This article develops a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. The heuristic depicts four network types by combining network structure with the state’s capacity to metagovern. It suggests that each network type produces a particular combination of input and output legitimacy. We illustrate the heuristic and its utility using a comparative study of agri-food networks (organic farming and land use) in four countries, which each exhibit different combinations of input and output legitimacy respectively. The article concludes by using a fifth case study to illustrate what a network type that produces high levels of input and output legitimacy might look like.
AnsellE. C.GashA. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
2.
AtkinsonM. M.ColemanW. D. (1989). Strong states and weak states: Sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 47-67.
3.
BakerK.StokerG. (2012). Metagovernance and nuclear power in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 1026-1051.
4.
BellS.HindmoorA. (2009). Rethinking governance: The centrality of the state in modern society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BevirM. (2013). A theory of governance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BevirM.RichardsD. (2009). Decentering policy networks: A theoretical agenda. Public Administration, 87, 3-14.
7.
BlancoI.LowndesV.PratchettL. (2011). Policy networks and governance networks: Towards greater conceptual clarity. Political Studies Review, 9, 297-308.
8.
BörzelT. A. (2011). Networks: Reified metaphor or governance panacea?Public Administration, 89, 49-63.
9.
BörzelT. A.PankeD. (2006). Network governance: Effective and legitimate? In SørensenE.TorfingJ. (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 153-166). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
10.
BoströmM.KlintmanM. (2006). State-centered versus nonstate-driven organic food standardization: A comparison of the US and Sweden. Agriculture and Human Values, 23, 163-180.
11.
DaugbjergC. (1998). Policy networks under pressure: Pollution control, policy reform, and the power of farmers. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
12.
DaugbjergC.HalpinD. (2010). Generating policy capacity in emerging green industries: The development of organic farming in Denmark and Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12, 141-157.
13.
DaugbjergC.MarshD. (1998). Explaining policy outcomes: Integrating the policy network approach with macro-level and micro-level analysis. In MarshD. (Ed.), Comparing policy networks (pp. 52-71). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
14.
DaugbjergC.SønderskovK. M. (2012). Environmental policy performance revisited: Designing effective policies for green markets. Political Studies, 60, 399-418.
15.
DowdingK. (1995). Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies, 43, 136-158.
16.
FawcettP.DaugbjergC. (2012). Explaining governance outcomes: Epistemology, network governance, and the policy network analysis school. Political Studies Review, 10, 195-207.
17.
HalpinD.DaugbjergC. (2008). Associative deadlocks and transformative capacity: Engaging in Australian organic farm industry development. Australian Journal of Political Science, 43, 189-206.
18.
HalpinD.DaugbjergC.SchvartzmanY. (2011). Interest group capacities and infant industry development: State-sponsored growth in organic farming. International Political Science Review, 32, 147-166.
19.
HayC. (2004). Theory, stylized heuristic, or self-fulfilling prophecy? The status of rational choice theory in political analysis. Public Administration, 82, 39-62.
20.
HindmoorA. (2009). Explaining networks through mechanisms: Vaccination, priming, and the 2001 foot and mouth disease crisis. Political Studies, 57, 75-94.
21.
JessopB. (2011). Metagovernance. In BevirM. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 106-123). London, England: SAGE.
22.
KleinK.WinickoffD. E. (2011). Organic regulation across the Atlantic: Emergence, divergence, convergence. Environmental Politics, 20, 153-172.
23.
KlijnE.-H. (2008). Policy and implementation networks: Managing complex interactions. In CropperS.HuxhamC.EbersM.Smith RingP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 118-146). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
KlijnE.-H.SkelcherC. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not?Public Administration, 85, 587-608.
25.
KlijnE.-H.SteijnB.EdelenbosJ. (2010). The impact on network management on outcomes of governance networks. Public Administration, 88, 1063-1082.
26.
KooimanJ.JentoftS. (2009). Meta-governance: Values, norms, and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87, 818-836.
27.
LindgrenK.-O.PerssonT. (2010). Input and output legitimacy: Synergy or trade-off? Empirical evidence from an EU survey. Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 449-467.
LynggaardK. S. C. (2001). The farmer within an institutional environment: Comparing Danish and Belgian organic farming. Sociologia Ruralis, 41, 85-111.
30.
MarinettoM. (2003). Governing beyond the centre: A critique of the Anglo-governance school. Political Studies, 51, 592-608.
31.
MarshD.SmithM. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectic approach. Political Studies, 48, 4-21.
32.
MichelsenJ.LynggaardK.PadelS.FosterC. (2001). Organic farming development and agricultural institutions in Europe: A study of six countries. Stuttgart, Germany: University of Hohenheim.
33.
OsborneS. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance?London, England: Routledge.
34.
O’TooleL. J. (2006). Governing outputs and outcomes of governance networks. In SørensenE.TorfingJ. (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 215-230). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
35.
PedersenA. B. (2006). Fra landvindingspolitik til naturgenopretningspolitik—policy-netværks magt og forandring [From Land Reclamation Policy to Nature Restoration Policy: the power and change of policy networks]. Aarhus, Denmark: Politica.
36.
PedersenA. B. (2010). The fight over Danish nature: Explaining policy network change and policy change. Public Administration, 88, 346-363.
37.
PetersB. G. (1998). Comparative politics: Theory and methods. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
38.
PierreJ.PetersB. G. (2005). Governing complex societies. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252.
40.
RhodesR. A. W. (1981). Control and power in central-local government relations. Farnborough, UK: Gower Publishing.
41.
RhodesR. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
42.
RhodesR. A. W.MarshD. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 181-205.
43.
RisseT. (Ed.). (2011). Governance without a state?New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
44.
RydénR. (2003). Medvindens tid: Ekologiska lantbrukarna och jordbrukspolitiken 1985-2000 [The time of the tailwind: organic farmers and agricultural policy 1985-2000]. Uppsala, Sweden: Centrum för uthålligt lantbruk, SLU.
45.
SandströmA.CarlssonL. (2008). The performance of policy networks: The relation between network structure and network performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36, 497-524.
46.
ScharpfF. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic?Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
SmithM. J. (1993). Pressure, power and policy: State autonomy and policy networks in Britain and the United States. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
48.
SønderskovK. M.DaugbjergC. (2011). The state and consumer confidence in eco-labelling: Organic labelling in Denmark, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 507-517.
49.
SørensenE. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36, 98-114.
50.
SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2006). Theoretical approaches to metagovernance. In SørensenE.TorfingJ. (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 169-182). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
51.
SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87, 234-258.
TokeD. (2010). Politics by heuristics: Policy networks with a focus on actor resources, as illustrated by the case of renewable energy policy under New Labour. Public Administration, 88, 764-781.
54.
TorfingJ.PetersB. G.PierreJ.SørensenE. (2012). Interactive governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
TurriniA.CristofoliD.FrosiniF.NasiG. (2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Administration, 88, 528-550.
56.
WheelerS. (2011). Review of organic farming policy in Australia: Time to wipe the slate clean?Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 35, 885-913.
