This article evaluates the effects of the Department of Defense’s Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) Strategic Plan on civilian perceptions of inclusion by utilizing data from the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey conducted between 2021 and 2023. Through statistical analyses—including t-tests, regression analysis, and difference-in-differences models—results indicate improved perceptions of inclusion in 2023 compared to 2021. However, older employees and those considering leaving the organization report lower levels of perceived inclusion, while marginalized groups show only limited statistically significant gains. These findings emphasize the need for sustained leadership, structured accountability, and tailored implementation strategies to navigate complex dynamics and promote inclusivity. They also highlight the time needed for DEIA initiatives to demonstrate their impact.
AshikaliT.GroeneveldS.KuipersB. (2020). The role of inclusive leadership in supporting an inclusive climate in diverse public sector teams. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(3), 497–519.
2.
BaeK. B.SabharwalM.SmithA. E.BermanE. (2017). Does demographic dissimilarity matter for perceived inclusion? Evidence from public sector employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16671367
3.
BishuS. G.KennedyA. R. (2020). Trends and gaps: A meta-review of representative bureaucracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 559–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19830154
4.
BorryE. L.Getha-TaylorH.HolmesM. H. (2021). Promoting diversity and inclusion in the federal workforce: Executive order 13583 and demographic trends. Public Administration Quarterly, 45(4), 392–417. https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.45.4.3
BrownL. A.KelloughJ. E. (2020). Contracting and the bureaucratic representation of minorities and women: Examining evidence from federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(3), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18822051
7.
CapersK. J. (2018). The effect of the external environment on bureaucratic representation: Assessing the passive to active representation link. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(4), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016686715
8.
CapersK.SmithC. (2021). Race, ethnicity, and immigration: Assessing the link between passive and active representation for foreign-born clients. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(4), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab009
9.
ChoY. J.LewisG. B. (2012). Turnover intention and turnover behavior: Implications for retaining federal employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X11408701
10.
ChoiS. (2009). Diversity in the US federal government: Diversity management and employee turnover in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 603–630. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun010
11.
ChoiS.RaineyH. G. (2010). Managing diversity in U.S. federal agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02115.x
12.
ChoiS.RaineyH. G. (2014). Organizational fairness and diversity management in public organizations: Does fairness matter in managing diversity?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(4), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13486489
13.
ChordiyaR. (2022). Organizational inclusion and turnover intentions of federal employees with disabilities. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20942305
14.
Chrobot-MasonD.AramovichN. P. (2013). The psychological benefits of creating an affirming climate for workplace diversity. Group & Organization Management, 38(6), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113509835
ClarkA.SuhJ.BaeK. (2022). Protected, but not included? The role of workplace inclusion for sexual and gender minorities in the federal service. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 8(3), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.8.3.323-348
17.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed). Academic Press.
18.
DavidsonM. N. (1999). The value of being included: An examination of diversity change initiatives in organizations. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 12(1), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1999.tb00121.x
19.
DingF.LuJ.RiccucciN. (2021). How bureaucratic representation affects public organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13361
20.
DunlopC. A. (2021). Implementation failures as learning pathologies. In SullivanH.DickinsonH.HendersonH. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the public servant (pp. 367–380). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_22
FerdmanB. M.DeaneB. R. (Eds.). (2014). Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Brand.
24.
GaganpreetS. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749–752.
25.
GoodenS.PortilloS. (2011). Advancing social equity in the Minnowbrook tradition. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl 1), i61–i76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq067
26.
GroeneveldS.VerbeekS. (2012). Diversity policies in public and private sector organizations: An empirical comparison of incidence and effectiveness. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(4), 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X11421497
27.
GrissomJ.KernE.RodríguezL. (2015). The “representative bureaucracy” in education. Educational Researcher, 44(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15580102
28.
HassanS. (2012). Does fair treatment in the workplace matter? An assessment of organizational fairness and employee outcomes in government. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(5), 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012447979
HuntV. H.RuckerL.KerrB. (2020). Reconsidering sex-based occupational segregation and agency missions: An analysis of U.S state bureaucracies (1987–2015) using two different thresholds. Administration & Society, 52(3), 431–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719836741
31.
