Queer adolescents experience compounding complications especially when they are estranged from their parents. Findings from a sample of 40 estranged queer adolescents revealed four triggers, five resilience processes, and three co-occurring relationships between the triggers and processes. Based on these findings, we advance the communication theory of resilience by (a) illustrating resilience enactments with an adolescent population, (b) introducing a new facet of putting alternative logics to work, and (c) arguing how access to LGBTQ+ vocabulary and embeddedness within the LGBTQ+ community can facilitate more and less resilient enactments. We also extend a new qualitative method, thematic co-occurrence analysis, to illuminate thematic ubiquity and inverse relationships between themes. Practical applications for primary/secondary school curriculum, counselors, and public policy are discussed.
AdamsT. E. (2011). Narrating the closet: An autoethnography of same-sex attraction. Left Coast Press, Inc.
2.
AlvarezC. F.ScharpK. M. (2021). Queer people’s communication with families of origin. In WestI. N. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of queer studies and communication. Oxford University Press.
3.
BegleyS. (2000). Getting inside a teen brain: Hormones aren’t the only reason adolescents act crazy: Their gray matter differs from children’s and adults. Newsweek, 135(9). 58–59.
4.
BettsT.HintzE. A.BuzzanellP. M. (2022). Emplotting anticipatory resilience: An antenarrative extension of the communication theory of resilience. Communication Monographs, 89(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.1971272
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021) One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
BuzzanellP. M. (2018). Communication theory of resilience: Enacting adaptive-transformative processes when families experience loss and disruption. In BraithwaiteD. O.SuterE. A.FloydK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication (2nd ed., pp. 98–109). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204321-9
8.
BuzzanellP. M. (2019). Communication theory of resilience in everyday talk, interactions, and network structures. In WilsonS.SmithS. (Eds.), Reflections on interpersonal communication research (pp. 65–88). Cognella.
9.
ColemanJ.HagellA. (2007). The nature of risk and resilience in adolescence. In ColemanJ.HagellA. (Eds.), Adolescents, risk, and resilience: Against all odds (pp 1–16). John Wiley & Sons.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.SAGE.
12.
CraigE. A.NieforthL.RosenfeldC. (2020). Communicating resilience among adolescents with childhood experiences (ACES) through equine assisted psychotherapy (EAP). Western Journal of Communication, 84(4), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2020.1754451
13.
EcclesJ. S.GootmanJ. A. (2002). Features of positive developmental settings. In EcclesJ. S.GootmanJ. A. (Eds.), Community programs to promote youth development (pp. 86–118). National Academies Press.
EckerJ.AubryT.SylvestreJ. (2019). A review of the literature on LGBTQ adults who experience homelessness. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(3), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1413277
16.
FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J. (2003). Resilience to childhood adversity: Results of a 21-year study. In LutharS. S. (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaption in the context of childhood adversities (1st ed., pp. 130–154). Cambridge University Press.
17.
ForgeN.Hartinger-SaundersR.WrightE.RuelE. (2018). Out of the system and onto the streets: LGBTQ-identified youth experiencing homelessness with past child welfare involvement. Child Welfare, 96(2), 47–74.
18.
GarmezyN. E.RutterM. E. (1983). Stress, coping, and development in children. Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
GattisM. N. (2009). Psychosocial problems associated with homelessness in sexual minority youths. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(8), 1066–1094. http://sdoi.org/10.1080/10911350902990478
20.
GrafskyE. L. (2018). Deciding to come out to parents: Toward a model of sexual orientation disclosure decisions. Family Process, 57(3), 783–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12313
21.
HintzE. A.BettsT.BuzzanellP. M. (2021). Caring for patients without personal protective equipment (PPE): Material conditions as multidimensional cascading triggers for resilience processes. Health Communication. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1953727
22.
KidderL. H. (1981). Research methods in social relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 317–354). SAGE.
25.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(1), 370–96.
MorrisA. S.CrissM. M.SilkJ. S.HoultbergB. J. (2017). The impact of parenting on emotion regulation during childhood and adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 11(4), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12238
PotoczniakD.Crosbie-BurnettM.SaltzburgN. (2009). Experiences regarding coming out to parents among African American, Hispanic, and white gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and questioning adolescents. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 21, 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720902772063
31.
RobertsR. E.BengtonV. L. (1996). Affective ties to parents in early adulthood and self-esteem across 20 years. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787121
32.
SavageD.MillerT. (Eds.). (2011). It gets better: Coming out, overcoming bullying, and creating a life worth living. Penguin.
33.
ScharpK. M. (2016). Parent–child estrangement: Conditions for disclosure and perceived social network member reactions. Family Relations, 65(5), 688–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12219
34.
ScharpK. M. (2019). “You’re not welcome here”: A grounded theory of family distancing. Communication Research, 46(4), 427–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217715542
35.
ScharpK. M. (2021). Thematic co-occurrence analysis: Advancing a theory and qualitative method to illuminate ambivalent experiences. Journal of Communication, 71(4), 545–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab015
36.
ScharpK. M.Dorrance HallE. (2019). Reconsidering family closeness: A review and call for research on family distancing. Journal of Family Communication, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1544563
37.
ScharpK. M.GearyD.WolfeB. H.WangT. R.FesenmaierM. (2021). Understanding the triggers and communication processes that constitute resilience in the context of migration to the United States. Communication Monographs, 88(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1080.03637751.2020.1856395
38.
ScharpK. M.KublerK. F.WangT. R. (2020). Individual and community practices for constructing communicative resilience: Exploring the communicative processes of coping with parental alienation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1734225
39.
ScharpK. M.ThomasL. J.PaxmanC. G. (2015). It was the straw that broke the camel’s back: Exploring the distancing processes communicatively constructed in parent-child estrangement backstories. Journal of Family Communication, 15(4), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1076422
40.
ScharpK. M.ThomasL. J. (2016). Family “bonds”: Making meaning of parent–child relationships in estrangement narratives. Journal of Family Communication, 16(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1111215
41.
ScharpK. M.WangT. R.WolfeB. H. (2022). Communicative resilience of first-generation college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Human Communication Research, 48(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab018.
42.
SiconolfiD.TuckerJ. S.ShadelW. G.SeelamR.GolinelliD. (2019). Health, homelessness severity, and substance use among sexual minority youth experiencing homelessness: A comparison of bisexual versus gay and lesbian youth. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(7), 933–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1695723
43.
TianZ.BushH. R. (2020). Half the sky: Interwoven resilience processes of women political leaders in China. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1704829
44.
WilsonS. R.KuangK.HintzE.BuzzanellP. M. (2021). Developing and validating the communication resilience process scale. Journal of Communication, 71(3), 478–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab013
ZarrettN.EcclesJ. (2006). The passage to adulthood: Challenges of late adolescents. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006(111), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.179
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
