This study compared changes in psychology and philosophy classes in two distinct components of critical thinking (CT): general skills and personal beliefs. Participants were 128 undergraduates enrolled in CT in psychology, other psychology courses, or philosophy courses. CT and philosophy students significantly reduced beliefs in paranormal phenomena at the end of the semester compared to other psychology students. Only philosophy students improved on the Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. The Watson–Glaser may not fully measure CT emphasized in psychology, but psychology instructors can still effectively teach students to examine their own beliefs and think differently in their daily lives. Differentiated assessment of CT is important as instructors evaluate student learning against specific goals.
AbramiP. C.BernardR. M.BorokhovhovskiE.WadeA.SurkesM. A.TamimR.ZhangD. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 4, 1102–1134. doi:10.3102/0034654308326084
2.
AllenM.BerkowitzS.HuntS.LoudenA. (1999). A meta-analysis of the impact of forensics and communication education on critical thinking. Communication Education, 48, 18–30. doi:10.1080/03634529909379149
3.
American Psychological Association. (2007). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 14, 2011, fromwww.apa.org/ed/resources.html
4.
BanzigerG. (1983). Normalizing the paranormal: Short-term and long-term change in belief in the paranormal among older learners during a short course. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 212–214. doi:10.1207/s15328023top1004_6
5.
BensleyD. A. (1998). Critical thinking in psychology: A unified skills approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
6.
BensleyD. A.BaxterC. (2006). The critical thinking in psychology test. Unpublished manuscript, Frostburg State University, Frostburg, MD.
7.
BensleyD. A.CroweD. S.BernhardtP.BucknerC.AllmanA. L. (2010). Teaching and assessing critical thinking skills for argument analysis in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 91–96. doi:10.1080/00986281003626656
8.
BensleyD. A.MurtaghM. P. (2012). Guidelines for a scientific approach to critical thinking assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 5–16. doi:10.1177/0098628311430642
9.
BernardR. M.ZhangD.AbramiP. C.SicolyF.BorokhovskiE.SurkesM. A. (2008). Exploring the structure of the Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal: One scale or many subscales?Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2007.11.001
10.
BernsteinD. A. (2007, October 6–7). Promoting critical thinking and active learning in psychology courses. Keynote presentation given at the Mountain States Conference on the Teaching of Psychology, Durango, CO.
11.
BlessingS. B.BlessingJ. S. (2010). PsychBusters: A means of fostering critical thinking in the introductory course. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 178–182. doi:10.1080/00986283.2010.488540
12.
BrownJ. M.AlversonE. M.PepaC. A. (2001). The influence of a baccalaureate program on traditional, RN-BSN, and accelerated students’ critical thinking abilities. Holistic Nursing Practice, 15, 4–8.
13.
BurkeB. L.SearsS. R.KrausS. (2012, January). I don’t think, therefore I cram: Critical thinking in psychology classrooms. Poster presentation given at the National Institute for the Teaching of Psychology (NITOP), St. Petersburg Beach, FL.
14.
ButlerH. A.DwyerC. P.HoganM. J.FrancoA.RivasS. F.SaizC.AlmeidaL. S. (2012). The Halpern critical thinking assessment and real-world outcomes: Cross-national applications. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 112–121. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.001
15.
ChamberlinJ. (2012). APA endorses higher education guidelines. Monitor on Psychology, 43, 22.
16.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
17.
DudleyR. T. (2000). The relationship between negative affect and paranormal belief. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 315–321.
EnnisR. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking abilities and dispositions. In BaronJ.SternbergR. (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills (pp. 9–26). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
20.
EnnisR. H.MillmanJ.TomkoT. N. (2004). Cornell Critical Thinking Tests, level X and level Z manual (4th ed.). Seaside, CA. Critical Thinking.
21.
FryeB.AlfredN.CampbellM. (1999). Use of the Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal with BSN students. Nursing and Health Care Perspectives, 20, 253–255.
22.
GadzellaB. M.StacksJ.StephensR. C.MastenW. G. (2005). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal, form-S for education majors. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 9–12.
23.
GouldingA.ParkerA. (2001). Finding psi in the paranormal: Psychometric measures used in research in paranormal beliefs/experiences and in research on psi-ability. European Journal of Parapsychology, 16, 73–101.
24.
GriggsR. A.JacksonS. L.MarekP.ChristopherA. N. (1998). Critical thinking in introductory psychology texts and supplements. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 254–266. doi:10.1080/00986289809709711
HurleyP. J. (2011). A concise introduction to logic (11th ed.). Independence, KY: Cengage.
