The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that possession of a strong social identity would motivate people to arrive at a conclusion which supported their previous beliefs when responding to information that threatened their group. In a pre-measure, participants were classified as either weak or strong in social identity. After reading a threatening or non-threatening (fictitious) report about their group, participants were asked to evaluate the report. The results showed that participants with a strong social identity evaluated the threatening information more negatively than those with a weak social identity. Participants who had a strong social identity evaluated the non-threatening information more positively than those with a weak social identity. These results are discussed in the context of motivated reasoning and social identity theory.
Abrams, D. , & Hogg, M. A. (1988) Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
2.
Abrams, D. , Thomas, J., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Numerical distinctiveness, social identity and gender salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 87-92.
3.
Bazerman, M. H. , Giuliano, T., & Appelman, A. (1984). Escalation in individual and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 141-152.
4.
Branscombe, N. R. , & Wann, D. L. (1991). The positive social and self-concept consequences of sports team identification. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 15, 115-127.
5.
Branscombe, N. R. & Wann, D. L. (1992). Physiological arousal and reactions to outgroup members during competitions that implicate an important social identity. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 85-93.
6.
Branscombe, N. R. , & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657.
7.
Branscombe, N. R. , Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381-388.
8.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
9.
Brown, J. D. , Collins, R. L., & Schmidt, G. W. (1988). Self-esteem and direct versus indirect forms of self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Society Psychology, 55, 445-453.
10.
Cialdini, R. B. , Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.
11.
Cialdini, R. B. , & DeNicholas, M. E. (1989). Self-presentation by association. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 57, 626-631.
12.
Cialdini, R. B. , & Richardson, K. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of impression management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406-415.
13.
Crocker, J. , & Schwartz, I. (1985). Prejudice and ingroup favouritism in a minimal intergroup situation: Effects of self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 379-386.
14.
Crocker, J. , Thompson, L. L., McGraw, K. M., & Ingerman, C. (1987). Downward comparison, prejudice and evaluations of others: Effects of self-esteem and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 907-916.
15.
Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal groups paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 263-292). Chichester: Wiley.
16.
Dietz-Uhler, B. (1996). The escalation of commitment in political decision-making groups: A social identity approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 611-629.
17.
Dietz-Uhler, B. , & Murrell, A. (1998). Effects of social identity and threat on self-esteem and attributions. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 1-12.
18.
Ditto, P. H. , & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568-584.
19.
Doosje, B. , & Ellemers, N. (1997). Stereotyping under threat: The role of group identification. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 257-272). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
20.
Doosje, B. , Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
21.
Doosje, B. , Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642-655.
22.
Eagly, A. H. , & Chaiken, S. (1992). The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
23.
Ellemers, N. , Doosje, B., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1992). Status protection in high status minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 123-140.
24.
Ellemers, N. , Rijswijk, W. V., Roefs, M., & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186-198.
25.
Ellemers, N. , Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626.
26.
Ethier, K. A. , & Deaux, K. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 243-251.
27.
Finch, J. F. , & Cialdini, R. B. (1989). Another indirect tactic of (self-)image management. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 222-232.
28.
Hogg, M. A. , & Abrams, D. (1990). Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 28-47). New York: Springer-Verlag.
29.
Hogg, M. A. , & Abrams, D. (1993). Toward a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173-190). New York: Prentice-Hall.
30.
Hogg, M. A. , & Hains, S. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295-309.
31.
Hogg, M. A. , & Turner, J. C. (1985). Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 51-66.
32.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
33.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
34.
Kameda, T. , & Sugimori, S. (1993). Psychological entrapment in group decision making: An assigned decision rule and a groupthink phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 282-292.
35.
Karasawa, M. (1991). Toward an assessment of social identity: The structure of group identification and its effects on in-group evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 293-307.
36.
Kowalski, R. M. , & Wolfe, R. (1994). Collective identity orientation, patriotism, and reactions to national outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 533-540.
37.
Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivation and inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636-647.
38.
Lalonde, R. N. (1992). The dynamics of group differentiation in the face of defeat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 336-342.
39.
Lalonde, R. N. , & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 78-85.
40.
Lee, M. J. (1985). Self-esteem and social identity in basketball fans: A closer look at basking-in-reflected glory. Journal of Sport Behavior, 8, 210-223.
41.
Lemyre, L. , & Smith, P. M. (1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 660-670.
42.
Liberman, A. , & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669-679.
43.
Long, K. M. , Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1994). The influence of personal and collective self-esteem on strategies of social differentiation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 313-329.
44.
Luhtanen, R. , & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
45.
Marques, J. M. (1990). The black-sheep effect: Out-group homogeneity in social comparison settings. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Critical and constructive advances (pp. 131-151). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46.
Marques, J. M. , Robalo, E. M., & Rocha, S. A. (1992). Ingroup bias and the `black sheep' effect: Assessing the impact of social identification and perceived variability on group judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 331-352.
47.
Marques, J. M. , & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
48.
Marques, J. M. , Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. -P. (1988). The `Black Sheep Effect': Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
49.
Matthews, D. , & Dietz-Uhler, B. (1998). The black sheep effect: How positive and negative advertisements affect voters' perceptions of the sponsor of the advertisement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1902-1914.
50.
Oakes, P. , & Turner, J. C. (1980). Social categorization and intergroup behavior: Does the minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive?European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 295-301.
51.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926.
52.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality. Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81.
53.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
54.
Pyszczynski, T. , Greenberg, J., & Holt, K. (1985). Maintaining consistency between self-serving beliefs and available data: A bias in information evaluation following success and failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 179-190.
55.
Schneider, D. J. (1969). Tactical self-presentation after success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 262-268.
56.
Snyder, C. R. , Lassegard, M., & Ford, C. E. (1986). Distancing after group success and failure: Basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 382-388.
57.
Spears, R. , Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
58.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
59.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
60.
Turner, J. C. , & Oakes, P. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Turner, P. J., & Smith, P. M. (1984). Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 97-111.
62.
Wann, D. L. (1996). Seasonal changes in spectators' identification and involvement with and evaluations of college basketball and football teams. Psychological Record, 46, 201-215.
63.
Wann, D. L. , & Branscombe, N. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14, 103-117.
64.
Wann. D. L. , & Branscombe, N. R. (1991). Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 1-17.
65.
Wann, D. L. , & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Influence of level of identification with a group and physiological arousal on perceived intergroup complexity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 223-235.
66.
Wann, D. L. , & Dolan, T. J. (1994). Attributions of highly identified sports spectators. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 783-792.
67.
Wann, D. L. , Hamlet, M. A., Wilson, T. M., & Hodges, J. A. (1993). Basking in reflected glory, cutting off reflected failure, and cutting off future failure: The importance of group identification. Social Behavior and Personality, 23, 377-388.
68.
Whyte, G. (1991). Diffusion of responsibility: Effects on the escalation tendency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 408-415.
69.
Whyte, G. (1993). Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 430-455.
