicilianoM. D.2025. “Integrating Formal and Relational Contracting: The Link between Network Structure and Contract Design in Interlocal Collaboration Agreements.” Public Administration. Published online January 15. doi:10.1111/padm.13050.
KettlD. F.1993. Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17.
KruegerS.BernickE. M.2010. “State Rules and Local Governance Choices.” Publius40:697–718.
18.
LamotheM.LamotheS.BellE.2018. “Understanding Local Service Delivery Arrangements: Are the ICMA ASD Data Reliable?” Public Admin Review78:613–25.
19.
LeinhardtG.LeinhardtS.1980. “Chapter 3: Exploratory Data Analysis: New Tools for the Analysis of Empirical Data.” Review of Research in Education8:85–157.
20.
McDonaldB. D.GoodmanC. B.HatchM. E.2020. “Tensions in State–Local Intergovernmental Response to Emergencies: The Case of COVID-19.” State and Local Government Review52:186–94.
21.
MullinM.DaleyD. M.2010. “Working with the State: Exploring Interagency Collaboration within a Federalist System.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory20:757–78.
22.
MurdochZ.MacCarthaighM.GeysB.2023. “It’s about Time! Temporal Dynamics and Longitudinal Research Designs in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review83 (6): 1727–36.
23.
RubadoM. E.2020. “From Neighbors to Partners: The Adoption of Interlocal Government Collaboration in the United States, 1977–2007.” Administration & Society53:708–736.
SánchezJ.QianH.2023. “Come Together, But How? Zooming into Economic Development Collaboration between State and Local Governments, and Nongovernmental Organizations.” Economic Development Quarterly38:113–21.
26.
StewartD. M.2011. “Collaboration between Federal and Local Law Enforcement: An Examination of Texas Police Chiefs’ Perceptions.” Police Quarterly14:407–30.
27.
StoutM.KeastR.2021. “Collaboration: What Does It Really Mean?” In Handbook of Collaborative Public Management, edited by MeekJ. W., 17–35. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
TukeyJ. W.1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
30.
WeissertC. S.IceJ. L.2014. “Relations between State and Local Governments: The Home Court (Dis)Advantage.” In The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government, edited by Haider-MarkelD. P., 71–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
ZeemeringE. S.2021. “Why Do State-Local Relations Need Our Attention?” In Cooperation and Conflict between State and Local Government, edited by HansonR. L.ZeemeringE. S., 1–17. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
32.
ZhangS.ZehraM.-E.-. 2024. “Exploring Accountability Choices in Service Contracts for Collaborative Public Safety Services Provision.” State and Local Government Review56:6–25.
