Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The molecular composition, stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes, and light hydrocarbons of the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field in the Ordos Basin were investigated to study the geochemical characteristics. The Lower Paleozoic gas in the Daniudi gas field displays methane contents of 87.41–93.34%, dryness coefficients (C₁/C_1–5) ranging from 0.886 to 0.978, δ¹³C₁ and δ¹³C₂ values ranging from −40.3 to −36.4‰, with an average of −38.3‰, and from −33.6 to −24.2‰, with an average of −28.4‰, respectively, and δD₁ values ranging from −197 to −160‰. The alkane gas generally displays positive carbon and hydrogen isotopic series, and the C₇ and C_5–7 light hydrocarbons of the Lower Paleozoic gas are dominated by methylcyclohexane and iso-alkanes, respectively. The Lower Paleozoic gas in the Daniudi gas field is mixed from coal-derived and oil-associated gases, similar to that observed in the Jingbian gas field. The oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic gas is secondary oil cracking gas and displays a lower cracking extent than that in the Jingbian gas field. The coal-derived gas in the Lower Paleozoic gas in the Daniudi gas field migrated from the Upper Paleozoic gas through the window area where the iron–aluminum mudstone caprocks in the Upper Carboniferous Benxi Formation were missing. The oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic gas in the Daniudi gas field was probably derived from presalt source rocks in the Lower Ordovician Majiagou Formation rather than the limestone in the Upper Carboniferous Taiyuan Formation. It seems unlikely that the marlstone in the Upper Ordovician Beiguoshan Formation and shale in the Middle Ordovician Pingliang Formation on the western and southwestern margins of the Ordos Basin contributed to the oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic gas in the Daniudi gas field.

Keywords

Daniudi gas field Lower Paleozoic strata natural gas geochemical characteristics genetic types gas–source correlation

Introduction

The Ordos Basin, a petroliferous basin located in central China, is the most stable basin in China (Xu et al., 1995). Natural gas exploration targets in the Ordos Basin mainly consist of Upper Paleozoic Carboniferous-Permian strata and Lower Paleozoic Ordovician strata (Dai et al., 2005). Several Upper Paleozoic large gas fields, such as Sulige, Yulin, Daniudi, Wushenqi, and Zizhou, with proven reserves exceeding 100 × 10⁹ m³, have been discovered, and Carboniferous-Permian tight sandstones are the main reservoirs (Dai et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2008; Zou et al., 2013). However, only one Lower Paleozoic large gas field, i.e. the Jingbian gas field, has been discovered in the basin, with Lower Ordovician Majiagou Formation (O₁m) carbonate rocks as the main reservoirs (Dai et al., 2008a; Liu et al., 2009), and the proven reserves of the field in the Ordovician weathering crust reached 655.2 × 10⁹ m³ at the end of 2012 (Yang and Liu, 2014). In addition to the Jingbian gas field, several gas reservoirs have been discovered in the Ordovician weathering crust in the northwestern Ordos Basin (Zhao et al., 2015), the Daniudi gas field in the northeastern Ordos Basin (Ding et al., 2016), and the presalt Majiagou Formation in the eastern Ordos Basin (Yang et al., 2009), which suggests that the Lower Paleozoic strata in the Ordos Basin have favorable exploration potential.

The geochemical characteristics of the natural gas in the Ordos Basin have been widely studied, and the Upper Paleozoic natural gas is generally considered to be coal-derived gas from the Carboniferous-Permian coal-measure source rocks (Dai et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2008a; Yang and Liu, 2014), whereas the Lower Paleozoic natural gas is commonly believed to be mixed gas (Cai et al., 2005; Zou et al., 2007). However, there is no consensus on whether the Lower Paleozoic natural gas is dominated by coal-derived gas from the Carboniferous-Permian coal-measure source rocks (Dai et al., 2005; Hu and Zhang, 2011; Mi et al., 2012; Xia et al., 1999a; Yang and Liu, 2014) or oil-associated gas (Chen, 2002; Hao et al., 1997; Huang et al., 1996), and Li et al. (2003) considered that the main genetic type of the Lower Paleozoic natural gas is different in different areas of the basin. The oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic natural gas has been considered to be derived from the limestone in the Carboniferous Taiyuan Formation (Dai et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2008a; Xia et al., 1999b), whereas other scholars demonstrated that the Lower Paleozoic natural gas was derived from the Ordovician source rocks on the western and southwestern margins of the basin (Liu et al., 2012) or within the basin (Chen, 2002; Hao et al., 1997; Huang et al., 1996), especially the presalt Majiagou Formation (Liu et al., 2016). Moreover, the carboxylate salts in the marine source rocks with low total organic carbon (TOC) in the Ordos Basin may also be a potential gas source at a high maturity stage (Liu et al., 2013). The source of the controversy on the gas origin is a divergence on understanding the gas geochemical characteristics, and that on the source of oil-associated gas is derived from whether the carbonate rocks with low TOC contents in the Lower Ordovician Majiagou Formation can be considered as the effective source rocks.

The Daniudi gas field is located in the northeastern Ordos Basin, and the Upper Paleozoic gas is coal-derived gas from the Carboniferous-Permian coal-measure source rocks (Hao et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2015). In recent years, gas exploration in the Lower Paleozoic strata has achieved continuous breakthroughs, and industrial gas flows have been obtained in the weathering crust in the fifth member of the Lower Ordovician Majiagou Formation in several drilling wells; e.g. a gas production test has obtained a daily output of 50.4 × 10⁴ m³, thus suggesting a favorable gas exploration prospect. The origin, source, and accumulation patterns of the Upper Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field have been widely studied (Liu et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016), whereas studies on the Lower Paleozoic gas reservoirs have generally concentrated on the characteristics and development regularity of the reservoirs in the Ordovician weathering crust (Ding et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2014), with only a few insufficient studies on the origin and source of the gas (Hui and Jia, 2001). The origin and source of the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field are ambiguous due to the complicated geochemical characteristics of the gas, which has restricted the deepening and expansion of the gas exploration field. Therefore, the authors intend to investigate the geochemical characteristics based on the molecular composition, stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes, and light hydrocarbons of the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field, probe into the origin and source of the gas based on a comparison with the Upper Paleozoic gas in the same field and the Lower Paleozoic gas in the Jingbian gas field and further provide valuable information for resource assessment and a geological basis for an expansion of the gas exploration.

