Race,Ethnicity,and Punishment for Federal Sex Offenses: Changing Composition in Child Pornography and Sex Abuse Cases and Temporal Disparity in Sentencing Over Time

Abstract

In response to several high-profile violent offenses against children over the past two decades, Congress has enacted several pieces of legislation aimed at increasing punishment for those convicted of federal sex offenses. Coinciding with these enhanced penalties was a demographic shift in the composition of those prosecuted for these offenses. In the federal criminal justice system, sex offenses fall into two main categories: child pornography and sexual abuse. The racial and ethnic makeup of individuals charged for federal sex offenses has significantly changed over the past 15 years. The current study utilizes federal sentencing data from the United States Sentencing Commission for the years 2006 to 2017 to explore the nature of punishment for these offenses over time. We also employ multivariate analyses to examine differences in punishment for the two types of offenses and employ disaggregated analyses by offense type to examine temporal change in racial/ethnic disparities in sentence length and departures from the federal sentencing guidelines. Findings demonstrate that convicted individuals who are Black and Hispanic are receiving harsher sentences over time net of controls for other key predictors such as age, sex, criminal history, and presumptive sentence length. Implications for how legislatively enhanced penalties and changing demographic makeup of those convicted for these offenses may have introduced extra-legal disparity into federal sentencing are further discussed.

Keywords

child pornography sexual abuse federal sentencing practices punishment disparity race ethnicity and sentencing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Flynn

(2017). Federal prosecution of commercial sexual exploitation of children cases, 2004–2013 (NCJ Publication No. 250746). Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fpcsecc0413.pdf

Albonetti

C. A.

(1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21(2), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053523

Albonetti

C. A.

(1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/800532

Babchishin

K. M.

Hanson

R. K.

VanZuylen

(2015). Online child pornography offenders are different: A meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 45–66.

Baumer

(2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30, 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.682602

Bontrager

Barrick

Stupi

(2013). Gender and sentencing: A meta-analysis of contemporary research. Journal of Gender Race & Justice, 16, 349.

Doerner

J. K.

Demuth

S. S.

(2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in US federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902926197

Droske

T. J.

(2008). Correcting Native American sentencing disparity post-Booker. Marquette Law Review, 91, 723–813.

Feldmeyer

Ulmer

J. T.

(2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 238–270.

10.

Franklin

T. W.

(2013). Sentencing Native Americans in US federal courts: An examination of disparity. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 310–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.605072

11.

Franklin

T. W.

Henry

T. K. S.

(2020). Racial disparities in federal sentencing outcomes: Clarifying the role of criminal history. Crime & Delinquency, 66(1), 3–32.

12.

Frase

R. S.

(2019). Forty years of American sentencing guidelines: What have we learned? Crime and Justice, 48(1), 79–135. https://doi.org/10.1086/701503

13.

Hamilton

(2011). The efficacy of severe child pornography sentencing: Empirical validity or political rhetoric? Stanford Law & Policy Review, 22, 545–586.

14.

Hartley

R. D.

Madden

Spohn

(2007). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701485379

15.

Hartley

R. D.

Miller

H. V.

Spohn

C. C.

(2010). Do you get what you pay for? Attorney type and its effects of criminal court outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.009

16.

Hartley

R. D.

Tillyer

(2012). Defending the homeland: Judicial sentencing practices for federal immigration offenses. Justice Quarterly, 29, 76–104.

17.

Hartley

R. D.

Tillyer

(2018). Examining prosecutorial discretion in federal criminal cases: Legal and extra-legal determinants of declination and charge change decisions. Justice Quarterly, 35(7), 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1530367

18.

Hessick

C. B.

(2011). Disentangling child pornography from child sexual abuse. Washington University Law Review, 88, 853–902.

19.

Hofer

P. J.

(2007). United States v. Booker as a natural experiment: Using empirical research to inform the federal sentencing policy debate. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(3), 433–460.

20.

Huebner

B. M.

Bynum

T. S.

(2006). An analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders: A focal concerns perspective. Criminology, 44(4), 961–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00069.x

21.

Johnson

B. D.

Betsinger

(2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47(4), 1045–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00169.x

22.

Johnson

B. D.

Larroulet

(2019). The “distance traveled”: Investigating the downstream consequences of charge reductions for disparities in incarceration. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1229–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1529250

23.

Johnson

B. D.

Ulmer

J. T.

Kramer

J. H.

(2008). The social context of guideline circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 711–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x

24.

Kaiser

Spohn

(2014). “Fundamentally flawed?” Exploring the use of policy disagreements in judicial downward departures for child pornography offenses. Criminology & Public Policy, 13, 241–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12082

25.

