The purpose of this study is to determine whether offenders’ history of hard drug use and hard drug use at the time of the crime affect case outcomes for offenders in three federal district courts. We focus on three outcomes—whether the offender was in pretrial detention prior to adjudication, whether the offender received a downward departure for providing substantial assistance, and the length of the sentence imposed on offenders who were sentenced to prison—and we hypothesize that the offender’s history of drug use and drug use at the time of the crime will have varying effects on the three outcomes. Our results reveal that use of illegal drugs had multifaceted, but not illogical, effects.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
2.
AlbonettiC. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789-822.
3.
AlbonettiC. A. (2002). The joint conditioning effect of defendant’s gender and ethnicity on length of imprisonment under the federal sentencing guidelines for drug trafficking/manufacturing offenders. Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice, 6, 39-60.
4.
AlbonettiC. A.HauserR. M.HaganJ.NagelI. H. (1989). Criminal justice decision making as a stratification process: The role of race and stratification resources in pretrial release. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 57-82.
5.
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. Pub L. 99-570, 100 Stat. 3207, enacted October 27, 1988, H.R. 5484.
6.
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. Pub L. 100-690, 102 Stat. 4181, enacted November 18, 1988, H.R. 5210.
7.
Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3141-3150 (2006).
8.
BallS. A. (2005). Personality traits, problems, and disorders: Clinical applications to substance use disorders. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 84-102.
9.
BelenkoS. (1993). Crack and the evolution of anti-drug policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
10.
BelenkoS. (2002). Drug courts. In LeukefeldC.TimsF.FarabeeD. (Eds.), Treatment of drug offenders: Policies and issues (pp. 301-318). New York, NY: Springer.
11.
BelenkoS.HouserK.WelshW. (2011). Understanding the impact of drug treatment in correctional settings. In PetersiliaJ.ReitzK. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on sentencing and corrections (pp. 463-491). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
BelenkoS.PeughJ. (1998). Fighting crime by treating substance abuse. Issues in Science and Technology, 15, 53-60.
13.
BelenkoS.PeughJ. (2005). Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77, 269-281.
14.
BelenkoS.SungH.-E.SwernA.DonhauserC. (2008). Prosecutors and treatment diversion: The Brooklyn (NY) DTAP Program. In WorrallJ. L.NugentM. E. (Eds.), The changing role of the American prosecutor (pp. 111-137). Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
BlumsteinA.BeckA. J. (1999). Population growth in U.S. prisons, 1980-1996. In TonryM.PetersiliaJ. (Eds.), Prisons: Crime and justice. A review of research (Vol. 26, pp. 17-61). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
BrennanP. K.SpohnC. (2009). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and sex on sentence length decisions in federal courts. Race and Social Problems, 1, 200-217.
17.
ChandlerR.FletcherB.VolkowN. (2009). Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: Improving public health and safety. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 183-190.
18.
ChiricosT. G.BalesW. D. (1991). Unemployment and punishment: An empirical assessment. Criminology, 29, 701-724.
19.
ChiricosT. G.CrawfordC. (1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In HawkinsD. F. (Ed.), Ethnicity, race, and crime: Perspectives across time and place (pp. 281-308). Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
DeasD.St. GermaineK.UpadhyayaH.2006, Psychopathology in substance abusing adolescents: Gender comparisons. Journal of Substance Use, 11, 45-51.
21.
De BellisM. D. (2002). Developmental traumatology: A contributory mechanism for alcohol and substance use disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 27, 155-170.
22.
DemuthS. (2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White felony arrestees. Criminology, 41, 873-908.
23.
DemuthS.SteffensmeierS. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 994-1011.
24.
ElkinsI. J.KingS. M.McGueM.IaconoW. G. (2006). Personality traits and the development of nicotine, alcohol, and illicit drug disorders: Prospective links from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 26-39.
25.
EngenR. L.GaineyR. R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207-1229.
26.
EverettR. S.WojtkiewiczR. A. (2002). Difference, disparity, and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 189-211.
27.
FaganJ. A. (1990). Intoxication and aggression. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Drugs and crime (pp. 241-320). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. Pub. L. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372, enacted August 3, 2010.
29.
GoldsteinP. (1985, Fall). The drugs-violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, pp. 493-506.
30.
HartleyR.MaddenS.SpohnC. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 382-407.
31.
HoferP. J.BlackwellK. R.RubackB. (1999). The effect of the federal sentencing guidelines on inter-judge sentencing disparity. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 90, 239-322.
32.
HogarthJ. (1971). Sentencing as a human process. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
33.
HopwoodC. J.MoreyL. C.SodolA. E.SanislowC. A.GriloC. M.AnsellE. B.StoutR. L. (2011). Pathological personality traits among patients with absent, current, and remitted substance abuse disorders. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 1087-1090.
34.
HoraP. F.SchmaW. G.RosenthalJ. T. A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 439-538.
35.
InciardiJ. A.MartinS. S.ButzinC. A. (2004). Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 88-107.
36.
JohnsonB. D.BetsingerS. (2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47, 1045-1090.
37.
JohnsonB. D.UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 737-783.
38.
KatzC. M.SpohnC. (1995). The effect of race and gender on bail outcomes: A test of an interactive model. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 161-184.
39.
KauttP. M. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19, 633-671.
40.
Kempf-LeonardK.SampleL. L. (2001). Have the federal sentencing guidelines reduced severity? An examination of one circuit. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17, 111-144.