Geological setting

The Ordos Basin, which is located on the western margin of the North China Block and has an area of 37 × 10⁴ km², is a multicycle cratonic basin with stable subsidence, migrated depression, and various contours in its evolutionary history (Yang et al., 2005). It can be divided into six secondary tectonic units (Figure 1), i.e. the Yimeng Uplift, Weibei Uplift, Jinxi Fault-fold Belt, Yishan Slope, Tianhuan Depression, and West Margin Thrust Belt, and the Ordos Basin is characterized by a gentle structure, stable subsidence, and few faults. The Paleozoic strata of the basin display a two-layer structure (Figure 2), i.e. the Upper Paleozoic strata are mainly composed of Carboniferous-Permian terrigenous clastic rocks and coal measures, with several transitional deposits in the Upper Carboniferous Taiyuan Formation (C₂t), and the Lower Paleozoic strata consist primarily of marine carbonate and gypsum-salt rocks in the Lower Ordovician Majiagou Formation (O₁m), which are unconformably underlying the Upper Paleozoic strata (Dai, 2014).

Figure 1.

The distribution of tectonic units and large gas fields in the Ordos Basin (a) and gas wells in the Daniudi gas field (b).

Figure 2.

Stratigraphic column of the Daniudi gas field in the Ordos Basin.

The Lower Ordovician Majiagou Formation in the Ordos Basin can be divided into five members, i.e. O₁m₁ to O₁m₅ from bottom to top, and the fifth member (O₁m₅) can be further divided into 10 submembers, i.e. from $O_{1} m_{5}^{1}$ to $O_{1} m_{5}^{10}$ downward. The gypsum-salt rocks in the sixth submember ( $O_{1} m_{5}^{6}$ ) are widely distributed in the central-eastern Ordos Basin and cover an area of 5 × 10⁴ km²; therefore, the strata in the Majiagou Formation deposited before and after the deposition of $O_{1} m_{5}^{6}$ gypsum-salt rocks are generally designated as presalt ( $O_{1} m_{1} - O_{1} m_{5}^{7}$ ) and postsalt ( $O_{1} m_{5}^{1} - O_{1} m_{5}^{5}$ ) strata (Yang et al., 2014). Because the O₁m strata have experienced long-term weathering and leaching dissolution and unconformably underlie the Carboniferous strata, the postsalt carbonate reservoirs are mainly karst weathering crust reservoirs, and the reservoir space mainly consists of the secondary pores that are dominated by intercrystalline dissolved pores (Liu et al., 2014). However, the presalt carbonate reservoirs were basically unaffected by the weathering and leaching, and the reservoir space mainly consists of primary pores that are dominated by intercrystalline pores in the dolomite (Yang et al., 2014). The iron–aluminum mudstones in the Upper Carboniferous Benxi Formation (C₂b) are the effective regional caprocks for the postsalt gas reservoirs (Dai, 2014), whereas the $O_{1} m_{5}^{6}$ gypsum-salt rocks were believed to be effective caprocks for the presalt gas reservoirs (Yang et al., 2014).

There are two sets of Paleozoic source rocks in the Ordos Basin: the Carboniferous-Permian coal measures, which display humic organic matter and are the main source for the Upper Paleozoic coal-derived large gas fields (Dai, 2014; Xiao et al., 2005), and Ordovician sapropelic source rocks (Dai et al., 2005). It was generally believed that the effective Lower Paleozoic source rocks were the marlstone in the Upper Ordovician Beiguoshan Formation (O₃b) and the shale in the Middle Ordovician Pingliang Formation (O₂p) on the western and southwestern margins of the Ordos Basin, which have average TOC contents of 0.9 and 0.93%, respectively (Liu et al., 2012). The Lower Paleozoic source rocks within the Ordos Basin are the O₁m carbonate rocks, and they were generally believed to be ineffective source rocks as a result of the extremely low TOC contents, which are generally lower than 0.5% (Dai et al., 2005). However, a recent study has indicated that effective source rocks are developed in the pre-salt O₁m strata in the central-eastern Ordos Basin, and they display a low hydrocarbon potential, with a gas generation intensity of 1–2 × 10⁸ m³/km², which is much lower than those of the Upper Paleozoic coal measures (Guo et al., 2014). A statistical analysis indicates that the presalt source rocks have an average TOC content of 0.3%, with type I kerogen, and rock samples with TOC contents higher than 0.4% account for 28.2% of the total samples, suggesting the potential of generating a certain amount of oil-associated gas (Liu et al., 2016). Moreover, the limestone in the transitional Upper Carboniferous Taiyuan Formation (C₂t) in the central-eastern Ordos Basin generally displays TOC contents ranging from 0.5 to 3%, and it is believed to have contributed to the Lower Paleozoic gas reservoirs in the basin (Dai et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2008a; Xia et al., 1999b).

The Daniudi gas field is located in the northern segment of the Yishan Slope in the Ordos Basin, and the proven reserves of the Upper Paleozoic natural gas by the end of 2011 reached 416.828 × 10⁹ m³ over an area of 2003.71 km² (Dai, 2014). The Upper Paleozoic natural gas is reservoired in tight sandstone in the Upper Carboniferous Taiyuan Formation (C₂t), Lower Permian Shanxi Formation (P₁s), and Lower Shihezi Formation (P₁x) (Liu et al., 2015). The Lower Paleozoic natural gas is reservoired in the postsalt marine carbonate rocks in $O_{1} m_{5}^{1} - O_{1} m_{5}^{3}$ and $O_{1} m_{5}^{3}$ . The carbonate reservoirs in the Daniudi gas field display low porosity and permeability, which are generally lower than 5% and 1 × 10⁻³ μm², respectively, and the main reservoir space of the weathering crust reservoirs is secondary pore (Liu et al., 2014). The C₂b iron–aluminum mudstones are the effective regional caprocks for the O₁m gas reservoirs in the Daniudi gas field (Sun et al., 2015). A preliminary study on the geochemical characteristics of the natural gas indicated that the Lower Paleozoic industrial gas reservoired in the O₁m weathering crust displays characteristics of both the Upper Paleozoic coal-derived gas and Lower Paleozoic oil-associated gas (Hui and Jia, 2001).