King

R. D.

(2019). Cumulative impact: Why prison sentences have increased. Criminology, 57(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12197

26.

King

R. D.

Light

M. T.

(2019). Have racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing declined? Crime and Justice, 48, 365–437. https://doi.org/10.1086/701505

27.

Lee

J. G.

(2019). To detain or not to detain? Using propensity scores to examine the relationship between pretrial detention and conviction. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416668016

28.

Lee

J. G.

Testa

(2020). Evidence, arrest circumstances, and felony cocaine case processing. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 21, 1.

29.

Levenson

Brannon

Fortney

Baker

(2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x

30.

Light

M. T.

(2014). The new face of legal inequality: Noncitizens and the long-term trends in sentencing disparities across US district courts, 1992–2009. Law & Society Review, 48(2), 447–478.

31.

Light

M. T.

Massoglia

King

R. D.

(2014). Citizenship and punishment: The salience of national membership in US criminal courts. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414543659

32.

Lynch

(2019). Focally concerned about focal concerns: A conceptual and methodological critique of sentencing disparities research. Justice Quarterly, 36, 1148–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1686163

33.

Lynch

Omori

(2018). Crack as proxy: Aggressive federal drug prosecutions and the production of Black–White racial inequality. Law & Society Review, 52(3), 773–809.

34.

Maddan

Hartley

R. D.

(2018). Towards the development of a standardized focal concerns theory of sentencing. In J. T.

Ulmer

M. S.

Bradley

(Eds.), Punishment decisions: Locations of disparity. ASC division on corrections and sentencing handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 311–335). Routledge.

35.

Mitchell

(2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466.

36.

Motivans

Kyckelhahn

(2007). Federal prosecution of child sex exploitation offenders, 2006. United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fpcseo06.pdf

37.

Mustard

D. B.

(2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the US federal courts. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 285–314.

38.

Nir

Griffiths

(2018). Sentencing on the evidence. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(4), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0887403416635248

39.

Pickett

J. T.

Mancini

Mears

D. P.

(2013). Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: Explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime. Criminology, 51(3), 729–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12018

40.

Rachlinski

J. J.

Johnson

S. L.

Wistrich

A. J.

Guthrie

(2009). Does unconscious racial bias affect trial judges. Notre Dame Law Review, 84, 1195–1246.

41.

Sample

L. L.

(2001). The social construction of the sex offender (Unpublished dissertation). University of Missouri, St. Louis, MI.

42.

Shermer

L. O. N.

Johnson

B. D.

(2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in US federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 394–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902856972

43.

Spears

J. W.

Spohn

C. C.

(1997). The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829700093451

44.

Spohn

(2017). Race and sentencing disparity. In: E.

Luna

(Ed.), Reforming criminal justice: A report of the academy for justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform (Vol. 4, pp. 169–186). Arizona State University.

45.

Spohn

Holleran

(2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38(1), 281–306.

46.

Spohn

Spears

(1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13(4), 649–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600093141

47.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

(2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705–729.

48.

Steffensmeier

Painter-Davis

Ulmer

(2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60(4), 810–833.

49.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x

50.

Testa

Lee

J. G.

(2020). Trends in sentencing of federal drug offenders: Findings from US district courts 2002–2017. Journal of Drug Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/0022042620959071

51.

Tewksbury

(2014). Evidence of ineffectiveness: Advancing the argument against sex offender residence restrictions. Criminology & Public Policy, 13, 135.

52.

Ulmer

Painter-Davis

Tinik

(2016). Disproportional imprisonment of Black and Hispanic males: Sentencing discretion, processing outcomes, and policy structures. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 642–681.

53.

Ulmer

J. T.

(2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.624115

54.

Ulmer

J. T.

Bradley

M. S.

(2019). Criminal justice in Indian country: A theoretical and empirical agenda. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024805

55.

Ulmer

J. T.

Johnson

(2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1), 137–178. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024805

56.

Ulmer

J. T.

Light

M. T.

Kramer

J. H.

(2011). Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision: An alternative analysis to the USSC’s 2010 report. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 1077–1118.

57.

United States v. Booker. (2005). Supreme Court of the United States 543 U.S. 220.

58.

United States Department of Justice. (2017). Indian country investigations and prosecutions.

59.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2009). History of the child pornography guidelines

60.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2012). Report to congress: Federal child pornography offenses.

61.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2019). Mandatory minimum penalties for sex offenses in the federal criminal justice system.

62.

United States Sentencing Commission. (2020). Quick facts federal offenders in prison June 2020.

63.

Ward

J. T.

Hartley

R. D.

Tillyer

(2016). Unpacking gender and race/ethnicity biases in the federal sentencing of drug offenders: A casual mediation approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.05.008