Husar HolmesM.EliasN. M.D’AgostinoM. J. (2023). Inclusion in public-sector workplaces: Charting a path for theory and practice. Public Personnel Management, 52(4), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260231191273
32.
HupeP. L. (2011). The thesis of incongruent implementation: Revisiting Pressman and Wildavsky. Public Policy and Administration, 26(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076710367717
33.
IvancevichJ. M.GilbertJ. A. (2000). Diversity management: Time for a new approach. Public Personnel Management, 29(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600002900106
34.
JiangZ.DeHart-DavisL.BorryE. L. (2022). Managerial practice and diversity climate: The roles of workplace voice, centralization, and teamwork. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13494
35.
JohnsonM.SeideW.Green-DixonA.RandallV. (2021). Black students’ perception of belonging: A Focus group approach with black students at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. International Journal of Medical Students, 9(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2021.877
36.
JungH.WelchE. W. (2022). The impact of demographic composition of social networks on perceived inclusion in the workplace. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13470
37.
KelloughJ. E.NaffK. C. (2004). Responding to a wake-up call: An examination of federal agency diversity management programs. Administration & Society, 36(1), 62–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703257269
38.
KimS.ParkS. (2017). Diversity management and fairness in public organizations. Public Organization Review, 17(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0334-y
39.
KlinksiekI. (2024). Bridging the gap between diversity, equity, and inclusion policy and practice: the case of disability. Transfer European Review of Labour and Research, 30(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589241251698
40.
KrauseG. A.ParkJ. (2024). Improving social equity within public organizations: Authority differentials as reference points for fostering diversity and inclusion within U.S. federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X241286176
41.
LeeH. W. (2020). A career stage analysis of the U.S. federal employees’ job satisfaction and turnover intention: A comprehensive overview. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 717–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19856082
42.
LewisG.PittsD. (2015). LGTB–heterosexual differences in perceptions of fair treatment in the federal service. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015605378
43.
LiangJ.ParkS.ZhaoT. (2020). Representative bureaucracy, distributional equity, and environmental justice. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13160
44.
LiggansG.AttohP. A.GongT.ChaseT.RussellM. B.ClarkP. W. (2019). Military veterans in federal agencies: Organizational inclusion, human resource practices, and trust in leadership as predictors of organizational Commitment. Public Personnel Management, 48(3), 413–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018819025
45.
MajJ. (2023). Influence of inclusive work environment and perceived diversity on job satisfaction: evidence from Poland. Central European Business Review, 12(4), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.334
MoonK. K. (2018). Examining the relationships between diversity and work behaviors in U.S. federal agencies: Does inclusive management make a difference?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 218–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16660157
48.
MoonK.ChristensenR. K. (2020). Realizing the performance benefits of workforce diversity in the U.S. federal government: The moderating role of diversity climate. Public Personnel Management, 49(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019848458
49.
Mor BarakM. E.CherinD. A. (1998). A tool to expand organizational understanding of workforce diversity: Exploring a measure of inclusion-exclusion. Administration in Social Work, 22(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v22n01_04
50.
MosherF. C. (1968). Democracy and the public service. Oxford University Press.
51.
NautiyalM. (2018). The intersection of diversity, equity, and inclusion in management practices: A descriptive study. Psychology and Education, 55(1), 608–615. https://doi.org/10.48047/pne.2018.55.1.74
52.
NelsonA.PiatakJ. (2021). Intersectionality, leadership, and inclusion: How do racially underrepresented women fare in the federal government?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(2), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19881681
53.
NishiiL. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
54.
NguyenN. T. H.TuanL. T. (2022). Trust in multi-level managers and employee extra-role behavior in the us federal government: The role of psychological well-being and workload. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(2), 312–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20979683
55.
OberfieldZ. W. (2014). Accounting for time: Comparing temporal and atemporal analyses of the business case for diversity management. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 777–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12278
56.
ParsonsH. M. (1974). What happened at Hawthorne? New evidence suggests the Hawthorne effect resulted from operant reinforcement contingencies. Science, 183(4128), 922–932. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.183.4128.922
57.