Samples and analytical methods

Eight gas samples from the Lower Paleozoic (O₁m) carbonate reservoirs and 15 gas samples from the Upper Paleozoic tight sandstone reservoirs in the Daniudi gas field in the Ordos Basin were collected from the wellheads after first flushing the lines for 15–20 min to remove air contamination. Additionally, 5 cm radius stainless steel cylinders with double valves were used to collect the gas samples. The gas samples were analyzed at the Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute of SINOPEC. The chemical compositions of the gas samples were determined using an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a thermal conductivity detector, and the detection followed Chinese National Standard GB/T 13610-2014. The stable carbon isotopic compositions of the natural gas were measured using a Finnigan MAT-253 mass spectrometer following Chinese National Standard GB/T 18340.2-2010 and were reported in the δ notation in permil (‰) relative to Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB), with an estimated measurement precision of ±0.5‰ for δ¹³C. The stable hydrogen isotopic compositions of the alkane gases were measured using a Thermo Scientific Delta V Advantage mass spectrometer (GC/TC/IRMS) following Chinese National Standard GB/T 6041-2002, and the measurement precision was estimated to be ±3‰ for δD with respect to Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW). The light hydrocarbons in the gases were analyzed using an HP5890II GC with a HP PONA capillary column following Chinese National Standard GB/T 10628-2008. The molecular compositions and stable carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions of the natural gas are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Molecular compositions and stable carbon and hydrogen isotopic values of the Paleozoic gas from the Daniudi gas field.

Gas well	Strata	Chemical composition (%)									δ¹³C (‰, VPDB)						δD (‰, VSMOW)
Gas well	Strata	CH₄	C₂H₆	C₃H₈	iC₄H₁₀	nC₄H₁₀	iC₅H₁₂	nC₅H₁₂	N₂	CO₂	δ¹³C₁	δ¹³C₂	δ¹³C₃	δ¹³iC₄	δ¹³nC₄	δ¹³C_CO2	δD₁	δD₂	δD₃
D66-38	O₁m₅	91.66	5.09	1.33	0.23	0.27	0.20	0.14	0.00	1.08	−40.3	−33.6	−28.9	−26.2	−26.8	/	−188	−127	/
D66-38	O₁m₅	92.22	4.44	1.09	0.20	0.27	0.14	0.08	0.44	1.12	−39.5	−33.3	−29.2	−25.6	−25.9	−10.8	−160	−167	−151
D66-52	O₁m₅	93.34	3.49	0.79	0.15	0.16	0.09	0.04	0.38	1.56	−37.6	−29.8	−27.3	−24.5	−24.0	−11.9	−180	−156	−147
PG2	O₁m₅	89.12	6.31	1.55	0.25	0.30	0.12	0.06	0.66	1.60	−36.4	−24.9	−24.2	−24.3	−22.2	−7.8	−193	−154	−144
PG3	O₁m₅	91.97	2.80	0.50	0.16	0.11	0.09	0.03	0.47	3.89	−40.1	−24.2	−22.8	−23.1	−21.4	−6.4	−191	−133	/
PG4	O₁m₅	93.18	1.66	0.25	0.07	0.05	0.04	0.00	0.44	4.30	−36.4	−26.3	−25.4	−24.8	−22.6	−6.2	−177	−143	−130
PG5	O₁m₅	87.41	7.84	2.29	0.34	0.50	0.18	0.09	0.79	0.50	−36.9	−26.1	−25.7	−25.2	−24.4	−7.4	−195	−160	−154
D66-62	O₁m₅	90.43	5.29	1.23	0.21	0.26	0.21	0.15	0.00	2.20	−39.2	−29.1	−28.3	−24.9	−24.8	/	−197	−161	−155
DK2	P₁x	96.63	2.09	0.38	0.08	0.08	0.07	0.00	0.00	0.64	−35.0	−25.6	−25.0	−23.4	−20.7	/	−181	−159	−152
DK14	P₁x	96.60	2.20	0.37	0.08	0.08	0.08	0.00	0.00	0.60	−34.5	−25.8	−25.9	−23.2	−22.1	/	−181	−158	−143
DK18	P₁x	96.08	2.43	0.43	0.08	0.08	0.07	0.00	0.00	0.79	−34.6	−25.2	−25.0	−23.2	−21.8	/	−183	−158	−153
DK33	P₁x	96.97	2.06	0.35	0.08	0.07	0.07	0.00	0.00	0.40	−35.2	−25.8	−25.5	−22.6	−21.8	/	−181	−156	−146
D1-4-98	P₁x	96.20	2.44	0.41	0.09	0.10	0.10	0.09	0.00	0.55	−35.7	−26.0	−25.4	−23.2	−23.1	/	−184	−157	−153
D50	P₁x	87.88	8.22	2.07	0.35	0.40	0.28	0.17	0.00	0.60	−37.2	−24.9	−24.6	−23.8	−23.6	/	−198	−155	−159
DK25	P₁s	91.93	4.11	0.91	0.16	0.17	0.13	0.08	0.00	2.50	−34.5	−25.1	−23.7	−22.9	−21.6	/	−186	−157	−155
DP6	P₁s	92.03	4.25	0.89	0.15	0.17	0.12	0.08	0.00	2.30	−34.4	−25.5	−24.3	−23.6	−21.4	/	−187	−159	−156
1-74	P₁s	91.50	4.64	0.86	0.14	0.14	0.11	0.00	0.00	2.61	−33.8	−23.9	−23.7	−22.9	−21.5	/	−192	−157	−156
D1-4-38	P₁s	83.11	9.81	3.19	0.61	0.71	0.51	0.45	0.00	1.61	−37.0	−25.0	−23.4	−23.9	−22.0	/	−209	−154	−157
D47-18	C₂t	91.09	5.88	1.41	0.23	0.25	0.16	0.10	0.00	0.87	−37.5	−25.5	−23.9	−24.0	−23.7	/	−201	−134	/
D47-13	C₂t	89.15	6.69	1.70	0.29	0.33	0.24	0.17	0.00	1.42	−37.8	−25.1	−23.7	−22.9	−21.7	/	−204	−158	−157
D47-31	C₂t	89.00	6.74	1.77	0.32	0.38	0.26	0.20	0.00	1.33	−37.7	−24.9	−24.3	−23.4	−21.8	/	−205	−158	−157
D47-45	C₂t	89.19	6.45	1.63	0.28	0.32	0.22	0.15	0.00	1.74	−37.8	−25.2	−24.5	−23.2	−22.4	/	−204	−157	−159
D49	C₂t	90.37	5.82	1.31	0.20	0.24	0.17	0.11	0.00	1.78	−37.2	−25.4	−25.1	−23.3	−22.5	/	−198	−155	−151

“/” indicates no data.

