Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-4
Longitudinal Relations Between Heterosexual Adolescents’ Perceived Exposure to Sex-Positive Television Messages and Their Supportive Attitudes and Behaviors Toward the LGBTQ+ Community
The literature on heterosexual adolescents’ television viewing and its over-time impact on attitudes and behaviors regarding LGBTQ+ is limited. The current study aims to fill this gap in the literature by using three-wave data from 338 heterosexual adolescents (Mage = 15.29, SD = 1.48, 68.6% girls). We explored relations between adolescents’ perceived exposure to sex-positive television messages, their respectful approach to different sexual expressions, and their endorsement of supportive behavior regarding LGBTQ+. A Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model (RI-CLPM) showed that, at a between-person level, perceived exposure to sex-positive television messages was related to the endorsement of supportive behavior regarding LGBTQ+. Yet, results revealed that an increased perceived exposure to sex-positive television messages was not associated with respectful approach to different sexual expressions and endorsement of supportive behavior regarding LGBTQ+ at the individual level. No sex or traditional gender role orientation differences were found. Our findings hopefully encourage sexual media research to further distinguish between-and within-person relations and to consider potential testing effects that mask true within-person change.
AubreyJ. S. (2007). Does television exposure influence college-aged women’s sexual self-concept?Media Psychology, 10(2), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701375561
BaamsL.RussellS. T. (2021). Gay-straight alliances, school functioning, and mental health: Associations for students of color and LGBTQ students. Youth & Society, 53(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x20951045
BemS. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.
6.
BeyensI.PouwelsJ. L.van DrielI. I.KeijsersL.ValkenburgP. M. (2021). Social media use and adolescents’ well-being: Developing a typology of person-specific effect patterns. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211038196
7.
BirkettM.EspelageD. L. (2015). Homophobic name-calling, peer-groups, and masculinity: The socialization of homophobic behavior in adolescents. Social Development, 24(1), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12085
8.
BondB. J. (2021). The development and influence of parasocial relationships with television characters: A longitudinal experimental test of prejudice reduction through parasocial contact. Communication Research, 48(4), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219900632
9.
BondB. J.ComptonB. L. (2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences’ endorsement of gay equality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(4), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1093485
10.
Bonds-RaackeJ. M.CadyE. T.SchlegelR.HarrisR. J.FirebaughL. (2007). Remembering gay/lesbian media characters: Can Ellen and Will improve attitudes toward homosexuals?Journal of Homosexuality, 53(3), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v53n03_03
11.
CalzoJ. P.WardL. M. (2009). Media exposure and viewers’ attitudes toward homosexuality: Evidence for mainstreaming or resonance?Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908049
12.
CarloG.HausmannA.ChristiansenS.RandallB. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431602239132
13.
CollierK. L.BosH. M.SandfortT. G. (2012). Intergroup contact, attitudes toward homosexuality, and the role of acceptance of gender non-conformity in young adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 899–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.12.010
14.
CollierK. L.HornS. S.BosH. M. W.SandfortT. G. M. (2015). Attitudes toward lesbians and gays among American and Dutch adolescents. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.858306
15.
CoyneS. M.RogersA. A.ZurcherJ. D.StockdaleL.BoothM. (2020). Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight year longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106160
16.
CoyneS. M.WardL. M.KroffS. L.DavisE. J.HolmgrenH. G.JensenA. C.EricksonS. E.EssigL. W. (2019). Contributions of mainstream sexual media exposure to sexual attitudes, perceived peer norms, and sexual behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(4), 430–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.11.016
17.
DajchesL.AubreyJ. S. (2020). Defining the relationship: An examination of sexual behaviors and relational contexts across tween, teen, and young adult US television. Communication Reports, 33(3), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2020.1803389
18.
Den HamerA. H.KonijnE. A.BushmanB. J. (2017). Measuring exposure to media with antisocial and prosocial content: An extended version of the content-based media exposure scale (C-ME2). Communication Methods and Measures, 11(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1375089
19.
FantusS.NewmanP. A. (2021). Promoting a positive school climate for sexual and gender minority youth through a systems approach: A theory-informed qualitative study. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000513
20.
