Research has focused mainly on whether race and ethnicity influence sentencing outcomes. Much less attention, however, has been paid to where, geographically, disparities occur in the United States. Using the United States Sentencing Commission’s sentencing data from FY2015 to FY2019, we estimated the effects of race and ethnicity on sentencing outcomes across 90 U.S. districts. First, we examined whether race and ethnicity varied across districts. Then we mapped district-level racial and ethnic disparities across the United States. Finally, we examined whether district-level racial and ethnic disparities were spatially correlated, creating hot- or cold spots of disparity. Evidence suggests that disparities are not concentrated within specific regions of the United States and are not spatially correlated. Instead, racial and ethnic disparities seem to be somewhat dispersed geographically. Yet, disparities do seem to concentrate in a relatively small portion of U.S. districts.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/800532
2.
BeichnerD.SpohnC. (2012). Modeling the effects of victim behavior and moral character on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Violence and Victims, 27(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.27.1.3
CaravelisC.ChiricosT.BalesW. (2013). Race, ethnicity, threat, and the designation of career offenders. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 869–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.635597
5.
ChiricosT. G.CrawfordC. (1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In HawkinsD. F. (Ed.), Ethnicity, race and crime: Perspectives across time and place (pp. 281–309). State University of New York Press.
6.
ClairM.WinterA. S. (2016). How judges think about racial disparities: Situational decision-making in the criminal justice system. Criminology, 54(2), 332–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12106
7.
DevineP. G.ForscherP. S.AustinA. J.CoxW. T. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003
8.
DoernerJ. K.DemuthS. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902926197
9.
DrummondW. J. (1990). About face: Blacks and the news media. American Enterprise, 1, 23–29.
10.
DuranteK. A. (2021). County-level context and sentence lengths for Black, Latine, and White individuals sentenced to prison: A multi-level assessment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(9), 915–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211021893
11.
EisensteinJ.FlemmingR. B.NardulliP. F. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Little, Brown.
12.
FarrellA.WardG.RousseauD. (2010). Intersections of gender and race in federal sentencing: Examining court contexts and the effects of representative court authorities. The Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice, 14(1), 85–125.
13.
FeldmeyerB.UlmerJ. T. (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 238–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810391538
14.
FeldmeyerB.WarrenP. Y.SiennickS. E.NeptuneM. (2015). Racial, ethnic, and immigrant threat: Is there a new criminal threat on state sentencing?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 62–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814548488
15.
FrankelM. E. (1972). Lawlessness in sentencing. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 41, 1–54.
FranklinT. W.HenryT. K. S. (2020). Racial disparities in federal sentencing outcomes: Clarifying the role of criminal history. Crime & Delinquency, 66(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719828353
18.
FreiburgerT. L.JordanK. L. (2011). A multilevel analysis of race on the decision to petition a case in the juvenile court. Race and Justice, 1(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368710383869
19.
FreiburgerT. L.SheeranA. M. (2020). The joint effects of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on the incarceration and sentence length decisions. Race and Justice, 10(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717739676
20.
Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38. (2007).
21.
GriffinT.WooldredgeJ. (2006). Sex-based disparities in felony dispositions before versus after sentencing reform in Ohio. Criminology, 44(4), 893–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00067.x
HesterR.SevignyE. L. (2016). Court communities in local context: A multilevel analysis of felony sentencing in South Carolina. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2014.913494
24.
HollandM. M.ProhaskaA. (2021). Gender effects across place: A multilevel investigation of gender, race/ethnicity, and region in sentencing. Race and Justice, 11(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368718767495
25.
JohnsonB. D. (2005). Contextual disparities in guidelines departures: Courtroom social contexts, guidelines compliance, and extralegal disparities in criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43(3), 761–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00023.x
26.
JohnsonB. D. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge-and county-level influences. Criminology, 44(2), 259–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00049.x
27.
JohnsonB. D.UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46(3), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x
28.
KaiserK.SpohnC. (2018). Why do judges depart: A review of reasons for judicial departures in federal sentencing. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 19, 43–62.
29.
KauttP. M. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 633–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095381
30.
Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85. (2007).
31.
KingR. D.LightM. T. (2019). Have racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing declined?Crime and Justice, 48(1), 365–437. https://doi.org/10.1086/701505
32.
KleckG. (1981). Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: A critical evaluation of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty. American Sociological Review, 46(6), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095079
33.
KramerK. L.KelleyS. M. (2022). Examining the sentencing of American Indian Women in U.S. Federal District Courts. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221137305
34.
KramerK. L.WangX. (2019). Assessing cumulative disadvantage against minority female defendants in state courts. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1284–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1685122
35.
LightM. T. (2022). The declining significance of race in criminal sentencing: Evidence from us federal courts. Social Forces, 100(3), 1110–1141. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab018
36.
MauerM. (1999). Race to incarcerate. New Press.
37.
MitchellO. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7
38.
MyersM. A.TalaricoS. M. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. Springer-Verlag.
PaskoL. (2002). Villain or victim: Regional variation and ethnic disparity in federal drug offense sentencing. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13(4), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/088740302237801
41.
PortillosE. L. (1998). Latinos and Latinas: Latinos, gangs, and drugs. In MannC. R.ZatzM. S. (Eds.), Images of color, images of crime (pp. 212–221). Roxbury.
42.
RachlinskiJ. J.JohnsonS. L.WistrichA. J.GuthrieC. (2009). Does unconscious racial bias affect trial judges?Notre Dame Law Review, 84(3), 1195.
43.
RidgewayG.MacDonaldJ. M. (2014). A method for internal benchmarking of criminal justice system performance. Crime & Delinquency, 60(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713514802
44.
Russell-BrownK. K. (1998). The color of crime. New York University Press.
45.
SpohnC. C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal, 3(1), 427–501.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657543
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
50.
TonryM. H. (1997). Sentencing matters. Oxford University Press.
51.
UlmerJ. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. SUNY Press.
UlmerJ. T. (2019). Criminal courts as inhabited institutions: Making sense of difference and similarity in sentencing. Crime and Justice, 48(1), 483–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/701504
54.
UlmerJ. T.EisensteinJ.JohnsonB. D. (2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27(4), 560–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902998063
UlmerJ. T.KurlychekM. C.KramerJ. H. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(4), 427–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807305853
57.
UlmerJ. T.LightM. T.KramerJ. H. (2011). Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision. Criminology and Public Policy, 10(4), 1077–1118.
58.
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220. (2005).
59.
WangX.MearsD. P. (2015). Sentencing and state-level racial and ethnic contexts. Law & Society Review, 49(4), 883–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12164
60.
ZatzM. S. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. In HorneyJ. (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (Vol. 3, pp. 503–552). Stanford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