Results

Chemical composition

The O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field is dominated by alkane gas with methane and heavy alkane (C_2–5) contents of 87.41–93.34% and 2.08–11.24%, respectively, and the dryness coefficients (C₁/C_1–5) range from 0.886 to 0.978, suggesting both dry and wet gases (Table 1, Figure 3). The methane contents and dryness coefficients of the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field display similar distribution ranges with those of the Upper Paleozoic gas, and they are generally obviously lower than those of the O₁m gas in the Jingbian gas field (Figure 3(a)).

Figure 3.

The correlation diagrams of dryness coefficient (C₁/C_1–5) versus CH₄% (a) and δ¹³C₁ values (b) of natural gas from the Daniudi gas field. The O₁m gas data from the Jingbian gas field are from Dai (2014).

The nonhydrocarbon components of the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field are mainly CO₂ and N₂, and they display contents of 0.50–4.30%, with an average of 2.03%, and 0–0.79%, with an average of 0.40%, respectively (Table 1). The Upper Paleozoic gas in the field displays slightly lower CO₂ contents in the range of 0.40–2.61%, with an average of 1.32%, and generally contains little N₂ (Table 1). The average CO₂ and N₂ contents in the O₁m gas in the Jingbian gas field are 3.65 and 1.04%, respectively (Dai, 2014), which are generally higher than those in the Daniudi gas field. The O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field contains trace amounts of H₂S, and the content is lower than the detection limit of the GC. The H₂S concentrations in the O₁m gases from wells D1 and D2 in the field were measured to be 280 and 330 mg/g by titrimetry, respectively (Wu et al., 2012), which can be separately converted into mole percentages of 0.018 and 0.022%. Therefore, the H₂S content of the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field is slightly lower than the average H₂S content (0.13%) of the O₁m gas in the Jingbian gas field (Liu et al., 2009).

Carbon isotopes

The δ¹³C₁ and δ¹³C₂ values of the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field range from −40.3 to −36.4‰, with an average of −38.3‰, and from −33.6 to −24.2‰, with an average of −28.4‰, respectively (Table 1), which are generally lower than those of the Upper Paleozoic gas in the field, which has average δ¹³C₁ and δ¹³C₂ values of −36.0 and −25.2‰, respectively (Table 1). The δ¹³C₁ values of the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field are generally lower than those in the Jingbian gas field (Figures 3(b) and 4), but the δ¹³C₂ values of the O₁m gases from those two gas fields display similar distribution ranges, which are evidently wider than that of the Upper Paleozoic gas in the Daniudi gas field (Figure 4). However, the dryness coefficient and δ¹³C₁ values of the Upper Paleozoic gas are positively correlated, unlike those of the O₁m gas (Figures 3(b) and 4).

Figure 4.

The correlation diagrams of δ¹³C versus 1/C_n of the Upper Paleozoic gas (a) and Lower Paleozoic gas (b) from the Daniudi gas field. The O₁m gas data from the Jingbian gas field are from Dai (2014).

The O₁m alkane gas in the Daniudi gas field displays positive carbon isotopic series (δ¹³C₁<δ¹³C₂<δ¹³C₃<δ¹³nC₄) and is consistent with the Upper Paleozoic alkane gas. A few O₁m gas samples from the Jingbian gas field display partial reversals between the CH₄ and C₂H₆ (δ¹³C₁ > δ¹³C₂) or C₂H₆ and C₃H₈ carbon isotopes (δ¹³C₂ > δ¹³C₃) (Figure 4(b)). The δ¹³C_CO2 values for the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field range from −11.9 to −6.2‰ (Table 1).

Hydrogen isotopes

The δD₁ values for the O₁m alkane gas in the Daniudi gas field range from −197 to −160‰, which is generally consistent with that of the Upper Paleozoic gas (Table 1). The O₁m alkane gas in the field generally displays positive hydrogen isotopic series (δD₁<δD₂<δD₃) and is consistent with the Upper Paleozoic alkane gas, with only one O₁m gas sample from Well D66-38 being partially reversed between methane and ethane (δD₁ > δD₂) (Table 1, Figure 5). Some O₁m gas samples in the Jingbian gas field display partial hydrogen isotopic reversals between CH₄ and C₂H₆ (δD₁ > δD₂) or C₂H₆ and C₃H₈ (δD₂ > δD₃) or even a continuous hydrogen isotopic reversal among CH₄, C₂H₆, and C₃H₈ (δD₁ > δD₂ > δD₃) (Figure 5(b)).

Figure 5.

The correlation diagrams of δD versus 1/C_n of the Upper Paleozoic gas (a) and Lower Paleozoic gas (b) from the Daniudi gas field. The O₁m gas data from the Jingbian gas field are from Dai (2014).

Light hydrocarbons

The C₇ light hydrocarbons of the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field are dominated by methylcyclohexane (MCH), with slightly higher n-heptane (nC₇) contents than those of the Upper Paleozoic gas, and the C_5–7 light hydrocarbons of the O₁m gas are mainly composed of iso-alkanes, which are consistent with those of the Upper Paleozoic gas (Figure 6). The C₇ light hydrocarbons of the O₁m gas in the Jingbian gas field are also dominated by MCH (Hu et al., 2010; Hu and Zhang, 2011).

Figure 6.

Ternary diagrams of C₇ (a) and C_5–7 (b) light hydrocarbons in natural gas from the Daniudi gas field (modified from Dai et al. (1992)). The O₁m gas data from the Jingbian gas field are from Dai (2014).

Discussion

Genetic types of natural gas

Natural gas can be divided into biogenic and abiogenic gases based on the different generation mechanisms. The abiogenic gas generally displays negative alkane carbon isotopic series with δ¹³C₁ values above −30‰, whereas the biogenic gas displays positive series with δ¹³C₁ values below −30‰ (Dai et al., 2008b). The O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field in the Ordos Basin displays positive alkane carbon isotopic series, with δ¹³C₁ values lower than −30‰ (Figures 3(b) and 4), and is consistent with the Upper Paleozoic gas (Figure 4), suggesting typical biogenic gas.

