This conceptual paper presents the analytical theory of agency (ATA), an overlooked philosophical approach to the concept of action, to develop its theoretical basis in routines research in which the constructs of action and agency play crucial roles. It expounds, in the framework of ATA, the ideas of the spectrum of intentionality, kinds of action, and collective agency, which help advance the rigor of action-theoretical concepts in routines research as well as reveal the rationale of the microfoundational approach to routine actions. To uncover the developmental potential of ATA, the article discusses the most crucial conceptual challenges for routines research; it also briefly examines the limitations and future work related to using ATA in the management field.
AbellP.FelinT.FossN.2008. Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29: 489-502.
2.
AbellP.FelinT.FossN.2010. Causal and constitutive relations, and the squaring of Coleman’s diagram: Reply to Vromen. Erkenntnis, 73: 385-391.
3.
AnscombeG. E. M.1957. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
ArgyrisC.1976. Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 363-375.
5.
AshforthB. E.FriedY.1988. The mindlessness of organisational behaviors. Human Relations, 41: 305-329.
6.
AustinJ. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BacharachM.1999. Interactive team reasoning: A contribution to the theory of co-operation. Research in Economics, 53: 117-147.
8.
BaldessarelliG.LazaricN.PezzoniM.2022. Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 32: 1119-1154.
9.
BapujiH.HoraM.SaeedA. M.2012. Intentions, intermediaries, and interaction: Examining the emergence of routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 1586-1607.
10.
BaradK. M.2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
11.
BarandiaranX.Di PaoloE.RohdeM.2009. Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17: 367-386.
12.
BarkerJ. R.1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 408-437.
13.
BarneyJ.FelinT.2013. What are microfoundations?Academy of Management Perspectives, 27: 138-155.
14.
BeckerM. C.2005. The concept of routines: Some clarifications. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29: 249-262.
15.
BhaskarR.1979. The possibility of naturalism. London: Routledge.
16.
BitektineA.HaackP.BothelloJ.MairJ. (2020). Inhabited actors: Internalizing institutions through communication and actorhood models. Journal of Management Studies, 57: 885-897.
17.
BourdieuP.1977. Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
BourdieuP.1990. The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
BrandM.1984. Intending and acting: Toward a naturalized action theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
BratmanM. E.1987. Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BratmanM. E.1999. I intend that we J. In Faces of ontention: Selected essays on intention and agency: 142-161. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
BratmanM. E.2014. Shared agency: A planning theory of acting together. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
BrozzoC.2017. Motor intentions: How intentions and motor representations come together. Mind & Language, 32: 231-256.
26.
CardenL.WoodW.2018. Habit formation and change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 20: 117-122.
27.
ChantS. R.2014. From individual to collective intentionality: New essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
ChaterN.ZeitounH.MelkonyanT.2022. The paradox of social interaction: Shared intentionality, we-reasoning, and virtual bargaining. Psychological Review, 129: 415-437.
29.
ChiaR.HoltR.2006. Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies, 27: 635-655.
30.
ClarkeR.2014. Omissions: Agency, metaphysics, and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
CohenM. D.2007. Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies, 28: 773-786.
32.
CohenM. D.2012. Perceiving and remembering routine action: fundamental micro-level origins. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8): 1383-1388.
33.
CohenM. D.BacdayanP.1994. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5: 554-568.
34.
CohenM. D.LevinthalD. A.WarglienM.2014. Collective performance: Modeling the interaction of habit-based actions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23: 329-360.
35.
ColemanJ. S.1986. Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 1309-1335.
36.
ColemanJ. S.1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
37.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G.1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.
D’AdderioL.2011. Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7: 197-230.
39.
D’AdderioL.2008. The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy, 37: 769-789.
40.
Danner-SchröderA.2021. Without actors, there is no action: How interpersonal interactions help to explain routine dynamics. Review of Managerial Science, 15: 1913-1936.
41.
DavidsonD.1963. Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy, 60: 685-700.
42.
DavidsonD.1970. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
43.
DennettD. C.1987. The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
DevinneyT. M.2013. Is microfoundational thinking critical to management thought and practice?Academy of Management Perspectives, 27: 81-84.
45.
DeweyJ.1922. Human nature and conduct, an introduction to social psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
46.
DietrichF.ListC.2016. Mentalism versus behaviorism in economics: A philosophy of science perspective. Economics and Philosophy, 32: 249-281.
47.
