The present study reports on the development and evaluation of a classroom module to train scientific thinking skills. The module was implemented in two of four parallel sections of introductory psychology. To assess learning, a passage-based question set from the medical college admissions test (MCAT2015) preview guide was included as extra credit on the final exam in all sections. This provided an outcome that was distinct in content from the module, while tapping the same underlying scientific thinking skills. Students in the experimental classrooms answered more questions correctly on targeted scientific thinking skills than students in the comparison classrooms. These data support the benefit of targeted activities for training scientific thinking skills in introductory psychology.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). Vision and change in education biology education: A call to action. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2007). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major. Washtington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/ed/resources.html.
3.
American Psychological Association. (2011). APA principles for quality undergraduate education in psychology. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
AndersonL.KrathwohlD. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York, NY: Longman.
5.
Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2011). What works in facilitating interdisciplinary learning in science and mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
6.
Association of American Medical Colleges. (2011). MCAT 2015: A better test for tomorrow's doctors. Preview guide for MCAT 2015. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
Association of American Medical Colleges. (2012). MCAT2015: A better test for tomorrow's doctors. Preview guide for the MCAT2015 exam (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
8.
BensleyD. A.CroweD. S.BernhardtP.BucknerC.AllmanA. (2010). Teaching and assessing critical thinking skills for argument analysis in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 91–96.
9.
BensleyD. A.MurtaghM. P. (2012). Guidelines for a scientific approach to critical thinking assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 5–16.
10.
BlessingS.BlessingJ. (2010). PsychBusters: A means of fostering critical thinking in the introductory course. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 178–182. doi:10.1080/00986283.2010.488540
11.
CarrollD. W.KenistonA. H.PedenB. F. (2008). Integrating critical thinking with course content. In DunnD. S.HalonenJ. S.SmithR. A. (Eds.), Teaching critical thinking in psychology (pp. 101–115). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
12.
DunnD. S.HalonenJ. S.SmithR. A. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching critical thinking in psychology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
13.
FrazerN. B.TwohigM. P. (2012). The new social and behavioral requirements: Inspired innovation, missed opportunity, or both?Peer Review, 14, 14–17.
14.
GareisK. C. (1995). Critiquing articles cited in the introductory textbook: A writing assignment. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 233–235.
15.
HalonenJ. S. (1995). Demystifying critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 75–81.
16.
HalpernD. (1993). Assessing the effectiveness of critical thinking instruction. The Journal of General Education, 50, 270–286.
17.
HalpernD. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69–74.
18.
HalpernD. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and meta-cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 449–455.
19.
HolmesJ. D. (2008). An introductory exercise for promoting critical thinking about psychological measurement. In DunnD. S.HalonenJ. S.SmithR. A. (Eds.), Teaching critical thinking in psychology (pp. 277–280). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
20.
KingA. K. (1995). Designing the instructional process to enhance critical thinking across the curriculum. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 13–17.
21.
KrathwohlD. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212–218.
22.
LamsonN.KippK. (2008). A module-based research project: Modeling critical thinking in psychology. In DunnD. S.HalonenJ. S.SmithR. A. (Eds.), Teaching critical thinking in psychology (pp. 247–250). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
23.
LutskyN. (2006). Teaching quantitative reasoning: How to make psychology statistically significant. American Psychological Society Observer, 19, 35–38.
24.
McLeanC. P.MillerN. A. (2010). Changes in critical thinking skills following a course on science and psuedoscience: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 85–90.
25.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26.
National Research Council. (2011). Promising practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Summary of two workshop. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
28.
National Science Board. (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation(volume 1, NSB 08-01; volume 2, NSB 08-01A).
29.
NolanS. A.HeinzenT. E. (2009). Graphing literacy in the psychology major: Florence Nightingale and the creation of a beautiful display of data. American Psychological Society Observer, 22, 33–36.
30.
NoorbalaA.AkhondzadehS.Tahmacebi-PourN.JamshidiA. (2005). Hydro-alocholic extract of Crocus sativus L. versus fluoxetine in the treatment of mild to moderate depression: A double-blind, randomized pilot trial. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 97, 281–284.
31.
ThiemanT. J.ClaryE. G.OlsonA. M.DaunerR. C.RingE. E. (2009). Introducing students to psychological research: General psychology as a laboratory course. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 160–168.
32.
WadeC. (1995). Using writing to develop and assess critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 24–28.
33.
WilkinsonT., JDikB. J.TixA. P. (2008). The critical thinking lab: Developing students skills through practical application. In DunnD. S.HalonenJ. S.SmithR. A. (Eds.), Teaching critical thinking in psychology (pp. 263–265). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
34.
WillinghamD. (2007). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach?American Educator, 31, 9–19.
