Introductory Psychology (Intro Psych) provides an opportunity to train key critical thinking skills. Recent models for Intro Psych propose adapting the course to establish research methods and the attendant critical thinking skills as the course foundation, applied iteratively throughout course content.
Objective
This study developed and evaluated an integrated critical thinking curriculum for Intro Psych that provided repeated, scaffolded practice embedded throughout the term. The curriculum serves as an overlay for existing courses, requiring minimal revision to the existing courses.
Method
Backward design-informed development of the whole critical thinking curriculum. Evaluation took place at both a 4-year and 2-year college. The sample included 334 Intro Psych students across 15 classrooms (8 experimental; 7 control). Assessment measures included three subscales of the Psychological Critical Thinking Exam.
Results
Students in classes implementing the curriculum scored significantly higher on the critical thinking assessment. There was no evidence for differential effects across the two colleges.
Teaching Implications
Integrating this critical thinking curriculum into existing Intro Psych courses can support students’ critical thinking skill development. The whole curriculum is available electronically.
Conclusion
These findings support the use of an integrated critical thinking curriculum in Intro Psych to support students’ critical thinking skills.
BarrowmanN. (2014). Correlation, causation, and confusion. The New Atlantis, Summer/Fall, 23–44.
4.
Becker-BleaseK.StevensC.WitkowM. R.AlmuaybidA. (2021). Teaching modules boost scientific reasoning skills in small and large lecture Introductory Psychology classrooms. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 7(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000173
5.
BensleyD. A.CroweD. S.BernhardtP.BucknerC.AllmanA. (2010). Teaching and assessing critical thinking skills for argument analysis in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 37(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986281003626656
6.
BlessingS.BlessingJ. (2010). Psychbusters: A means of fostering critical thinking in the introductory course. Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.488540
7.
BouillionL. M.GomezL. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878–898. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1037
8.
BranchJ. G.DubowE. F. (2021). Research experience in recitation sections within Introductory Psychology courses: The effectiveness of a semester-long laboratory component. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 7(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000187
9.
ButlerH. A.HalpernD. F. (2020). Critical thinking impacts our everyday lives. In SternbergR. J.HalpernD. F. (Eds.), Critical thinking in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 152–172). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.008
10.
CarrollD. W.KenistonA. H.PedenB. F. (2008). Integrating critical thinking with course content. In DunnD. S.HalonenJ. S.SmithR. A. (Eds.), Teaching critical thinking in psychology (pp. 101–115). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305173.ch9
11.
CascioT. V. (2020). Methodological thinking drills: A novel technique for boosting real-world methodological thinking ability. Teaching of Psychology, 47(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319888093
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
14.
GurungR. A. R.HackathornJ. (2018). Ramp it up: A call for more research in Introductory Psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 45(4), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318796413
15.
GurungR. A. R.HackathornJ.EnnsC.FrantzS.CacioppoJ. T.LoopT.FreemanJ. E. (2016). Strengthening Introductory Psychology: A new model for teaching the introductory course. American Psychologist, 71(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040012
16.
GurungR. A. R.NeufieldG. (2021). Transforming Introductory Psychology: Expert advice on teacher training, course design, and student success. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000260-000
HalonenJ. S.DunnD. D. (2020). Critical thinking: Promise, progress, and paradox. In SternbergR. J.HalpernD. F. (Eds.), Critical thinking in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 224–248). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.011
19.
HalpernD. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80(Winter), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8005
20.
HalpernD. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and meta-cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449
21.
HalpernD. F.SternbergR. J. (2020). An introduction to critical thinking: Maybe it will change your life. In SternbergR. J.HalpernD. F. (Eds.), Critical thinking in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–9). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.002
22.
HerringtonJ.OliverR. (2002). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
23.
HomaN.HackathornJ.BrownC. M.GarczynskiA.SolomonE. D.TennialR.SanbornU. A.GurungR. A. R. (2013). An analysis of learning objectives and content coverage in Introductory Psychology syllabi. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313487456
24.
KingA. K. (1995). Designing the instructional process to enhance critical thinking across the curriculum. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2201_5
25.
KirschnerP. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7
26.
LaCosseJ.AinsworthS. E.ShepherdM. A.MossJ. H.LichtM.LichtB. (2017). An active-learning approach to fostering understanding of research methods in large classes. Teaching of Psychology, 44(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317692614
27.
LawsonT. J.BrownM. (2018). Using pseudoscience to improve Introductory Psychology students’ information literacy. Teaching of Psychology, 45(3), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318779259
28.
LawsonT. J.Jordan-FlemingM. K.BodleJ. H. (2015). Measuring psychological critical thinking: An update. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315587624
29.
MerrillM. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 43–59https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
30.
MuellerJ. F.TaylorH. K.BrakkeK.DrysdaleM.KellyK.LevineG. M.Ronquillo-AdachiJ. (2020). Assessment of scientific inquiry and critical thinking: Measuring APA Goal 2 student learning outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 47(4), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320945114
31.
NorcrossJ. C.HailstorksR.AikenL. S.PfundR. A.StammK. E.ChristidisP. (2016). Undergraduate study in psychology: Curriculum and assessment. American Psychologist, 71(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040095
32.
RushingN. C.Van AllenK. L. (2022). A psychometric evaluation of the Psychological Critical Thinking Examination for course and program assessment. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 8(4), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000318
33.
SibulkinA. E.ButlerJ. S. (2019). Learning to give reverse causality explanations for correlations: Still hard after all these tries. Teaching of Psychology, 46(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319853936
StevensC.WitkowM. R. (2025). A Critical Thinking Skill-Based Curricular Overlay (SBCO) for Introductory Psychology [Teaching resource]. https://tinyurl.com/4cx588sv
36.
StevensC.WitkowM. R.SmeltB. (2016). Strengthening scientific reasoning skills in introductory psychology: Evidence from community college and liberal arts classrooms. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2(4), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000070
37.
StevensC.WitkowM. R.SmeltB.GoodK.HershmanT. (2020). Where is psychology teaching and learning research conducted? An analysis of institution setting and class sizes. Teaching of Psychology, 47(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319884489
SwellerJ. (1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.457
40.
ThiemanT. J.ClaryE. G.OlsonA. M.DaunerR. C.RingE. E. (2009). Introducing students to psychological research: General psychology as a laboratory course. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902959994
41.
WentworthD. K.WhitmarshL. (2017). Thinking like a psychologist Introductory Psychology writing assignments: Encouraging critical thinking and resisting plagiarism. Teaching of Psychology, 44(4), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317727909
42.
WielkiewiczR. M. (2024). Rethinking the pedagogy of evaluating causal claims in the psychology curriculum. Psychology, 15(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2024.151009
43.
Wilson-DoengesG.GurungR. A. R. (2013). Benchmarks for scholarly investigations of teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12011