The O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field displays obviously higher δ¹³C₁ values than typical bacterial gas (δ¹³C₁<−55‰) and displays the characteristics of thermogenic gas in the modified Bernard diagram (Figure 7). Thermogenic gas can be generally divided into coal-derived gas from humic organic matter and oil-associated gas from sapropelic organic matter (Dai et al., 1992), which follow different trends in the Bernard diagram (Bernard et al., 1976). Although several O₁m gas samples in the Daniudi gas field follow the trend of natural gas derived from type III kerogen with relatively low C₁/C_2 + 3 ratios (<10) and are consistent with the C₂t and P₁s coal-derived gas in the modified Bernard diagram, more O₁m gas samples are located in the transitional zone between gases from types II and III kerogen with relatively high C₁/C₂₊₃ ratios (>10), suggesting a mixed origin of the O₁m gas (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Modified Bernard diagram of natural gas from the Daniudi gas field (modified from Bernard et al. (1976)). The O₁m gas data from the Jingbian gas field are from Dai (2014).

Because coal-derived gas derived from humic organic matter has relatively higher δ¹³C₂ values than oil-associated gas derived from sapropelic organic matter with similar δ¹³C₁ values, the gases derived from different types of organic matter display different evolution trends on the correlation diagram between δ¹³C₁ and δ¹³C₂ values (Rooney et al., 1995). The O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field displays a wide range of δ¹³C₂ values and is consistent with those observed in the Jingbian gas field (Figure 4), and several O₁m gas samples display high δ¹³C₂ values (>−28.0‰) and are consistent with the Upper Paleozoic coal-derived gas. The O₁m gas samples with high δ¹³C₂ values follow the trend of coal-derived gas from type III kerogens in the Niger Delta or Sacramento Basin, whereas the other O₁m gas samples with low δ¹³C₂ values (<−28.0‰) follow the trend of oil-associated gas from the type II kerogen in the Delaware/Val Verde Basin (Figure 8). Therefore, the O₁m natural gas contains both coal-derived and oil-associated gases.

Figure 8.

The correlation diagram between δ¹³C₂ and δ¹³C₁ values of natural gas from the Daniudi gas field. The trend lines for gases from type III kerogen of the Niger Delta and type II kerogen of the Delaware/Val Verde Basin are from Rooney et al. (1995), and that from type III kerogen of the Sacramento Basin is from Jenden et al. (1988). The O₁m gas data from the Jingbian gas field are from Dai (2014).

Because the C₅ and C_5–7 light hydrocarbon compositions can indicate the organic matter types, the ternary diagrams of C₇ (MCH, ΣDMCP, and nC₇) and C_5–7 (n-C_5–7, iso-C_5–7, and cyc-C_5–7) light hydrocarbons were proposed to discriminate coal-derived gas from oil-associated gas (Dai et al., 1992; Hu et al., 2008b). The O₁m natural gas in the Daniudi gas field displays C_5–7 light hydrocarbons dominated by iso-alkanes and is consistent with the Upper Paleozoic coal-derived gas in the C_5–7 ternary diagram (Figure 6(b)). The O₁m natural gas in the Jingbian gas field also displays the characteristics of coal-derived gas in the C_5–7 ternary diagram (Hu and Zhang, 2011). However, the O₁m natural gas in the Daniudi gas field generally displays higher nC₇ contents than the Upper Paleozoic coal-derived gas and is situated around the boundary line between coal-derived gas and oil-associated gas, indicating the characteristics of a mixed gas (Figure 6(a)).

Both the correlation diagram between the δ¹³C₂ and δ¹³C₁ values (Figure 8) and the C₇ ternary diagram (Figure 6(a)) indicate that the O₁m natural gas in the Daniudi gas field contains both coal-derived and oil-associated gases, but the C_5–7 ternary diagram indicates that the O₁m gas is typically coal-derived gas (Figure 6(b)). This inconsistency may be related to the mixed origin of the gas, e.g. the natural gas in the Kekeya oil and gas field in the Tarim Basin displays similar characteristics (Wu et al., 2014). Because the O₁m gas is dominated by methane, with contents of 87.41–93.34%, it may be one sided that only the trace components such as the light hydrocarbons were used to identify the gas origin, and the methane hydrogen isotopic composition could provide additional information for the identification of the gas origin.

The hydrogen isotopic compositions of natural gas are controlled by the types of organic matter, thermal maturity, and environmental conditions of the aqueous medium (Dai et al., 1992, 2012; Liu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2015). The Upper Paleozoic gas in the Daniudi gas field displays the characteristics of gases from humic organic matter in the correlation diagram between the δD₁ and δ¹³C₁ values and follows the maturity trend with a positive correlation between the δD₁ and δ¹³C₁ values (Figure 9(a)). The O₁m gas in the Jingbian gas field displays similar characteristics, which indicates that the methane is mainly coal-derived. However, the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field does not display a positive correlation between the δD₁ and δ¹³C₁ values or follow the maturity and is mainly located in the mixing or transitional zones, unlike the typically coal-derived or oil-associated gas in the correlation diagram between the δD₁ and δ¹³C₁ values (Figure 9(a)), suggesting a mixed origin.

Figure 9.

Cross-plots of δD₁ versus δ¹³C₁ (a) and δD₁ versus δ¹³C₂ (b) for natural gas from the Daniudi gas field (modified from Wang et al. (2015)). The O₁m gas data from the Jingbian gas field are from Dai (2014).

The Upper Paleozoic gas in the Daniudi gas field also displays the characteristics of gases from humic organic matter in the correlation diagram between the δD₁ and δ¹³C₂ values (Figure 9(b)), whereas the O₁m gas in the Jingbian gas field displays a mixing trend with sapropelic (oil-associated) gases as a result of the wide-ranging δ¹³C₂ values (−33.6 to −24.2‰), consistent with the conclusions on the gas origin by previous studies (Cai et al., 2005; Zou et al., 2007). Although several O₁m gas samples in the Daniudi gas field display the characteristics of coal-derived or oil-associated gas, half of the samples display the trend of mixing by coal-derived and oil-associated gases (Figure 9(b)).

