Scholars often offer ideas for public administration focusing on the changing relationships between public and private sectors. These ideas have grown into discourses including the new public management and others. Scholars also tend to differ in their view of what public administration should be, fostering conflict. If one considers these discourses collectively through the lens of managing resources in a blurred environment, it can provide a space for meaningful discussions to emerge. One then might reshape a civic space that engages new public management, governance, and others collaboratively employing usufruct to focus this discussion given the emergence of postmodern conditions.
Abel, C., & Sementelli, A. (2003). Evolutionary critical theory and its role in public affairs. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
2.
Adams, G. (1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52, 363-373.
3.
Amable, B. (2000). Institutional complimentary and diversity of social systems of innovation and production. Review of International Political Economy, 7, 645-687.
4.
Apel, K. (1981). Charles S. Pierce from pragmatism to pragmaticism (J. M. Krois, Trans.). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
5.
Ayres, R., & Kneese, A. (1969). Production, consumption, and externalities. American Economic Review, 59, 282-297.
6.
Barber, B. (1995). Jihad vs. McWorld: How globalism and tribalism are reshaping the world. New York: Ballantine.
7.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. (1996). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life (Updated ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Bevir, M. (1999). Foucault and critique: Deploying agency against autonomy. Political Theory, 27(1), 65-84.
10.
Bos, D., & Peters, W. (1988). Privatization, internal control, and internal regulation. Journal of Public Economics, 36, 231-258.
11.
Bozeman, B. (1989). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private sector organization theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Bradford, W. (2004). Beyond reparations: An American Indian theory of justice (ExpressO Preprint Series Paper 170). Berkeley Electronic Press.
13.
Buck, S. (2003). TELRIC vs. universal service: A takings violation?”Federal Communications Law Journal, 56(1), 1-54.
14.
Cohen, G. (1995). Self-ownership freedom and equality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Cohen, S., & Eimicke, W. (2000, April). Assuring public ethics in privatized public programs. Paper prepared for the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Public Administration, San Diego, CA.
16.
Commons, J. (1931). Institutional economics. American Economic Review, 21, 648-657.
17.
Commons, J. (1936). Institutional economics. American Economic Review, 26, 237-249.
18.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon.
19.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
20.
Fox, C. (1996). Reinventing government as postmodern symbolic politics. Public Administration Review, 56, 256-262.
21.
Furubotn, E., & Richter, R. (1998). Institutions and economic theory: The contributions of the new institutional economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22.
Goodsell, C. (1994). The case for bureaucracy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
23.
Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon.
24.
Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
25.
Hall, J. (1995). Civil society: Theory history, comparison. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
26.
Hollingsworth, J. (1998). New perspectives on the spatial dimensions of economic coordination: Tensions between globalization and social systems of production. Review of International Political Economy, 5, 482-507.
27.
Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical theory: Selected essays. New York: Herder and Herder.
28.
Hunter, D. (1995). Rationing health care: The political perspective. British Medical Bulletin, 51, 876-884.
29.
Kaboolian, L. (1998). The new public management: Challenging the boundaries of the management vs. administration debate. Public Administration Review, 58, 189-193.
30.
Kelly, R. (1998). An inclusive democratic polity, representative bureaucracies, and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 58, 201-207.
31.
Kettl, D. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty first century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32.
Kirlin, J. (1996). The big questions of public administration in a democracy. Public Administration Review, 56, 416-423.
33.
Koziebrodzki, L. (1966). Administrative and civil law in the regulation of property rights in present-day Poland. American Journal of Comparative Law, 15, 772-781.
34.
Lan, Z., & Rainey, H. (1992). Goals, rules, and effectiveness in public, private, and hybrid organizations: Some assertions about differences. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 5-28.
35.
Langenkamp, R., & Zedalis, R. (2003). What happens to the Iraqi Oil?: Thoughts on some significant, unexamined international legal questions regarding occupation of oil fields. European Journal of International Law, 14, 417-435.
36.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
37.
Lynn, L. (1998). The new public management: How to transform a theme into a legacy. Public Administration Review, 58, 231-237.
38.
Lyotard, J. (1999). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39.
Malinvaud, E. (1972). Prices for individual consumption, quantity indicators for collective consumption. The Review of Economic Studies, 39, 385-405.
40.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One dimensional man. Boston: Beacon.
41.
Marcuse, H. (1970). The obsolescence of the Freudian concept of man. In Five lectures (pp. 44-61). Boston: Beacon.
42.
Marcuse, H. (1974). Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. New York: Beacon.
43.
Mbiba, B. (1999). Security of tenure, development victims, and the limits of environmental impact assessment in Zimbabwe’s communal lands. Development in Practice, 9, 316-322.
44.
Milward, H., & Provan, K. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-379.
45.
Nordhaus, W., Stavins, R., & Weitzman, M. (1992). Lethal model 2: The limits to growth revisited. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 1-59.
46.
Onuf, P. (Ed.). (1993). Jefferson legacies. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
47.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York: Addison-Wesley.
48.
Otsuka, M. (1998). Self-ownership and equality: A Lockean reconciliation. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27(1), 65-92.
Putterman, L. (1996). Ownership and the nature of the firm. In L. Putterman & R. Kroszner (Eds.), The economic nature of the firm (pp. 361-369). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Rainey, H. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52.
Rainey, H., Backoff, R., & Levine, C. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 363, 233-244.
53.
Ramos, A. (1981). The new science of organizations: A reconceptualization of the wealth of nations. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
54.
Rifkin, J. (1996). The end of work. New York: Putnam.
55.
Rohr, J. (1986). To run a constitution.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
56.
Rorty, R. (1998). Achieving our country. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
Roth, G., & Wittich, C. (Eds.). (1978). Max Weber economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
58.
Savas, E. (1982). Privatizing the public sector. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
59.
Schroeder, R. (1997). Re-claiming land in the Gambia: Gendered property rights and environmental intervention. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87, 487-508.
60.
Shalin, D. (1992). Critical theory and the pragmatist challenge. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 237-279.
61.
Soroos, M. (1994). Global change, environmental security, and the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Peace Research, 31, 317-332.
62.
Spence, D. (1999). Agency discretion and the dynamics of procedural reform. Public Administration Review, 59, 425-442.
63.
Spicer, M., & Terry, L. (1996). Administrative interpretation of statutes: A constitutional view on the “new world order” of public administration. Public Administration Review, 56, 38-47.
64.
Stillman, R. (1997). American vs. European public administration: Does public administration make the modern state, or does the state make public administration? Public Administration Review, 57, 332-338.
65.
Terry, L. (1995). Leadership of public bureaucracies: The administrator as conservator. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
Veblen, T. (1919). The vested interests and the common man. New York: B.W. Huebsch.
67.
Ventriss, C. (1989). Toward a public philosophy of public administration: A civic perspective of the public. Public Administration Review, 49, 173-179.
68.
Waldo, D. (1984). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration. New York: Holmes and Meir.
69.
Wamsley, G., Bacher, R., Goodsell, C., Kronenberg, P., Rohr, J., Stivers, C., et al. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70.
Waterson, J. (1999). Redefining community care social work: Needs or risks led? Health & Social Care in the Community, 7, 276-279.
71.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
72.
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.
