Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines the role country-of-origin plays in immigration sentencing, with a particular focus on early disposition departures, sentence discount, and sentence length. Using data from the 2020 to 2021 Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, we examine how a variety of case-level variables, including region-of-origin, affect immigration sentencing outcomes. We found that persons from Latin American and Caribbean countries were less likely to receive those departures, but we did not find differences by region-of-origin for sentence discount. While region-of-origin may affect the departure decision, the magnitude of discounts that come from these departures appears to be more influenced by legally-relevant variables.

Keywords

immigration fast-track departures federal sentencing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

(1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/800532

Amaral

F. A.

Loeffler

C. E.

Ridgeway

(2024). Prosecutorial discretion not to invoke the criminal process and its impact on firearm cases. Journal of Criminal Justice, 95, 102313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102313

American Immigration Council. (2023). A primer on expedited removal. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/primer_on_expedited_removal_factsheet_2023.pdf

Bail

C. A.

(2012). The fringe effect: Civil society organizations and the evolution of media discourse about Islam since the September 11th attacks. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412465743

Berger

(2020). Why has COVID-19 not led to more humanitarian releases? Boston Review, 45(3), 1–10.

Berman

D. A.

(2017). Sentencing guidelines. In Luna

(Ed.), Reforming criminal justice: A report of the academy for justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform (Vol. 4, pp. 95–116). Arizona State University.

Brader

Valentino

N. A.

Suhay

(2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 959–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00353.x

Browning

C. R.

Dirlam

Boettner

(2016). From heterogeneity to concentration: Latino immigrant neighborhoods and collective efficacy perceptions in Los Angeles and Chicago. Social Forces, 95(2), 779–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow064

Buckler

Swatt

M. L.

Salinas

(2009). Public views of illegal migration policy and control strategies: A test of the core hypotheses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.06.008

10.

Burns

Gimpel

J. G.

(2000). Economic insecurity, prejudicial stereotypes, and public opinion on immigration policy. Political Science Quarterly, 115, 201–225.

11.

Bushway

S. D.

Piehl

A. M.

(2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review, 35(4), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185415

12.

Cho

(2009). Lowering sentences for illegal immigrants-Why judges should have discretion to vary from the guidelines based on fast-track sentencing disparities. Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 43, 447–490.

13.

Czaika

De Haas

(2013). The effectiveness of immigration policies. Population and Development Review, 39(3), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00613.x

14.

Dabach

D. B.

Merchant

N. H.

Fones

A. K.

(2018). Rethinking immigration as a controversy. Social Education, 82(6), 307–314.

15.

Dennison

Geddes

(2021). Thinking globally about attitudes to immigration: Concerns about social conflict, economic competition and cultural threat. The Political Quarterly, 92(3), 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13013

16.

Dixon

(1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1157–1198. https://doi.org/10.1086/230635

17.

Doerner

J. K.

Demuth

(2014). Gender and sentencing in the federal courts: Are women treated more leniently? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(2), 242–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412466877

18.

Donato

K. M.

Rodriguez

L. A.

(2014). Police arrests in a time of uncertainty: The impact of 287 (g) on arrests in a new immigrant gateway. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(13), 1696–1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214537265

19.

Donnelly

E. A.

(2022). Neighborhoods, criminal incidents, race, and sentencing: Exploring the racial and social context of disparities in incarceration sentences. The British Journal of Criminology, 62(1), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab046

20.

Eisenstein

Flemming

R. B.

Nardulli

P. F.

(1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Bloomsbury Academic.

21.

Engen

R. L.

Steen

(2000). The power to punish: Discretion and sentencing reform in the war on drugs. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5), 1357–1395. https://doi.org/10.1086/210433

22.

Flores

R. D.

Schachter

(2018). Who are the “illegals?” The social construction of illegality in the United States. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 839–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418794635

23.

Frase

R. S.

(2007). The Apprendi-Blakely cases: Sentencing reform counter revolution? Criminology & Public Policy, 6(3), 403–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00445.x

24.

Freiburger

T. L.

Romain

(2018). An examination of the impacts of gender, race, and ethnicity on the judicial processing of offenders in family violence cases. Crime & Delinquency, 64(13), 1663–1697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717743780

25.

Garcini

L. M.

Domenech Rodríguez

M. M.

Mercado

Silva

Cadenas

Galvan

Paris

(2023). Anti-immigration policy and mental health: Risk of distress and trauma among deferred action for childhood arrivals recipients in the United States. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 15(7), 1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001228

26.

Ghobadian

Han

Zhang

O’Regan

Troise

Bresciani

Narayanan

(2022). COVID-19 pandemic: The interplay between firm disruption and managerial attention focus. British Journal of Management, 33(1), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12556

27.