PelledL. H.LedfordG. E.JrAlbers MohrmanS. (1999). Demographic dissimilarity and workplace inclusion. Journal of Management Studies, 36(7), 1013–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00168
58.
PittsD. (2006). Modeling the impact of diversity management. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X05278491
59.
PittsD. (2009). Diversity management, job satisfaction, and performance: Evidence from U.S. federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01977.x
60.
PittsD.WiseL. (2010). Workforce diversity in the new millennium: Prospects for research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X09351823
61.
PlessN.MaakT. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes, and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-9465-8
62.
PontingS.DilletteA. (2023). Diversity, equity, and inclusion practices: A Delphi study to build a consensus in hospitality and tourism organizations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(11), 3764–3786. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2022-1503
63.
PrasadA. (2001). Understanding workplace empowerment as inclusion: A historical investigation of the discourse of difference in the United States. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886301371004
64.
PressmanJ. L.WildavskyA. B. (1973). Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland: or, why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the economic development administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes (Pbk. ed.). University of California Press.
65.
PutnamR. D. (2020). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (Simon & Schuster trade paperback edition). Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
66.
Rezai-RashtiG.ZhangB.AbdmolaeiS.SegerenA.AbbaspourA.TaskohA. K. (2021). A critical policy analysis of the Ontario equity and inclusive strategy: The dynamics of non-performativity. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 2(4), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.52547/johepal.2.4.7
67.
RiccucciN.RyzinG. (2016). Representative bureaucracy: A lever to enhance social equity, coproduction, and democracy. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12649
68.
RichardO. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556374
69.
RobersonQ. M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104273064
70.
SabharwalM. (2014). Is diversity management sufficient? Organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014522202
71.
SabharwalM.LevineH.D’AgostinoM. (2018). A conceptual content analysis of 75 years of diversity research in public administration. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16671368
72.
SabharwalM.LevineH.D’AgostinoM.NguyenT. (2019). Inclusive work practices: turnover intentions among LBGT employees of the U.S. federal government. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(4), 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018817376
73.
SeldenS. C. (1997). The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. M.E. Sharpe.
74.
ShoreL. M.ClevelandJ. N.SanchezD. (2018). Inclusive workplaces: A review and model. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.003
75.
ShoreL. M.RandelA. E.ChungB. G.DeanM. A.Holcombe EhrhartK.SinghG. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943
76.
StazykE. C.DavisR. S.LiangJ. (2021). Probing the links between workforce diversity, goal clarity, and employee job satisfaction in public sector organizations. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030077
77.
SweetingK. D. (2023). Executive orders: Mandating inclusion in the federal workplace: Insights from federal executive departments’ strategic plans. Public Personnel Management, 52(4), 590–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260231187542
78.
TamtikM.GuenterM. (2019). Policy analysis of equity, diversity, and inclusion strategies in Canadian universities—How far have we come?Canadian Journal of Higher Education (1975), 49(3), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v49i3.188529
79.
TrochmannM.StewartK.RagusaJ. (2023). The impact of employee perceptions of inclusion in a racially diverse agency: Lessons from a state government survey. Public Personnel Management, 52(4), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260231187544
U.S. Department of Defense, Office of Inspector General. (2022). Evaluation of the DoD’s implementation of the Military Leadership Diversity Commission’s 2011 report recommendations and the DoD Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan for 2012 to 2017 (Report No. DODIG-2022-144). https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/2022-11/DODIG-2022-144.pdf
83.
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2023). DOD civilian workforce: Actions needed to enhance diversity and inclusion efforts. (GAO Publication No. GAO-23-105284). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105284
84.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). (2013). Federal equal opportunity recruitment program (FEORP) report to Congress: Fiscal year 2013. U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
85.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). (2014). Federal equal opportunity recruitment program (FEORP) report to Congress: Fiscal year 2014. U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
86.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). (2019). Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program (FEORP) Report to Congress Fiscal Year 2019. U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
87.
Van LutterveltM. P. (2024). (In)credibly inclusive? A panel study on inclusive leadership, leader credibility, and inclusive climate. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X241282103
88.
WaldmanD.SparrJ. (2023). Rethinking diversity strategies: An application of paradox and positive organization behavior theories. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(2), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2021.0183
