HakamaM., ChamberlainJ., DayN.E., MillerA.B., ProrokP.C.Evaluation of screening programmes for gynaecological cancer. Br J Cancer1985; 52: 669–73
2.
LääräE., DayN.E., HakamaM.Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes. Lancet1987; i: 1247–9
3.
JohannessonG.E., GeirssonG., DayN., TuliniusH.Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Iceland 1965-1978. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Supp1982; 61: 199–203
4.
PettersonF., BjörkholmE., NäslundI.Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980. Int J Epidemiol, 1985; 14: 521–7
5.
LyngeE.Regional trends in incidence of cervical cancer in Denmark in relation to local smear-taking activity. Int J Epidemiol1983; 12: 405–13
6.
LyngeE.Screening for cancer of the cervix uteri. World J Surg1989; 13: 71–8
7.
PedersenE., HoegK., KolstadP.Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Ostfold county, Norway: an experiment. Second report of the Norwegian Cancer Society. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl1971; 11: 1–18
8.
HakamaM.Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer in the Nordic countries. In: MagnusK., ed. Trends in cancer incidence: causes and practical implications.New York: Hemisphere, 1982: 279–92
9.
IARC Working Group on Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: the duration of low risk after negative result of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. Br Med J1986; 293: 659–64
10.
IARC Working Group on Cervical Cancer Screening. Summary chapter. In: HakamaM., MillerA.B., DayN.E., eds. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix.Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications No 76, 1986: 133–42
11.
DraperG.J., CookG.A.Changing patterns of cervical cancer rates. Br Med J1983; 287: 510
12.
ParkinD.M., Nguyen-DinhX., DayN.E.The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1985; 92: 150–7
13.
CopplesonM., ElliottP., ReidB.Puzzling changes in cervical cancer in young women. Med J Aust1987; 146: 405–6
14.
ArmstrongB., HolmanD.Increasing mortality from cancer of the cervix in young Australian women. Med J Aust1981; i: 460–2
15.
BeralV., BoothM.Predictions of cervical cancer incidence and mortality in England and Wales. Lancet1986; i: 495
16.
HakamaM., LouhivuoriK.A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked. Cancer Surveys1988; 7: 403–16
17.
HakamaM., PukkalaE., SaastamoinenP.Selective screening: Theory and practice based on high risk groups of cervical cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health1979; 33: 257–61
18.
MillerA.B.Screening for cancer.Orlando FL: Academic Press, 1985
19.
MillerA.B.Evaluation of the impact of screening for cancer of the cervix. In: HakamaM., MillerA.B., DayN.E., eds. Screening for Cancer of the Uterine Cervix.Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications No 76, 1986: 149–60
20.
ChamberlainJ.Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer. In: HakamaM., MillerA.B., DayN.E., eds. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix.Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications No 76, 1986: 161–8