Gender Backlash and the Moderating Role of Shared Racial Group Membership

Abstract

Research suggests that White women often experience more gender backlash than women of color in response to expressions of agency. We consider whether this differential in backlash is driven by the match or mismatch of the race of both perceivers and targets. Much of the existing work in this space examines the perspective of White perceivers, which might underestimate racial minority women’s susceptibility to backlash if backlash occurs primarily in same-race interactions. We examine how the racial group memberships of targets and perceivers jointly affect backlash against gender-norm violating women. In analyses of Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford’s accusations of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh and Anita Hill’s accusations against Clarence Thomas during their respective U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings, an archival analysis of the 2016 U.S. presidential election, and two experiments, we find that perceivers of different races tend to express more backlash toward racial in-group than out-group women.

Keywords

gender race intersectionality backlash

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Viki

G. T.

Masser

Bohner

(2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111

Akinola

Martin

A. E.

Phillips

K. W.

(2018). To delegate or not to delegate: Gender differences in affective associations and behavioral responses to delegation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1467–1491. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0662

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley.

Amanatullah

E. T.

Tinsley

C. H.

(2013). Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much . . . or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.006

American National Election Studies. (1993). American National Election Study, 1992: Pre- and post-election survey [enhanced with 1990 and 1991 data] [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06067.v3

American National Election Studies. (2017). American National Election Studies 2016 time series study [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36824.v2

Bai

(2018). Evidence that A Large Amount of Low Quality Responses on MTurk Can Be Detected with Repeated GPS Coordinates. https://www.maxhuibai.com/blog/evidence-that-responses-from-repeating-gps-are-random

Bem

S. L.

(1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215

Berdahl

J. L.

Min

J.-A.

(2012). Prescriptive stereotypes and workplace consequences for East Asians in North America. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027692

10.

Biernat

Vescio

T. K.

Billings

L. S.

(1999). Black sheep and expectancy violation: Integrating two models of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(4), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4<523::AID-EJSP944>3.0.CO;2-J

11.

Bonilla-Silva

Goar

Embrick

D. G.

(2006). When whites flock together: The social psychology of white habitus. Critical Sociology, 32(2–3), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916306777835268

12.

Brescoll

V. L.

Okimoto

T. G.

Vial

A. C.

(2018). You’ve come a long way . . . maybe: How moral emotions trigger backlash against women leaders. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12261

13.

Brewer

M. B.

(1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307

14.

Burns

Barton

Kerby

(2012). The state of diversity in today’s workforce. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2012/07/12/11938/the-state-of-diversity-in-todays-workforce/

15.

Chow

R. M.

Lowery

B. S.

Hogan

C. M.

(2013). Appeasement: Whites’ strategic support for affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212475224

16.

Christopher

A. N.

Mull

M. S.

(2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x

17.

Chuang

Wilkins

Tan

Mead

(2020). Racial minorities’ attitudes toward interracial couples: An intersection of race and gender. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24, 453–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219899482

18.

Coles

(2009). Negotiating the field of masculinity: The production and reproduction of multiple dominant masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 12(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X07309502

19.

Eagly

A. H.

Wood

Diekman

A. B.

(2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes

Trautner

H. M.

(Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Psychology Press.

20.

Galinsky

A. D.

Hall

E. V.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

(2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24(4), 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457783

21.

Gaunt

(2013). Breadwinning moms, caregiving dads: Double standard in social judgments of gender norm violators. Journal of Family Issues, 34(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12438686

22.

Ghavami

Peplau

L. A.

(2012). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464203

23.

Glenn

E. N.

(2000). The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race. In Ferree

M. M.

Lorber

Hess

B. B.

(Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Rowman & Littlefield.

24.

Hall

E. V.

Hall

A. V.

Galinsky

A. D.

Phillips

K. W.

(2019). MOSAIC: A model of stereotyping through associated and intersectional categories. Academy of Management Review, 44(3), 643–672. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0109

25.

Heilman

M. E.

Caleo

(2018). Combatting gender discrimination: A lack of fit framework. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 725–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218761587

26.

A. K.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

K. E.

Foels

Stewart

A. L.

(2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO 7 Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

27.

A. K.

Sidanius

Levin

D. T.

Banaji

M. R.

(2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021562

28.

Hoffman

L. W.

Kloska

D. D.

(1995). Parents’ gender-based attitudes toward marital roles and child rearing: Development and validation of new measures. Sex Roles, 32(5–6), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544598

29.

Johnson

K. L.

Freeman

J. B.

Pauker

(2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025335

30.

Judd

C. M.

Park

(1988). Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.778

31.

Jun

Lowery

B. S.

Guillory

(2017). Keeping minorities happy: Hierarchy maintenance and Whites’ decreased support for highly identified White politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(12), 1615–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217722554

32.