Gorman

T. E.

(2008). A history of fast-track sentencing. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 21, 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2009.21.5.311

28.

Gorman

T. E

. (2010). Fast-track sentencing disparity: Rereading congressional intent to resolve the circuit split. University of Chicago Law Review, 77, 479–520.

29.

Gubernskaya

Dreby

(2017). US immigration policy and the case for family unity. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 5(2), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241700500210

30.

Han

Piquero

A. R.

(2022). Is it dangerous to live in neighborhoods with more immigrants? Assessing the effects of immigrant concentration on crime patterns. Crime & Delinquency, 68(1), 52–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211007736

31.

Hartley

R. D.

Tillyer

(2012). Defending the homeland: Judicial sentencing practices for federal immigration offenses. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 76–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.585140

32.

Haynes

(2020). Right-wing populism and religion in Europe and the USA. Religions, 11(10), 490–508. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11100490

33.

Hofer

P. J.

(2007). United States v. Booker as a natural experiment: Using empirical research to inform the federal sentencing policy debate. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(3), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00446.x

34.

Holland

M. M.

(2018). Equal justice: Examining the effects of citizenship, documentation status, and country of origin on carceral punishment across federal districts. Criminal Justice Review, 43(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016817742474

35.

Holland

M. M.

(2020). Fast-tracking justice: An examination of the role of gender in the application of federal early disposition decisions and other departure outcomes for immigration offenses. Women & Criminal Justice, 30(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2019.1664968

36.

Holland

M. M.

Prohaska

(2021). Gender effects across place: A multilevel investigation of gender, race/ethnicity, and region in sentencing. Race and Justice, 11(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368718767495

37.

Iles

Adegun

O. V.

(2018). Geography and sentencing: Does country of citizenship influence sentence longevity. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 7(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2018.07.05

38.

Johnson

B. D.

Betsinger

(2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47(4), 1045–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00169.x

39.

Kapelner

(2024). Anti-immigrant backlash: The Democratic Dilemma for immigration policy. Comparative Migration Studies, 12(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00370-7

40.

Kerr

Dubé

K. A.

(2020). Adjudicating the risks of confinement: Bail and Sentencing during COVID-19. Criminal Reports, 7, 311–333.

41.

Klein

Ogbunugafor

C. B.

Schafer

B. J.

Bhadricha

Kori

Sheldon

Kaza

Sharma

Wang

E. A.

Eliassi-Rad

Scarpino

S. V.

Hinton

(2023). COVID-19 amplified racial disparities in the US criminal legal system. Nature, 617(7960), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05980-2

42.

Kluegel

(1990). Trends in whites’ explanations of the black-white gap in SES. American Sociological Review, 55(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095804

43.

Koo

Feldmeyer

Holmes

(2022). Citizenship and sentencing: Assessing intersectionality in national origin and legal migration status on federal sentencing outcomes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 59(2), 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278211023980

44.

Kozey

Hardy

(2019). Uncovering the citizenship effect: The impact of citizenship status on federal sentencing outcomes. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 14(2), 181–198.

45.

Kurpiel

Alabanese

(2023). The noncitizen penalty in the U.S. Federal courts: Differences in punishment by region of origin. Sociological Perspectives, 66(5), 820–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214231180482

46.

Light

M. T.

(2014). The new face of legal inequality: Noncitizens and the long-term trends in sentencing disparities across US district courts, 1992–2009. Law & Society Review, 48(2), 447–478.

47.

Light

M. T.

(2017). Punishing the “others”: Citizenship and state social control in the United States and Germany. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 58(1), 33–71.

48.

Light

M. T.

Massoglia

King

R. D.

(2014). Citizenship and punishment: The salience of national membership in US criminal courts. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414543659

49.

Logue

M. A.

(2017). The interactive effects of national origin and immigration status on Latino drug traffickers in US federal courts. Race and Justice, 7(3), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368716647425

50.

Nicholson-Crotty

(2010). Reassessing the impact of Hispanic stereotypes on White Americans’ immigration preferences. Social Science Quarterly, 91(5), 1312–1327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00733.x

51.

Mayda

A. M.

Peri

Steingress

(2022). The political impact of immigration: Evidence from the United States. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14(1), 358–389. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20190081

52.

McCann

W. S.

Boateng

F. D.

Schimchak

(2024). An analysis of 287 (g) program memorandums of agreement. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 25(2), 1043–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-024-01122-3

53.

Miller

J. M.

Blumstein

(2020). Crime, justice & the COVID-19 pandemic: Toward a national research agenda. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09555-z

54.

Motivans

(2024). Federal justice statistics, 2022. U.S. Department of Justice.

55.