DionysiouD. D.2021. Pragmatism and routine dynamics. In PentlandB. T.RerupC.SeidlD.DittrichK.D’AdderioL.FeldmanM. S. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of routine dynamics: 62-72. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
DittrichK.2021. Ethnography and routine dynamics. In PentlandB. T.RerupC.SeidlD.DittrichK.D’AdderioL.FeldmanM. S. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of routine dynamics: 103-129. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
DittrichK.SeidlD.2018. Emerging intentionality in routine dynamics: A pragmatist view. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 111-138.
50.
DreyfusH. L.1990. Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
EggersJ. P.KaplanS.2013. Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 7: 295-340.
53.
Elder-VassD.2010. The causal power of social structures: Emergence, structure and agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Elder-VassD.2015. Collective intentionality and causal powers. Journal of Social Ontology, 1: 251-269.
55.
ElsterJ.1983. Explaining technical change: A case study in the philosophy of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
ElsterJ.1989. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
EnçB.2003. How we act: Causes, reasons, and intentions. New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
FeldmanM. S.2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11: 611-629.
59.
FeldmanM. S.2016. Routines as process: Past, present and future. In Howard-GrenvilleJ.RerupC.LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), Organizational routines. How they are created, maintained, and changed: 23-46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
FeldmanM. S.D’AdderioL.DittrichK.JarzabkowskiP.2019. Introduction: Routine dynamics in action. In Routine dynamics in action: Replication and transformation: 1-10. Boston: Emerald Publishing Ltd.
61.
FeldmanM. S.OrlikowskiW. J.2011. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22: 1240-1253.
62.
FeldmanM. S.PentlandB. T.2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94-118.
63.
FeldmanM. S.PentlandB. T.D’AdderioL.DittrichK.RerupC.SeidlD. (Eds.). 2021. Cambridge handbook of routine dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64.
FelinT.FossN.2009. Organizational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25: 157-167.
65.
FelinT.FossN.HeimeriksK. H.MadsenT. L.2012. Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 1351-1374.
66.
FelinT.FossN. J.2005. Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3: 441-455.
67.
FelinT.FossN. J.2011. The endogenous origins of experience, routines, and organizational capabilities: The poverty of stimulus. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7: 231-256.
68.
FelinT.FossN. J.2012. The (proper) microfoundations of routines and capabilities: A response to winter, Pentland, Hodgson and Knudsen. Journal of Institutional Economics, 8: 271-288.
69.
FelinT.FossN. J.PloyhartR. E.2015. The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9: 575-632.
70.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E.1991. Social cognition (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
FossN. J.LindenbergS.2012. Teams, team motivation, and the theory of the firm. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33: 369-383.
73.
FossN. J.LindenbergS.2013. Microfoundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27: 85-102.
74.
FossN. J.LinderS.2019. Microfoundations: Nature, debate, and promise. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
FoxS.2006. “Inquiries of every imaginable kind”: Ethnomethodology, practical action and the new socially situated learning theory. The Sociological Review, 54: 426-445.
76.
FrankfurtH. G.1971. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy, 68: 5-20.
77.
GaoD.DengX.BaiB.2014. The emergence of organizational routines from habitual behaviours of multiple actors: An agent-based simulation study. Journal of Simulation, 8: 215-230.
78.
GardnerB.LallyP.WardleJ.2012. Making health habitual: The psychology of ‘habit-formation’ and general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 62: 664-666.
79.
GarfinkelH.1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
80.
GeachP. T.1957. Mental acts: Their contents and their objects. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
81.
GherardiS.2009. Introduction: The critical power of the “practice lens.”Management Learning, 40: 115-128.
82.
GibbsR. W.2005. Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
83.
GiddensA.1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
84.
GinetC.1990. On action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
85.
GlaserV. L.ValadaoR.HanniganT. R.2021. Algorithms and routine dynamics. In PentlandB. T.RerupC.SeidlD.DittrichK.D’AdderioL.FeldmanM. S. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of routine dynamics: 315-328. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
86.
GodfreyP. C.HillC. W. L.1995. The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 519-533.
87.
GohJ. M.GaoG.AgarwalR.2011. Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Information Systems Research, 22: 565-585.
88.
GohK. T.PentlandB.2019. From actions to paths to patterning: Toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Academy of Management Journal, 62: 1901-1929.
89.
GrégoireD. A.CorbettA. C.McMullenJ. S.2011. The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 1443-1477.
90.
GreveH. R.2013. Microfoundations of management: Behavioral strategies and levels of rationality in organizational action. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27: 103-119.
91.
GulatiR.2007. Tent Poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 775-782.
92.
HaackP.SiewekeJ.WesselL. (Eds.). 2019. Microfoundations of institutions. Boston: Emerald Publishing Ltd.
93.
