Policing in the United States has a racist history, with negative implications for its legitimacy among African Americans today. Legitimacy is important for policing's effective operations. Community policing may improve policing's legitimacy but is difficult to implement with fidelity and does not address history. An apology for policing's racist history may work as a legitimizing supplement to community policing. On the other hand, an apology may be interpreted as words without changes in practices. Using a survey vignette experiment on Amazon's Mechanical Turk to sample African Americans, this research tests the legitimizing effect of a supplemental apology for historical police racism during a community policing policy announcement. Statistical findings suggest that supplementing the communication with an apology imparted little to no additional legitimacy on policing among respondents. Qualitative data suggested a rationale: Apologies need not indicate future equitable behavior or policy implementation, with implementation itself seeming crucial for police legitimacy improvements.
AndrewsK.GabyS. (2015). Local protest and federal policy: The impact of the civil rights movement on the 1964 civil rights Act. Sociological Forum, 30(S1), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12175
3.
AndroffD. (2010a). “To not hate”: Reconciliation among victims of violence and participants of the Greensboro truth and reconciliation commission. Contemporary Justice Review, 13(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2010.498226
4.
AndroffD. (2010b). Truth and reconciliation commissions (TRCs): An international human rights intervention and its connection to social work. British Journal of Social Work, 40(6), 1960–1977. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp139
BasnakK.HainmuellerJ.HopkinsD.YamamotoT. (2018). The number of choice tasks and survey satisficing in conjoint experiments. Political Analysis, 26(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.40
7.
BenjaminA. (2017). Racial coalition building in local elections: Elite cues and cross-ethnic voting. Cambridge University Press.
8.
BensonP. (2016). The crime of innocence and the depths of sorriness: Notes on apologies and reparations in the United States. Cultural Dynamics, 28(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374016653231
9.
BerinskyA.HuberG.LensG. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
10.
BlatzC.SchumannK.RossM. (2009). Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30(2), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00689.x
11.
BlessettB. (2017). To imagine a world where all lives truly mattered. Public Integrity, 19(3), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1270103
12.
BoettkeP.LemkeJ.PalagashviliL. (2016). Re-evaluating community policing in a polycentric system. Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741500034X
13.
BolgerC.WaltersG. (2019). The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.01.001
14.
BrainardL.Derrick-MillsT. (2011). Electronic commons, community policing, and communication: Online police-citizen discussion groups in Washington, DC. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 33(3), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806330304
15.
BrainardL.EdlinsM. (2014). Top 10 U.S. Municipal police departments and their social media usage. The American Revie of Public Administration, 45(6), 728–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014524478
16.
CampbellJ. (2009). Settling accounts? An Americanist perspective on historical reconciliation. The American Historical Review, 114(4), 963–977. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.114.4.963
17.
ChappellA. (2009). The philosophical versus actual adoption of community policing: A case study. Criminal Justice Review, 34(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016808324244
ChristensonD.GlickD. (2013). Crowdsourcing panel studies and real time experiments in MTurk. The Political Methodologist, 20(2), 27–32.
20.
CliffordS.JeritJ. (2016). Cheating on political knowledge questions in online surveys: An assessment of the problems and solutions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(4), 858–887. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw030
21.
CliffordS.JewellR.WaggonerP. (2015). Are samples drawn from mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?Research and Politics, 2(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072
22.
Community Oriented Policing Services. (2014). Community policing defined. U.S. Department of Justice.
23.
CordnerG. (2014). Community policing. In ResigM.KaneR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of police and policing (pp. 148–171). Oxford University Press.
24.
CorriganL. (2017). 50 Years later: Commemorating the life and death of Malcolm X. Howard Journal of Communications, 28(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2017.1288179
25.
CunninghamM. (1999). Saying sorry: The politics of apology. The Political Quarterly, 70(3), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.00231
26.
DavisA. (2012). Racial reconciliation or retreat? How legislative resolutions apologizing for slavery promulgate white supremacy. The Black Scholar, 42(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5816/blackscholar.42.1.0037
27.
DawsonM. (1994). Behind the mule: Race, class and African American politics. Princeton University Press.
28.
DowneyS. (1993). The evolution of the rhetorical genre of apologia. Western Journal of Communication, 57(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319309374430
29.
DrakulichK.WozniakK.HaganJ.JohnsonD. (2020). Race and policing in the 2016 presidential election: Black lives matter, the police, and dog whistle politics. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 58(2), 370–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12239
30.
DurrM. (2015). What is the difference between slave patrols and modern day policing? Institutional violence in a community of color. Critical Sociology, 41(6), 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920515594766
31.
EastonD. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. John Wiley and Sons.
32.
EnglishB. (2009). A black belt anomaly: Biracial cooperation in reconstruction-era Perry County, 1865–1874. Alabama Review, 62(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/ala.2009.0007
33.
EvensW.OwensE. (2007). COPS and crime. Journal of Public Economics, 91(1-2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.05.014
34.