Knowles

E. D.

Peng

(2005). White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.223

33.

Larsen

K. S.

Long

(1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: Traditional or egalitarian? Sex Roles, 19(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292459

34.

Linville

P. W.

Jones

E. E.

(1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(5), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.5.689

35.

Lithwick

(2014). Talking to Anita Hill, 23 years after the hearings. Slate, 21 March. https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/03/talking-to-anita-hill-at-57-the-woman-who-stood-up-to-clarence-thomas-is-as-truthful-as-ever.html

36.

Livingston

R. W.

Rosette

A. S.

Washington

E. F.

(2012). Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science, 23(4), 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611428079

37.

Lumley

(2017). Survey: Analysis of complex survey samples (R package version 3.32). R Core Team.

38.

Marin

A. J.

Guadagno

R. E.

(1999). Perceptions of sexual harassment victims as a function of labeling and reporting. Sex Roles, 41(11/12), 921–940. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018888614601

39.

Marques

J. M.

Paez

(1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000011

40.

Marques

J. M.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

Leyens

J.-P.

(1988). The ‘black sheep effect’: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102

41.

McMahon

J. M.

Kahn

K. B.

(2018). When sexism leads to racism: Threat, protecting women, and racial bias. Sex Roles, 78(9–10), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0828-x

42.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2002). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

43.

Mollica

K. A.

Gray

Treviño

L. K.

(2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organization Science, 14(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.2.123.14994

44.

North

(2018). Christine Blasey Ford still getting threats after Kavanaugh hearing. Vox, 8 November. https://www.vox.com/2018/11/8/18076154/christine-blasey-ford-threats-kavanaugh-gofundme

45.

Okimoto

T. G.

Brescoll

V. L.

(2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371949

46.

Park

Rothbart

(1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(6), 1051–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1051

47.

Pascoe

C. J.

(2003). Multiple masculinities? Teenage boys talk about jocks and gender. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(10), 1423–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203251483

48.

Prentice

D. A.

Carranza

(2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066

49.

Pulerwitz

Barker

(2008). Measuring attitudes toward gender norms among young men in Brazil: Development and psychometric evaluation of the GEM scale. Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X06298778

50.

Purdie-Vaughns

Eibach

R. P.

(2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4

51.

Pyke

K. D.

Johnson

D. L.

(2003). Asian American women and racialized femininities: “Doing” gender across cultural worlds. Gender and Society, 17(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202238977

52.

Ratliff

K. A.

Redford

Conway

Smith

C. T.

(2019). Engendering support: Hostile sexism predicts voting for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(4), 578–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217741203

53.

Richeson

J. A.

Sommers

S. R.

(2016). Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115115

54.

Ridgeway

C. L.

Kricheli-Katz

(2013). Intersecting cultural beliefs in social relations: Gender, race, and class binds and freedoms. Gender and Society, 27(3), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213479445

55.

Rosette

A. S.

Koval

C. Z.

Livingston

(2016). Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties. Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.008

56.

Rudman

L. A.

Fairchild

(2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157

57.

Rudman

L. A.

Moss-Racusin

C. A.

Glick

Phelan

J. E.

(2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 167–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394286-9.00004-4

58.

Ryan

T. J.

(2018). Data contamination on MTurk. http://timryan.web.unc.edu/2018/08/12/data-contamination-on-mturk/

59.

Sagar

H. A.

Schofield

J. W.

(1980). Racial and behavioral cues in Black and White children’s perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(4), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.590

60.

Schug

Alt

N. P.

Klauer

K. C.

(2015). Gendered race prototypes: Evidence for the non-prototypicality of Asian men and Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.012

61.

Schuman

Steeh

Bobo

Krysan

(1997). Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.

62.

Sellers

R. M.

Shelton

J. N.

(2003). The role of racial identity in perceived racial discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1079–1092. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1079

63.

Sesko

A. K.

Biernat

(2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.016

64.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.

65.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2013, January 17–19). Life after P-hacking [Conference session]. Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, LA, United States. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2205186

66.

Smith

J. A.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

(2014). Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 432–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414531776

67.

Stillwell

Lowery

B. S.

(2020). Gendered racial boundary maintenance: Social penalties for White women in interracial relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121, 548–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000332

68.

Thomas

E. L.

Dovidio

J. F.

West

T. V.

(2014). Lost in the categorical shuffle: Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of black women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035096

69.

Tinkler

Zhao

Ridgeway

C. L.

(2019). Honorary Whites? Asian American women and the dominance penalty. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119836000

70.

West

Zimmerman

D. H.

(1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208326253

71.

Yamawaki

(2007). Rape perception and the function of ambivalent sexism and gender-role traditionality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(4), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506297210

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

6.84 MB