This study employed a quasi-experimental design to test the effects of three pedagogies on learning outcomes in a simulated psychology of gender lecture. Results showed that meaning and relational pedagogies, as well as a combination of meaning, relational, and explanatory pedagogies, significantly improved participant learning beyond self-study and produced a significant improvement in retention as well. Interestingly, participants in the relational condition excelled on these learning outcomes even though the instructor covered very little reading material in that condition. Despite the benefits of these pedagogies, participants showed a clear preference for the lower performing explanatory instructional approach, which suggests that students may not readily recognize pedagogies that best contribute to effective learning and retention in classes like the psychology of gender.
AllenM. J. (2006). Assessing general education programs. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company.
2.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A.NystrandM.GamoranA. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685–730. doi:10.3102/00028312040003685
3.
AsterhanC. S. C.SchwarzB. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 626–639. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626
4.
BaghdadyM.CarnahanH.LamE. W. N.WoodsN. N. (2014). Test-enhanced learning and its effect on comprehension and diagnostic accuracy. Medical Education, 48, 181–188.
5.
BarrR. B.TaggJ. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27, 13–25.
6.
BlighD. A. (2000). What’s the use of lectures?San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BrownleeJ. (2004). Teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs: Developing a relational model of teaching. Research in Education, 72, 1–17.
8.
BuberM. (2002). Between man and man. New York, NY: Routledge Classics.
9.
CarpenterS. K.PashlerH.WixtedJ. T.VulE. (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438–448.
10.
CunliffeA. L. (2008). Orientations to social constructionism: Relationally responsive social constructionism and its implications for knowledge and learning. Management Learning, 39, 123–139.
11.
EdwardsJ. B.RichardsA. (2002). Relational-teaching: A view of relational teaching in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22, 33–48.
12.
EwellP. T. (2001). Accreditation and student learning outcomes: A proposed point of departure. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Retrieved February 21, 2014, from Council for Higher Education Accreditation web sitehttp://www.chea.org/award/StudentLearningOutcomes2001.pdf
13.
FreemanS.EddyS. L.McDonoughM.SmithM. K.OkoroaforN.JordtH.WenderothM. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410–8415.
14.
FreireP. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
15.
GeelanD. (2003). Teacher expertise and explanatory frameworks in a successful physics classroom. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 49, 22–32.
16.
GoodboyA. K.WeberK.BolkanS. (2009). The effects of nonverbal and verbal immediacy on recall and multiple student learning Indicators. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 44, 4–12.
17.
HamiltonR. (2012). Elaboration effects on learning. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 3, 1103–1105.
18.
HubertyC. J.PetoskeyM. D. (2000). Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance. In TinsleyH.BrownS. (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 183–208). New York: Academic Press.
19.
KarpickeJ. D. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 157–163.
20.
KuhnD.UdellW. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245–1260. doi:10.1111/1467–8624.00605
21.
LaurenceauJ.-P.BarrettL. F.RovineM. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 314–323.
22.
LipsH. M. (2007). Sex and gender: An introduction (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
23.
LomaxH. A. (2000). Human relationship development: A soul waiting to be born in the heart of American higher education. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Database. 3015617.
24.
LonkaK.MikkonenV. (1989). Why does the length of an essay-type answer contribute to examination marks?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 220–231.
25.
McDanielM. A.AndersonJ. L.DerbishM. H.MorrisetteN. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 494–513.
MuisK. R.DuffyM. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students’ beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 213–225.
28.
MuisK. R.FoyM. J. (2010). The effects of teachers’ beliefs on elementary students’ beliefs, motivation, and achievement in math. In BendixenL. D.FeuchtF. C. (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 435–469). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MurphyP. K.SoterA.WilkinsonI. A. G.HennesseyM. N.AlexanderJ. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740–764. doi:10.1037/a0015576
30.
OeberstA.LindnerI. (2015). Unannounced memory tests are not necessarily unexpected by participants: Test expectation and its consequences in the repeated test paradigm. Cognitive Process, 16, 269–278.
31.
OlafsonL.SchrawG. (2010). Beyond epistemology: Assessing teachers’ epistemological and ontological worldviews. In BendixenL.FeuchtF. (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 516–554). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
O’LearyC.StewartJ. (2013). The interaction of learning styles and teaching methodologies in accounting ethical instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 225–241. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1291-9
33.
PalmerP. J. (1993). To know as we are known: Education as a spiritual journey. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
34.
PalmerP. J. (2007). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life (10th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
PerozL.BeucheA.PerozN. (2009). Randomized controlled trial comparing lecture versus self studying by an online tool. Medical Teacher, 31, 508–512.
36.
ReberJ. S. (2011). The under-examined life: A proposal for critically evaluating teachers’ and students’ philosophies of teaching. College Teaching, 59, 102–110.
37.
ReznitskayaA.GregoryM. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 48, 114–133.
38.
SarachoO. N. (1991). Teacher expectations and cognitive style: Implications for students’ academic achievement. Early Childhood Development and Care, 77, 97–106.
39.
SchwerdtG.WuppermannA. C. (2011). Is traditional teaching really that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review, 30, 365–379.
40.
SvinickiM. D.McKeachieW. J. (2013). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college, and university teachers (14th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41.
TormeyR.HenchyD. (2008). Re-imagining the traditional lecture: An action research approach to teaching students to ‘do’ philosophy. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 303–314. doi:10.1080/13562510802045337
42.
ToutkoushianR. K. (2005). What can institutional research do to help colleges meet the workforce needs of states and nations?Research in Higher Education, 46, 955–984.
43.
UlrichR. E.PrayS. L. (1965). Comparison of directed self-study vs lecture in teaching general psychology. Psychological Reports, 16, 278.
44.
WeltzenO. A. (1994). Two great professors: Formidable intellects with affection for students. College Teaching, 42, 124–130.
45.
WittP. L.WheelessL. R.AllenM. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184–207.
46.
WittwerJ.RenklA. (2008). Why instructional explanations often do not work: A framework for understanding the effectiveness of instructional explanations. Educational Psychologist, 43, 49–64. doi:10.1080/00461520701756420
47.
XuX.PadillaA. M. (2013). Using meaningful interpretation and chunking to enhance memory: The case of Chinese character learning. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 402–422.
48.
ZhangL.-f. (2006). Does student-teacher thinking style match/mismatch matter in students’ achievement?Educational Psychologists, 26, 395–409.