Pantoja

(2006). Against the tide? Core American values and attitudes toward U.S. immigration policy in the mid-1990s. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32, 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830600555111

56.

Pérez

E. O.

(2010). Explicit evidence on the import of implicit attitudes: The IAT and immigration policy judgments. Political Behavior, 32, 517–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9115-z

57.

Provine

D. M.

Varsanyi

Lewis

P. G.

Decker

S. H.

(2016). Policing immigrants: Local law enforcement on the front lines. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226363219

58.

Rodriguez

S. F.

Curry

T. R.

Lee

(2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00383.x

59.

Rudnicki

(2021). Confronting the experience of imprisonment in sentencing: Lessons from the COVID-19 jurisprudence. The Canadian Bar Review, 99(3), 469–487.

60.

Sampson

R. J.

(2006, March 11). Open doors don’t invite criminals. The New York Times, 15.

61.

Sampson

R. J.

(2008). Rethinking crime and immigration. Contexts, 7(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2008.7.1.28

62.

Sayad

(2004). The suffering of the immigrant. Polity Press.

63.

Steffensmeier

D. J.

(1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime & Delinquency, 26(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112878002600305

64.

Steffensmeier

D. J.

Kramer

Streifel

(1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01136.x

65.

Steffensmeier

D. J.

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x

66.

Tillyer

Hartley

(2016). The use and impact of fast-track departures: Exploring prosecutorial and judicial discretion in federal immigration cases. Crime & Delinquency, 62(12), 1624–1647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713505481

67.

Tonry

M. H.

(1996). Sentencing matters. Oxford University Press.

68.

Tonry

M. H.

(2016). Sentencing fragments: Penal reform in America, 1975-2025. Oxford University Press.

69.

Ulmer

J. T.

Kurlychek

M. C.

Kramer

J. H.

(2007). Prosecutorial discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(4), 427–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807305853

70.

Ulmer

J. T.

Silver

Hanrath

L. S.

(2023). Back to basics: A critical examination of the focal concerns framework from the perspective of judges. Justice Quarterly, 40(6), 813–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2132274

71.

U. S. Department of Homeland Security. (2025). DHS 287(g) reaches more than 1,000 partnerships with state and local enforcement to help remove the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens. https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/09/17/dhs-287g-reaches-more-1000-partnerships-state-and-local-enforcement-help-remove

72.

U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). Self-help legal materials: Executive Office for Immigration Review. https://www.justice.gov/eoir/self-help-materials

73.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2022). Do you just want to go home? Information on voluntary departure. https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1480811/dl

74.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (n.d.). Delegation if immigration authority section 287(g): Immigration and Nationality Act. https://www.ice.gov/identify-and-arrest/287g

75.

U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2024). Quick facts: Illegal reentry. https://www.ussc.gov/research/quick-facts/illegal-reentry

76.

Varsanyi

M. W.

Lewis

P. G.

Provine

D. M.

Decker

(2012). A multilayered jurisdictional patchwork: Immigration federalism in the United States. Law & Policy, 34(2), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00356.x

77.

Weber

(2015). National and regional proportion of immigrants and perceived threat of immigration: A three-level analysis in Western Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 56(2), 116–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715215571950

78.

Webster

Huebner

B. M.

Early

A. M.

Torres

L. C.

(2023). “Court can happen anywhere”: Courtroom workgroup members’ perceptions of the challenges and opportunities of a transformed workplace. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(11), 1737–1756. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231196574

79.

Willert

Nowacki

J. S.

(2025). Social context and early disposition departures: An examination of disparity in immigration sentencing across US district courts. Crime & Delinquency, 71(11), 3554–3581. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241249741

80.

Wilson

T. C.

(2001). Americans’ views on immigration policy: Testing the role of threatened group interests. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2001.44.4.485

81.

Wirth

Baumer

(2024). Immigrant threat or institutional context? Examining police agency and county context and the implementation of the 287 (g) program. The Sociological Quarterly, 65(3), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2024.2304335

82.

Wolfe

S. E.

Pyrooz

D. C.

Spohn

C. C.

(2011). Unraveling the effect of offender citizenship status on federal sentencing outcomes. Social Science Research, 40(1), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.09.013

83.

(2023). Within-race variations in sentencing outcomes: Nationality and punishment among Asians in United States federal courts. Punishment & Society, 25(2), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211063120

84.

Kim

D. Y.

(2014). The model minority myth for noncitizen immigration offenses and sentencing outcomes. Race and Justice, 4(4), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368713507000

85.

Zvonkovich

Kleiman

Hester

Strange

C. C.

(2023). The impact of COVID-19 on sentencing practices. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(4), 921–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-023-09730-y

Immigration and Sentencing: Early Disposition Departures,Sentence Discount,and Length of Sentence

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References