FontayneP.SarrazinP.FamoseJ. P. (2000). The Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Validation of a short version for French teenagers. European Review of Applied Psychology/revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée, 50(4), 405–416.
21.
FoutsG.InchR. (2005). Homosexuality in TV situation comedies: Characters and verbal comments. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v49n01_02
22.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
GilligT.MurphyS. (2016). Fostering support for LGBTQ youth? The effects of a gay adolescent media portrayal on young viewers. Journal of International Communication, 10, 23.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P.P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
27.
HardenK. P. (2014). A sex-positive framework for research on adolescent sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614535934
28.
HatzenbuehlerM. L. (2017). Advancing research on structural stigma and sexual orientation disparities in mental health among youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 53, 46(3), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1247360
29.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
30.
KimJ. L.SorsoliC. L.CollinsK.ZylbergoldB. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. The Journal of Sex Research, 44(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701263660
31.
KinslerJ. J.GlikD.de Castro BuffingtonS.MalanH.Nadjat-HaiemC.WainwrightN.Papp-GreenM. (2019). A content analysis of how sexual behavior and reproductive health are being portrayed on primetime television shows being watched by teens and young adults. Health Communication, 34(6), 644–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1431020
32.
KlimmtC.RiegerD. (2021). Biographic resonance theory of eudaimonic media entertainment. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 383–402). Oxford University Press.
33.
KlineR. B. (2012). Assumptions in structural equation modeling. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, 111, 125.
34.
KneppM. M. (2022). Closeness of relationship to LGBTQ individuals is associated with increases in ally identity and behavior. Journal of LGBT Youth, 19, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2020.1761924
35.
KosciwJ. G.ClarkC. M.TruongN. L.ZongroneA. D. (2020). The 2019 National school climate survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and Queer Youth in our nation’s schools. A report from GLSEN. Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).
36.
LapointeA. A. (2015). Standing “straight” up to homophobia: Straight allies’ involvement in GSAs. Journal of LGBT Youth, 12(2), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2014.969867
MaesC.TrekelsJ.ImpettE.VandenboschL. (2023). The development of the Positive Sexuality in Adolescence Scale (PSAS). The Journal of Sex Research, 60(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.2011826
39.
MaesC.VandenboschL. (2022a). “Consent is sexy”: Exploring the portrayal of prosocial sexuality messages in youth-oriented series. Journal of Children and Media, 16(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1982741
40.
MaesC.VandenboschL. (2022b). Physically distant, virtually close: Adolescents’ sexting behaviors during a strict lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 107033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107033
41.
MalacaneM.MartinsN. (2017). Sexual socialization messages in television programming produced for adolescents. Mass Communication & Society, 20(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1203436
42.
MarxR. A.KettreyH. H. (2016). Gay-straight alliances are associated with lower levels of school-based victimization of LGBTQ+ youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(7), 1269–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0501-7
OrthU.ClarkD. A.DonnellanM. B.RobinsR. W. (2021). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000358
45.
O’HaraR. E.GibbonsF. X.GerrardM.LiZ.SargentJ. D. (2012). Greater exposure to sexual content in popular movies predicts earlier sexual debut and increased sexual risk taking. Psychological Science, 23(9), 984–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435529
46.
PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and notions of women as sex objects: Assessing causality and underlying processes. The Journal of Communication, 59, 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01422.x
47.
PostA.GilljamH.BrembergS.GalantiM. R. (2012). Psychosocial determinants of attrition in a longitudinal study of tobacco use in youth. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/654030
48.
PoteatV. P. (2015). Individual psychological factors and complex interpersonal conditions that predict LGBT-affirming behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1494–1507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0257-5
49.
PoteatV. P.VechoO. (2016). Who intervenes against homophobic behavior? Attributes that distinguish active bystanders. Journal of School Psychology, 54, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.10.002
PozzoliT.GiniG. (2013). Why do bystanders of bullying help or not? A multidimensional model. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(3), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431612440172
52.
