This article describes a simulation activity designed to teach students about the wage gap. The wage gap is an important topic in many sociology classrooms, but it can be difficult to convey the accumulated disadvantage experienced by women and racial/ethnic minorities to students using in-class discussions, lectures, or assigned readings alone. This is particularly true on college campuses that may draw their students from more affluent areas. Classroom simulations, however, provide an opportunity for students with all types of backgrounds to engage their sociological imaginations. In our simulation—Intersectionopoly—we use a modified version of Monopoly based on the wage gap and racial/ethnic minorities’ experiences of everyday life to illustrate how members of different racial and gender groups experience disparities in earnings. Unlike other versions of stratified Monopoly, this simulation more closely mirrors the subtle nature of discrimination in the contemporary United States.
AgnewRobert. 2006. Pressured into Crime: An Overview of General Strain Theory. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.
2.
American Association of University Women. 1994. Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America: Executive Summary: A Nationwide Poll That Assesses Self-esteem, Educational Experiences, Interest in Math and Science, and Career Aspirations of Girls and Boys Ages 9–15. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
3.
American Association of University Women. 2016. The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap. Washington, DC: AAUW.
4.
BrameRobertBushwayShawn D.PaternosterRayTurnerMichael G.2014. “Demographic Patterns of Cumulative Arrest Prevalence by Ages 18 and 23.”Crime & Delinquency60(3):471–86.
5.
BramesfeldKosha D.GoodArla. 2015. “The Game of Social Life: An Assessment of a Multidimensional Poverty Simulation.”Teaching Sociology43(2):92–103.
6.
BrislenWilliamPeoplesClayton D.2005. “Using a Hypothetical Distribution of Grades to Introduce Social Stratification.”Teaching Sociology33(1):74–80.
7.
Burgess-ProctorAmanda. 2006. “Intersections of Race, Class, Gender, and Crime.”Feminist Criminology1:27–47.
CoghlanCatherine L.HugginsDenise W.2004. “‘That’s Not Fair!’: A Simulation Exercise in Social Stratification and Structural Inequality.”Teaching Sociology32:177–87.
10.
ColemanJames S.LivingstonSamuel A.FennesseyGail M.EdwardsKeith J.KidderSteven J.1973. “The Hopkins Games Program: Conclusions from Seven Years of Research.”Educational Researcher2(8):3–7.
11.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?”American Journal of Sociology112(5):1297–338.
12.
DavisJames A.DukesRichardGamsonWilliam A.1981. “Assessing Interactive Modes of Sociology Instruction.”Teaching Sociology8(3):313–23.
13.
DemuthStephenSteffensmeierDarrell. 2004. “The Impact of Gender and Race-Ethnicity in the Pretrial Release Process.”Social Problems51(2):222–42.
14.
DornDean S.1989. “Simulation Games: One More Tool on the Pedagogical Shelf.”Teaching Sociology17:1–18.
15.
FinkDee L.2013. Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
16.
FisherEdith M.2008. “USA Stratified Monopoly: A Simulation Game about Social Class Stratification.”Teaching Sociology36(3):272–82.
17.
HatchStephani L.DohrenwendBruce P.2007. “Distribution of Traumatic and Other Stressful Life Events by Race/Ethnicity, Gender, Sex and Age: A Review of the Research.”American Journal of Community Psychology40(3/4):313–32.
18.
HerringCedricHendersonLoren. 2016. “Wealth Inequality in Black and White: Cultural and Structural Sources of the Racial Wealth Gap.”Race and Social Problems8(1):4–17.
19.
JessupMichael2001. “Sociopoly: Life on the Boardwalk.”Teaching Sociology29(1):102–09.
20.
McCammonLucy. 1999. “Introducing Social Stratification and Inequality: An Active Learning Technique.”Teaching Sociology27:44–54.
21.
MertonRobert. 1938. “Social Structure and Anomie.”American Sociological Review3:672–82.
22.
MotelSeth. 2014. Who Runs for Office? A Profile of the 2%. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
23.
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. 2015. “2015 C.I.R.P. Freshman Survey: Institutional Profile Reports.” in Cooperative Institutional Research Program Freshman Survey: Oakland University. Retrieved September1, 2016 (https://wwwp.oakland.edu/oira/surveys/).
24.
OlesonJ. C.LowenkampChristopher T.CadiganTimothy P.VanNostrandMarieWooldredgeJohn. 2016. “The Effect of Pretrial Detention on Sentencing in Two Federal Districts.”Justice Quarterly33(6):1103–22.
25.
PagerDevah. 2003. “The Mark of a Criminal Record.”American Journal of Sociology108(5):937–75.
26.
PainoMariaChinJeffrey. 2011. “Monopoly and Critical Theory: Gaming in a Class on the Sociology of Deviance.”Simulation & Gaming42:571–88.
27.
PetranekCharles. 1994. “A Maturation in Experiential Learning: Principles of Simulation and Gaming.”Simulation & Gaming25(4):513–23.
28.
RandelJosephMorrisBarbara A.WetxelDouglasWhitehillBetty V.1992. “The Effectiveness of Games for Educational Purposes: A Review of Recent Research.”Simulation & Gaming23(2):261–76.
29.
ReskinBarbaraPadavicIrene. 2002. Sex Differences in Earnings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
30.
SacksMeghanAckermanAlissa R.2014. “Bail and Sentencing: Does Pretrial Detention Lead to Harsher Punishment?”Criminal Justice Policy Review25(1):59–77.
31.
SweetStephen A.MeiksinsPeter. 2012. Changing Contours of Work: Jobs and Opportunities in the New Economy. Los Angeles: Sage.
32.
TapiaMike. 2015. “U.S. Latino Arrest: An Analysis of Risk by Nativity and Origin.”Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences37(1):37–58.
