Populism is on the rise across liberal democracies. The sociopsychological underpinnings of this increasing endorsement of populist ideology should be uncovered. In an online cross-sectional survey study among adult samples from five countries (Chile, France, Italy, Romania, and the United Kingdom; N = 9,105), we aimed to replicate an economic distress pattern in which relative deprivation and identity threat are associated with populism. We further tested a cultural backlash pattern—including perceived anomie, collective narcissism, and identity threat as predictors of populism. Multigroup structural equation models supported both economic distress and cultural backlash paths as predictors of populist thin ideology endorsement. In both paths, identity threat to belonging played a significant role as partial mediator. Furthermore, an integrative model showed that the two patterns were not mutually exclusive. These findings emphasize the implication of identity threat to belonging as an explanatory mediator and demonstrate the cross-national generalizability of these patterns.
AbramsD.GrantP. R. (2012). Testing the Social Identity Relative Deprivation (SIRD) model of social change: The political rise of Scottish nationalism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02032.x
2.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
3.
Bar-TalD.MagalT. (2021). Socio-psychological analysis of the deterioration of democracy and the rise of authoritarianism: The role of needs, values, and context. In ForgasP. J.CranoB.FiedlerK. (Eds.), The psychology of populism (pp. 42–61). Routledge.
4.
BertinP.NeraK.HamerK.Uhl-HaedickeI.DelouvéeS. (2021). Stand out of my sunlight: The mediating role of climate change conspiracy beliefs in the relationship between national collective narcissism and acceptance of climate science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 738–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992114
5.
BlanzM.MummendeyA.MielkeR.KlinkA. (1998). Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(5), 697–729.
6.
BonansingaD. (2022). “A threat to us”: The interplay of insecurity and enmity narratives in left-wing populism. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24, 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481221078187
7.
BreakwellG. M. (1988). Strategies adopted when identity is threatened. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 1(2), 189–203.
8.
BrislinR. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
CarrerasM.Irepoglu CarrerasY.BowlerS. (2019). Long-term economic distress, cultural backlash, and support for Brexit. Comparative Political Studies, 52(9), 1396–1424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830714
11.
Castanho SilvaB.JungkunzS.HelblingM.LittvayL. (2020). An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919833176
12.
CenaL.RoccatoM.RussoS. (2022). Relative deprivation, national GDP and right-wing populism: A multilevel, multinational study. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2636
13.
DennisonJ.Turnbull-DugarteS. J. (2022). Populist attitudes and threat perceptions of global transformations and governance: Experimental evidence from India and the United Kingdom. Political Psychology, 43, 873–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12817
14.
DestinM.Rheinschmidt-SameM.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Status-based identity: A conceptual approach integrating the social psychological study of socioeconomic status and identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616664424
15.
Di MarcoM.MarzuilloC.De VitoC.MatarazzoA.MassimiA.VillariP. (2013). Prevention in times of economic crisis and spending review. The Lazio Region as a study case. Igiene e Sanita Pubblica, 69(6), 639–656.
16.
DurkheimE. (1897). Suicide: A study in sociology. The Free Press.
17.
FilsingerM.WamslerS.ErhardtJ.FreitagM. (2021). National identity and populism: The relationship between conceptions of nationhood and populist attitudes. Nations and Nationalism, 27(3), 656–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12689
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904
20.
Golec de ZavalaA.KeenanO. (2021). Collective narcissism as a framework for understanding populism. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.69
21.
HaferJ. A.RanB. (2016). Developing a citizen perspective of public participation: Identity construction as citizen motivation to participate. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38(3), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2016.1202080
HartwichL.BeckerJ. C. (2019). Exposure to neoliberalism increases resentment of the elite via feelings of anomie and negative psychological reactions: Neoliberalism and anti-elitism. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12311
24.
HawkinsK. A.Rovira KaltwasserC.AndreadisI. (2020). The activation of populist attitudes. Government and Opposition, 55(2), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.23
25.
HinckleyR. A. (2021). Local existential threat, authoritarianism, and support for right-wing populism. The Social Science Journal, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1859816
26.
HoggM. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In McKeownS.HajiR.FergusonN. (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory: Contemporary global perspectives (pp. 3–17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1
27.
HoggM. A.Gøtzsche-AstrupO. (2021). Self-uncertainty and populism: Why we endorse populist ideologies, identify with populist groups, and support populist leaders. In ForgasP. J.CranoB.FiedlerK. (Eds.), The psychology of populism (pp. 197–218). Routledge.
28.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2016, August). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash (HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026). Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659
29.
JayS.BatruchA.JettenJ.McGartyC.MuldoonO. T. (2019). Economic inequality and the rise of far-right populism: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2409
30.
