Prior research suggests that repeatedly approaching or avoiding a stimulus changes the liking of that stimulus. In two experiments, we investigated the relationship between, on one hand, effects of approach–avoidance (AA) training on implicit and explicit evaluations of novel faces and, on the other hand, contingency awareness as indexed by participants’ memory for the relation between stimulus and action. We observed stronger effects for faces that were classified as contingency aware and found no evidence that AA training caused changes in stimulus evaluations in the absence of contingency awareness. These findings challenge the standard view that AA training effects are (exclusively) the product of implicit learning processes, such as the automatic formation of associations in memory.
AmirN.KuckertzJ. M.NajmiS. (2013). The effect of modifying automatic action tendencies on overt avoidance behaviors. Emotion, 13, 478-484. doi:10.1037/a0030443
2.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
3.
BaeyensF.EelenP.van den BerghO. (1990). Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective evaluative learning. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 3-18. doi:10.1080/02699939008406760
4.
Bar-AnanY.De HouwerJ.NosekB. (2010). Evaluative conditioning and conscious knowledge of contingencies: A correlational investigation with large samples. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2313-2335. doi:10.1080/17470211003802442
5.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-6. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
6.
BryC.TreinenE.CorneilleO.YzerbytV. (2011). Eye’m lovin’ it! The role of gazing awareness in mimetic desires. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 987-993. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.023
7.
CacioppoJ. T.PriesterJ. R.BerntsonG. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5-17. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.65.1.5
8.
ChenM.BarghJ. A. (1999). Nonconscious approach and avoidance behavioral consequences of the automatic evaluation effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215-224. doi:10.1177/0146167299025002007
9.
DedonderJ.CorneilleO.BertinchampsD.YzerbytV. (2014). Overcoming correlational pitfalls: Experimental evidence suggests that evaluative conditioning occurs for explicit but not implicit encoding of CS–US pairings. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 250-257. doi:10.1177/1948550613490969
10.
De HouwerJ. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230-241.
11.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1-20. doi:10.3758/LB.37.1.1
12.
De HouwerJ. (2014). A Propositional Model of Implicit Evaluation. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342-353. doi:10.1111/spc3.12111
13.
De HouwerJ.BeckersT.MoorsA. (2007). Novel attitudes can be faked on the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 972-978. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.007
14.
de ZilvaD.VuL.NewellB. R.PearsonJ. (2013). Exposure is not enough: Suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e77726. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077726
15.
EberlC.WiersR. W.PawelczackS.RinckM.BeckerE. S.LindenmeyerJ. (2014). Implementation of approach bias re-training in alcoholism-how many sessions are needed?Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 38, 587-594. doi:10.1111/acer.12281
16.
FazioR. H.SanbonmatsuD. M.PowellM. C.KardesF. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.50.2.229
17.
GastA.De HouwerJ.De SchryverM. (2012). Evaluative conditioning can be modulated by memory of the CS-US Pairings at the time of testing. Learning and Motivation, 43, 116-126. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.001
18.
GastA.RothermundK. (2011). What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 89-110. doi:10.1080/02699931003696380
19.
GawronskiB.WaltherE. (2012). What do memory data tell us about the role of contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 617-623. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.002
20.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
21.
HoffmanL.RovineM. J. (2007). Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: Foundations and illustrative examples. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 101-117. doi:10.3758/bf03192848
22.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390-421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
23.
HuX. Q.AntonyJ. W.CreeryJ. D.VargasI. M.BodenhausenG. V.PallarK. A. (2015). Unlearning implicit social biases during sleep. Science, 348, 1013-1015. doi:10.1126/science.aaa3841
24.
HuijdingJ.de JongP. J. (2005). A Modified Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST) to assess the affective value of pictorial stimuli: No influence of age and educational level. Psychologica Belgica, 45, 241-255. doi:10.5334/pb-45-4-241
25.
