Municipalities are on fracking’s front lines. Unlike the extraction techniques of the past, many of today’s operations are located within a mile or two of residential areas. Yet, little scholarly attention has been paid to the factors that can precipitate municipal challenges to the state’s authority. For some, the decision to oppose the state may be related to environmental concerns, while in other communities, leaders are much more concerned about how development impacts homeowners. Recognizing this debate, this article examines local defiance in the era of fracking with a sample of Colorado, Texas, and Ohio communities.
AbelTroyStephanMarkKraftMichael E.. 2007. Environmental information disclosure and risk reduction among the states. State and Local Government Review39:153–65.
2.
ArnoldGwenHolahanRobert. 2014. The federalism of fracking: How the locus of policymaking authority affects civic engagement. Publius: The Journal of Federalism44:344–68.
3.
BaumgartnerFrankJonesBryan D.. 1991. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BoudetHilaryClarkeChristopherBugdenDylanMaibachEdwardRoser-RenoufConnieLeiserowitzAnthony. 2014. “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using National survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy65:57–67.
5.
BowmanAnnKearneyRichard. 2011. Second-order devolution: Data and doubt. Publius: The Journal of Federalism41:563–85.
6.
BowmanAnnKearneyRichard. 2012. “Are U.S. cities losing power and authority? Perceptions of local government actors.” Urban Affairs Review48:528–46.
BruhlRebecca J.LinderStephen H.SextonKen. 2013. Case study of municipal air pollution policies: Houston’s air toxic control strategy under the white administration, 2004–2009. Environmental Science & Technology47:4022–28.
ColburnTheoKwiatkowskiCarolSchultzKimBachranMary. 2011. Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal17:1039–56.
DaleyDorothy M.GarandJames C.. 2005. Horizontal diffusion, vertical diffusion and internal pressure in state environmental policymaking, 1989-1998. American Politics Research33:615–44.
13.
DavisCharles. 2012. The politics of ‘fracking’: Regulating natural gas drilling practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research29:177–91.
14.
DavisCharles. 2014. Substate federalism and fracking policies: Does state regulatory authority trump local land use autonomy?Environmental Science & Technology48:8397–403.
15.
DavisCharlesFiskJonathan M.. 2014. Analyzing public support for fracking in the U.S. Review of Policy Research31:1–16.
16.
DiPasqualeDeniseGlaeserEdward L.. 1999. Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens?Journal of Urban Economics45:354–84.
JacquetJeffrey B.2012. Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in Northern Pennsylvania. Energy Policy50:677–88.
24.
JacquetJeffrey B.2014. Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. Environmental Science and Technology48:8321–33.
25.
JonesRobert EmmetDunlapRiley E.. 1992. The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?Rural Sociology57:28–47.
26.
KettlDonald F.2002. The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. 1st ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
KincaidJohn. 1999. The international competence of US states and their local governments. Regional and Federal Studies9:111–33.
28.
KraneDaleEbdonCarolBartleJohn. 2004. Devolution, fiscal federalism, and changing patterns of municipal revenues: The mismatch between theory and reality. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14:513–33.
29.
LowryWilliam R.1991. The dimensions of federalism: State governments and pollution control policies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
LowryWilliam R.2008. Disentangling energy policy from environmental policy. Social Science Quarterly89:1195–211.
MatisoffDaniel C.2008. The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants?Review of Policy Research25:527–46.
33.
McAdamDougBoudetHilary S.2012. Putting social movements in their place. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
PortneyKent. 2009. Sustainability in American cities: A comprehensive look at what cities are doing and why? In Toward sustainable communities, ed. MazmanianDaniel A.KraftMichael E., 227–55. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
PutnamRobert D.2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
37.
RabeBarry G.2010. Racing to the top, the bottom, or the middle of the pack? Evolving state Gov’t role in environmental protection. In Environmental politics & policy: New directions for the 21st century, 8th ed., ed. VigNormanKraftMichael, 30–54. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
38.
RabeBarry G.BorickChristopher. 2013. Conventional politics for unconventional drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania’s early move into fracking policy development. Review of Policy Research30:321–40.
39.
RahmDiane. 2011. Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays: The case of Texas. Energy Policy39:2974–81.
40.
Riverstone-NewellLori. 2012. Bottom-up activism: A local political strategy for higher policy change. Publius: The Journal of Federalism42:401–21.
41.
ShermanDaniel. 2011. Not here, not there, not anywhere. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
42.
ShumanMichael H.1992. Dateline main street: Courts v. local foreign policies. Foreign Policy86:158–77.
43.
StephensG. Ross. 1974. State centralization and the erosion of local autonomy. Journal of Politics36:44–76.
44.
StephensG. RossWikstromNelson. 2007. American intergovernmental relations: A fragmented federal polity. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
SvaraJames H.WattTanya C.JangHee Soun. 2013. “How are US cities doing sustainability? Who is getting on the sustainability train, and why?” Cityscape15:9–44.
WarnerBarbaraShapiroJennifer. 2013. Fractured, fragmented federalism: A study in fracking regulatory policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism43:474–96.
48.
WisemanHannah. 2009. Untested waters: The rise of hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas production and the need to revisit regulation. Fordham Environmental Law Review20:115.
49.
WoodCurtis. 2011. Exploring the determinants of the empowered US municipality. State and Local Government Review43:123–39.
50.
WoodsNeal D.PotoskiMatthew. 2010. Environmental federalism revisited: Second-order devolution in air quality regulation. Review of Policy Research27:721–39.
51.
WrightDeil S.1978. Understanding intergovernmental relations: Public policy and participants’ perspectives on local, state, and national governments. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
52.
YiHongtao. 2013. Clean energy policies and green jobs: An evaluation of green jobs in U.S. metropolitan areas. Energy Policy56:644–52.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