KalemajI. (2021). Transitional justice and democratic consolidation in post-communist Eastern Europe: Romania and Albania. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 12(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2021-0104
31.
KneuerM. (2019). The tandem of populism and Euroscepticism: A comparative perspective in the light of the European crises. Contemporary Social Science, 14(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1426874
32.
LammersJ.BaldwinM. (2020). Make America gracious again: Collective nostalgia can increase and decrease support for right-wing populist rhetoric. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(5), 943–954. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2673
33.
LangenkampA.BienstmanS. (2022). Populism and layers of social belonging: Support of populist parties in Europe. Political Psychology, 43, 931–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12827
34.
ManuntaE.BeckerM. (2024). The populist thin ideology: From a logical-theoretical analysis to the development of a new scale. In SensalesG. (Ed.), Political psychology perspectives on populism (pp. 187–232). Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
ManuntaE.BeckerM.EasterbrookM. J.VignolesV. L. (2022). Economic distress and populism: Examining the role of identity threat and feelings of social exclusion. Political Psychology, 43(5), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12824
36.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.PanayiotouO.CastellanosK.BataynehJ. (2018). Populism as identity politics: Perceived in-Group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732393
37.
McNeilK. A.BeggsD. L. (1971, February). Directional hypotheses with the multiple linear regression approach [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY, United States of America.
38.
MeijenJ.VermeerschP. (2023). Populist memory politics and the performance of victimhood: Analysing the political exploitation of historical injustice in Central Europe. Government and Opposition, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2023.10
39.
MinkovM.KaasaA. (2022). Do dimensions of culture exist objectively? A validation of the revised Minkov-Hofstede model of culture with world values survey items and scores for 102 countries. Journal of International Management, 28(4), 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2022.100971
40.
MuddeC. (2017). An ideational approach. In Rovira KaltwasserC.TaggartP. A.EspejoP. O.OstiguyP. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on populism (pp. 27–47). Oxford University Press.
41.
MuddeC.KaltwasserC. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11
42.
MuddeC.KaltwasserC. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
43.
MuthukrishnaM.BellA. V.HenrichJ.CurtinC. M.GedranovichA.McInerneyJ.ThueB. (2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782
44.
OliverJ. E.RahnW. M. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639
45.
OnraetE.DhontK.Van HielA. (2014). The relationships between internal and external threats and right-wing attitudes: A three-wave longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(6), 712–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524256
46.
OxendineA. R. (2019). The political psychology of inequality and why it matters for populism. International Perspectives in Psychology, 8(4), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000118
47.
PettigrewT. F.ChristO.WagnerU.MeertensR. W.van DickR.ZickA. (2008). Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00567.x
ProoijenJ.RosemaS.Chemke-DreyfusA.TrikalitiK.HormigoR. (2022). Make it great again: The relationship between populist attitudes and nostalgia. Political Psychology, 43, 952–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12825
50.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
51.
RevelleW. (2021). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
52.
Rhodes-PurdyM.NavarreR.UtychS. M. (2021). Populist psychology: Economics, culture, and emotions. The Journal of Politics, 83, 1559–1572. https://doi.org/10.1086/715168
53.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
54.
RooduijnM.Van KesselS.FroioC.PirroA.De LangeS.HalikiopoulouD.LewisP.MuddeC.TaggartP. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and eurosceptic parties in Europe. www.popu-list.org
55.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
56.
SchulzA.MüllerP.SchemerC.WirzD. S.WettsteinM.WirthW. (2018). Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw037
57.
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F.HuoY. J. (2020). Relative deprivation theory: Advances and applications. In SulsJ.CollinsR. L.WheelerL. (Eds.), Social comparison, judgment, and behavior (pp. 495–526). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190629113.003.0018
58.
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F.PippinG. M.BialosiewiczS. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825
UrbanskaK.GuimondS. (2018). Swaying to the extreme: Group relative deprivation predicts voting for an extreme right party in the French presidential election. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.201
64.
VignolesV. L. (2011). Identity motives. In SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK.VignolesV. L. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 403–432). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_18
65.
VignolesV. L. (2018). Identity: Personal AND social. In DeauxK.SnyderM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 289–316). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190224837.013.12
66.
WalsheK.SmithJ. (2015). Comprehensive spending review and the NHS. British Medical Journal, 351, h6477. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6477
67.
WangY. A.RhemtullaM. (2021). Power analysis for parameter estimation in structural equation modeling: A discussion and tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920918253
68.
YuanK.-H.ChanW. (2016). Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-difference tests. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000080
69.
ZhangC. X.PearceP.ChenG. (2019). Not losing our collective face: Social identity and Chinese tourists’ reflections on uncivilised behaviour. Tourism Management, 73, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.01.020
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