The carbon isotopes of ethane and propane were effective indexes for identifying the coal-derived and oil-associated gases, because they generally inherited the carbon isotopes of the original organic matter (Dai et al., 2005). Dai (1999) proposed that δ¹³C₂ and δ¹³C₃ values of coal-derived gas were generally higher than −27.5 and −25.5‰, respectively, whereas those of oil-associated gas were lower than −29.0 and −27.0‰, respectively. The O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field displays the characteristics of both coal-derived and oil-associated gases with wide δ¹³C₂ (−33.6 to −24.2‰) and δ¹³C₃ values (−29.2 to −22.8‰) and it is similar to the O₁m gas in the Jingbian gas field and obviously different from the Upper Paleozoic coal-derived gas in the Daniudi gas field (Figure 10(a)).

Figure 10.

Cross-plots of δ¹³C₃ versus δ¹³C₂ (a) and δ¹³C₂–δ¹³C₃ versus C₂/C₃ (b) of natural gas from the Daniudi gas field (modified from Dai (1999) and Lorant et al. (1998), respectively). The O₁m gas data from the Jingbian gas field are from Dai (2014).

The oil-associated gas was considered to be from the primary cracking of kerogen or secondary cracking of oil according to the generation pathways (Prinzhofer and Huc, 1995), which could be effectively discriminated by the correlation diagram between δ¹³C₂–δ¹³C₃ and C₂/C₃ (Lorant et al., 1998). The O₁m oil-associated gas samples in the Daniudi gas field, with δ¹³C₂ and δ¹³C₃ values separately lower than −29.0 and −27.0‰, display the characteristics of secondary oil cracking gas rather than the primary kerogen cracking gas in the correlation diagram between δ¹³C₂–δ¹³C₃ and C₂/C₃ (Figure 10(b)). The O₁m oil-associated gas in the Jingbian gas field, with δ¹³C₂ and δ¹³C₃ values separately lower than −29.0 and −27.0‰, is generally derived from the secondary cracking of oil, with two samples reaching the stage of secondary cracking of gas (Figure 10(b)), which indicate that the O₁m oil-associated gas in the Jingbian gas field displays a higher cracking extent than that in the Daniudi gas field.

Therefore, the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field is mixed from coal-derived and oil-associated gas, in which the oil-associated gas is secondary oil cracking gas, with a lower cracking extent than that in the Jingbian gas field. The wide variations in the carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions of the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field might be caused by the different mixing proportions of the coal-derived and oil-associated gases.

The source of natural gas

The Upper Paleozoic coal-derived gas was considered to be from the C₂t–P₁s coal measures (dark mudstone and coal), which were the only set of humic source rocks in the Ordos Basin (Dai et al., 2005). Previous studies also demonstrated that the Upper Paleozoic coal-derived gas in the Daniudi gas field was derived from the C₂t–P₁s coal measures (Liu et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). The O₁m gas in the Jingbian gas field displays the characteristics of a mixed gas and is dominated by coal-derived gas, which migrated downward and laterally into the O₁m carbonate reservoirs (Dai et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2014). The O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field partially displays the carbon and hydrogen isotopic characteristics of coal-derived gas and has a good affinity with the Upper Paleozoic gas (Figures 8 to 10(a)). The O₁m gas reservoirs in the Daniudi gas field are mainly distributed around the window area where the C₂b strata are missing, suggesting the control of the C₂b iron–aluminum mudstone caprocks (Sun et al., 2015). Therefore, the coal-derived gas in the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field migrated downward from the Upper Paleozoic gas through the window area where the C₂b iron–aluminum mudstone caprocks were missing.

The oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Ordos Basin was believed to be from the Ordovician (Chen, 2002; Hao et al., 1997; Huang et al., 1996; Liu et al., 2012) or Carboniferous source rocks (Dai et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2008a; Xia et al., 1999b). The C₂t limestone is oil prone, with depths reaching 50 m in the central Ordos Basin, including the Jingbian area, and has certain hydrocarbon potential because the TOC content mainly ranges from 0.5 to 3%, with an average of 1.42%; therefore, it is considered to have contributed to the O₁m gas in the Jingbian gas field (Dai et al., 2005; Hao et al., 2011). However, the C₂t limestone in the Daniudi gas field displays thicknesses of only 0–5 m (Dai et al., 2005) and is only developed in the southern part of the field, and the C₂t strata in the northern part of the field is composed of transitional coal-bearing clastic rock series without limestone (Guo et al., 2009). The C₂t limestone in the Daniudi gas field has TOC contents of 0.07–0.38%, with an average of 0.16%, and only three out of 16 samples displayed TOC contents higher than 0.2%, suggesting poor source rocks (Hao et al., 2011). Therefore, the oil-associated gas in the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field was probably not derived from the C₂t limestone with extremely low hydrocarbon generation potential, as indicated by the small thicknesses and low TOC contents.

The Lower Paleozoic source rocks with high organic matter abundances were the O₃b marlstone and the O₂p shale on the western and southwestern margins of the Ordos Basin, which have average TOC contents of 0.9 and 0.93%, respectively (Liu et al., 2012). Therefore, the oil-associated gas in the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field was considered to be derived from the secondary cracking of oil, which had been generated by those two sets of source rocks, migrated into the basin and accumulated in the central paleo-uplift in the basin, and the oil cracking gas migrated eastwards or northeastwards (Liu et al., 2012). If the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field migrated from the Jingbian gas field, it should display higher dryness coefficients and lower δ¹³C₁ values than those in the Jingbian gas field as a result of the molecular and isotopic fractionation of migration (Prinzhofer and Pernaton, 1997). However, the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field displays lower dryness coefficients and δ¹³C₁ values than those in the Jingbian gas field (Figure 3(b)), suggesting a lower maturity rather than migration effect, which is consistent with the lower cracking extent of the O₁m oil-associated gas in the Daniudi gas field indicated by the correlation diagram between δ¹³C₂–δ¹³C₃ and C₂/C₃ (Figure 9(b)). The O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field probably did not migrate from the Jingbian gas field. Therefore, the oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas was probably not derived from the O₃b marlstone or O₂p shale on the western and southwestern margins of the Ordos Basin.

The Ordovician source rocks within the Ordos Basin are the O₁m carbonate rocks with generally low TOC contents, which hardly meet the hydrocarbon generation standard for the formation of industrial gas reservoirs (Hu et al., 2008a). However, gas exploration in recent years indicated that self-generated and self-reservoired oil-associated gas existed in the presalt O₁m strata in the central-eastern Ordos Basin, and effective source rocks were developed to a certain extent and could be the source of the Lower Paleozoic gas (Liu et al., 2016). The presalt O₁m carbonate rocks display an average TOC content of 0.3%, with type I kerogen, and the rock samples with TOC contents higher than 0.4% accounted for 28.2% of the total samples, suggesting the potential for generating a certain amount of oil-associated gas (Liu et al., 2016). Therefore, the O₁m gas in the Daniudi gas field was probably derived from the presalt O₁m source rocks. Because the presalt strata in the Daniudi gas field have not been drilled, the characteristics of the presalt O₁m source rocks should be further studied.