41.
KostenT. R. (1998). Addiction as a brain disease. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 711-713.
KramerJ. H.UlmerJ. T. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 81-106.
44.
LaCasseC.PayneA. A. (1999). Federal sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences: Do defendants bargain in the shadow of the judge?Journal of Law and Economics, 42, 245-269.
45.
LaFrenzC.SpohnC. (2006). Who is punished more harshly? An examination of race/ethnicity, gender, age and employment status under the federal sentencing guidelines. Justice Research and Policy, 8, 25-56.
46.
MarloweD. B. (2003). Integrating substance abuse treatment and criminal justice supervision. NIDA Science and Practice Perspectives, 2, 4–14.
47.
MauerM.KingR. S. (2007). A 25-year quagmire: The war on drugs and its impact on American society. Washington DC: Sentencing Project.
48.
MaxfieldL. D.KramerJ. H. (1998). Substantial assistance: An empirical yardstick gauging equity in current federal policy and practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Sentencing Commission.
49.
MumolaC.KarbergJ. (2006). Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004 (NCJ 213530). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
50.
MustardD. (2001). Racial, ethnic and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 285-314.
51.
NagelI. H.SchulhoferS. J. (1992). A tale of three cities: An empirical study of charging and bargaining practices under the federal sentencing guidelines. Southern California Law Review, 66, 501-566.
52.
ParkerR. N.AuerhahnK. (1998). Alcohol, drugs and violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 291-311.
53.
PaskoL. (2002). Villain or victim: Regional variation and ethnic disparity in federal drug offense sentencing. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 307-328.
54.
PelissierB.WallaceS.O’NeilJ. A.GaesG. G.CampS.RhodesW.SaylorW. G. (2001). Federal prison residential drug treatment reduces substance use and arrests after release. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27, 315-337.
55.
RuizM. A.PincusA. L.SchinkaJ. A. (2008). Externalizing pathology and the five-factor model: A meta-analysis of personality traits associated with antisocial personality disorder, substance use disorder, and their co-occurrence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 365-388.
SchlesingerT. (2005). Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly, 22, 170-192.
58.
SinhaR. (2001). How does stress increase risk of drug abuse and relapse?Psychopharmacology, 158, 343-359. Belmont, CA: Sage.
59.
SpohnC. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially-neutral sentencing process. In HorneyJ. (Ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (Vol. 3, pp. 427-501). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
60.
SpohnC. (2005). Sentencing decisions in three U.S. district courts: Testing the assumption of uniformity in the federal sentencing process. Justice Research and Policy, 7, 1-27.
61.
SpohnC. (2009). Race, Sex and Pretrial Detention in Federal Court: Indirect Effects and Cumulative Disadvantage, University of Kansas Law Review, 57: 879-902.
62.
SpohnC.BrennanP. K. (2011). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and gender on substantial assistance departures in federal courts. Race and Justice, 1, 48-78.
63.
SpohnC.FornangoR. (2009). U.S. attorneys and substantial assistance departures: Testing for interprosecutor disparity. Criminology, 47, 813-846.
64.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
65.
StaceyA. M.SpohnC. (2006). Gender and the social costs of sentencing: An analysis of sentences imposed on male and female offenders in three U.S. district courts. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 11, 43-76.
66.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.
67.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ. H.StreifelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.
68.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
69.
StithK.CabranesJ. A. (1998). Fear of judging: Sentencing guidelines in the federal courts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
SullumJ. (2003). H: The surprising truth about heroin addiction. Reason, 35, 32-40.
71.
TaxmanF.HendersonC.BelenkoS. (2009). Organizational context, systems change, and adopting treatment delivery systems in the criminal justice system. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103S, S1-S6.
72.
TonryM. (1995). Malign Neglect: Race, Crime and Punishment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
73.
TonryM. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
74.
TravisJ.SolomonA. L.WaulM. (2001). From prison to home: The dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
75.
UhlG. R. (2004). Molecular genetic underpinnings of human substance abuse vulnerability: Likely contributions to understanding addiction as a mnemonic process. Neuropharmacology, 47(Suppl. 1), 140-147.
76.
UhlG. R.GrowR. W. (2004). The burden of complex genetics in brain disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 223-229.
77.
UlmerJ. T. (2005). The localized uses of federal sentencing guidelines in four U.S. district courts: Evidence of processual order. Symbolic Interaction, 28, 255-279.
78.
UlmerJ. T.EisensteinJ.JohnsonB. (2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27, 560-592.
79.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2003). Sourcebook of federal sentencing statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
80.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2004). Fifteen years of guidelines sentencing: An assessment of how well the federal criminal justice system is achieving the goals of sentencing reform. Washington, DC: Author.
81.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2007). Cocaine and federal sentencing policy. Washington, DC: Author.
82.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2008). Federal sentencing guidelines manual. St. Paul, MN: West.
83.
VolkowN.FowlerJ.WangG.-J.SwansonJ.TelangF. (2007). Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction: results of imaging studies and treatment implications. Archives of Neurology, 64, 1575-1579.
84.
VolkowN.LiT .K. (2005). The neuroscience of addiction. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1429-1430.
85.
WeisselbergC. D.DunsworthT. (1993). Inter-district variation under the guidelines: The treesmaymore significant than the forest. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 6, 25-28.
86.
WheelerS.MannK.SaratA. (1988). Sitting in judgment: The sentencing of white-collar criminals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