HuijdingJ.MurisP.LesterK. J.FieldA. P.JoosseG. (2011). Training children to approach or avoid novel animals: Effects on self-reported attitudes and fear beliefs and information-seeking behaviors. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 606-613. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.005
26.
HütterM.SweldensS.StahlC.UnkelbachC.KlauerK. C. (2012). Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: Evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 539-557. doi:10.1037/a0026477
27.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
JonesC. R.VilenskyM. R.VaseyM. W.FazioR. H. (2013). Approach behavior can mitigate predominately univalent negative attitudes: Evidence regarding insects and spiders. Emotion, 13, 989-996. doi:10.1037/a0033164
29.
KawakamiK.PhillsC. E.SteeleJ. R.DovidioJ. F. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial evaluations and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957-971. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957
30.
LahamS. M.KashimaY.DixJ.WheelerM.LevisB. (2014). Elaborated contextual framing is necessary for action-based attitude acquisition. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 1119-1126. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.867833
31.
LangnerO.DotschR.BijlstraG.WigboldusD. H. J.HawkS. T.van KnippenbergA. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1377-1388. doi:10.1080/02699930903485076
32.
LockerL.HoffmanL.BovairdJ. A. (2007). On the use of multilevel modeling as an alternative to items analysis in psycholinguistic research. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 723-730. doi:10.3758/BF03192962
33.
LovibondP. F.ShanksD. R. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3-26. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.28.1.3
34.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298. doi:10.1037/h0076778
35.
MarkmanA. B.BrendlC. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6-10. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x
36.
MitchellC. J.De HouwerJ.LovibondP. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183-198. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000855
37.
NeumannR.StrackF. (2000). Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 39-48. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.39
38.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413-417. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00376
39.
PeruginiM.RichetinJ.ZogmaisterC. (2014). Indirect measures as a signal for evaluative change. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 208-229. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.810145
40.
PhillsC. E.KawakamiK.TabiE.NadolnyD.InzlichtM. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197-210. doi:10.1037/a0022159
41.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.LuminetO.YzerbytV. (2007). Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 130-144. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130
42.
RotteveelM.GierholzA.KochG.van AalstC.PintoY.MatzkeD.. . . WagenmakersE.-J. (2015). On the automatic link between affect and tendencies to approach and avoid: Chen and Bargh (1999) revisited. Frontiers in Psychology: Cognition, 6, 335. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00335
43.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
44.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 995-1008. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995
45.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R.MackieD. M.StrainL. M. (2006). Of two minds: Forming and changing valence inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 17, 954-958.
46.
SpruytA.De HouwerJ.HermansD. (2009). Modulation of semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 37-54. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.03.004
47.
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
48.
SweldensS.CorneilleO.YzerbytV. (2014). The role of awareness in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 187-209. doi:10.1177/1088868314527832
49.
TaylorC. T.AmirN. (2012). Modifying automatic approach action tendencies in individuals with elevated social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 529-536. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.05.004
50.
VandenboschK.De HouwerJ. (2011). Failures to induce implicit evaluations by means of approach-avoid training. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1311-1330. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.596819
51.
Van DesselP.De HouwerJ.GastA.SmithC. T. (2015). Instruction-based approach–avoidance effects: Changing stimulus evaluation via the mere instruction to approach or avoid stimuli. Experimental Psychology, 62, 161-169. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000282
52.
Van DesselP.De HouwerJ.RoetsA.GastA. (in press). Failures to change stimulus evaluations by means of subliminal approach and avoidance training. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
53.
WagnerA. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In: SpearN. E.MillerR. R. (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
WoudM. L.BeckerE. S.RinckM. (2008). Implicit evaluation bias induced by approach and avoidance. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 1187-1197. doi:10.1080/02699930801906843
56.
WoudM. L.BeckerE. S.RinckM. (2011). Induction of implicit evaluation biases by approach-avoidance training: A commentary on Vandenbosch and De Houwer. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1331-1338. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.628300
57.
WoudM. L.MaasJ.BeckerE. S.RinckM. (2013). Make the manikin move: Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 738-744. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.817413
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