Conclusions

The Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field is dominated by alkane gas with methane contents of 87.41–93.34% and dryness coefficients (C₁/C_1–5) ranging from 0.886 to 0.978. The δ¹³C₁ and δ¹³C₂ values range from −40.3 to −36.4‰, with an average of −38.3‰, and from −33.6 to −24.2‰ with an average of −28.4‰, respectively, and the δD₁ values range from −197 to −160‰. The Lower Paleozoic alkane gas generally displays positive carbon and hydrogen isotopic series, and the C₇ and C_5–7 light hydrocarbons of the Lower Paleozoic natural gas are dominated by MCH and iso-alkanes, respectively.

An integrated study on the stable carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions and the light hydrocarbons indicated that the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field obviously differs from the Upper Paleozoic coal-derived gas in the same field and was mixed from coal-derived and oil-associated gases, similar to the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Jingbian gas field. The oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field is secondary oil cracking gas, with a lower cracking extent than that in the Jingbian gas field. The wide variations in the carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions of the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field might be caused by the different mixing proportions of coal-derived and oil-associated gases.

The coal-derived gas in the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field migrated from the Upper Paleozoic gas through the window area where the iron–aluminum mudstone caprocks in the Upper Carboniferous Benxi Formation were missing. The oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field was probably not derived from the limestone in the Upper Carboniferous Taiyuan Formation with extremely low hydrocarbon generation potential, as indicated by the small thicknesses and low TOC contents. The Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field displays lower dryness coefficients and δ¹³C₁ values than those in the Jingbian gas field, suggesting lower maturity rather than a migration effect. Therefore, the oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas was probably not derived from the marlstone in the Upper Ordovician Beiguoshan Formation and the shale in the Middle Ordovician Pingliang Formation on the western and southwestern margins of the Ordos Basin. The oil-associated gas in the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field was probably derived from the presalt source rocks in the Lower Ordovician Majiagou Formation, which were developed to a certain extent in the central-eastern Ordos Basin.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Jinxing Dai for generous guidance and assistance, the North China Branch Company of SINOPEC for sample collection and technical support, and the Key Laboratory for Hydrocarbon Accumulation Mechanism of SINOPEC for chemical analyses of natural gas.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by the National Science & Technology Special Project (2016ZX05002-006) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41302118 & U1663201).

References

Bernard

Brooks

Sackett

(1976) Natural gas seepage in the Gulf of Mexico. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 31(1): 48–54.

Cai

(2005) Geochemical characteristics and origin of natural gas and thermochemical sulphate reduction in Ordovician carbonates in the Ordos Basin, China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 48(3–4): 209–226.

Chen

(2002) Feature of mixed gas in central gas field of Ordos Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development 29(2): 33–38. in Chinese).

Dai

(1999) Significant advancement in research on coal-derived gas in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development 26(3): 1–10. in Chinese).

Dai

(2014) Giant Coal-Derived Gas Fields and the Source in China, Beijing: Science Press, pp. 1–424. (in Chinese).

Dai

Luo

(2005) Stable carbon isotope compositions and source rock geochemistry of the giant gas accumulations in the Ordos Basin, China. Organic Geochemistry 36(12): 1617–1635.

Dai

Zou

(2012) Stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes of natural gases sourced from the Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin, China. Organic Geochemistry 43(1): 103–111.

Dai

Pei

(1992) Natural Gas Geology in China (Vol. 1), Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, pp. 1–149. in Chinese).

Dai

Zou

Qin

(2008a) Geology of giant gas fields in China. Marine and Petroleum Geology 25(4–5): 320–334.

10.

Dai

Zou

Zhang

(2008b) Discrimination of abiogenic and biogenic alkane gases. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 51(12): 1737–1749.

11.

Ding

Zhang

Pan

(2016) Development patterns of collapse-type karst reservoirs in the Ordovician of Daniudi gasfield, Ordos Basin. Oil and Gas Geology 37(2): 210–217. in Chinese).

12.

Guo

Zhang

Chen

(2009) Stratigraphic division of the Upper Carboniferous-Lower Permian in Daniudi gasfield, the Ordos Basin. Oil and Gas Geology 30(6): 697–705. in Chinese).

13.

Guo

Wei

(2014) Natural gas accumulation and models in Ordovician carbonates, Ordos Basin, China. Petroleum Exploration and Development 41(4): 393–403. in Chinese).

14.

Hao

Chen

(2011) The Accumulation Theory and Practice of Tight Sandstone Gas in Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin, Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, pp. 1–301. in Chinese).

15.

Hao

Gao

Huang

(1997) Characteristics of dynamic equilibrium for natural gas migration and accumulation of the gas field in the center of the Ordos Basin. Science in China (Series D) 40(1): 11–15.

16.

Hao

Hui

(2006) Reservoiring features of Daniudi low-permeability gas field in Ordos basin and its exploration and development technologies. Oil and Gas Geology 27(6): 762–768. in Chinese).

17.

Zhang

(2008a) Geochemical characteristics and origin of gases from the Upper, Lower Paleozoic and the Mesozoic reservoirs in the Ordos Basin, China. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 51(Supp. I): 183–194.

18.

(2008b) Preliminary study on the origin identification of natural gas by the parameters of light hydrocarbon. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 51(Supp. I): 131–139.

19.

Shan

(2010) The origin of natural gas and the hydrocarbon charging history of the Yulin gas field in the Ordos Basin, China. International Journal of Coal Geology 81(4): 381–391.

20.

Zhang

(2011) Characterization of low molecular weight hydrocarbons in Jingbian gas field and its application to gas sources identification. Energy Exploration and Exploitation 29(6): 777–796.

21.

Huang

Xiong

Yang

(1996) Gas source discrimination of central gas field in Ordos Basin. Chinese Science Bulletin 41(17): 1588–1592. in Chinese).

22.

Huang

Fang

Liu

(2015) Natural gas genesis and sources in the Zizhou gas field, Ordos Basin, China. International Journal of Coal Geology 152(Part A): 132–143.