HarleyB.CornelissenJ.2020. Rigor with or without templates? The pursuit of methodological rigor in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25: 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120937786
94.
HedströmP.YlikoskiP.2010. Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 49-67.
95.
HelfatC. E.PeterafM. A.2014. Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 831-850.
96.
HodgsonG. M.2003. The mystery of the routine: The Darwinian destiny of an evolutionary theory of economic change. Revue économique, 54: 355-384.
97.
HodgsonG. M.KnudsenT.2011. Poverty of stimulus and absence of cause: Some questions for Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7: 295-298.
98.
HodgkinsonG. P.StarbuckW. H. (Eds.) 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
99.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.RerupC.2017. A process perspective on organizational routines. In LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), Sage handbook of process organizational studies: 323-339. London, UK: Sage Publications.
100.
HuebnerB.2014. Macrocognition: A theory of distributed minds and collective intentionality. New York: Oxford University Press.
101.
JarzabkowskiP.SearleR. H.2004. Harnessing diversity and collective action in the top management team. Long Range Planning, 37: 399-419.
102.
JeannerodM.2006. Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103.
KingB. G.FelinT.WhettenD. A.2010. Perspective—finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science, 21: 290-305.
104.
Knorr CetinaK.SchatzkiT. R.von SavignyE.2001. The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge.
105.
KnudsenT.2008. Organizational routines in evolutionary theory. In BeckerM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines: 125-151. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
106.
KremserW.BlagoevB.2020. The dynamics of prioritizing: How actors temporally pattern complex role–routine ecologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66: 339-379.
107.
KremserW.PentlandB.BrunswickerS.2019. Interdependence within and between routines: A performative perspective. In FeldmanM. S.D’AdderioL.DittrichK.JarzabkowskiJ. P. (Eds.), Routine dynamics in action: Replication and transformation: 79-98. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Ltd.
108.
KremserW.XiaoJ.2021. Self-managed forms of organizing and routine dynamics. In PentlandB. T.RerupC.SeidlD.DittrichK.D’AdderioL.FeldmanM. S. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of routine dynamics: 421-432. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
LeeM. Y.EdmondsonA. C.2017. Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37: 35-58.
111.
LevinthalD.RerupC.2006. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17: 502-513.
112.
LewinS. B.1996. Economics and psychology: Lessons for our own day from the early twentieth century. Journal of Economic Literature, 34: 1293-1323.
113.
LindenbergS.FossN. J.2011. Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36: 500-525.
114.
LinderS.FossN. J.2018. Microfoundations of organizational goals: A review and new directions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20: S39-S62.
115.
ListC.HerfeldC.forthcoming. In favor of mentalism in economics: A conversation with Christian List. In HerfeldC. (Ed.), Conversations on rational choice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
116.
ListC.PettitP.2011. Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
117.
LittleD.1986. The scientific Marx. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
118.
LittleD.1998. Microfoundations, method, and causation: On the philosophy of the social sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction/Routledge.
119.
LittleD.2020. Organizations as actors: Microfoundations of organizational intentionality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50: 260-279.
120.
LoweE. J.2008. Personal agency: The metaphysics of mind and action. New York: Oxford University Press.
121.
LudwigK.2014. Proxy agency in collective action. Noûs, 48: 75-105.
122.
LudwigK.2017. Do corporations have minds of their own?Philosophical Psychology, 30: 265-297.
123.
LudwigK.JankovicM.2018. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. New York: Routledge.
124.
MakowskiP. T.2017. Tadeusz Kotarbiński’s action theory - Reinterpretive studies. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
125.
MakowskiP. T.2020. Shared intentionality and automatic imitation: The case of La Ola. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50: 465-492.
126.
MakowskiP. T.2021a. Optimizing concepts: Conceptual engineering in the field of management. The case of routines research. Academy of Management Review, 46: 702-724.
127.
MakowskiP. T.2021b. Routines: Towards the complexity of organizational intentionality. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 13: 1059-1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164–021-00566-1
128.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A.1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
129.
MarshallN.2008. Cognitive and practice-based theories of organizational knowledge and learning: Incompatible or complementary?Management Learning, 39: 413-435.
130.
MeleA. R.1992. Springs of action: Understanding intentional behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
131.
MeleA. R.2003. Motivation and agency. New York: Oxford University Press.
132.
MenaryR.2010. Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9: 459-463.
133.
MisyakJ. B.MelkonyanT.ZeitounH.ChaterN.2014. Unwritten rules: Virtual bargaining underpins social interaction, culture, and society. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18: 512-519.
134.
MoosmayerD. C.2012. A model of management academics’ intentions to influence values. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11: 155-173.