Fischer-StewartG. (2017). To serve and protect: The police, race, and the episcopal church in the black lives matter era. Anglican Theological Review, 99(3), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/000332861709900302
35.
FrankeF.BierieD.MackenzieD. (2010). Legitimacy in corrections: A randomized experiment comparing boot camp with a prison. Criminology and Public Policy, 9(1), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x
36.
GalesicM.BosnjakM. (2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp031
37.
GianakisG.DavisG.III (1998). Reinventing or repackaging public services? The case of community-oriented policing. Public Administration Review, 58(6), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.2307/977576
38.
GibsonJ.NelsonM. (2018). Black and blue: How African Americans judge the U.S. Legal system. Oxford University Press.
39.
GlasserM.DenhardtJ. (2010). Community policing and community building. 2010. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074009340050
40.
GoldE. (1978). Political apologia: The ritual of self-defense. Communication Monographs, 45(4), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757809375976
41.
Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission. (2006). Greensboro truth and reconciliation commission report. Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Last accessed 3 November. http://www.greensborotrc.org/
42.
GuoY.KopekJ.CibereJ.LiL.GoldsmithC. (2016). Population survey features and response rates: A randomized experiment. American Journal of Public Health, 106(8), 1422–1426. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303198
43.
HaamJ.TrinknerR.CarrJ. (2017). Fair process, trust, and cooperation: Moving toward an integrated framework of police legitimacy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(9), 1183–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817710058
HatchJ. (2006). Beyond apologia: Racial reconciliation and apologies for slavery. Western Journal of Communication, 70(3), 186–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310600843496
46.
HatchJ. (2015). “Accidental racist”: Stumbling through the motions of racial reconciliation. Communication Quarterly, 64(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1103281
47.
HauserD.SchwarzN. (2016). Attentive turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavioral Research Methods, 48, 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
48.
HillH. (2003). Understanding implementation: Street-level bureaucrats’ resources for reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug024
49.
HollingM.MoonD.NevisA. (2014). Racist violations and racializing apologia in a post-racism era. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 7(4), 260–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2014.964144
50.
HoodC. (2010). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton University Press.
51.
HortonJ.RandD.ZeckhauserR. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14(3), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9
52.
House Resolution 194, 110th congress. Apologizing for the enslavement and racial segregation of African-Americans.
53.
HuffC.TingleyD. (2015). “Who are these people?” evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research and Politics, 2(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604648
54.
JeongmM.ZhangD.MorganJ. C.RossJ. C.OsmanA.BoyntonM. H.MendelJ. R.BrewerN. T. (2019). Similarities and differences in tobacco control research findings from convenience and probability samples. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53(5), 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay059
55.
JonesM. (2008). A complexity science view of modern public administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 443–457.
56.
KahnK.ThompsonM.McMahonJ. (2017). Privileged protection? Effects of suspect race and mental illness status on public perceptions of police use of force. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9280-0
57.
KaiserK.ReisigM. (2019). Legal socialization and self-reported criminal offending: The role of procedural justice and legal orientations. Journal of Qualitative Criminology, 35(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9375-4
58.
KeesJ.BerryC.BurtonS.SheehanK. (2017a). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon's mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
59.
KeesJ.BerryC.BurtonS.SheehanK. (2017b). Reply to “Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A comment”. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281781
60.
KettlD. (2017). Can governments earn our trust?Polity Press.
61.
KingS. (2011). “Ready to shoot and do shoot”: Black working-class self-defense and community politics in Harlem, New York, during the 1920s. Journal of Urban History, 37(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144211413234
62.
KoestenJ.RowlandR. (2004). The rhetoric of atonement. Communication Studies, 55(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388606
LeeJ.RobinsonM. (2019). “That’s my number one fear in life. It’s the police”: Examining young black men’s exposures to trauma and loss resulting from police violence and police killings. Journal of Black Psychology, 45(3), 143–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798419865152
65.
MaguireE. (1997). Structural change in large municipal police organizations during the community policing era. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 547–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829700093471
66.
McConnellA.LeiboldJ. (2001). Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1470
67.
MooreD. (2018). Black radical love: A practice. Public Integrity, 20(4), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1439564
68.
MouleR.BurrussG.ParryM.FoxB. (2019). Assessing the direct and indirect effects of legitimacy on public empowerment of the police: Study of public support for police militarization in America. Law and Society Review, 53(1), 77–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12379
69.
MutzD.PemantleR.PhamP. (2018). The perils of balance testing in experimental design: Messy analyses of clean data. The American Statistician, 73(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1322143
70.
Nicholson-CrottyS.O’TooleL.Jr. (2004). Public management and organizational performance: The case of law enforcement agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh001
71.
NytagodienR.NealA. (2004). Collective trauma, apologies, and the politics of memory. Journal of Human Rights, 3(4), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475483042000299714
72.
O’BrienT.MearesT.TylerT. (2020a). Reconciling police and communities with apologies, acknowledgements, or both: A controlled experiment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220904659
73.