23.

Hui

Jia

(2001) Study on the source of natural gas in Ordovician in Tabamiao area of North Ordos Basin. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology 21(1): 23–27. in Chinese).

24.

Jenden

Kaplan

Poreda

(1988) Origin of nitrogen-rich natural gases in the California Great Valley: Evidence from helium, carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 52(4): 851–861.

25.

(2003) Geochemical indexes and evaluation of mixed origin natural gases from Central Gas Field in the Ordos Basin. Geochimica 32(3): 282–290. in Chinese).

26.

Liu

Zhang

Kong

(2016) Lower Paleozoic source rocks and natural gas origins in Ordos Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development 43(4): 540–549. in Chinese).

27.

Liu

Ding

Wan

(2014) Characteristics and distribution of Ordovician weathering crust reservoirs in Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology 19(1): 35–42. in Chinese).

28.

Liu

Chen

Liu

(2009) Origin of natural gas from the Ordovician paleo-weathering crust and gas-filling model in Jingbian gas field, Ordos basin, China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 35(1): 74–88.

29.

Liu

Dai

(2008) Hydrogen isotope composition of natural gases from the Tarim Basin and its indication of depositional environments of the source rocks. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 51(2): 300–311.

30.

Liu

Jin

Liu

(2013) Presence of carboxylate salts in marine carbonate strata of the Ordos Basin and their impact on hydrocarbon generation evaluation of low TOC, high maturity source rocks. Science China Earth Sciences 56(12): 2141–2149.

31.

Liu

Jin

Meng

(2015) Genetic types of natural gas and filling patterns in Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin, China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 107: 1–11.

32.

Liu

Jin

Wang

(2012) Gas filling pattern in Paleozoic marine carbonate reservoir of Ordos Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica 28(3): 847–858. in Chinese).

33.

Lorant

Prinzhofer

Behar

(1998) Carbon isotopic and molecular constraints on the formation and the expulsion of thermogenic hydrocarbon gases. Chemical Geology 147(3–4): 249–264.

34.

Wang

Zhu

(2012) Origin determination of gas from Jingbian gas field in Ordos basin collective through the geochemistry of gas from inclusions and source rock pyrolysis. Acta Petrologica Sinica 28(3): 859–869. in Chinese).

35.

Prinzhofer

Pernaton

(1997) Isotopically light methane in natural gas: bacterial imprint or diffusive fractionation? Chemical Geology 142(3–4): 193–200.

36.

Prinzhofer

Huc

(1995) Genetic and post-genetic molecular and isotopic fractionations in natural gases. Chemical Geology 126(3–4): 281–290.

37.

Rooney

Claypool

Moses Chung

(1995) Modeling thermogenic gas generation using carbon isotope ratios of natural gas hydrocarbons. Chemical Geology 126(3–4): 219–232.

38.

Sun Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, et al. (2015) The Accumulation Conditions and Play Optimization and Assessment of the Ordovician Strata in the Ordos Basin. Beijing: Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, pp.1–158 (in Chinese).

39.

Wang

Liu

Shi

(2015) Hydrogen isotope characteristics of thermogenic methane in Chinese sedimentary basins. Organic Geochemistry 83–84(1): 178–189.

40.

Zhang

(2012) Daniudi gas field sulfur gas well corrosion monitoring. Total Corrosion Control 26(10): 50–53. in Chinese).

41.

Tao

(2014) Geochemical characteristics and source of natural gases from Southwest Depression of the Tarim Basin, NW China. Organic Geochemistry 74: 106–115.

42.

Xia

Zhao

Dai

(1999b) Main source rocks of oil-type components in natural gas from Ordovician weathering crust, Changqing gas field. Petroleum Exploration and Development 26(4): 22–24. in Chinese).

43.

Xia

Zhao

(1999a) Geochemical characteristics and source rock of Ordovician gas reservoir, Changqing Gasfield. Chinese Science Bulletin 44(20): 1917–1920.

44.

Xiao

Zhao

Thu

(2005) Upper Paleozoic petroleum system, Ordos Basin, China. Marine and Petroleum Geology 22(8): 945–963.

45.

Nakai

Wakita

(1995) Helium isotope compositions in sedimentary basins in China. Applied Geochemistry 10(6): 643–656.

46.

Yang

Bao

(2014) Reservoir-forming by lateral supply of hydrocarbon: A new understanding of the formation of Ordovician gas reservoirs under gypsolyte in the Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Industry 34(4): 19–26. in Chinese).

47.

Yang

Wei

(2008) Sulige field in the Ordos Basin: Geological setting, field discovery and tight gas reservoirs. Marine and Petroleum Geology 25(4–5): 387–400.

48.

Yang

Liu

(2014) Progress of Paleozoic coal-derived gas exploration in Ordos Basin, West China. Petroleum Exploration and Development 41(2): 129–137. in Chinese).

49.

Yang

Zhang

Zan

(2009) Geochemical characteristics of Ordovician subsalt gas reservoir and their significance for reunderstanding the gas source of Jingbian Gasfield, east Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience 20(1): 8–14. in Chinese).

50.

Yang

(2005) Tectonic and stratigraphic controls of hydrocarbon systems in the Ordos basin: A multicycle cratonic basin in central China. AAPG Bulletin 89(2): 255–269.

51.

Yang

Guo

(2016) Formation of low permeability reservoirs and gas accumulation process in the Daniudi Gas Field, Northeast Ordos Basin, China. Marine and Petroleum Geology 70: 222–236.

52.

Zhao

Wang

Sun

(2015) Origin of the Ordovician gas and its accumulation patterns in Northwestern Ordos Basin. Oil and Gas Geology 36(5): 711–720. in Chinese).

53.

Zou

Yang

Tao

(2013) Continuous hydrocarbon accumulation over a large area as a distinguishing characteristic of unconventional petroleum: The Ordos Basin, North-Central China. Earth-Science Reviews 126: 358–369.

54.

Zou

Cai

Zhang

(2007) Variations of natural gas carbon isotope-type curves and their interpretation – A case study. Organic Geochemistry 38(8): 1398–1415.

Genetic types and sources of Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the Daniudi gas field,Ordos Basin,China

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Geological setting

Samples and analytical methods

Results

Chemical composition

Carbon isotopes

Hydrogen isotopes

Light hydrocarbons

Discussion

Genetic types of natural gas

The source of natural gas

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

References