Problems of Follow-up for Abnormal Cervical Smears: Discussion Paper

Paul C . The New Zealand cervical cancer study: could it happen again? Br Med J 1988; 297: 533–8

Chisholm DK Haran D . Cases of invasive cervical cancer in the North West in spite of screening. Br J Family Plannig 1984; 10: 3–8

Ellman R Chamberlain J . Improving the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. J R Coll Gen Pract 1984; 34: 537–42

Elwood JM Cotton RE Johnson J Jones GM Curnow J Beaver MW . Are patients with abnormal cervical smears adequately managed? Br Med J 1984; 289: 891–4

Kinlen LJ Spriggs AI . Women with positive cervical smears but without surgical intervention. Lancet 1978; ii: 465

Robertson JH Woodend BE Crozier EH Hutchinson J . Risk of cervical cancer associated with mild dyskaryosis. Br Med J 1988; 297: 18–21

Posner T Vessey M . Prevention of cervical cancer. The patient's view. London: King Edward's Hospital Fund for London, 1988

Campion MJ Brown JR McCance DJ Atia W Cuzick J Singer A . Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 175–81

Silcocks PBS Moss SM , Rapidly progressive cervical cancer: is it a real problem? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 1111–16

Russell JM Blair V Hunter RD . Cervical carcinoma: prognosis in younger patients. Br Med J 1987; 295: 300–3

Meanwell CA Kelly KA Wilson S Roginski C Woodman C Griffiths R Blackledge G . Young age as a prognostic factor in cervical cancer: analysis of population based data from 10022 cases. Br Med J 1988; 296: 386–91

Yobs AR Plott AE Hicklin MD Retrospective evaluation of gynecologic cytodiagnosis. II. Inter-laboratory reproducibility as shown in rescreening large consecutive samples of reported cases. Acta Cytol 1987; 31: 900–9

Ismail SM Colclough AB Dinnen JS Eakins D Evans DMD Gradwell E O'Sullivan JP Summerell JM Newcombe RG . Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br Med J 1989; 298: 707–10