Both older individuals and women are proscribed from engaging in power-related behaviors, with women proscribed from behaving agentically and older individuals expected to cede desirable resources through “Succession.” However, little is known about whether these overlapping agency prescriptions equally target men and women across the lifespan. In seven studies, we find that older men face the strongest prescriptions to behave less agentically and cede resources, whereas older women are comparatively spared. We show that agency prescriptions more strongly target older men, compared to older women (Studies 1a, 1b, 2) and their younger counterparts (Studies 3 and 4) and examine social and economic consequences for agentic behavior in political, economic, and academic domains. We also find that older men garner more extreme (i.e., polarized) reactions due to their greater perceived resource threat (Studies 4-6). We conclude by discussing theoretical implications for diversity research and practical considerations for accommodating the fast-aging population.
AbeleA. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768.
ChasteenA. (2005). Seeing eye-to-eye: Do intergroup biases operate similarly for younger and older adults?International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 61, 123-139.
7.
CuddyA. J.NortonM. I.FiskeS. T. (2005). This old stereotype. The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 265-283.
8.
CuddyA. J.WolfE. B.GlickP.CrottyS.ChongJ.NortonM. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 622-635.
9.
DiekmanA. B.EaglyA. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
10.
EaglyA. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52, 1380-1383.
11.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878.
HallE.GalinskyA. D.PhillipsK. W. (2015). Gender profiling: A gendered race perspective on person–position fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 853-868.
15.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
HeilmanM. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
17.
HeilmanM. E.OkimotoT. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81.
18.
KahnJ. R.García-ManglanoJ.BianchiS. M. (2014). The motherhood penalty at midlife: Long-term effects of children on women’s careers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 56-72.
19.
KiteM. E.WhitleyB. R. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 22, 336-353.
20.
LivingstonR. W.RosetteA. S.WashingtonE. F. (2012). Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science, 23, 354-358.
21.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
22.
McHughM. C.FriezeI. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes a review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 1-16.
23.
MorrisonK. R.FastN. J.YbarraO. (2009). Group status, perceptions of threat, and support for social inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 204-210.
24.
NelsonT. D. (2016). The age of ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 72, 191-198.
25.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 982.
26.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2013a). Act your (old) age: Prescriptive, ageist biases over Succession, Consumption, and Identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 720-734.
27.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2013b). A prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scale: Succession, Identity, and Consumption (SIC). Psychological Assessment, 25, 706-713.
28.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2015). Intergenerational resource tensions in the workplace and beyond: Individual, Interpersonal, Institutional, International. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 159-179.
29.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2016). Resource scarcity and prescriptive attitudes generate subtle, intergenerational older-worker exclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 72, 119-141.
30.
PrattoF. (1994). Consciousness and automatic evaluation. In NiedenthalP.KitayamaS. (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences on perception and attention. (pp. 115-143). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
32.
PrenticeD. A.CarranzaE. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.
33.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The ideological sources and social consequences of non-prototypicality. Sex Roles, 59, 377-391.
34.
RolleroC.GlickP.TartagliaS. (2014). Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21, 149-159.
35.
RosetteA. S.LivingstonR. W. (2012). Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1162-1167.
36.
RudmanL. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645.
37.
RudmanL. A.Moss-RacusinC. A.PhelanJ. E.NautsS. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165-179.
38.
RudmanL. A.PhelanJ. E. (2008). Backlash effects for counterstereotypical behavior in organizations. In BriefA.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 28, pp. 61-79). New York, NY: Elsevier.
39.
SchulerD. A.RehbeinK.CramerR. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 659-672.
40.
SettlesI. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589-601.
United Nations. (2015a). Department of economic and social affairs, population division demographic components of future population growth: 2015 revision. New York, NY: Author. Available from http://unpopulation.org
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