PratiG.PietrantoniL.D’AugelliA. R. (2011). Aspects of homophobia in Italian high schools: Students’ attitudes and perceptions of school climate. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(11), 2600–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00842.x
53.
RagsdaleK.BersaminM. M.SchwartzS. J.ZamboangaB. L.KerrickM. R.GrubeJ. W. (2014). Development of sexual expectancies among adolescents: Contributions by parents, peers and the media. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.753025
SantonaA.TognassoG. (2018). Attitudes toward homosexuality in adolescence: An Italian study. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(3), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1320165
56.
SchmitzR. M.TylerK. A. (2018). LGBTQ+ young adults on the street and on campus: Identity as a product of social context. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1314162
SimonW.GagnonJ. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219
59.
SlaterM. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
60.
SlaterM. D. (2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
61.
SteeleJ. R. (1999). Teenage sexuality and media practice: Factoring in the influences of family, friends, and school. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(4), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909552005
62.
te PoelF.BaumgartnerS. (2016). A Longitudinal Multilevel Approach to Examine Media Effects: Introducing the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model to Communication Research.
63.
TreismanA. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76(3), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027242
64.
TrekelsJ.EggermontS. (2021). Adolescents’ multi-layered media processing: A panel study on positive and negative perceptions towards ideals and adolescents’ appearance anxiety. OSF. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/u3pvg
65.
VandenboschL.van OostenJ. M. F. (2017). The relationship between online pornography and the sexual objectification of women: The attenuating role of porn literacy education. The Journal of Communication, 67(6), 1015–1036.
66.
van OostenJ. M. F.PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2015). The influence of sexual music videos on adolescents’ misogynistic beliefs: The role of video content, gender, and affective engagement. Communication Research, 42(7), 986–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565893
67.
van OostenJ. M. F.VandenboschL.PeterJ. (2017). Gender roles on social networking sites: Investigating reciprocal relationships between Dutch adolescents’ hypermasculinity and hyperfemininity and sexy online self-presentations. Journal of Children and Media, 11(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.1304970
68.
VerbeijT.PouwelsJ. L.BeyensI.ValkenburgP. M. (2021). The accuracy and validity of self-reported social media use measures among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100090
69.
WardL. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 1-15.
70.
WardL. M.ReedL.TrinhS. L.FoustM. (2014). Sexuality and entertainment media. In TolmanD. L.DiamondL. M.BauermeisterJ. A.GeorgeW. H.PfausJ. G.WardL. M. (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 2. Contextual approaches (pp. 373–423). American Psychological Association.
WrightP. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior: Assessing the claim for causality. Communication Yearbook, 35, 343–385.
73.
WrightP. J. (2020). Pornography and sexual behavior: Do sexual attitudes mediate or confound?Communication Research, 47(3), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218796363
74.
WrightP. J. (2021a). Overcontrol in pornography research: Let it go, let it go. . .. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(2), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01902-9
75.
WrightP. J. (2021b). Pornography consumption and condomless sex among emerging US adults: Results from six nationally representative surveys. Health Communication, 37, 1740–1747. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1917745
76.
WrightP. J.RandallA. K. (2014). Pornography consumption, education, and support for same-sex marriage among adult US males. Communication Research, 41(5), 665–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212471558
77.
WrightP. J.TokunagaR. S. (2015). Activating the centerfold syndrome: Recency of exposure, sexual explicitness, past exposure to objectifying media. Communication Research, 42(6), 864–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213509668
78.
WrightP. J.TokunagaR. S. (2022). US adults’ attitudes toward gay individuals’ civil liberties, moral judgments of homosexuality, support for same-sex marriage, and pornography consumption, revisited. The Journal of Sex Research, 59(5), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1999893
79.
WrightP. J.TokunagaR. S.HerbenickD.PaulB. (2022). To misspecify is common, to probe misspecification scientific: Common “confounds” in pornography research may actually be predictors. The Journal of Communication, 72(3), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac012
80.
ZillmannD.BryantJ. (1985). Selective-exposure phenomena. In: ZillmannD.BryantJ. (Eds.) Selective exposure to communication (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