27.
KrausS.SearsS. R.BurkeB. L. (2012). Is truthiness enough? Classroom activities for encouraging evidence-based critical thinking. Manuscript in Preparation. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 13, 83–93.
28.
LawrenceT. (1995). How many factors of paranormal belief are there? A critique of the PBS. Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 3–25.
29.
LawsonT. J. (1999). Assessing psychological critical thinking as a learning outcome for psychology majors. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 207–209.
30.
LehmanD. R.NisbettR. E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the effects of undergraduate training on reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 26, 952–960.
31.
LilienfeldS. O.LohrJ. M.MorierD. (2001). The teaching of courses in the science and pseudoscience of psychology: Useful resources. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 182–191.
32.
LilienfeldS. O.LynnS. J.LohrJ. M. (2004). Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
ManzaL.HilpertsK.HindleyL.MarcoC.SantanaA.HawkM. V. (2010). Exposure to science is not enough: The influence of classroom experiences on belief in paranormal phenomena. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 165–171. doi:10.1080/00986283.2010.488554
34.
McLeanC. P.MillerN. A. (2010). Changes in critical thinking skills following a course on science and pseudoscience: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 85–90. doi:10.1080/00986281003626714
35.
MyersD. G. (2009). Psychology: Ninth edition. New York, NY: Worth.
36.
NietoA. M.SaizC. (2008). Evaluation of Halpern’s “Structural Component” for improving critical thinking. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 266–274.
37.
PaulR. (1995). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
38.
PenningrothS. L.DespainL. H.GrayM. J. (2007). A course designed to improve psychological critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 153–157. doi:10.1080/00986280701498509
39.
SandorM. K.ClarkM.CampbellD.RainsA. P.CascioR. (1998). Evaluating critical thinking skills in a scenario-based community health course. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 15, 21–29. doi:10.1207/s15327655jchn1501_3
40.
ScottJ. N.MarkertR. J.DunnM. M. (1998). Critical thinking: Change during medical school and relationship to performance in clinical clerkships. Medical Education, 32, 14–18. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00701.x
41.
ShiahY.TamW. C.WuM.ChangF. (2010). Paranormal beliefs and religiosity: Chinese version of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scales. Psychological Reports, 107, 367–382.
42.
ShinK. R. (1998). Critical thinking ability and clinical decision-making skills among senior nursing students in associate and baccalaureate programmes in Korea. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, 414–418. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00499.x
43.
SolonT. (2007). Generic critical thinking infusion and course content learning in introductory psychology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34, 95–104.
44.
SparksG. G.NelsonC. L.CampbellR. G. (1997). The relationship between exposure to televised messages about paranormal phenomena and paranormal beliefs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 345–359. doi:10.1080/08838159709364412
45.
StanovichK. E. (2004). How to think straight about psychology. Boston, MA: Pearson Higher Education.
46.
StarkE. (2012). Enhancing and assessing critical thinking in a psychological research methods course. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 107–112. doi:10.1177/0098628312437725
47.
TobacykJ. (1984). Paranormal belief and college grade point average. Psychological Reports, 54, 217–218. doi:10.2466/pr0.1984.54.1.217
48.
TobacykJ. (2004). A Revised Paranormal Belief scale. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23, 94–98.
49.
TobacykJ.MilfordG. (1983). Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1029–1037. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.44.5.1029
50.
ValenzuelaJ.NietoA. M.SaizC. (2011). Critical thinking motivational scale: A contribution to the study of relationship between critical thinking and motivation. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 823–848.
51.
WatsonG.GlaserE. M. (1994). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal: Form S manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
52.
WatsonG.GlaserE. M. (2006). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal: Short form manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
53.
WespR.MontgomeryK. (1998). Developing critical thinking through the study of paranormal phenomena. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 275–278. doi:10.1080/00986289809709714
54.
WilliamsE.FrancisL.LewisC. A. (2009). Introducing the modified paranormal belief scale: Distinguishing between classic paranormal beliefs, religious paranormal beliefs and conventional religiosity among undergraduates in Northern Ireland and Wales. Archive for the Psychology of Religions, 31, 345–356.
55.
WilliamsR. L.OliverR.AllinJ. L.WinnB.BooherC. S. (2003). Psychological critical thinking as a course predictor and outcome variable. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 220–223. doi:10.1163/008467209X12499946199605