MorgesonF. P.HofmannD. A.1999. The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. The Academy of Management Review, 24: 249-265.
MuñozF.-F.EncinarM.-I.2014. Intentionality and the emergence of complexity: An analytical approach. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24: 317-334.
139.
MurrayA.RhymerJ.SirmonD. G.2020. Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46: 552-571.
140.
MylopoulosM.PacherieE.2018. Intentions: The dynamic hierarchical model revisited. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review of Cognitive Science, 10: e1481.
141.
NayakA.ChiaR.CanalesJ. I.2019. Non-cognitive microfoundations: Understanding dynamic capabilities as idiosyncratically refined sensitivities and predispositions. Academy of Management Review, 45: 280-303.
142.
NealD. T.WoodW.LabrecqueJ. S.LallyP.2012. How do habits guide behavior? Perceived and actual triggers of habits in daily life. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48: 492-498.
143.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G.1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press / Harvard University Press.
144.
NewellA.SimonH. A.1956. The logic theory machine—A complex information processing system. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 2: 61-79.
145.
NicoliniD.2013. Practice theory, work, and organization. An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
146.
NicoliniD.GherardiS.YanowD.2003. Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
147.
O'BrienL.SoteriouM. (2009). Mental actions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
148.
O’ConnorT.2000. Persons and causes: The metaphysics of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
149.
OkhuysenG.BonardiJ.-P.2011. The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 36: 6-11.
150.
OrlikowskiW. J.2015. Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. In GolsorkhiD.SeidlD.VaaraE.RouleauL. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice: 33-43. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
151.
OrlikowskiW. J.ScottS. V.2008. Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2: 433-474.
152.
OswickC.FlemingP.HanlonG.2011. From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory building. Academy of Management Review, 36: 318-337.
153.
PacherieE.2008. The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107: 179-217.
154.
PacherieE.2012. The phenomenology of joint action: Self-agency versus joint agency. In AxelS. (Ed.), Joint attention: New developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and social neuroscience: 343-389. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
155.
ParmigianiA.Howard-GrenvilleJ.2011. Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 5: 413-453.
156.
ParsonsT.1968. The structure of social action. New York: Free Press.
157.
PaternotteC.2014. Constraints on joint action. In GallottiM.MichaelJ. (Eds.), Perspectives on social ontology and social cognition: 103-123. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
158.
PentlandB. T.2010. The foundation is solid, if you know where to look: Comment on Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7: 279-293.
159.
PentlandB. T.RueterH. H.1994. Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 484-510.
160.
PeterssonB.2017. Team reasoning and collective intentionality. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 8: 199-218.
161.
PollardB.2006. Explaining actions with habits. American Philosophical Quarterly, 43: 57-69.
162.
ReckwitzA.2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5: 243-263.
163.
RerupC.SpencerB.2021. Carnegie school experiential learning and routine dynamics. In PentlandB. T.RerupC.SeidlD.DittrichK.D’AdderioL.FeldmanM. S. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of routine dynamics: 445-459. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
RouseJ.2001. Two concepts of practices. In Knorr-CetinaK.SchatzkiT. R.von SavignyE. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory: 189-198. New York: Routledge.
166.
RouseJ. T.2006. Practice theory. In TurnerS.RisjordM. (Eds.), Philosophy of anthropology and sociology: 499-540. Boston: Elsevier.
167.
RowlandsM.2013. The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
SalvatoC.2021. Dynamic capabilities and routine dynamics. In PentlandB. T.RerupC.SeidlD.DittrichK.D’AdderioL.FeldmanM. S. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of routine dynamics: 460-480. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
170.
SamuelsonJ.2006. The new rigor: Beyond the right answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5: 356-365.
171.
SchatzkiT.2017a. Pas de deux: Practice theory and phenomenology. Phenomenologische Forschungen, 2017: 25-40.
172.
SchatzkiT.2017b. Practices and people. Teoria e Prática em Administração, 7: 26-53.
173.
SchatzkiT. R.1987. Overdue analysis of Bourdieu’s theory of practice. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 30: 113-135.
174.
SchatzkiT. R.1996. Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
175.
SchatzkiT. R.2001a. Introduction: Practice theory. In Knorr CetinaK.SchatzkiT. R.von SavignyE. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory: 10-23. London-New York: Routledge.
176.
SchatzkiT. R.2001b. Practice mind-ed orders. In Knorr-CetinaK.SchatzkiT. R.von SavignyE. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory: 42-55. New York: Routledge.
177.