O’BrienT.TylerT. (2019). Rebuilding trust between police & communities through procedural justice & reconciliation. Behavioral Science and Policy, 5(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2019.0003
74.
O’BrienT.TylerT.MearesT. (2020b). Building popular legitimacy with reconciliatory gestures and participation: A community-level model of authority. Regulation and Governance, 14(4), 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12264
75.
OppenheimerD.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
PaasL.DolcinarS.KarlssonL. (2018). Instructional manipulation checks: A longitudinal analysis with implications for MTurk. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.01.003
78.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
79.
PeerE.VosgerauJ.AcquistiA. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon mechanical Turk. Behavioral Research, 46, 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
PraschA. (2015). Retelling watergate: Apologia, political eulogy, and Richard Nixon’s “final campaign”. Southern Communication Journal, 80(4), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2015.1045622
82.
RafailP.SouleS.McCarthyJ. (2012). Describing and accounting for the trends in US protest policing, 1960–1995. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(40), 736–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002711431793
83.
ReisigM.GiacomazziA. (1998). Citizen perceptions of community policing: Are attitudes toward police important?Policing: An International Journal, 21(3), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639519810228822
84.
ReisigM.LloydC. (2008). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime: Results from a survey of Jamaican adolescents. Police Quarterly, 12(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611108327311
85.
ReisigM.ParksR. (2004). Can community policing help the truly disadvantaged?Crime and Delinquency, 50(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128703253157
86.
RobinsonJ.RosenzweigC.MossA.LitmanL. (2019). Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool. PsyArVix Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jq589. Last accessed 9 September 2019.
SchulerJ. (2012). Blood & bone: Truth and reconciliation in a southern town. University of South Carolina Press.
89.
SiegelJ.NavarroM. (2019). A conceptual replication examining the risk of overtly listing eligibility criteria on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(4), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12580
90.
SimienE. (2005). Race, gender, and linked fate. Journal of Black Studies, 35(5), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934704265899
91.
SkoganW. (2006). Police and community: A tale of three cities. Oxford University Press.
92.
SmithS.RosterC.GoldenL.AlbaumG. (2016). A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples. Journal of Behavioral Research, 69(8), 3139–3148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.002
93.
SossJ.WeaverV. (2017). Police are our government: Politics, political science, and the policing of race–class subjugated communities. American Review of Political Science, 20, 565–591. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060415-093825
94.
SprattM. (2008). When police dogs attacked: Iconic news photographs and construction of history, mythology, and political discourse. American Journalism, 25(2), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/08821127.2008.10678111
95.
SpruillL. (2016). Slave patrols, “packs of Negro dogs” and policing black communities. Phylon (1960), 53(1), 42–66.
96.
SteffensL. (2018). The shame of the cities. Forgotten Books.
97.
StolteJ. (1994). The context of satisficing in vignette research. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(6), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9923007
98.
StoneD. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. W.W. Norton and Company.
99.
StoutC.KretchmerK.RuppannerL. (2017). Gender linked fate, race/ethnicity, and the marriage gap in American politics. Political Research Quarterly, 70(3), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917702499
100.
StritchJ.PendersonM.TaggartG. (2017). The opportunities and limitations of using mechanical Turk (MTURK) in public administration and management scholarship. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1276493
101.
SunshineJ.TylerT. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(7), 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
102.
TeagueH. (2018). Black and blue in North Texas: The long neglected history of anti-black police violence in North Texas, 1880–1930. Journal of Black Studies, 49(8), 756–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934718785631
103.
TeagueH. (2019). Bullets and ballots: Destruction, resistance, and reaction in 1920s Texas and Oklahoma. Great Plains Quarterly, 39(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1353/gpq.2019.0020
104.
TurnerK. B.GiacopassiD.VandiverM. (2006). Ignoring the past: Coverage of slavery and slave patrols in criminal justice texts. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17(1), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250500335627
105.
TylerT. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press.
106.
TylerT. (2002). A national survey for monitoring police legitimacy. Justice Research and Policy, 4(1–2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.4.1.2002.71
107.
TylerT. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262627
108.
TylerT. (2007). Psychology and the design of legal institutions. Wolf Legal Publishing.
109.
TylerT.FaganJ. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities?Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
110.
TylerT.JacksonJ. (2013). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 79–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034514
111.
WadeR. (1996). The urban frontier: The rise of Western cities, 1790–1830. University of Illinois Press.
112.
WalterS.SiebertS.GoeringD.O’BoyleE.Jr. (2019). A tale of two sample sources: Do results from online panel data and conventional data converge?Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(4), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9552-y
113.
WaltersG.BolgerP. (2018). Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15, 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9338-2Last accessed 9 September 2019.
114.
WareB. L.LinkugelW. (1973). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383176
115.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
116.
WeisburdD.EckJ. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262548
117.
WesslingK.HuberJ.NetzerO. (2017). MTurk character misrepresentation: Assessment and solutions. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx053