SchatzkiT. R.2012. A primer on practices. In HiggsJ.BarnettR.BillettS.HutchingsM.TredeF. (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies: 1326. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
178.
SchilkeO.HuS.HelfatC. E.2018. Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 12: 390-439.
179.
SchlosserM.2018. Embodied cognition and temporally extended agency. Synthese, 195: 2089-2112.
180.
SchlosserM. E.2011. Agency, ownership, and the standard theory. In AguilarJ. H.BuckareffA. A.FrankishK. (Eds.), New waves in philosophy of action: 13-31. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
181.
SchlosserM. E.2019. Agency. In ZaltaE. N. (Ed.) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/agency/.
182.
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
183.
Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
184.
SearleJ.1990. Collective intentions and actions. In Jerry MorganP. R. C.PollackM. (Eds.), Intentions in communication: 401-415. MIT Press.
185.
SenA.1973. Behaviour and the concept of preference. Economica, 40: 241-259.
186.
ShapiroS.2014. Massively shared agency. In VargasM.YaffeG. (Eds.), Rational and social agency. The philosophy of Michael Bratman: 258-289. New York: Oxford University Press.
187.
ShepherdD. A.McMullenJ. S.JenningsP. D.2007. The formation of opportunity beliefs: Overcoming ignorance and reducing doubt. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 75-95.
SobelD.WallS. (Eds.). 2009. Reasons for action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
190.
TaillardM.PetersL. D.PelsJ.MeleC.2016. The role of shared intentions in the emergence of service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69: 2972-2980.
191.
ThomasonR. H.HortyJ.2022. Artificial and machine agency. In FerreroL. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of agency: 366-375. New York: Routledge.
192.
TsoukasH.1998. The word and the world: A critique of representationalism in management research. International Journal of Public Administration, 21: 781-817.
193.
TsoukasH.2010. Practice, strategy making and intentionality: A Heideggerian onto-epistemology for strategy as practice. In GolsorkhiD.SeidlD.VaaraE.RouleauL. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice: 47-62. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
194.
TsoukasH.2021. Process theorizing and routine dynamics. In PentlandB. T.RerupC.SeidlD.DittrichK.D’AdderioL.FeldmanM. S. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of routine dynamics: 37-48. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
195.
TuomelaR.2007. The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. New York: Oxford University Press.
196.
TuomelaR.2011a. Cooperation as joint action. Analyse & Kritik, 33: 65-86.
197.
TuomelaR.2011b. Holistic social causation and explanation. In DieksD.GonzalezW.HartmannS.UebelT.WeberM., (Eds) Explanation, prediction, and confirmation. The philosophy of science in a European perspective: 305-318. Dordrecht: Springer.
198.
TuomelaR.2013. Social ontology: Collective intentionality and group agents. New York: Oxford University Press.
199.
TurnerS. F.CacciatoriE.2016. The multiplicity of habit: Implications for routines research. In Howard-GrenvilleJ. A.RerupC.LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), Organizational routines: How they are created, maintained, and changed: 71-95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
200.
TurnerS. F.RindovaV. P.2017. Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1253-1280.
201.
VaastE.WalshamG.2005. Representations and actions: The transformation of work practices with IT use. Information and Organization, 15: 65-89.
202.
VardamanJ. M.TaylorS. G.AllenD. G.GondoM. B.AmisJ. M.2015. Translating intentions to behavior: The interaction of network structure and behavioral intentions in understanding employee turnover. Organization Science, 26: 1177-1191.
203.
von MisesL.1949. Human action. A treatise on economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
204.
VoronovM.WeberK.2020. People, actors, and the humanizing of institutional theory. Journal of Management Studies, 57: 873-884.
WestgrenR.ForemanP.2021. Shared identity, intentionality and agency in organizations. In GalavanR. J.SundK. J. (Eds.), Thinking about cognition: 57-72. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Ltd.
207.
WheelerM.2010. The problem of representation. In SchmickingD.GallagherS. (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science: 318-336. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
208.
WinterS. G.2011. Problems at the foundation? Comments on Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7: 257-277.
209.
WinterS. G.2013. Habit, deliberation, and action: Strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27: 120-137.
210.
WoodW.NealD. T.2007. A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 114: 843-863.
211.
WoodW.RüngerD.2016. Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67: 289-314.
212.
YlikoskiP.2012. Micro, macro, and mechanisms. In KincaidH. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of social science: 21-45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
213.
ZahleJ.2021. Methodological holism in the social sciences. In ZaltaE. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/holism-social/.
214.
ZahleJ.KincaidH.2019. Why be a methodological individualist?Synthese, 196: 655-675.
